Inside Video Review: NWSL #8

Рет қаралды 2,043

Professional Referee Organization

16 күн бұрын

#PRO Manager of Video Review, Greg Barkey, takes a closer look at Video Review use in #NWSL in 2024.

Пікірлер: 13

@samueljiboku 11 күн бұрын

The same VAR official made the same mistake calls for this one. Insisting rather than just having the referee make the decision

@probaddie456 14 күн бұрын

1:15 This is an offence because the circumstances (opponent deliberately taking a shot) don't justify that arm position, which therefore makes her body unnaturally bigger. If the VAR (AVAR?) thinks this prevented a goal, why not recommend a red card for DOG? Would he not recommend a review if the shot had been going wide? All this to say I hope this VMO doesn't really think the trajectory of the ball has an impact on whether a foul was committed.

@josiasroach5601 14 күн бұрын

So its not DOGSO bc the keeper had a chance to make a save here. If you take the keeper out of the picture then it would be DOGSO

@johnmcgimpsey1825 14 күн бұрын

I'd call it SPA rather than DOGSO because it doesn't meet all 4 criteria for DOGSO: there's at least one additional defender between the offense and the goal in addition to the GK.

@probaddie456 14 күн бұрын

@@johnmcgimpsey1825 I agree: it's always (at worst) just SPA, and likely won't be soon with upcoming changes to the Laws. I'm just pointing out the problem with reasoning about whether or not a foul occurred using this logic, especially when your voice is being recorded with the possibility of publication. People with a bone to pick might latch on to this, or refer back to it when a decision doesn't go their way.

@damage113 13 күн бұрын

How did the VAR ref confidently proclaim that the ball did not come off her foot when it is clear? That's the problem, even when confronted with the clear view they tried to justify their original claim of hb.

@DukeTrout 7 күн бұрын

It doesn’t matter. Deflections no longer negate handling.

@alysiamaguellal5836 13 күн бұрын

He even said it hit her foot first but reviewer tells him no.....

@DukeTrout 7 күн бұрын

So? That doesn’t negate handling.

@josiasroach5601 14 күн бұрын

The last one hits her foot first this shouldnt be a penalty

@probaddie456 14 күн бұрын

And PRO agrees with you, though it's important to note that it hits the arm while outbound, which makes the difference.

@DukeTrout 14 күн бұрын

@@probaddie456Agreed. @josiasroaach5601 Deflections are no longer automatically no handling. This isn’t handling because, as @probaddie456 says, the ball was going away from the goal or any attacking players.