oDJOldskull you should go watch the races this season. Lots of action and IndyCar schooled F1 in on-track competition.

@@CoSmicGoesRacing still not as entertaining though.

@@mabra33 I disagree. I honestly enjoy watching IndyCar races, whether on a road course or an oval. I like the unpredictability of the race outcomes. F1, yes I can still watch a race in full but I would know who would win majority of the time.

It's manic because the camera isn't bolted onto the body of the car. Makes such a difference to the perspective of how on the edge he is driving. How it should be.

Except Senna drove a H box and and a more peaky engine, sitting in a cockpit you could punch through with your fist.

tommythetreat000 different microphones

Fantastic driver.

if it looks fast, its slow

@@psypher514 considering that he's won the IndyCar championship 6 times including thos year I'm pretty sure he's not slow unless your comparing him to F1 drivers or something but that would be stupid.

@@Arirezz he was on par with f1 drivers during tests 15 years ago.

As a Kiwi. Scott Dixon is our most successville international driver in our motor sport history .- others - Denny Hulme 67, F1 world Champ & CanAm champ. Bruce McLaren ,66, LeMans winner, CanAm champ @ McLaren Racing.Paul Radisich 93-94 World Touring Car Winner,- Greg Murphy ,Jim Richards multiple Bathurst winners,.Brendon Hartley - LeMans winner & WEC ,FIA, World Endurance Championship.] ,Rod Millen multiple Pikes Peak winner.& Kenny Smith,and Richie McCaw,-Wille Apiata,- Ed Hillary, [legends],- Mad Mike [Red Bull],- Michael Pickens,Barry Butterworth, [speedway] Steve Millen [Stillen Racing] ;. Scott Dixon has not got a raz a mataz personality , but is the quite achiever & leaves his talking on the track.[ice man] But as time goes on and history will reflect,that he is a Legend, and one of the best of Indy car champions.!!! 5 x times sofar & still counting..lol .Extraordinary Kiwis - Scott Dixon Television Documentary. www.nzonscreen.com/title/extraordinary-kiwis-scott-dixon www.nzonscreen.com/title/trio-at-the-top-2001

i wish f1 didnt have that stupid thing that obstructs the drivers view as its not even a windshield

@@fargeeks it has saved multiple lives and when you are driving the car you hardly notice it.

Preferred setup, loose is fast! If you're under-steering in an open wheel car you're in big trouble.. Look how much earlier he can get on the throttle than the pigot onboard

I thought it was understeer.

@@lameduck3630 Oversteer. There's a lot of corrections he made on that lap

He wasn't backing off the throttle much at all though, so it's very well setup

I would say cold tires. Race tires need sometimes 3 to 4 laps to gain temperature properly. Oversteer helps In a qualy lap but that much snap could lead to loosing time too

I hate how stubborn the rest of the iRacing community is about this, like not being able to push the car just takes away a lot of the fun in racing tbh

I believe they do get that input from the real world drivers but it seems hard to implement into a game, dunno.

@@user-eq7zq6so3j iracing codebase is realistically 14 years old. a new sim is needed

Left Foot Brake thumbs up for your name

was just about to say this too. i thought sonoma was very brown like laguna seca

Both are green in the winter and spring.

That's why they should Race there when it's Winter or Spring.

Sahil M i know right i go there all the time

Is it not very expensive when You go there all the Time? Or is it specific on a Racing Weekend like IndyCar or Nascar?

Se nota que los indy tienen menos ángulo de giro comparado con un f1

Thanks for this comment. Having spent some of coronavirus time watching old F1 and Indy car films, you are correct in saying there is a lot going on here. Might be interesting to hear what someone who has driven the cars through the decades would say about that. Paging Mario.

Seen both in person and Indy now sounds better and the racing is better. F1 just sounds like a long quiet fart. The F1 V8's and V10's sound way better than Indy but this drive for efficiency and turbo's etc...in F1 is crap and ruining the sport. Hopefully the new Yankee owner will do something about it and we can finally kiss goodbye to the shit position Ecclestone put the series in. In any case the driver plays more of a role in Indy, you could put Maldonado in a Merc and he'd win the championship.

Have you heard the v6 Honda sound? They sound much better than this.

Way to narrow track and to many jump-hills for the F1. It would be too dangerous to drive there F1.

