Inside The Cockpit: F-4 Phantom II FGR.2

  Рет қаралды 660,587

Military Aviation History

Military Aviation History

Күн бұрын

The F-4 Phantom II is an absolute classic from the Cold War era. Let's jump into the cockpit and find out what makes this bird click.
⚜ Sit Inside this Phantom (and the Vulcan) ⚜
Cold War Experience: www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/w...
RAF Museum on KZfaq: / rafmuseum
Visit the RAF Museum: www.rafmuseum.org.uk/london/
⚜ Support Inside The Cockpit ⚜
- Patreon: / milavhistory
- PayPal: www.paypal.me/BismarckYT
⚜ Find Me On Social Media ⚜
- Twitter: / milavhistory
- Instagram: / milaviationhistory
- Facebook: / militaryaviationhistory
⚜ Sources ⚜
ADC016682, A comparative analysis of USAF fixed-wing aircraft losses in South-East Asia, Dec 1977
Aeroguide, McDonnell Phantom FG MK 1/FGR Mk 2
A.P.101B-0902-16, Phantom FGR MK 2 2x SPEY MK 201 or 202 Aircraft - Operating Data Manual, 1968
AP.101B-0902-15A - Phantom FGR Mk2 Aircrew manual
Michael Burns, McDonnell Douglas F-4K and F-4M Phantom II
Patrick Martin, British Phantoms FG Mk.1, FGR Mk.2 and F-4J (UK) in RAF Service 1979-1992
Philip Moyes, Aerodata International N 14, McDonnell Douglass F-4 Phantom II
P.S. 454 Plane Captain's Handbook F-4K/M
USAF, The Vietnam War Almanac
USAF, Phantom guide: A guide to the F-4
RAF Museum
⚜ Music ⚜
Music and Sfx from Epidemic Sound

Пікірлер: 870
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 4 жыл бұрын
*Hope you all enjoyed this one! Please consider sharing and check out the description for sources and helpful links!*
@shadmanpatoary6783
@shadmanpatoary6783 4 жыл бұрын
Educational......nice
@cyclingnerddelux698
@cyclingnerddelux698 4 жыл бұрын
Outstanding episode!
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 4 жыл бұрын
cheers
@STROPPYJ
@STROPPYJ 4 жыл бұрын
I was engineering groundcrew on that Squadron, on that aircraft, for 4 years. You’re probably not the first German in that one: we had Luftwaffe pilots and navs on the Squadron as exchange crew! (Good characters and I can even remember some names.)
@hihi-qy2jt
@hihi-qy2jt 4 жыл бұрын
I See you in the RAF Museum and my dad know how are you he thing KZfaq wher som stupid
@josiahricafrente585
@josiahricafrente585 4 жыл бұрын
“World’s Leading Distributer of MiG Parts!” I like that. Very clever!
@FunBotan
@FunBotan 4 жыл бұрын
Comrades Mikoyan and Gurevich have disliked this video
@sciencetechfreakers3777
@sciencetechfreakers3777 4 жыл бұрын
I paused for a second to let that sink.
@TLTeo
@TLTeo 4 жыл бұрын
Best nickname a Western jet can have really
@tinglydingle
@tinglydingle 4 жыл бұрын
Just FYI, that's been a moniker of the Phantom since Vietnam.
@mecenario7
@mecenario7 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah, very clever propaganda...
@rudyyarbrough5122
@rudyyarbrough5122 9 ай бұрын
As a young Marine pilot, I spent a lot of time looking at that instrument panel. I flew the F-4B at Mach I at 500 feet over the Yuma desert and Mach 2 at 35,000 feet. It was a hell of a ride and I loved every minute of it. It brought me home from Vietnam and I will always have a soft spot in my heart every time I see one.
@brianscott8528
@brianscott8528 7 ай бұрын
Awesome. Thanks! Originally from Scotland, I was blown away by a pair of F-4s flying low over Loch Doon, southeast of Girvan and The Royal Turnbury on the Southwest Scottish Coast in my early teens. I had no idea what they were doing there, though military aircraft often stopped in at Prestwick just up the coast, and they were heading south towards England, but a little too low and fast in my mind looking back. Just me and my Grandad, who'd taken me fishing that day. No one else as far as the eye could see. Absolutely priceless!
@Cramblit
@Cramblit 4 жыл бұрын
Phantoms have a very majestic rugged look that I really love.
@ShadrachVS1
@ShadrachVS1 4 жыл бұрын
Do you also find the Thunderbolt II the same ugly/beautiful mix? Asking because I find both a great example of function defining form and creating something that should be aesthetically ugly, yet is so beautiful in operation.
@Cramblit
@Cramblit 4 жыл бұрын
@@ShadrachVS1 Yes I do. I wouldn't say beautiful/ugly, I'd say "rustic and charming" more than beautiful. Kinda hard to explain actually.
@ShadrachVS1
@ShadrachVS1 4 жыл бұрын
@@Cramblit I understand.
@aaronsanborn4291
@aaronsanborn4291 3 жыл бұрын
The two nick names the Phantom had in the U.S. were Rhino and Double Ugly
@ralphhalliwellwright7652
@ralphhalliwellwright7652 3 жыл бұрын
@@ShadrachVS1 i just like the way it looks lol
@DickHolman
@DickHolman 4 жыл бұрын
3 Phantoms used to practise at combat speed through our village, probably suppressing AA sites, for an accompanying Buccaneer, which practised lobbing a nuke over the ridge above the village. A Canberra reconnaissance plane would appear before & after, the first appearance was the only warning we got. The attack group came in well below chimney height, often level with the 1st floor windows of the houses along the edge of the little valley the village is built around. It was very, very loud. We assumed we were a topographical twin of a target somewhere in Europe.
@charliemorris2338
@charliemorris2338 4 жыл бұрын
They would buzz us at a golf course in Va. mountains practicing for Balkens war,I believe.
@zepter00
@zepter00 4 жыл бұрын
charlie morris buccaner in Balkans wars? 😆
@vegasspaceprogram6623
@vegasspaceprogram6623 3 жыл бұрын
@@zepter00 Falkland war
@zepter00
@zepter00 3 жыл бұрын
Vegas space program lol Buccaner never served in Falkland war. Only two versions of Harier served in Falkaland war.
@TheTomBevis
@TheTomBevis 3 жыл бұрын
I once lived in a top floor apartment, just under the takeoff path of F-4s. I only thought they were loud until they brought in F-16s. The C-5s may have been the loudest, though.
