I think Indian historians should re-write India's history from stronger evidences within India. We must ruthlessly reject all false foreign narratives.

Heartening to hear the confirmation that Vedic Samskrutam and Tamizh were born to the same mother. Koti pranams. And more importantly, for laying bare the fact that Samskrutam was the Rashtra Bhasha of Bharatam before the arrival of the Brits. It is high time we Bharateeyas get rid of Christian English and Islamic Hindi as the official languages of this ancient land. The sooner the better.

Bharata’s chronology was rejected by the Europeans as it did not suit the Xtian church- how could the Brown natives dare to say that their civilisation was older than their Bibilical flood. We have sadly cowered to their bullying. Hindus must assert themselves!

I am aware of our own fallacies, biases & heuristics! We need more professional studying this

Listening to Arya ji, I feel we have lots of educational institutions but they don't educate how to study. My pranams to him for his tremendous patience and time in the task he had undertaken.

big family discussion need in India about the history of 4 dharmic families

The village of Tamluk (West Bengal) in the year 1987 around 200 plates were uncovered. Those were mostly from 900-1100 CE.

Inscriptions on Copperplates do pique my interest because of the LCI-Laguna Copperplate Inscription in the Philippines 🇵🇭

Thanks for your seva of sanatana Hindu Sanskriti and Bharatvarsh 🙏🙏🙏🙏

many thanks to ved veerji ..more scholars are needed to study these in detail comparative number of inscriptions across civilizations (including rock edits) would helpful 🙏

Sangam Talks, please also have a short highlight video with important parts of the talk, not everyone can follow the whole 1 to 2 hours long talks. I want these messages to reach to most audiences. Thank you

Wow what a name sir , Ved Veer Arya . Also most ancient names

Historians like him makes India great !

Despite all this evidence, DMK fellows run around claiming Tamils are not Hindus :)

Recent case of Rajasthan (RTI) regarding aurangzeb 👿 & temples will be a turning point in changing false narrative in ncert books

Great video Lucky to have such scholars doing such great work and Sangam Talks for facilitating

great lecture ... you with nilesh and others who are challenging these errors are doing great job ... a specific narrative should not be called history ... may be this would involves a change of meaning of word "history" which is tough ... so may be we can call true study of history as historiology or some such word ... historiology is a science of validating conflicting ancient material and theories about them ... and we are really lucky in that that our ancients had obsessive recorders of astronomical events ... just as british found bower manuscripts we should relaunch search of ancient writings outside of india ... north indian copper plates may be lost but some of it may have been spirited away to lands outside of india ... we need to change the way history is taught to school children ... we should teach historiology with specific example such as this confusion created by use of word shaka in old shaka era and post-shakant era and other such efforts driving home that a specific narrative is just one theory like in science a theory is not truth and a theory can always be challenged and a new theory can be result of new interpretation of words ... in this case it seems that word shaka started being used as "year" pre- and post shakant even though its meaning had changed because of change of anchor ... teaching historiology rather than a specific narrative story also will give us excuse to teach astronomical texts (such as sury siddhant and other sinddhant texts on astronomy) and dynamic of language and script evolution ... obviously this means we must refrain from teaching any history at all at young age because scientific method cannot be taught to very young people ... when a child has grown up he needs to be taught scientific methods rather than a list of accepted scientific theories ... in the same way rather than teaching a list of stories in the name of history we must teach how science helps making those stories and corrections to them ... in this way really historiology is just a branch of science

One manuscript and copper inscription found Indus inscription.check book of d.p. sharma

Always such a pleasure to listen to Vedveerji's talks. Very informative and factual. Thank You.

You are one of the asset for us ved veerji

This epigraphical data match Greek literature

Great Talk

So many things

Good work sir 🙏🙏

Solid scholar

Why they have rejected copper plates of Kadambas, Gangas,. And Chalukya, and not others ?

👍

The Rigveda HYMN LXXXI. Visvakarman. 1. HE who sate down as Hotar-priest, the Rsi, our Father, offering up all things existing,- He, seeking through his wish a great possession, came among men on earth as archetypal. 2 What was the place whereon he took his station? What was it that supported him? How was it? Whence Visvakarman, seeing all, producing the earth, with mighty power disclosed the heavens. 3 He who hath eyes on all sides round about him, a mouth on all sides, arms and feet on all sides, He, the Sole God, producing earth and heaven, weldeth them, with his arms as wings, together. 4 What was the tree, what wood in sooth produced it, from which they fashioned out the earth and heaven? Ye thoughtful men inquire within your spirit whereon he stood when he established all things. 5 Nine highest, lowest, sacrificial natures, and these thy mid-most here, O Visvakarman, Teach thou thy friends at sacrifice, O Blessed, and come thyself, exalted, to our worship. 6 Bring thou thyself, exalted with oblation, O Visvakarman, Earth and Heaven to worship. Let other men around us live in folly here let us have a rich and liberal patron. 7 Let us invoke to-day, to aid our labour, the Lord of Speech, the thoughtswift Visvakarman. May he hear kindly all our invocations who gives all bliss for aid, whose works are righteous. HYMN LXXXII. Visvakarman. 1. THE Father of the eye, the Wise in spirit, created both these worlds submerged in fatness. Then when the eastern ends were firmly fastened, the heavens and the earth were far extended. 2 Mighty in mind and power is Visvakarman, Maker, Disposer, and most lofty Presence. Their offerings joy in rich juice where they value One, only One, beyond the Seven Rsis. 3 Father who made us, he who, as Disposer, knoweth all races and all things existing, Even he alone, the Deities' narne-giver,him other beings seek for information. 4 To him in sacrifice they offered treasures,-Rsis of old, in numerous troops, as singers, Who, in the distant, near, and lower region, made ready all these things that have existence. 5 That which is earlier than this earth and heaven, before the Asuras and Gods had being,- What was the germ primeval which the waters received where all the Gods were seen together? 6 The waters, they received that germ primeval wherein the Gods were gathefed all together. It rested set upon the Unborn's navel, that One wherein abide all things existing. 7 Ye will not find him who produced these creatures: another thing hath risen up among you. Enwrapt in misty cloud, with lips that stammer, hymn-chanters wander and are discontented.

