dude you could have at least bought a bit more than 5k likes I mean pete bought 4k likes and now you bought 5k to pass him thats kinda sad... its pretty obvious you guys just bought the likes from somewhere or botting...

How come you have 9600 likes and no replies?

Amazing idea 💡

Just an cheater doing that for the 3d printer also is it worth to cheat for an 3d printer? Instead of buying likes cant you just buy a printer for yourself?

Built

I like how there's no replies, everybody's just in agreement 😂

@@lewismassie Yeah ! Who else could @integza do a collab with?

Do a Rotor Riot collab! Perhaps Joshua Bardwell? Rocket Boost system would be so cool on a freestyle quad.

i also think BPS Space would be great, as he already experimented with throtteling solid motors

Integza inspired propuls-ion is truly interesting thing to colab with other rocket building KZfaqr

@@josephmercel1146 That doesn't sound like C4. You need a blasting cap to ignite C4, otherwise it does nothing else.

@@josephmercel1146 There is no such thing as a blastic cap. You are obviously not ex military if you don't know that. Because I had family in the miliary, like one who flew a EC-121.

@Sam3460 I guess that's why the recovery team are in hazmat suits when there's an accident

Oooh like the Turbonique? They had a drag axle that gave you 1000 HP or so instantly at the axle.

Very dangerous, if it spills on you, assuming you survive that, you get cancer too.

So you’re saying extreme fuel was real and not some random thing that a lot of racing movies have for some reason

@@Bubble_Nugget Extreme is an understatement, even old school astronauts (people that went from flying fighter jets to strapping themselves to a modified ICBM) used extreme caution with the stuff. If memory serves it was only used for emergency escape or landing systems and only because they didn't have something else that was compact and reliable enough (better to deal with toxic chemicals than have astronauts or possibly others die because the landing and/or maneuvering thrusters failed). SpaceX went to extreme measures to create compact liquid rocket engines that could be quickly and reliably ignited so they could avoid using hydrazine or similar propellants on their Dragon capsules.

They stayed a whole week? Wow!

Nice a comment from the people in the video

@@nightmareinaction629 I was looking too lol

I had never heard of this before seeing this video. A lot more people need to know about you and your company, and your breakthroughs! I really hope you get the contracts and backing you need to take this to orbit, literally! I look forward to learning more.

Thank you for allowing one of my all time favorite channels the opportunity to visit . You really enlightened many of us in an area we have little to no knowledge about. I wish there were many more companies like yours . I hope this coming year brings even bigger breakthroughs and successes.

How can rockets use ESP for efficient flight when the batteries will add a lot more weight?

@@defeatSpace well if you're talking about a space ship there's solar panels battery won't be a problem in terms of weight. But what i wonder if it'll be more efficient than a normal jet engine or rocket engine it might be better used for the tomahawk to increase its effective range.

Nitromethane is a better propellant than hydrazine. And safe. Why not just use that.

@@defeatSpace I don't think it needs a huge amount of power. Maybe a small battery is enough to get it started.. could even just put a tiny fan on the rocket that generates the power from the motion through the air and stores it in a supercapacitor.. If done right I think the controller & PCB could be more of a weight concern 🤣

Can I contact you I have experiences with fuel

Until the craft gets hit by lightening.

​@@user-sp4gy7ko5lin space ? Lightning?

I still miss the 'stache though, but I can see how it might be a fire hazard. 😆

@@paulmurgatroyd6372 And his fake ads from the beginning. And tomato lord.

@@paulmurgatroyd6372 YES IT MIGHT!! LOL!! 🤣

And dude still have all fingers.

Yes!!

And a cooling system

@@victorcurie-ismard3135 well they are passive air cooled hehe

I mean your idea is totally awesome. I just wanted it finally.

oh that would be interesting

Yeah.. It would be awesome to be able to give away $200+ every video lol

@@trumpatier it’s possible

@@vicariouswitness yeah, if you actually make a good bit of money on KZfaq. I make $0

@@trumpatier I was thinking investing other funds into giveaways to drive YT vids to the point… but I haven’t done the numbers … depends on ‘type of content… I think make-up” vids pay out more than “how to” vids… so ya edit maybe not 200 dollars but 200 perceived dollars/or value. Anyway zzz

@@vicariouswitness ahh. Yeah the bad thing about doing that is you attract viewers that are only there for free stuff. The second you stop giving out free stuff, they're gone. And they don't carry genuine interest in your content, so they tend to just skip through to find out how to get the free stuff.