@marksauck8481
@marksauck8481 2 жыл бұрын
The F4 was always refered to as a muscle jet with good reason. The full amount of ordinance load was incredible making it so versatile it lasted a long time in the Navy's and Air Force's arsenals.
@paulscountry456
@paulscountry456 Жыл бұрын
They were huge...
@GaldirEonai
@GaldirEonai 4 жыл бұрын
18:12 "Jelly Baby Dispenser". Obviously a critical modification for the UK version...
@maciek_k.cichon
@maciek_k.cichon 4 жыл бұрын
Time frame: Fouth Doctor era
@markbass7145
@markbass7145 4 жыл бұрын
this is the comment i was looking for
@filmandfirearms
@filmandfirearms 2 жыл бұрын
@@maciek_k.cichon Tom Baker was great. Actually, I can't think of any Doctors that weren't, until Peter Capaldi. He had his moments, but he mostly acted like a senile old man
@russellbryan2288
@russellbryan2288 2 жыл бұрын
I learned that a friend of mine flew these while he was in a Air Force. He never mentioned that he was in the military, much less a pilot, to any of us and we all learned of this part of his life only after he died very unexpectedly. Had I known that he flew the F-4 I would have had a thousand questions for him.
@robertgutheridge9672
@robertgutheridge9672 4 жыл бұрын
The Phantom did everything. Didn't do anything great but it did everything it was asked to do. Including bringing my uncle and a lot of other pilots home while absorbing a lot of damage
@drianmortiz9375
@drianmortiz9375 4 жыл бұрын
Yes indeed sir this type of aircraft has some great endurance in terms of durability no wonder everybody in the west love this famous warbird.
@fkerpants
@fkerpants 3 жыл бұрын
I'd say that plane was great at going fast, but I get what you mean. :)
@a-10thunderboltii24
@a-10thunderboltii24 3 жыл бұрын
It broke 13 records, it did more things than other fighters at the time, foreign or domestic.
@robertgutheridge9672
@robertgutheridge9672 3 жыл бұрын
@@a-10thunderboltii24 i think it did more things that any other aircraft. Including today's. It truly is /was a beast.
@lepanhman
@lepanhman 3 жыл бұрын
2 engines baby
@siberiandaddy6065
@siberiandaddy6065 4 жыл бұрын
worked on them for 4 years, usn, f4-b, vf-11, 1967-71. brought back allot of memories.
@enzoacorda
@enzoacorda 4 жыл бұрын
This series is definitely helpful for us modellers. I realized I may have missed something out on the Phantom FGR.2 I finished and in turn, this video along with my 2gb folder are probably why I have 4 of them now.
@rubenlopez3364
@rubenlopez3364 2 жыл бұрын
Model some Belkan Aggressors
@enzoacorda
@enzoacorda 2 жыл бұрын
@@rubenlopez3364 nahh. Currently working on a Fine Molds F-4EJ right now..
@billfisher990
@billfisher990 2 жыл бұрын
I was a signalman on the USS Saratoga (CVA-60) 1962-1966. We had two squadrons of F-4 Phantoms on board, which are probably more responsible for my old-age hearing problems. But that never stopped me from standing on the signal bridge, watching those lovely birds taxi to the catapult, light their afterburners and take off in front of two trails of smoke! Their landings were just as awesome. Great memories.
@samuelbadger4371
@samuelbadger4371 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for making this vid!!! My great grandpa was the Captain of the carrier USS Ranger for the US Navy and was previously the head test pilot for the E variant of this plane. Currently looking into his tapes for more information about him, just thought it was nice to share.
@free-birdrocker8809
@free-birdrocker8809 3 жыл бұрын
My dads buddy flew an F-4 in Nam, he did napalm sorties. My pop flew the Cobra Gunship in nam also. I I met his buddy and he had a hanger full of birds, 1 pitts s-1 and a cessna 190? It had a radial engine, and I got to sit in the co pilot seat for a fun ride. He said the phantom handled like a trash truck but it got the job done. Thanks Mr. Bismark for good av-history videos!
@johnshields6852
@johnshields6852 Жыл бұрын
My uncle Jack piloted the F4 phantom in Vietnam late 60's early 70's, I was a young boy and in awe, I wanted to ask him about it on the rare times he was home for holidays but back then you kept your mouth shut, plus I don't think he'd want to talk to me about his missions or his experiences. Cool show, thank you 🇺🇸🙏
@shawnadams1965
@shawnadams1965 4 жыл бұрын
My favorite plane of all time. My first contact with the Phantom II was the Blue Angels flying in a airshow my father took me to in 1971 when I was 6 years old. I've been in love with "Old Smokey" ever since.
@fkerpants
@fkerpants 3 жыл бұрын
I'm with you, bud. Everything about that plane is beautiful. I'm not sure if you're aware, but the United States had been converting them into drones for target practice. It's enough to make your head spin until you hear that they were difficult to shoot down. They were THAT tough. If I'm not mistaken, I read somewhere it took four or five hits from a Raptor to kill one.
@shawnadams1965
@shawnadams1965 3 жыл бұрын
@@fkerpants Funny you mention that, I was in the ADA during my time in the Army, we didn't fire at F-4 drones but I've seen them used. Our drone while I was stationed at Bliss was a A-7. And our HAWK missile obliterated it. Not sure what they used for our live fire at Crete, but our missile ruined it's day as well.
@gazza2933
@gazza2933 3 жыл бұрын
Shawn I'm English, but yes a great 'don't mess with me' aircraft!! Served the Royal Air Force very well.
@Panzerfan93
@Panzerfan93 4 жыл бұрын
20:00 i like "Luftverteidigungsdiesel" (Air defence diesel) which was given to the F-4 because the trailing smoke of the engines
@MultiZirkon
@MultiZirkon 4 жыл бұрын
That one was new. It may be the best I've ever heard ;-)
@anakinskywalker4086
@anakinskywalker4086 4 жыл бұрын
The F-4 Phantom, AKA a Brick with engines.
@TLTeo
@TLTeo 4 жыл бұрын
Triumph of thrust over aerodynamics! :)
@anakinskywalker4086
@anakinskywalker4086 4 жыл бұрын
Matteo Haha yes
@ludgerhoutman4464
@ludgerhoutman4464 4 жыл бұрын
The A-10 of its day?