Hey dumbass did you realize while making these comparisons that this is a completely different car from what those two drove over 40 years ago?

These are indycars🙄🙄

@@sssj9978 Yes, they are Indi, I say that they are very far from F1 cars

if that was 1980s then you sure as hell would never see a steering wheel with electronics on it of any sort, and you would see the driver actually use the shift stick

ive seen some somewhat onboard videos of indy cars that were only 5 speeds

@@fargeeks its high downforce. The 7th gear is for the cambered low downforce tracks. For speeds up to 240 but i figured theyd have different gear ratios

I loved Laguna Seca. Remember "The Pass"? Miss the Corkscrew. Bring back Laguna seca!!!!!

And your wish has been given. Laguna Seca is now the season finale, replacing Sonoma.

No power steering. A bare ones rougher racing experience.

F1 team's yearly cost's are between 150 - 425 million $ as of 2019. An F1 power unit likely costs more than or around 10 million $ (without it's R&D!!). And they had a strong intention to exclude the power unit from the planned cost cap. Does that sound honest, an utter willing of change, or just some projection of richest corporate's will? F1 delaying simplified aero package's delivery while that would be cheaper again. While Indy has many races where they are racing instead of complaining about dirty air. Fielding an Indy team can be done from some million $ compared to F1's 100 millions. Driver salaries are something like 2-3 millions for top drivers compared to 10 millions for top drivers at F1. The recent F1 midfield drivers signed into Indycar were not really more than midfield drivers there. Do you think that being just a bit more than 10 seconds faster around an average GP circuit makes up for multiple 100 millions and lots of dishonesty? Indy's and F2's machinery costs are much closer. 2020's F2 season is very nice and looks amazing, nice new talents Armstrong, Schwartzman, Zhou, and many more! Simpler aero, less aero sensitivity, try to watch some races and enjoy. Great, but considering F2 is a development series, that's pricy, and that's induced by F1. Indy is not a development series, most of the rookies and not talented guys are hammered there. Even worse F1 is drowning in it's own money so much that many of F2 champions not getting an F1 drive, many talents dropping out even without a downwards career trajectory, after a few years like: Nakajima, Kobayashi, Di Resta, Wehrlein etc. They are drowning in the money but the formula is too pricy to be changed so they are using it for 15 years, while it could be much more exciting, and way cheaper!!!! if some of the reliability rules would be relaxed. Even with higher reliability than today, you can't factor our luck and random events, so pay this insane price for it? Research and development at todays world is completely fine without F1, and will achieve many things (hopefully). Most of the guys don't need anything that's "developed at F1" according to some TV advertisement. A formula (set of rules) having costs of Indy could be changed way more often without bankrupting the smaller teams. That would provide challenge for engineers, what used to be part of pinnacle of motorsport. Car's with lesser reliability and simpler aero would produce greater and more exciting and dramatic races. Instead of doing so they often back off and chicken out if some team develops some super improvement, and they often have to ban it in some races, because they are bound so much to that big money that they can't hurt other participant's interests. And there are the other things where scrutineering founds out something hellish scandalous. They can't punish too much, because that would again hurt too much some interests. They are bound to money at such an ill level, they would need baller leaders, flaming swords to redeem themselves or I don't know what to do Mr., really sorry. Modern Indy has many road races, and less ovals than previously as I percieve. (I'm an European guy who wacthes mainly F1, but I always considered Indy a great top level championship.) Sonoma is slightly oldschool and a bit dangerous with F1's measurements, but a very nice track. I'm not really surprised that he has to fight with the wheel quite much, power is not much less, aero is much simpler. I don't say F1 should have very specificated and simple aero, but definitely needs to simplify it, because their cars are damn aero sensitive, so they can't fight that much. I would watch great drivers driving lower classes or diva cars instead of driving roadtrains. Probably the difficulty is responsible for having the "challenge part" that used to be around racing for a long while :)

Jc

Stupid troll

Para alguém ignorante é sim uma novidade já que desde 1966 a Indy corre em mistos assaltados parecidos com esse do vídeo. Vc nem deve saber que a Indy correu em Silverstone em 1978. Nem deve saber que o calendário da Indy é o mais diversificado do mundo das corridas de carro. Enfim, a ignorância