Thats a cool idea

maybe making a working tornado model using smoke or gas would be also a cool idea to see it visually

Indeed

A tesla coil isn't a power source, it uses a lot of power in order to make an electrical field.

you deserve the printer

Or caseless ammunition in general

Have you seen steering thruster arrays on military rockets ? That's the business .

It might be used in terrestrial rockets, like air-air missiles. Not for space.

The really fun ones are the ones that go from entirely insensitive precursors to a chemical that will explode if you breathe on it. Which is an alarming number of chemicals tbh.

Hydroxylamonium nitrate or HAN is easy to make from hexamine (Camping fuel Tablets), HCl , dilute nitric acid etc.

@@punishedgloyperstormtroope8098 just really slowly like the lady said so you don't blow yourself up

​@@punishedgloyperstormtroope8098 hans is easy to make but their solution may be different. Your end result may yield a completely different product than theirs.

A manufacturer can tell you exactly how to make RDX too and you could do it with no problem, but can't legally sell it to you

I like the idea of this as a propellant, but there might be an even better one, so we have started to understand frequency and how we can use it to lift objects, right now we're only lifting very small objects, but if we were to figure out how to boost that power, we could potentially create crafts of any shape or size that could fly by using frequency generator technology. It sounds science fiction, but we already have something like this that exists now, currently they're using it to piece together building items without touching them using frequency, but I believe that if these frequency generators we're all within a craft pointed in all directions, and focused on each other that we could create liftoff without the need of any other propellant, it's completely without sound to the human ear, the frequencies just too high for us to hear, but we could use it to propel any of our vehicles if the generators are put in the right spots and properly programmed and focused on each other. Anyway, I believe using frequency focused could actually take us much further in space than any other propellant that we've ever used and far faster using far less power in order to achieve on that return.

I agree

@@user-tp5yb4hr4w I think what you're referring to is a type of sound wave engine. The term frequency is a measure of oscillation (back and forth movements) which could refer to sound/air, electrical current, or what most people think of when the term is mentioned electromagnetic frequencies (which includes low earth EM, radio, infrared, visible light, ultra violet A B and C, X-Rays, and Gamma Rays). The general idea of a sound wave engine has been around for quite a while and there is some merit to them but there's also a lot of factors that make them less practical. Sound waves don't travel in a vacuum, they are made up of a fluid (typically air) that's being moved in a particular way. Sound waves could potentially be used to move in heavy atmospheres like some planets have and/or be used to control a fuel but they can't just push a ship along without some sort of fluid to push against.

@@grn1 well a wave is pushing the frequency wave correct? so if it's only pushing the wave that it's emmiting, wouldn't that propell objects, and if there were several of them for all directions for a craft, it could push that object right? i have already seen a few videos on this subject, now my terminology is probably off, the applications i have seen are very small scale, but i believe so long as it has a powerfull enough energy source to push out constant vibration or sound waves that is tuned to a frequency that will create lift off, i also believe there would have to be many of these sound emitters in various directions likely needing to be controled through an computer algorithm with machine learning capabilitys to gain the proper method of what will lift the object the best way possible. there is a quote that Nikola Tesla once stated about sound vibration and frequency in this way, but he was also referring to his coil tech extract electricity from the air when this other device was fully connected, at the time he didn't have the tech to use vibration so he couldn't build this craft with the tech of his time, but he had this theory that this is how it would have worked having all the parts and tech at his disposal. but his rival pretty much shut down any hope he ever got of getting anything off the ground because he would have needed the funding to make his ideas to become a reality, it's too bad he wasn't that good of a business man, i know he wanted to help people and provide free electricity to the world and pretty much made his tech at cost only and never wanted more.