@kazsmaz
@kazsmaz 4 жыл бұрын
@@ludgerhoutman4464 the A10 was the A10 of its day
@903strikerunit
@903strikerunit 4 жыл бұрын
@@ludgerhoutman4464 the a10 is a 'flying cannon' not a brick.
@ant4812
@ant4812 4 жыл бұрын
Australia didn't order Phantoms mate. We got them on some sort of lease to use until our F-111's were ready. I'm told the pilots liked them so much they didn't want to return them.
@grunderhunter
@grunderhunter 4 жыл бұрын
I had the pleasure of watching two phantoms scramble from raf wildenrath when I was at school; my teacher was the squadron commanders wife. Amazing sight that is still vivid 30 years on. Great video, thanks!
@hailandfire1822
@hailandfire1822 2 жыл бұрын
The phantom, or the wife?
@neues3691
@neues3691 4 жыл бұрын
My grandad flew a variant of the Phantom in the German air force. I still think it is one of the best looking post ww2 planes out there.
@Spartaner251
@Spartaner251 4 жыл бұрын
@@neues3691 RIO / WSO
@DickHolman
@DickHolman 4 жыл бұрын
@@neues3691 Literally "Combat observer". In the RAF, a Weapon Systems Operator, colloquially 'wizzo' or sometimes GiB, 'Guy in the Back'.
@DickHolman
@DickHolman 4 жыл бұрын
@@neues3691 :D Great air forces speak alike!
@patrickbrennan1317
@patrickbrennan1317 4 жыл бұрын
It had a predatory look that was unmistakable. Adaptability was it's greatest virtue.
@DickHolman
@DickHolman 4 жыл бұрын
IMO, the Hawker Hunter was the best looking plane of that era, & the Handley-Page Victor the most menacing.
@TheCommissarIsDead
@TheCommissarIsDead 2 жыл бұрын
The phantom was the first jet I ever fell in love with,it didn’t help all the stories my grandpa would tell me about them and the Cobras during nam. He would always say “when you would hear that roar over the mountains coming towards you you’d always hear a sigh and a little cheer over the guys when they came around”
@sarrumac
@sarrumac 4 жыл бұрын
When you are so american that even your airplane manufacturer is a Mc Donald.
@niixodus
@niixodus 4 жыл бұрын
But McDonald is Scottish tho
@ShadrachVS1
@ShadrachVS1 4 жыл бұрын
Mc Donnel/Douglas... Remember Mc Donnel asks "Do you want Cannons with that?", McDonald asks about Fries...
@rokuth
@rokuth 4 жыл бұрын
That's "McDonnell Douglas," now part of McDonnell Douglas Hughes North American Boeing multi-conglomerate aviation company... aka Boeing
@madirishman9240
@madirishman9240 4 жыл бұрын
Hilarious!!! this comment definitely deserve more likes
@arsarma1808
@arsarma1808 4 жыл бұрын
@@leontam221 You shouldn't like it. Boeing absorbing MD has been one debacle after another. Actually, Boeing has been that for a while now...
@tonykeith76
@tonykeith76 4 жыл бұрын
When I was younger, every day, every hour and every half our, the sky was filled with jets.. Sometimes even with US-Navy jets.. Now the skies are empty
@davidtoth8975
@davidtoth8975 4 жыл бұрын
Haha, here on the other side of the curtain, it is pretty much the same. My father told me MiGs would fly sorties non-stop over the underdeveloped countryside. Today's skies are very sparse, only the occasional Gripen flight, or some Mi-17 relics, thank God those are still flying.
@Legitpenguins99
@Legitpenguins99 4 жыл бұрын
@@davidtoth8975I Interpret that as a good thing. It means we arent 10 minutes away from nuking the absolute shit out of eachother anymore :)
@Strawberry-12.
@Strawberry-12. 4 жыл бұрын
nunzio menin where you from
@tonykeith76
@tonykeith76 4 жыл бұрын
@@Strawberry-12. North Italy... I was talking about the 60 - 70 - 80 years
@ji3194
@ji3194 3 жыл бұрын
Same here My Local Air National Guard (NM USA) unit lost its F-16s and now flies Helicopters. I miss seeing them almost daily
@lindapowell117
@lindapowell117 2 жыл бұрын
Jim Powell here. I served in Navy fighter squadron VF-154 in Vietnam. Two deployments from 1967-68 and 1968-69, we flew the F4 Phantom. I worked on the radar systems. I was a fire control technician. Our last cruise we had the F4J bird. The F4 was a work horse. It could fly as a bomber with a significant payload or as a fighter in a support role carrying sparrow missiles and side winders. The F4 was a big fighter, the engines were J79’s. They could fly right at Mach 2. They were a magnificent and very durable aircraft. I really enjoyed being part of the Navy and being part of VF-154, the Black Knights. The best fighter squadron in the Navy.
@roadrunner6224
@roadrunner6224 4 жыл бұрын
I also like „Americas proof to the world that even a brick can fly, if the engines, are powerful enough“
@SymphonicPoet
@SymphonicPoet 4 жыл бұрын
And yet it would be Mickey D's next major fighter contract, the F-15, which successfully flew on only one wing. But yes, I do enjoy that one.
@deffington6627
@deffington6627 4 жыл бұрын
But that's the soviet approach to fighter planes (after MiG-17).
@Vermiliontea
@Vermiliontea 4 жыл бұрын
The Phantom is not a brick, aerodynamically, so in the end that's just silly and misleading. The British proved that a more brick-like design actually does go slower, despite more powerful Spey engines.
@dogeness
@dogeness 4 жыл бұрын
it’s even more so in the case of the F-104
@zeeeman8744
@zeeeman8744 4 жыл бұрын
Vermiliontea it may be silly and misleading but that’s what we would joke about sometimes when we were flying them way back when
@jmi-ps2ov
@jmi-ps2ov 4 жыл бұрын
Great job - so fun that you had access to cockpit controls. Thanks for such an intimate look at one of my top favorite aircraft. One of the last plastic models I made was a 1/32 scale model of the F4E flown by Captain Ritchie USAF in Vietnam. Fun to get a closer look at the things I was toiling over when I made the model!
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 4 жыл бұрын
Cheers, happy you enjoyed it
@Jamie-kg8ig
@Jamie-kg8ig 4 жыл бұрын
OK the Iron Pig fits this plane so well.
@michaelmckinnon1591
@michaelmckinnon1591 3 жыл бұрын
Probably because it's a hard working aircraft
@Walter_E_Kurtz
@Walter_E_Kurtz 2 жыл бұрын
This is the Jet that I first fell in love with, and discovered aviation. When I was 8 years old my grandpa bought me a model of the F-4 Phantom II to put together with him. I've always loved everything about the F-4 and still do. The absolute greatest aircraft ever made and to fly. Thank you McDonnell Douglas.
