Inside the Lab That Could Save the World From Climate Change (Unsolvable: Episode 2)

Рет қаралды 147,585

8 жыл бұрын

June 14 -- Most of the talk about climate change has been about reducing the emissions we’re going to make; but what about the emissions we’ve already made? Cleaning up that mess is going to be hard, expensive and controversial. But it’s also going to be necessary. On this episode of Unsolvable we meet the people who are already figuring out how we’ll do it.
Watch more from Unsolvable: • Inside the Lab That Co...
Like this video? Subscribe to Bloomberg on KZfaq: kzfaq.info?sub_...
And subscribe to Bloomberg Politics for the latest political news:
kzfaq.infoPolit...
Bloomberg is the First Word in business news, delivering breaking news & analysis, up-to-the-minute market data, features, profiles and more: www.bloomberg.com
Connect with us on...
Twitter: / business
Facebook: / bloombergbusiness
Instagram: / bloombergbusiness
Bloomberg Television brings you coverage of the biggest business stories and exclusive interviews with newsmakers, 24 hours a day: www.bloomberg.com/live
Connect with us on...
Twitter: / bloombergtv
Facebook: / bloombergtelevision
Instagram: / bloombergtv

Пікірлер: 457

@kkkk-wg6je 8 жыл бұрын

They should install it in places where there are already fans moving air. like A/C units or furnace filters or window screens

@zdenek3010 5 жыл бұрын

The best way to solve this is to put price tag on CO2 removal. Then you let CO2 emmitors pay for it and you create market with demand and supply that creates equilibrium.

@dave161256 5 жыл бұрын

The problem is thinking that capitalism can solve the problem. We have been told that this for 30 years and capitalism has failed. We need a different approach that does not try to maintian business as usual.

@dave161256 5 жыл бұрын

@@zUJ7EjVD The issue is that countries like Australia and France have introduced measures that disproportionately affect the poorest in society. Global warming is a problem caused by the accumulation of wealth and it is the wealthy that must be made to pay for it. A quote from the climate conference COP24:"if the wealthiest 10% lived like average Europeans CO2 emissions would fall by 1/3". The wealthiest 10% are responsible for more than 50% of CO2 emissions.

@MegzeeR 5 жыл бұрын

The best way to solve this is to let inventors who have invented cheap, clean energy to actually manufacture and sell their products and we can say goodbye to oil/gas. If govts were actually serious about this problem, that would be the FIRST bill on their to do list

@MegzeeR 5 жыл бұрын

@@zUJ7EjVD Boy, you hit the nail on the head here.

@MikeHarrison3266 4 жыл бұрын

Nothing wrong with C02 we actually need more of it. We need to concentrate on what is harmful in our air and water not what is a totally natural element and really very important to life on earth.

@17ephp 5 жыл бұрын

"We accidentally messed up the climate" Are you kidding me right now?? I was taught about climate change in primary school in the 90s! Some researchers knew about it in 40s. Exxon learned about it in 50s and Carl Sagan warned us about it in the 60s. But somehow it was an extreme notion for American public in 2009~ Everything was mindfull, conscious and premeditated, cuz Benjamins are more important.

@coolworx 5 жыл бұрын

It's not just the Benjamins. By the 1940's human societies had already exploded thanks to the cheap energy that coal, gas and oil provided. The Haber Bosch process was in full swing, and mechanized farms were pumping out the food stuffs, and even the third world was beginning its 'green revolution'. If we were to stop using FFs, you'd have revolt, the forests would be denuded for fuel, and the system would collapse. It's going to happen, because we can't stop without billions perishing. So we're all going to perish.

@julioalbertoreymaful5491 5 жыл бұрын

The DINOSAUR know about that TOO..., and I do not think Carl Sagan was that STUPID.

@dnickaroo3574 5 жыл бұрын

We all go together -- our Earth is dying.

@NeverSuspects 5 жыл бұрын

changing climates is a obvious deduction made by students when introduced to the scientific observations and theory in geology lessons... also in each era the 'experts warnings' were not all warning of the same kind of coming calamity.

