Yes

So dumb why nerf single player game stuff

​@@Kaheiyattsu221to make it not has easy for the player to win, and therefore get more playtime

It's mostly about balance and progression. People think they want instant wins, but if something is so broken it dominates an emerged meta, even in singleplayer, the fun dies very quickly. The whole joy in any video game is actually completing something. If it becomes trivialized to the point of simplicity then the act of winning loses all value. Balance can actually matter more in a singleplayer game because of this. Multiplayer games have the side effect where simply winning over someone is a good enough reward that game balance can slip pretty far before people stop getting any joy out of the game. A broken singleplayer game can lose all value in under 20 minutes if theres no suitable challenge to actually overcome.

Since Alpha is only worth 4 bone now, you can use your overpowered strategy even easier now!

Xddd

Oh, and when something tried to kill it it moved away and let you draw another card

Holy. Shit.

How about a new sigil allowing it tp hit targets that are underwater, like sharks

@@JonathanMandrake the fishing sigil

@@Ezecool-3105 Yeah, the King Fisher could instead be 1/2 with the Fisher sigil, instead of a 1/1 with the Waterborne & Flying sigils. And if you make the Fisher sigil in the game, then the River Otter could be a 1/3. And to expand on the Fisher sigil a bit more, you could make an Anglerfish, which could be a 2 blood 2/1 with the Fisher & Waterborne sigils.

I think 2 damage is viable. Look at it like this, cuckoo does the same thing but is always opposed by a 0 damage card and blocks enemies in. So having 2 damage is balanced because it can be countered easy by a wolf or something while a cuckoo can’t be countered without a mantis/mantis god

@@therustybucket221 the probem is than 1 Costs can only have up to 1 damage, because they have 4 sp, +1 attack costs 2 sp, so a card with 2 damage and 1 cost would have 0 health, what is not possible, and a card with more stats than normal and 2 sigils is kinda broken

Nope

Yes, they do now

@@TheTrueCopyUniverse That would be quite underhwelming sinve they will basically just be a Daus.

Fecundity from totems is unaffected by the nerf, and due to a bug Fecundity, when used with Undying, is unaffected by the nerf.

@@BraveLilToasty I felt the purpose of the Daus was more so to cover multiple lanes from attackers? With a basic example of you can only play the daus but you got 2 cards from different lanes (for the sake of this say lanes 1 and 3, and aren't flyers*) then the daus shines by playi g him in lane 2 to have him deal 2 to leshy, then block and likely kill the things in lanes 1 and 3. That's what I felt Daus's best case was, and having field mice as a rare wouldn't make Daus pointless. Daus's main issue is I feel his bells should get anti-air sigil then he'd be a worthwhile rare card rather than a hyper situational card. Giving it the same buff as Beaver would be op but could fit with a theory of balance I have about Inscryption. Where each rare is just a slightly better version of an existing card (Mantis god slightly better Mantis, Mole man better Mole, etc.) And so having Daus be a better Beaver can work but might be op if it has the same buff, so my only suggestion would be it's bells get the anti air sigil so people are more inclined to use it.

You can still make a bootleg fecundity if you put the ant spawner sigil on a worker ant

@@Opanker_ not good enough to be called Fecundity...

@@PiydTH wdym it's litterally the same if you put fecundity on a worker ant

@@Opanker_ ? Spawned ants wont have the ant spawner sigil on them. If you meant the totem than yeah. But fecund should've worked with the totem

Yes

You mean squirrel

He did

Didint xd