@TheLeonhamm
@TheLeonhamm 4 жыл бұрын
Yip! Eisenschwein .. I like it - somewhere between a mega-train, a hyper-tractor and a thunder-bike, only in the sky. Cool. ;o)
@jeffreytam7684
@jeffreytam7684 4 жыл бұрын
TheLeonhamm Love that name! Honestly classic planes breed classic names
@TheSkipjack95
@TheSkipjack95 4 жыл бұрын
I like "Kampfdiesel" better :D
@jeffreytam7684
@jeffreytam7684 4 жыл бұрын
TheSkipjack95 Also an excellent one. Especially since the early versions had the dirty black exhausts A classic English language one is “The Triumph of Thrust Over Aerodynamics”
@michaelmckinnon1591
@michaelmckinnon1591 3 жыл бұрын
@@jeffreytam7684 only by those who didn't know how to fly it, but if they knew how it was a work of art and a pleasure to fly
@GG-ir1hw
@GG-ir1hw 4 жыл бұрын
II Royce Spey engines were not simply a pointless addition soley to keep British jobs, while the FGR phantoms were slower than the American counterparts at high altitude Mach 1.9 appossed to Mach 2.2~2.3 it was faster at sea level. Also the British phantoms at low altitude out accelerated the American phantoms having a 20% shorter take off distance and a faster initial climb rate also. This was important to the Royal Navy given their carriers relatively small size compared to their American cousins. So this demand was largely at Royal navy's request while the RAF was happy to receive the F-4 Phantom II as it was. Still amazing video for a rarely covered variant of the F-4!
@rokuth
@rokuth 4 жыл бұрын
Since the Speys were turbofan engines as opposed to the turbojet J79s, they also had a longer range than the American versions. Plus, they were smokeless from the start. It was only on the later versions that the newer "smokeless" J79s were used. Having a smoke trail was a dead giveaway to enemy fighters.
@PenzancePete
@PenzancePete 4 жыл бұрын
@@rokuth The expression is, "from the start", not the get go.
@rokuth
@rokuth 4 жыл бұрын
@@PenzancePete corrected as you stated. Thanx!
@GCJT1949
@GCJT1949 4 жыл бұрын
I was told by a USAF ground control officer back in the 1970s, that the Spey Phantoms could put on power and fly out of Angle-of-Attack problems, where a GE crew would eject. He was an F-4 pilot.
@anthonykaiser974
@anthonykaiser974 3 жыл бұрын
@@PenzancePete 🙄 it's called slang, should be "get-go."
@MrRipper1956
@MrRipper1956 3 ай бұрын
Good presentation Chris on my beloved F-4 Phantom 2. I flew them in W.Germany days as a Reconnaissance fighter over a 10 year period. To illustrate the USAF's initial adoption of the F-4 one of my military instructors was an evaluation pilot in the early 1960s and told me of that process. In the late 1950s the USAF had the idea of a multi-role fighter to reduce costs. They proposed an interceptor, strike, reconnaissance, bomber, eieio. General Dynamics and Boeing won the proposal and eventually, GD won it as the F-111. At the same time during the Kennedy admin Robert McNamara ( the greatest disaster for the US military readiness affecting decades of damage) tried to force the Navy into adopting the F-111B. The aircraft eventually worked but only as a light bomber. That left a void in the other roles for the USAF which if they could not cover them then the interservice conflict may lead to a transfer of missions. SO they scrambled to find existing alternatives for the F-111. They tried the Navy's Phantom 2 as the F-110, the A-7 for Close air support, and the Skyraider as the B-66 light bomber. All functioned admirably and were timely replacements but this led to a political decision that the USAF would never adopt another services platform for the primary missions.
@Robloxman01
@Robloxman01 4 жыл бұрын
Something worth mentioning is that the Phantom was designed without a gun largely due to it's intended role, which was to intercept Soviet bombers and attack aircraft. It was never really intended to fill the role of a multi role fighter bomber, because the Navy believed that the F8 Crusader and F11F Tiger would be more than sufficient in that role, so the Navy didn't think a gun would be worth the trade-offs. After all, if you're only expected to be firing Sparrows at Tu-95s from beyond visual range, what's the point in wasting weight on a gun?
@hawkertyphoon4537
@hawkertyphoon4537 4 жыл бұрын
The Flying Brick. Jet powered Dump Truck. Cannot dance the Tango, but is still loved by many.
@briangoldy8784
@briangoldy8784 4 жыл бұрын
Air Force,,,,,,,Navy.............Like Flying a Bus.............lol..........
@GregSherlock
@GregSherlock 4 жыл бұрын
The opening line was pretty funny Bismark 'first used in the second world war......jets' got me hooked and questioning my understanding of the chronology for a second! Keep up the amazing work!
@tempest411
@tempest411 4 жыл бұрын
It's easy to laugh, but don't. There are actually a lot of really, REALLY stupid people out there that know nothing of history before yesterday, which is when they were born. At least in the U.S., that is.
@thaster973
@thaster973 4 жыл бұрын
The Rolls Royce Spey, the engine that melted the flight deck of an aircraft carrier
@TOMAS-lh4er
@TOMAS-lh4er 4 жыл бұрын
AMEN !!BRO. We used to bet on when the deck was actually going to go liquid !!
@Michael.Talbot
@Michael.Talbot 2 жыл бұрын
@Thaster 97...... How many aircraft carriers were sunk on takeoff?
@simmo8490
@simmo8490 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that, great detail of the F4 cockpit, much appreciated. The Phantom was always one of my favorites growing up especially as we had the 74th Bengal (Tiger) Squadron based just down the road from me at RAF Wattisham in Suffolk. We often saw them coming and going from their daily exercises :)
@DeadBaron
@DeadBaron 4 жыл бұрын
Largest distributor of MiG parts XD I remember when the Blue Angels flew these monsters.
@anthonykaiser974
@anthonykaiser974 3 жыл бұрын
Not hard to understand why they switched to the A-4F Skyhawk in 1974.
@f4dphantomII
@f4dphantomII 3 жыл бұрын
USAF Thunderbirds flew F-4s as well.