@johnkang1202 5 жыл бұрын

Lots of companies are making grips of money going "Green". That's the way things are going. All about the Benjis :) Did they mention water vapor in your school lessons? I thought we called it global warming in the 90's. Changed the verbiage when we had a couple cold years. Climate change has been going on for a long time. Infact temperatures have been going up ever since the Ice Age. We have brief cold spells (that's where we get Stradivarius violins from), but over all it's been going up. People seem to really not like it when I gets cold though. Lots of famine and disease. Btw, the oil companies are on the front lines of alternative energy sources. Maybe they were conspiring to to destroy the Earth before, but if going "Green" is trying to save the planet, then it would seem they've changed their ways and are the major players fighting climate change. What a bunch of nice guys.

@Vidz0022 8 жыл бұрын

Way to show a couple of cooling towers for a nuclear plant that are emptying out harmless steam while speaking about co2 emissions from smokestacks like those used in coal power plants.

@hirawat 5 жыл бұрын

I thought I was the only one to notice that..😂

@jackbarbey 5 жыл бұрын

I kept thinking that too from certain videos and articles, but then I realized that certain lignite reactors in Germany, some of the most polluting, share that distinctive shape.

@kenmarriott5772 5 жыл бұрын

Yes. These are cooling towers.

@pamelahomeyer748 5 жыл бұрын

3 mile Island and Chernobyl

@Matt_10203 5 жыл бұрын

@@pamelahomeyer748 wat

@DockLightProductions 5 жыл бұрын

Listen, I wanna know who the brilliant mind is who got that shot at 5:38, along with the editor who knew to put it there, and if y'all don't give this person a raise, then I will.

@AlexandrosKAG 5 жыл бұрын

Go for it

@markoschatziathanasiou6754 5 жыл бұрын

@@AlexandrosKAG op pesame se ellhna 😃

@surfbum8166 5 жыл бұрын

All hands on deck if we are to survive

@SuperDipMonster 5 жыл бұрын

Fortunately, some people have figured out how to *make heaps of cash* for a non-existent problem.

@Pcarnevaaa 5 жыл бұрын

... non existent really?

@precisiont5188 5 жыл бұрын

A part of the answer is growing more plants, turning the deserts into green lush areas, etc. We also need to use more solar energy. Plants clean the air, convert carbon dioxide into oxygen, etc.

@tomasamaral9042 5 жыл бұрын

the title of the video should be "how to not plant trees"

@borntodoit8744 5 жыл бұрын

Video didn't say "not to plant real trees" Video advocates "plant synthetic trees" To be clear plant both green and white trees enmass.

@buzzyhead6415 5 жыл бұрын

@Adam Purkrt ok Mr scientist .....

@jackc8621 4 жыл бұрын

Trees aren't a decent solution to climate change. They absorb large volumes of carbon, then die and release most of it right back into the atmosphere as they decay.

@Talltrees84 4 жыл бұрын

No one silver bullet. If you are able to switch your electric provider to one with a renewable portfolio, purchase an electric vehicle and make sure climate change is on the agenda with your elected leaders.

@marcellobomfim5629 4 жыл бұрын

Jack C Really? That was one of the most stupid think I have ever heard from someone. Please think it over. Lol

@precisiont5188 5 жыл бұрын

We should start with turning our deserts into forests and jungles.

@danstrayer111 5 жыл бұрын

and the water for that comes from....where?

@nuber11blade 4 жыл бұрын

Nice work, I'll keep planting trees.

@joshuahansen5486 5 жыл бұрын

you guys need to make that material into a belt so that you can continuously absorb release and collect the carbon dioxide

@notbuyingit9520 5 жыл бұрын

A belt with a booster pack on the back side.... to capture farts.

@aniross5549 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you so much Bloomberg for these informative educational newscasts. You are appreciated.

@nodoxonil7236 5 жыл бұрын

Put that filter on cars and industrial exhaust.

@antoniobortoni 8 жыл бұрын

Pollution also gets sick and kills lots of people, another reason why to promote renewable energy.