After corona everybody has to switch on oral teaching

Prakrit was spoken language in ancient India but it was very much similar to sanskrit with little variation in phonetics of 25% of vocabulary.

Sir, can please put all the collections into a smart documentary/books as proofs, and make it a branch of history where students would like to study as restoration process

🙏🙏🙏

SR Rao has deceiphered the so-called "Indus Script" decades ago. I read this in a book by Shrikant Talageri named "The Aryan Invasion Theory and Indian Nationalism". The methodology used by Rao as per this book makes perfect sense. But of course there is no consensus on this as people keep asking for "bilingual inscription" (one in Indus script, and the other in a known script) to verify any proposition. And course, no such bilingual inscription has been found for Indus script.

Sir how is kaliyuga 4248 = 1145 CE when Mahabharat date is still not undisputedly established. Currently 5561 BCE is being proposed as the date for Mahabharat.

I'm curious: why would the post-Mahabharata kings decide to use Brahmi script across the country? This period correlates with the Harappan during which the seals could perhaps be used by traders only. In that case, ideally the Harappan script should have evolved as well.

Sir Please put light on Navasaari inscription.

Has anyone decifered rock edicts Ashoka the great at Kalinga warsite at Dhauli mountain at Bhuvaneshvar.

Where are 303k subscribers?

True

Indian history should be re written.

We’re there any metal inscriptions

Yogi ji future Prime minister 🔥🚩💪

When did dev nagri manuscript be identified

Sir d.p. sharma found bilingual script of Indus. Check his book

I agree. There are many pertinent questions which challenges the current chronology. The alternative chronology requires a good debate and study.

Sir tell me about tell me about Telugu language

At least give it a watch of some time

Perhaps Harappa is yet to discover.Archeologists say.

We learned wrong history! History of Kadambas, and Gangas goes Back to bc ! . Who is behind this Conspiracy?

If Chandragupta & Ashoka are from 2500 BCE - 1300BCE then that implies Alexander's invasion didn't happen in 326 BCE??

Namastey to All 🙏

Why our researchers didn't dig deep to find out our history and destroy AIT theory

Why so less views

Can not understand accent

british historians think i have come from central sia as i am from mathura ,, then why m i not fair in colour :(

Historians : Indians have no writing knowledge before 600BCE. Le me : Reading Brihat parashara hora shastra carrying conversation between Maharishi Parashar and Rishi putra Maitreya narrated before Mahabharat war.

Please show the photos of all the copper plates. Seeing is believing

App to CID serial ke Dr. Salunkhe jaise dikh rahe hain..

Assumptions based on assumptions...

सिकन्दर कभी भारत नहीँ आया था एशिआटिकसोसाइटी बनने के समय से ही यह भ्रम फैलाया जा रहा है।।

Sounded more like personal view like adding own views to prove Vedic religion is the oldest in the absence of any scientific proof

Why have you been sitting on this information for so many years without doing anything about it, i.e. making it available on a database, etc. The nonsensical theories is because there is no proper and half decent institution that has the will to rewrite and contextualize and document a proper history....

Tamil brahmi is now older than Ashoka brahmi, Ashoka brahmi is only in Ashoka's Sthupa that is Kings Sthupa more over as per Megasthaneees and Indica there is a person appointed near sthupa to read it to the public who wants to know what is written in it. This means the public don't know to read. Now Tamil brahmi is in pottery, gold biscuits and local village sthupas erected foe the village hero fought against tiger or thiefs to protect cows this shows tamil brahmi is deeply routed and in Sangam Literature there are mention that if an younger brother is educated and elder brother uneducated the statement or words of younger educated one is more valued. In another Sangam poem it is mentioned that uneducated people living amongst educated people is like animals living amongst Human From the above it is clear that Brahmi script is Tamil origin and copied by Ashoka or by north Indians from south India Earliest tamil brahmi dated to 600 BC while Ashoka brahmi is 300 BC

Vedveer you incorrect of Tamil and Sankrit language. Both these langauge derive from independent langauge families: Dravidian and Indo-Aryan. We shouldn't club these two languages together.

Vedveer Arya is speaking in English for whome?. Is this way you set narrative?!! He should speak in Hindi so as to understand by Indians.

very bad presentation. He is just telling us some points as bias and fallacies but he is not pointing who said that means no reference to the fallacies and bias which he is talking about

Whose bias, whose error? Are your theories based on science? If so, it is easy to correct. Else let's call your theory as tradition