@michaelmagill189
@michaelmagill189 2 жыл бұрын
Not for long
@deputy.foreskin3407
@deputy.foreskin3407 2 жыл бұрын
As a kid I’d go through the NASA air and space museum and the F-4 phantom always caught my eye, it’s perfect war face painting lit up my young mind. I love the F-4
@marcosavila8215
@marcosavila8215 2 ай бұрын
i can imagine how many times Heatblur looked at this video, despite having their own real F-4E to module graphically, looking more and more to other F4 planes is never too much when you want to achieve perfection like They did, this plane in DCS is a master piece to fly
@specforged5651
@specforged5651 4 жыл бұрын
As a corporate jet pilot and airplane freak in general, there is something menacing and just “plane” brutal about the F4. Looks like it could take endless fire that would just bounce off. Love it. True unadulterated power and ruggedness. Use to love watching these as a little kid living near Hill AFB. I can see the runway from my house and I remember the huge black smoke trails as those monsters would take off. Being in my late 30s the majority have been F16s (which I miss already) and now F35s, but I still remember those F4s like it was yesterday. Thanks for sharing.
@ushitooso3872
@ushitooso3872 4 жыл бұрын
You are so freaking lucky! There’s nothing more beautiful than an F-4
@Historybuffm8
@Historybuffm8 4 жыл бұрын
I just went to that museum back in June and it was one heck of a place. Loved every building and aircraft
@watchfordpilot
@watchfordpilot 4 жыл бұрын
Another great video Mr Bismarck, thanks. I have the good fortune to know a few guys who flew these for the Fleet Air Arm (as well as having sat in a few as well, on the ground - but i have had a go at a sim) so it was comfortingly familiar. One thing they did mention was the amount of drag produced by the 'bins' at the back of the engines as well. Looking fwd to your next video - cheers.
@paulhancock7670
@paulhancock7670 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the vid. I was a Nav Insty on 29(F) Sqn in the 80's (RAF Coningsby). Brought back loads of memories, my favourite ever aircraft, the Toom.
@davidhoffman8122
@davidhoffman8122 2 жыл бұрын
I worked F-4Cs, Ds and RF4Cs from 1978 to 1981 then the F4Gs and Es from 1988 to 1991. The plane is MUCH better than most people can imagine.
@Calgrissom
@Calgrissom 2 жыл бұрын
I love the F-4 Phantom II's. They remind me of that quote from Halo, "For a brick, he flew pretty good!"
@Starphot
@Starphot 4 жыл бұрын
A Royal Navy F-4 cross-decked along with a Buccaneer in 1972 on my ship the USS JFK from the HMS Ark Royal. I got pictures of that. We had 2 squadrons of F-4 onboard at the time.
@Wien1938
@Wien1938 4 жыл бұрын
1. The Royal Navy was originally planning to replace its (then) present aircraft carriers with new fleet carriers with displacements falling between the American Midway and Forrestal fleet carriers (see the correction by Force A1 in comments). This was dropped due to the opposition of all things sensible in British military affairs...the Treasury. So, the F-4K had expensive modifications to let it fly more easily from HMS Eagle and HMS Ark Royal. (Note that Eagle had just been - expensively - refitted to fly the new F-4Ks when the Treasury insisted that the Navy had to lose a carrier. Inexplicably, the Navy chose to lose the just refitted Eagle and retain the increasingly decrepit Ark Royal - which promptly spent more time in port than at sea until being decommissioned and scrapped). 2. As Calemb Jackson notes elsewhere in the comments, the Spey was draggier but much more powerful and, at low level, this was fine for the RAF and RN flight profiles, which emphasised low level tactics in the light of US experience in Vietnam and (you guessed it) Treasury reluctance to actually spend money on things like...ECM or decoys. It was also less smokey than the J79 turbojets (until GE finally fixed the fuel burn ratios in the 1980s). 3. The F-4J(UK)s were not retrofitted with Speys because the engine was thought a bad idea by then but because the RAF needed to station a squadron of Phantoms in the Falklands, the existing squadrons were already committed in the UK and West Germany and there was not the industrial capacity (or time) to build new F-4s, so a new squadron was stood-up and took over. These were only intended as a stop-gap solution. The F-4J(UK) had better high-altitude performance, so the role of air-defence over the Falklands was better suited to this model. (addendum) 4. The pod on top of the vertical stabiliser is a RWR pod, not an ECM pod.
@forcea1454
@forcea1454 4 жыл бұрын
CVA-01 had by 1965, a displacement of 54,500tons (earlier designs displaced 53,000 tons). It was considerably smaller than US CVA/CVAN designs, and was designed around projecting power East of Suez in wars with Third-world countries (admittedly with access to modern Soviet weapons).
@Wien1938
@Wien1938 4 жыл бұрын
86% of the length of a Forrestal or Kitty Hawk but you're quite right about this being a smaller design - my error from memory. The complement of aircraft was smaller - about 2/3s of the Forrestal design but still potent with 18 Phantoms and 18 Buccaneers and the extra length would have reduced or removed the need for the extended nose-wheel on the F-4K.
@PenzancePete
@PenzancePete 4 жыл бұрын
The F-4Js could not have been retro fitted with the Spey as fitting of them required the fuselage to be widened. Little know fact: the wing span was the same, in other words the Spey Phantoms had less wing area.
@SPiderman-rh2zk
@SPiderman-rh2zk 2 жыл бұрын
Mate I'm just so glad I found your channel. The methodical thoroughness that you have going through the aircraft and cockpit really appeal to me as someone with Asperger's. When I research aircraft types there are a lot of grey areas which I cannot easily find and you clear a lot of these away.
@towedarray7217
@towedarray7217 3 жыл бұрын
Really really cool video. Awesome thorough cockpit walkthrough - this was great. Thank you!
@earl2688
@earl2688 2 жыл бұрын
As a USMC Phantom Phixer, I worked fire control on the F-4J and F-4S for 6 years; spent my days and nights in both cockpits, in the nose radar, and down at the missile stations. A lot of good memories, except when one of them pulled in to park across from me and I would get a face full of exhaust. Of note, in the late '70s, we intercepted Russian bombers every night during our deployment to Iceland.
@Riccardo_Silva
@Riccardo_Silva 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Bismarck, another great video! When i was young, kynda thirty years ago, i'd have to struggle for days, visit libraries and send letters to gather a FRACTION of the infomations you presented us with in this video. What exciting modern times we're living in (quote from capt Aubrey). Keep up the outstanding job!