@str8cndian 5 жыл бұрын

Antonio< Antonio! Please,, spare us the Bullsht! If u wanna die and get sick, just wait until these nutjobs block your sun out! You'll see sick when your body runs outta Vitamin D and u cannot fight Cancer anymore.. This is Genocide my Friend,, and white people are on the hit list!

@Matt_10203 5 жыл бұрын

@Angel Guerra don't even engage with the crazies. No point just ignore them, they aren't bound by logic.

@bigsmall246 5 жыл бұрын

@@str8cndian nobody said they were gonna block the sun out 100%. Probably 50% at most. Do you seriously think some man-made dust in the sky can block out the sun and turn day to night? Simpleton.

@bigsmall246 5 жыл бұрын

@@Matt_10203 it's possible they're just stupid. Though I guess stupid people and crazy people basically behave the same way.

@jayyyzeee6409 5 жыл бұрын

Pretending that geoengineering hasn't been done in the U.S. is insulting. We know they've been doing these experiments and risking human health for decades.

@HuFlungDung2 5 жыл бұрын

So this is one of those make work projects sponsored by climate alarmism? Why would anyone in their right mind want to build something that has to be tediously maintained, when natural plants will do this job in a completely automated fashion? Plus, plants get better at extracting CO2 (and waste less water) when there is more CO2 present. If that is not a negative feedback pressure, then I don't know what is.

@Barskor1 5 жыл бұрын

Indeed algae farms can deal with this and give us new products to use a net win in production not a net loss or zero sum game like these jokers want.

@GrantSR 5 жыл бұрын

Y'all need to improve your sourcing for your B-roll footage. You showed a shot of a field that had merely been harvested (with unharvested, healthy green crops in the background) while talking about drought. You showed cooling towers when talking about air pollution merely because the cooling towers had lots of water vapor riding out of them. So that looks like pollution but any astute observer knows it isn't. There are plenty of examples of real drought and real pollution coming out of smokestacks. Why did you not show those?

@krjourneyfan78 5 жыл бұрын

Grant Robertson Because this video is pure propaganda....

@MrJhuang999 7 жыл бұрын

spin that material in building materials and onto roof tops

@jakob497 5 жыл бұрын

How many 1000 trees could be planted for the cost of one of these machine?

@dave161256 5 жыл бұрын

Trees also provide habitas that can help to prevent the loss of biodiversity.

@paavoallasjarvi3805 5 жыл бұрын

In Finland those who cut down forests plant new ones about 150 million a year. The forests grow about 110 million cubic meters of wood every year. That is a lot of CO2 taken out of air and oxygen released. Any amount of those expensive machines will be only a drop in ocean in comparison. You are on the right track Jakob, planting trees will give the most bang for the buck.

@dave161256 5 жыл бұрын

@@paavoallasjarvi3805 This is what more countries (like the UK) also need to do. China has planted a huge forest to stop the spread of the desert. There is some similar activities in the middle east and in Africa but we need much more.

@thecrazyandthewild 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

@saddimohamed 4 жыл бұрын

This team should have the Nobel reward

@Noahkk12 8 жыл бұрын

So can this process or material make coal clean? I'd really like some feedback on this. Thanks,

@Barskor1 5 жыл бұрын

maybe but bubbling the coal pant emissions through a algae farm sure does work and it makes many other valuable products instead of costing you money.

@bigsmall246 5 жыл бұрын

No it won't. Coal will always be dirty.

@scotty562 8 жыл бұрын

Nu ke plants don't produce co2 emissions..

@Barskor1 5 жыл бұрын

Condensed that it is pure water for the "Water Crisis" problem they want everyone to pay stupid amounts of money to fix.

@Barskor1 5 жыл бұрын

@Joel A Thorium nuclear power does not it burns it up and what is left just gets added to the next batch it can even destroy current stock piles of nuclear waste and at present consumption of electrical power there is 40,000 years worth of that to burn through.

@Barskor1 5 жыл бұрын

@Joel A Because the EPA are run by enviroNazis who want Solar Wind and Hydro power and nothing else and the Department of Energy is a gatekeeper for the status quo.

@safir2241 5 жыл бұрын

Barskor1 The Head of the EPA is a coal lobbyist. He owns a company that used to do things against coal, and now is doing as little as it can.