@jettsetter7
@jettsetter7 4 жыл бұрын
Good video, my grandpa died in one of these in Laos at night, so helps to see what was going on a little bit more
@xandercreates6766
@xandercreates6766 4 жыл бұрын
“First used during World War 2” *imagines Germans getting wrecked by that jet*
@super5oldier139
@super5oldier139 4 жыл бұрын
Imagine a cocky 262 pilot trying to outrun a F4 then he hears a sonic boom behind him
@vaclav_fejt
@vaclav_fejt 3 жыл бұрын
@@super5oldier139 Well...if you hear the sonic boom behind you, the F-4 is chasing someone else.
@roanferguson8873
@roanferguson8873 3 жыл бұрын
The phantom cruises faster than the 262's cannon rounds travel from the muzzle
@mchalllldfjlfkj
@mchalllldfjlfkj 3 жыл бұрын
@@vaclav_fejt that's if you are flying super sonic too?
@vaclav_fejt
@vaclav_fejt 3 жыл бұрын
@@mchalllldfjlfkj not possible in a 262
@EliasGraves
@EliasGraves 4 жыл бұрын
Love your channel, Bismarck! Thank you for sharing your expertise.
@neilrobinson5115
@neilrobinson5115 Жыл бұрын
I remember in the 80s when the phantoms were at coningsby with RAF 228 ocu,I used to see them running along the seafront at Mablethorpe on there way to RAF Donna nook bombing range,you could see the gun pack under the fuselage,great days,better days here for aviation spotting,range is fairly quiet nowadays
@BobSmith-dk8nw
@BobSmith-dk8nw 4 жыл бұрын
I remember when these aircraft were the main stay and you'd see them tooling along leaving their big smoke trails through the sky. Eventually they got versions of the engines that didn't produce all that smoke. Yes. A very capable aircraft for a very long time. .
@sillyone52062
@sillyone52062 4 жыл бұрын
You missed one of the nicknames: Lead Sled.
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 4 жыл бұрын
There are so many on this one, I missed several
@Philistine47
@Philistine47 4 жыл бұрын
"Lead Sled" was applied to several different aircraft, including the F-84 and (especially) the F-105, but AFAIK wasn't commonly associated with the F-4.
@knutdergroe9757
@knutdergroe9757 4 жыл бұрын
The guide ratio of a rock.... I Did more RF4 models..... But a damn big bird, And surprisingly fast. Still classified(top end speed) for RF4 models.
@knutdergroe9757
@knutdergroe9757 4 жыл бұрын
At 20 years old I had the chance to watch a combat intercept (coldwar 1984) launch of a pair of F4's. Almost as good as watching the SR71 launch. By the by, The F4's were just gone......
@sillyone52062
@sillyone52062 4 жыл бұрын
@@knutdergroe9757 🇩🇪 Phantoms were once based at Pfrerdsfeld. The afterburner takeoffs for practice scrambles blew the roofs off the houses of the nearby town. It was evacuated by the time I visited Pferdsfeld in 1982.
@gtv6chuck
@gtv6chuck 4 жыл бұрын
F4s used to fly out of the base I lived at as a kid - Clark AFB in the Philippines. I always thought they were just an unattractive plane. That and their engines left a trail of black smoke. But hearing them go supersonic over the South China Sea occasionally on their way to Vietnam was kind of neat.
@lilasnowflake5632
@lilasnowflake5632 2 жыл бұрын
I once went to an airshow in Florida, and I think I saw a phantom take off and fly back low and fast. I'll never forget what I felt that day.. The rumble from its two mighty engines roaring through the sky, it muffled anything else around me. That roar of the engines making every part inside me tremble. I didn't know if I was feeling the sound waves, or in shock and awe of this powerful machine. It's shark decals near the nose as it flew by, stuck me with the thought that it could take down anything it saw, and that anything it faced was going to feel fear. It certainly scared me. As it passed I saw its two engines glowing a bright yellow, it looked like a pair of eyes of a monster, a big scary one, it looked mighty angry too. It flew away beyond the horizon, making way for another jet. But just like a phantom it came, striking fear, before leaving as if nothing happened.
@PelicanIslandLabs
@PelicanIslandLabs 4 жыл бұрын
Russian SAM: "the worlds leading distributor of F-4 parts" Oh, well.
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 4 жыл бұрын
What goes around, comes around
@durhamdavesbg4948
@durhamdavesbg4948 4 жыл бұрын
Wasn't that whole problem the start of the Wild Weasel SEAD missions?
@CLIFFORD392
@CLIFFORD392 4 жыл бұрын
F-105 : 👀
@Tigershark_3082
@Tigershark_3082 4 жыл бұрын
@@CLIFFORD392 Heh, the F-105 was quite the victim of circumstance. It was still an amazing aircraft, just was sadly a prime target for SAMs
@mostevil1082
@mostevil1082 3 жыл бұрын
From the wiki numbers it seems 90% was AAA
@chrisaskin6144
@chrisaskin6144 4 жыл бұрын
Used to be an armourer on Phantoms, finishing up on the now long since defunct Phantom Servicing School at Coningsby as an instructor. Military jet noise, the sound of freedom.
@maschinen181
@maschinen181 4 жыл бұрын
13:28 "the tiger is a lot more comfortable" does this mean you've also sat in the f5s cockpit?
@MilitaryAviationHistory
@MilitaryAviationHistory 4 жыл бұрын
Coming soonTM
@anttitheinternetguy3213
@anttitheinternetguy3213 4 жыл бұрын
Ahh i fucking love freedom fighter/Tiger. Waiting For MiG-21 (even though i live in jyväskylä near finnish aviation museum with multiple actual MiG-21s and enterable MiG-cockpit)
@lauriewise6271
@lauriewise6271 4 жыл бұрын
Vietnam vintage F5 were twin engined and called freedom fighter. Later F5 were single engined and called Tiger.
@Tigershark_3082
@Tigershark_3082 4 жыл бұрын
@@lauriewise6271 The Tiger II actually still maintained the twin engines. The inly evolution in the F-5's design was the F-20 Tigershark, which was originally designated as the F-5G. Honestly though, I really wish the Tigershark entered service, but it was only ever a prototype...
@terrydouglas5008
@terrydouglas5008 3 жыл бұрын
I have. While primarily a F4 WCS (Weapons Control System) specialist I was also qualified on the F105 and the F5. Mainly as an instructor for foreign students.