@Barskor1 5 жыл бұрын

@@safir2241 Ah regulatory capture! This is just more proof of why governments suck at managing anything.

@DrRonontheInternet 8 жыл бұрын

In general I don't suggest band-aid solutions. But in the case of our environmental mess, there is such volume of symptoms that it makes sense to alleviate these first.

@bigsmall246 5 жыл бұрын

If the band-aid solution turns out to be more profitable, people will go for it

@bigsmall246 5 жыл бұрын

Or rather, politicians will go for it

@christopherbuilder5354 5 жыл бұрын

Any updates to this story? Are these devices being deployed already?

@ericfernandes3966 4 жыл бұрын

What we should do is , before making those big plants you were talking about. You should put these in vehicle exhausts ,industrial exhausts , aeroplane exhausts. Cut The tap , then everything else will be easier

@dave161256 5 жыл бұрын

Using trees to remove CO2 from the atmosphere is still the better idea because the forrests that we need to plant canhelp to prevent the reduction in biodiversity and can help with the health of soil which can also remove CO2 from the atmosphere.

@marcobroca4020 5 жыл бұрын

name of the music in minute 8:22 ?

@mikestevens8012 5 жыл бұрын

Forget weather , move underground. , Moist is grande! Dank dark an centipede- y

@turdbomitch9007 5 жыл бұрын

The official US position is ignorance. Love it haha

@jean-pierredevent970 5 жыл бұрын

What I don't like much is that it releases C02 when exposed to water. The water must no doubt be very pure. Then the material needs to dry which asks energy. Perhaps exposure to steam made with concentrated solar works also I hope because this requires less water and even sea water could be used and the condensed water vapor could be useful.

@ChrisMorton 5 жыл бұрын

Is the material calcium hydroxide?

@thruthewormhole 8 жыл бұрын

We will adapt Resistance is futile

@TheBalhamboy 5 жыл бұрын

1mn shipping containers or 1bn smaller units? Are there plans to make these on a small scale for individuals, then each home could have their own CO2 extractor (at least those that want one). Perhaps open source the tech?

@turdbomitch9007 5 жыл бұрын

Could these be washed out in the rain?

@zeitgeist5134 5 жыл бұрын

I'd like to know the carbon footprint of building and maintaining the CO2 absorption machine (as opposed to planting a tree, shall we say). I would also like to know more about the resin coating the paper. I would also like to know why there isn't a worldwide campaign to plant more trees in every possible location available. (Note to self: Come springtime, plant trees wherever you can.)

@ytSuns26 4 жыл бұрын

Reverse osmosis membranes are spiral wound. Maximizing surface area in small foot prints.

@jordanharris3553 5 жыл бұрын

We just got record-breaking snowfall this year over in Washington state, now how does this make sense?

@theodorh.8687 5 жыл бұрын

Jordan Harris climate change does necessarily mean the that the earth will only heat up its also cause for more dramatic weather conditions like more snowfall or for example the hurricanes which have been picking up over the Gulf of Mexico. There are also many other things which come along with climate change.

@gaslitworldf.melissab2897 5 жыл бұрын

The "change" is climate includes radical weather, so not just heat, but storms, untimely weather - all effecting different weather systems. Note: We no longer call it global warming.

@trygveevensen171 5 жыл бұрын

I'm voting for you guys, I doubt you'll ever find a solution but if you do *it'll litteraly mean the world to me*

@juanfo7307 5 жыл бұрын

Climate change deniers are the same ones that oppose banning single use plastics. Down here it is currently 40*C hot af

@juanfo7307 5 жыл бұрын

@tractor choking the ocean with plastic is the wrong thing to do

@MichaelSHartman 5 жыл бұрын

It might be more efficient than trees, but how much carbon dioxide does it create by making it? How much does it cost compared to a handful of seeds? What can you do with it once its usefulness is over?

@jayyyzeee6409 5 жыл бұрын

They say critics worry these carbon capture technologies will weaken the will to reduce emissions. In the U.S., there is absolutely zero will when Trump wants to revive the coal industry. The fact that things have gotten as bad as they have is absolute madness.

@BustAbeam 5 жыл бұрын

Check Carbon Engineering (a Canadian company, aye), their factory makes fuel from CO2 captured from air. 2 birds, one stone

@jaanli6626 5 жыл бұрын

the great resource might be groundbreaking ....................

@bluettr250 4 жыл бұрын

"we need to fix climate change". Works in giant building that took carbon to build and probably heat/cool.

@originate2464 5 жыл бұрын

About reducing warming: Could warming be reduced with high roofs blocking some heat with solar panels arranged in a checkerboard like pattern let enough light and water through while at the same time generating electricity? Or what if a similar arrangement were orbiting the planet in space? It could block some of the heat while still letting enough light through for the things we need. It also could be arranged in such a way that the shading panels could rotate to let more or less light through. Maybe the electricity could be stored in batteries and sent back to Earth, or some wireless transmission like Tesla suggested is possible?

@nocensorship8092 5 жыл бұрын

Dumb idea since you'd burn a gazillion tons of rocket fuel to get this done and then all you Need is a little bit of space debris to destroy all the panels creating even more debris making it even more impossible. Much better idea: put methane filters on cows butts.

@originate2464 5 жыл бұрын

@@nocensorship8092 raise cows inside. Methane collection in roof like ventilation system, but carrying methane to vessel instead of exhausting it

@originate2464 5 жыл бұрын

@@nocensorship8092 could parts be launched magnetically by rail guns? Is the launching of the parts what you feel would take too much fuel?

@ndenman420 4 жыл бұрын

Put those filters on those goofy looking solar powered airplanes (with the big wings). Especially, if there was a a way to clean and dry them without landing the solar planes. Fly them at the altitute where CO2 chills out.

@cfmpam498230 5 жыл бұрын

Awesome approach ! If we were to mandate vapor carbirators on all vehicles would cut emissions from cars by 98% which would slow the amount of carbon being released which will make this system a huge player in reducing previously emitted Co2!

@kenmarriott5772 5 жыл бұрын

The CO2 released last year or earlier has already been used by plants. CO2 like water is part of the life cycle. There isn’t a cloud of CO2 hanging over heads, as most politicians would have us believe.

@cfmpam498230 5 жыл бұрын

@@kenmarriott5772 false if that was true then the CO2 levels wouldn't be 3000 times the level in 1900

@jongelb9603 5 жыл бұрын

I'm curious to know how it preferentially captures co2--and not the other gases, equally interested to know how washing with water displaces co2. Agree that this technology isn't at all tree like. Without the light reactions of photosynthesis along with Calvin cycle enzymes, there's no carbon fixing. 100mm units sounds like a decent amount of money can be made doing something like this.

@lesliesweeney7804 5 жыл бұрын

when the Co2 laced water evaporates wouldn't it release Co2 back into the atmosphere?

@Kal-0000 5 жыл бұрын

Not unless its precipitated into carbon

@byronmasser7798 5 жыл бұрын

My support here

@precisiont5188 5 жыл бұрын

It needs to do more than just not damage the atmosphere and reflect sunlight, at some point a lot of it will fall onto the earth, go into the soil, into our lungs, our water, our food, etc. It's more complicated than just not damaging the atmosphere and reflecting light.

@cheese8912 8 жыл бұрын

just putting it out there, but what if, u then turn the c02 into oxygen and glucose u use the glucose to make a bit of energy and maybe other stuff like feeding plants or whatever I'm not scientist but yeah we could do that

@thalesnemo2841 5 жыл бұрын

PAPPIN And where would one get the energy in the physics meaning to this work you suggest?

@Barskor1 5 жыл бұрын

@@thalesnemo2841 Where? the Ocean and sunlight and algae and some iron oxide.

@Misdirecting 5 жыл бұрын

This video should show that greed is the one thing holding America back.

@sahilkaushal7199 5 жыл бұрын

So wont that diamond dust become space debris?

@rudiwinkelstein2483 5 жыл бұрын

Talks about CO2 shows chimneys that emit water vapor

@dave161256 5 жыл бұрын

Be kind. They probably did not know.