@warrenash5370
@warrenash5370 4 жыл бұрын
Loaded weapons on this type of aircraft, F4-E, when I was stationed at George AFB, CA in 1978. Saw the last active duty F-105 retire. The aircraft that I worked on were marked for the German training squadron, 20th AMU. Originally Blue section, later changed to Silver section. Was a member of the 35th MMS.
@alanhess9306
@alanhess9306 4 жыл бұрын
I was there in 1978 in the 562 AMU. We had 10 F-Fs that belonged to the German government along with our F-4Es.
@ivyfalls1
@ivyfalls1 3 жыл бұрын
My father was an F-4 pilot in Vietnam from 1967-68, flying out of Tan Son Nhut AFB. 210 missions. Dad said that his navigator would get sick more often than not on takeoff!!
@stevenschofield8518
@stevenschofield8518 4 жыл бұрын
nice video! i love these field trips you take us on.... i love this channel : )
@chopper7352
@chopper7352 4 жыл бұрын
The F-4 ...an awesome & iconic aircraft. Great video Biz !
@Pozer714
@Pozer714 4 жыл бұрын
My father worked on the F-4 Phantoms, and once he brought my brother and I down to check it out. First thing he said while putting me into the pilots seat was "Don't touch ANYTHING", and the first thing I did was grab the stick and press the fire button! He pulled me right out! Not sure if my brother made it in or not. I was like 8 or 9. F-4's are cool!
@keithattwood59
@keithattwood59 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the nostalgia trip! I worked the RAF F4 simulators for 10 years!
@rocketman48
@rocketman48 4 жыл бұрын
great videos and you bring it to the aircraft enthusiast.well done.
@blue2sco
@blue2sco 4 жыл бұрын
R.A.F Museum Hendon. Love that place.
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 2 жыл бұрын
Love the detail of the cockpit controls, switches, instruments, etc. Very useful when configuring buttons on my HOTAS :)
@martentrudeau6948
@martentrudeau6948 4 жыл бұрын
A lot of history attached to F-4 Phantom II, Great review.
@marksauck8481
@marksauck8481 2 жыл бұрын
While on an aircraft carrier during the Vietnam War I watched F4's ladened with huge bomb loads that defied belief how they could get airborne in such a short launch. Those F4 powerplants we're something.
@bpmuppet72
@bpmuppet72 4 жыл бұрын
What an awesome video! Expertly presented!
@johnpatterson6205
@johnpatterson6205 2 жыл бұрын
A tank with wings. I saw some return to our base in Thailand and wondered how they made it back. But they did. The F-4 was a beast.
@LooxJJ
@LooxJJ 2 жыл бұрын
If you think about it, the first flight of F-4 Phantom was back in 1950s...for more than half of the history of human powered flight, F-4 Phantom was in service in various air forces around the globe, and it is still flying today. That itself is a feat of it's own.
@ezugoobiorah5277
@ezugoobiorah5277 4 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed it learned a lot
@klausbmj
@klausbmj 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing knowledge of the aircraft, professionally explained in fantastic English. 👌
@peterlethbridge7859
@peterlethbridge7859 4 жыл бұрын
I really don't know how one person can work all these instruments and fly/fight at the same time. Amazing workload.
@paceflight
@paceflight 4 жыл бұрын
Practice!
@zeeeman8744
@zeeeman8744 4 жыл бұрын
Peter Lethbridge , one person didn’t work all those instruments, the F-4 was a two seater
@mohawkdriver2504
@mohawkdriver2504 3 жыл бұрын
As an army fixed wing aviator assigned to a non flying position at a ROTC unit, I wanted to keep my flying skills honed and was fortunate to have the flight simulator facility at George AFB, Victorville, CA. Whenever there was an opening and the F4 simulator was not in use, they let me climb in and use it for as long as I wanted. It was a complete F4 cockpit with motion, sound and video. Using some basic information and a checklist, I taught myself to fly the F4. Did a bunch of IFR flights around he Southwest including approaches to LAX. It was so realistic that I’d finish up a session soaked in perspiration.
@ph11p3540
@ph11p3540 4 жыл бұрын
One of my favorite jet fighters, especially the USAF F-4Es and F-4G Wild Weasels. The story of those Wild Weasels made those pilots sound like Spanish bull fighters as they draw aggro from enemy SA-2 and later SA-3 SAM batteries. I have 7 1/48 scale models of this jet sitting in my cabinet.
@brianhendrie9466
@brianhendrie9466 2 жыл бұрын
I flew in an FGR2 but it's so nice to see GF F3 with the black 43 (F) tail. I was on 74 with the F4J and FGR2 and 43 with the F3. Great memories,
@germanspy5242
@germanspy5242 3 жыл бұрын
There's just something that's beautiful about the Phantom.
@mlugin8050
@mlugin8050 4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting as always Bismark
@DavidKing-ph8or
@DavidKing-ph8or 4 жыл бұрын
Good review of my favourite cold war aircraft. Good work Bismarck
@arttafil6792
@arttafil6792 4 жыл бұрын
I like the statement, this was the time that air to air missiles were beginning to work, Sort Of. In 1966-1968 when I flew F4’s in Vietnam they didn’t work work a shit!
@arttafil6792
@arttafil6792 4 жыл бұрын
terry waller, another problem was that the iron bombs we carried were from a previous police action in Korea. Those blunt nosed bombs caused aa lot of drag thereby limiting our effective ordinance loads. The missiles were a great contribution to the VC in providing explosives from their unused warheads since more often than not they just fell from our racks when fired.
@zeeeman8744
@zeeeman8744 4 жыл бұрын
Art Tafil, Marine, Navy, or Air Force Phantoms ?
@arttafil6792
@arttafil6792 4 жыл бұрын
Zeee Man, OK, this’ll give you an idea, there are only two branches of the military, The Marine Corps and the wannabe’s.
@arttafil6792
@arttafil6792 4 жыл бұрын
Zeee Man, I’m sorry, Marine Corps. We pretty much had what the Navy didn’t want. :) We were all Naval Aviators, or tail hookers! Like any good Marine will tell you, yes we are a department of the Navy, The Men’s Department. LOL. As for the fragile hydraulics goes, the Air Force pilots would declare an emergency with utility hydraulics failure. Usually this was on the primary side. I once told and Air Force Pilot in an officers club discussion that that was nothing because Marine Corps and Navy pilots took off that way. LOL.