@landontakeamericaback2106 5 жыл бұрын

Nice

@jhonmacraimbanajokora8657 5 жыл бұрын

Why not use bioengineering? We make a GMO tree that could efficiently transform CO2 in to O and do nothing else. We can also try to bioengineer organisms to eat plastic and turn them to fuel.

@MrKZdemos 8 жыл бұрын

Holy shit thats fucken great

@vladimir0700 5 жыл бұрын

BTW, there used to be things, lots of them, on the planet that removed carbon from the atmosphere. They were called trees. Sadly, we’ve cut most of them down.

@fg786 5 жыл бұрын

In almost every piece about clean air or something along this line, they talk about big chimneys from factories and what do the show? A nuclear power plant releasing nothing but water vapor into the air.

@myrealtorphil 5 жыл бұрын

Wow this

@Violet._.PhoeniX 3 жыл бұрын

Please just find a way to fix this im having sleepless nights

@Catlover664 5 жыл бұрын

It's all about jobs and money. The oil industry employs 35 million people. That's right 35 million people. What are we going to to employ all those people if we go to clean and renewable energy? That's the problem. We need a workable solution. We need policy changes that reflect changing times.

@PongoXBongo 5 жыл бұрын

Wouldn't it be both safer and easier to simply deploy fleets of steamships to turn ocean water into clouds? They could be nuclear or solar (maybe sail?) powered and run for months at a time.

@manikandan_k 5 жыл бұрын

Don't you know the clouds are the biggest green house gas on this planet? Go check it out.

@PongoXBongo 5 жыл бұрын

@@manikandan_k High-level clouds reflect light much better than dark blue ocean water. It's a similar effect to when a volcanic eruption blocks out the sunlight, or like a milder version of nuclear winter.

@PepinsSpot 5 жыл бұрын

So... how much burning coal does it take to make that CO2 scrubber?

@daviddreyer5817 5 жыл бұрын

Grow Hemp because it grows faster than trees and seeds less water. Pay the people incentives to stop burning the rainforests around the world. Cut the small trees to have bigger trees go faster for wood. The problem might be done better by adapting agricultural technologies such as no till practices and wasteful grain production for cattle feed and let the cattle graze on natural foddor. It is not so much what you do but what you do not do! 🌱🌲🌳🌾☘🍀🍂🍃

@falabsi 5 жыл бұрын

The truth is no one will stop using fossils fuels until they are depleted completely or become to expensive, so please go ahead do it now, why wait till its really too late, at least balance out the harm we are doing to the atmosphere, these people are saying wait because this technology doesn’t currently generate money but consumes money to save future generations.

@kimlibera663 4 жыл бұрын

Plant a tree, set up a spice box in your kitchen window.

@freenando75 4 жыл бұрын

what about just plant trees???? trees produce polen,, polen produce water and rain.. water vapor, not co2 is the greatest heating gas.. we need biodiverse forests around equador. there.

@mrthugamer7603 4 жыл бұрын

"we accidentely messed up the climate" Are you kidding me?

@danielvenne2931 5 жыл бұрын

What is green house principle for an airborne gas that never get explained in the mainstream medias? The principle is the same as in a microwave oven. A magnetron sent a microwave signal at 2.45 gigahertz which is the resonant frequency of the water molecule contained in the food. It heats up under the incoming wave and communicate that heat to it surrounding. CO2 has two such frequencies: one next to 20 terahertz and the second next to 70 terahertz. There are satellites which bear spectrometer on board measuring out-coming rays to space and at these two frequencies the returned energy to space is less than 5% of what is available and that percentage is essentially associated to the combined effect of reflected heat upon the top of clouds and on the ice found at the poles. Adding CO2 will not result in increasing temperature as stated by this geopolitical institution called IPCC. Since this molecule of CO2 is food for vegetation. Any adding of this molecule will only benefit to them.

@Randomvideos-yr6cc 5 жыл бұрын

And private schools,factorie earns a lot of profit so they should be forced to use solar power asuch as they can.

@drmosfet 5 жыл бұрын

The real question is the CO2 it can absorb over it life time is greater than the CO2 it took to make this material, it would be great if someone could figure out a way to remove the carbon only and make a large sheet of diamond glass with the carbon.

@aarusty51 5 жыл бұрын

There is only one problem with this. The earth is not warming up. Check it out.

@randygray3291 4 жыл бұрын

Klaus looks like Carl Sagan

@bigdaverobo21 8 жыл бұрын

Its the rate of change rather than the change itself at the cause of the problem. Nature takes time to adapt so I am fully for this research to go ahead because i like polar bears. peace out!

@Randomvideos-yr6cc 5 жыл бұрын

Come why don't just countries plant trees on the side of roads, clear patches of land.

@lizzo001 5 жыл бұрын

Why is it that I knew I would see nuclear cooling towers in here. Can’t you actually find other factories pumping out huge amounts of smoke?

@kimlibera663 4 жыл бұрын

The temp is not going to go up a gazillion degrees & you are from Harvard. Consult w/ your rival down the road working on fusion.

@kamran102 5 жыл бұрын

The lunacy is going hyperbolic..

@ChunkyChest 5 жыл бұрын

the damage is BEING done.

@richardorberson4991 4 жыл бұрын

I don't understand much of the hype today about climate change. If you look at the whole picture climate change and global warming started at the end of the Ice Age it has been continually warning since

@mrthugamer7603 4 жыл бұрын

Trees are still a more efficient and holistic solution for climate change

@pamelahomeyer748 5 жыл бұрын

Plant trees in the desert. Start on the outside recreate better swamp plants where they have been destroyed

@YangSunWoo 8 жыл бұрын

What's with the downvotes?

@groovinlv 8 жыл бұрын

Probably because it's a Chemtrails commercial and climate hysteria.

@pacificbowmen7384 4 жыл бұрын

What a croc

@irvinwittmeier5208 5 жыл бұрын

Collect it sell it to greenhouse? So you are admitting it is plant food! It will take care of it self by just letting feed trees

@iketheranter9126 5 жыл бұрын

Heat is heat, steam is heat,duh. $ to be made. Go Green!!

@godlesssss 5 жыл бұрын

This is not a realistic, cost effective idea unfortunately. We would have to remove ten gigatons per year in order to reduce the levels of carbon in time to prevent disaster. Not sure how this could be achieved. What we do need is a program that can earn a profit while reducing carbon levels. LFTR reactors fit this description.

@moritzklug1858 5 жыл бұрын

This. Needs. Funding. NOW.

@leo333333able 8 жыл бұрын

Plant trees ???

@remicaron3191 8 жыл бұрын

We couldn't keep up with trees but now we'll catch up with this BS crap. Keep the hope up all the way to extinction.

@groovinlv 8 жыл бұрын

Plant Hemp.

@DgurlSunshine 8 жыл бұрын

YES!

@matthewrosso8569 5 жыл бұрын

Trees and other solutions are not mutually exclusive. We need every solution ppl can come up with. The advantage of the carbon capture example in this video is that the carbon can then be used for other purposes.

@alvinxyz7419 5 жыл бұрын

Plants release co2 too

@elchefe7701 5 жыл бұрын

What is it? An "Anti-Fake-Science" device?

@tge3069 4 жыл бұрын

Fusion reactors n A/C ain't hard & neither is food, housing, water & healthcare

@magiclee9482 5 жыл бұрын

I really don't understand 2 things: 1. Why always saving the earth? It's about securing inhabitablte conditions on this planet. 2. Why not simply massively plant trees, food forests and transform industrial agriculture to agroforestry. Please do a documentary about mind shifting in financial policies to foster these urgently needed transformations... Maybe we need another playground for people besides making money... gamification of sustainable actions of some kind...

@syedalishanzaidi1 5 жыл бұрын

The music in the background was quite unnecessary and conflicted with the ability to hear the commentary clearly. Documentaries dealing with serious topics should especially avoid adding music noise to the commentary. When are we going to understand that adding two audio files side by side create aural conflict and disturbance. I for one found this (and other innumerable documentaries I have watched) very annoying. But does anyone listen!