@zeeeman8744
@zeeeman8744 4 жыл бұрын
Art Tafil you’ll get no argument from me on that score, Semper Fi ! p.s. by the time I was flying them they had improved both the 7’s and the 9’s. Fox 2
@Daniel.scaletta
@Daniel.scaletta 4 жыл бұрын
Love your cockpit videos
@redporschekilla
@redporschekilla 2 жыл бұрын
Have been blessed to work VERY closely with the RF4…. Priceless time in the GEAF and it’s Recce forces! But the UK version of the carrier based bird, priceless! We called them the air diesel, since they would throw a never ending smoke tail, because their prat and Whitney’s would do that w/o the suppressor cartridges!
@jcheck6
@jcheck6 Жыл бұрын
Where and what did you do when working with the RF-4?
@BenjoKazooie64
@BenjoKazooie64 4 жыл бұрын
I realize it's an Emil 109 in the background, but I would love the poetry of having an F-4 next to the F-4
@jameson1239
@jameson1239 4 жыл бұрын
Witch one the wildcat or the Corsair
@tex8564
@tex8564 4 жыл бұрын
@@jameson1239 I think he means the BF-109 F4 model
@jameson1239
@jameson1239 4 жыл бұрын
CMDR Griffon possibly
@hphp31416
@hphp31416 2 жыл бұрын
Iranian air force might have those
@nealhadley1482
@nealhadley1482 2 жыл бұрын
Once again you don't have your facts right. The F-4E nose gun had about 850 round drum. The fire rate for this was low speed 4,000 rounds per minute or high speed of 6,000 rounds per minute. The hydraulic system was actually not bad. It had 3 separate hydraulic systems in it. Utilty,PC-1 and PC-2.The utility system was the main system,PC-1 was a back up for the l/h side flight controls,ailerons and spoilers. PC-2 was the back up system for the r/h side ailerons and spoilers if something happened to the utility hydraulic system. Then it had an pneumatic system that was used if no hydraulic pressure was available for the landing gear and the leading edge flaps/slats and trailing edge flaps. This system actually had a hydraulic driven air compressor to keep the pneumatic system up to 3,000 psi. The F-4 might not have been as maneuverable as the migs,but the loss of F-4s was contributed to the bad air to air missiles and the lack of proper pilot training in air to air combat. That is what started Top Gun. And Red Flag with the Air Force.
@MCF2233
@MCF2233 4 жыл бұрын
The sidewinder is the AIM-9, not the AIM-6.
@paulzaborny6741
@paulzaborny6741 4 жыл бұрын
Ya even the Russians knew that from the one they got ahold of a dud
@bennylofgren3208
@bennylofgren3208 4 жыл бұрын
Roger Patterson VIW-6
@mostevil1082
@mostevil1082 3 жыл бұрын
I thought he was going for the Falcon missile, but that's an AIM-4. Presumably he just split the difference.
@pauldg837
@pauldg837 4 жыл бұрын
And I get confused checking the 6 display dials on my car's dashboard. I don't care what anyone says, to be a fast jet pilot you need to be a very special breed. My respects and admiration to those pilots, both past and present.
@EthanBSide
@EthanBSide 4 жыл бұрын
Pretty thorough sir. Although with ordnance, you mentioned the missile only for the F-14 the Phoenix. Thank you for these posts
@jeadie2273
@jeadie2273 4 жыл бұрын
Remember these well. I was an assistant crew chief on the F-4G model wild weasel stationed at Spangdahlem AB, Germany in 1988-90. Great plane.
@jtstonewallaggieclassof2005
@jtstonewallaggieclassof2005 4 жыл бұрын
My brother was A1C working on the AN/APQ 120, pod systems to display issues, etc. at Clark AB in the Philippines on the F-4G WW in the mid 80's (going on exercise to Korea once/year). I still remember the stories he would tell me. Like remembering seeing guy who became the new lead singer for Journey when he was just a kid and was performing at the bars around Clark all of the AF guys would go to. How terrible and cold Korea was, etc.
@brianpetersen3429
@brianpetersen3429 4 жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation of the cockpit.
@Anonymous-ux3tu
@Anonymous-ux3tu 4 жыл бұрын
If you haven't seen one in person they're MASSIVE.
@towedarray7217
@towedarray7217 3 жыл бұрын
They really are huge. The F-14 is also humongous, I couldn’t believe how big until I saw one in a museum. I’ts about the size of a small local service airliner like a CRJ-200.
@anthonykaiser974
@anthonykaiser974 3 жыл бұрын
@@towedarray7217 yeah, Tomcat, a fighter big enough to play tennis on it. F-14 jocks refer to the rear fuselage as a "tactical tennis court."
@blackielawless2791
@blackielawless2791 Жыл бұрын
The F-4 Phantom shines forever in its great and majestic history, and its brilliant achievements will be handed down to future generations as a part of the great history of the country that operated the F-4 fighter. The F-4 fighter and I commend the pilots for their hard work.
@jaybabcock9123
@jaybabcock9123 4 жыл бұрын
these in depth videos are awesome
Inside The Cockpit - Avro Vulcan B.2
24:55
Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 189 М.
F-104G Starfighter - Inside The Cockpit
27:55
Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 226 М.
Женская драка в Кызылорде
00:53
AIRAN
Рет қаралды 486 М.
Дарю Самокат Скейтеру !
00:42
Vlad Samokatchik
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
ВОДА В СОЛО
00:20
⚡️КАН АНДРЕЙ⚡️
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
The Brutal Reality of Flying the F-4 Phantom
28:13
TJ3 History
Рет қаралды 414 М.
Inside The Cockpit - Panavia Tornado
30:19
Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 397 М.
McDonnell F-4 Phantom II | Curator on the Loose!
13:04
The Museum of Flight
Рет қаралды 175 М.
Inside The Cockpit - F-5E Tiger II
22:42
Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 606 М.
ALL 14 PHANTOMS COMPARED: F-4C to F-4EJ Kai
9:17
Jaek_
Рет қаралды 78 М.
Phantom FGR2 Walk Around | w/ Paul Wright
39:17
Aircrew Interview
Рет қаралды 51 М.
Flying the USAF F-4 Phantom | Steve Ladd (Part 1 In-Person)
33:45
Aircrew Interview
Рет қаралды 169 М.
Inside the F4U-4 Corsair
20:14
Blue Paw Print
Рет қаралды 1,3 МЛН
Inside The Cockpit - Short Sunderland
48:50
Military Aviation History
Рет қаралды 373 М.
F-4 Phantom II Documentary (1987)
56:12
Mike Guardia
Рет қаралды 84 М.
Женская драка в Кызылорде
00:53
AIRAN
Рет қаралды 486 М.