@@user-tp5yb4hr4w The sound wave itself is kinetic energy moving or more accurately transferring through air or some other fluid as it moves away from the actuator/source. The actuator pushes against the atoms of the fluid which sends them flying into other atoms and when they collide they transfer some energy into those atoms and so on and so forth. The sound wave needs a medium to move through unlike electromagnetic waves which are made up of photons and can fly freely through a vacuum. Technically photons have some kinetic energy as well but because of their low (practically non-existent) mass they can't exert much force. In space there is almost no fluid, there's technically some (mostly hydrogen/single protons) but nowhere near enough for sound waves to travel, basically there's nothing for the actuator to push against in space. Sound waves could propel a craft in atmosphere or possibly underwater (might actually work better underwater) but not in space. Normally when you hit air it doesn't have much back force, the force that pushes the vessel away from the atoms it's hitting like someone pushing off against a wall. If you hit the air hard and fast enough though it can act more like a solid wall creating much stronger back forces. Sounds waves may also be able to create cavitation bubbles in water or a similar effect in air to reduce drag though that issue doesn't exist in space. The most promising propulsion technologies for space are nuclear engines and rotating detonation engines (RDEs) which can throw fuel out (creating a back force/propulsion) at faster than sound speeds (much faster than an actuator, which is needed for a sound wave engine, can work). The most likely candidate right now is an RDE, there's been a lot of progress on them but they actually suffer from their success, they are so powerful that they can't be contained for long. If we can overcome the issues of containment they could potentially become more powerful and possibly easier to build rocket engines. Nuclear engines require nuclear reactors (ideally a fusion reactor but fission could also work) which are very problematic due in large part to red tape but also because of the safety concerns with trying to build a reactor in space or send one up from Earth but that may be even harder due to size and weight. To be clear the type of nuclear system needed for a nuclear engine is a completely different beast than the tiny nuclear batteries we've used in the past (which also suffer heavily from red tape and supply issues).

Might be interesting for unusual maneuvers, but it's probably better to have control surfaces running on servos for safe flight overall. Perhaps as a control scheme for some sort of missile that makes more sense. Something like the Sprint.

Look too much theoretic stufs there. I prefer JPL. where can test it and finde aplication and not just test under microscope and theorize it.

Howdy from Alberta!

Alberta fucking sucks, wish you the best though :)

one of us !, one of us !, one of us !

ooh that’s a great idea! i really hope he makes this into an actual video, think about all the tomatoes we could neutralize if we controlled the waters

Future congrats on your 3d 😊

I took one look at the flow reactor they flashed on screen and immediately saw how I can make it out of two plates and a CNC router... Flow the two together over a large surface area so you could pull the heat out of the reaction and then you just thermally regulate the other side of the plates. I would probably use a secondary fluid on the other side of the plates and then regulate the temperature of that fluid That way you just have to pump something through the plates and if something goes wrong you still have fluid there to help control thermals. Sounds like a fun project to me

Ik heb je berichtje geliket. Wie weet win je een 3D printer :-)

Probably easy of supply and "no unknown factors". As they can get a well know LiPo while a aluminium fuel cell... I do now know were you would get one, or even how safe or viable for space travel is. So they would have to make one and make it viable.

Also the amount of energy it takes to make aluminium

I think it would be worth a try since aluminum-air batteries have been used for powering missile guidance computers for decades.

aluminum instead of lithium?

@@JWQweqOPDH Yes I do think they would be worth a try but I don't think they are ideal.

@Integza is this real?

Bro, is there a thing like thermal expansion of rate of reaction ?? Thermal expansion occurs in metals and every element has its coefficient of thermal expansion. And yeah, nozzles won't change any materials thermal expansion.

@@imrealrageI think they wanted to talk about the volume of exhaust gas generated by a mass unit of propellant.

@@mixer0014 That would have made sense mate!

Nice one dude u got a 3d printer with a smart comment. Wow.

We use aerogel all the time as firewall for race cars, I guess the conditions in rockets are even worse but the industry can justify the price more than us :D

Not to be a kill joy but don't the fuel types have that listed somewhere?

I don't know how many Integza videos you watched, but based on my experience, that plane would survive max 3, maybe 4 flights before exploding or crashing.

@@hubertnnn I watched quite a lot of Integza's videos and it would be fun to see the outcome even if it ends in a blast!

@@Eduardo_Espinoza Yeah there probably are many documentations of fuel types but trying out different rocket designs and nozzle's and strapping them to a RC plane would be very interesting.

reinventing the wheel

and compared with other solid propellants

Plasma jet engine/directed electric arcs

The link is fake. Scam

pretty sure what you're describing there is any ion drive?

@@nonchip yeah maybe, I think ion drives are a little different and more complex

@@nefariousone643 yeah i know, only a fool would fall for it

Ya unfortunately it dont have a long half life

I think a better propellant would be to use frequency, frequency if focused correctly, you could create lift of any object no matter what size or shape, and I believe that it could work in space as well, not to mention take far less propellant power in order to achieve the goal

Amen. I appreciate the growth and excitement.

Theres a spelling mistake tho its with not whith -🤓

If you develop any sort of terminally guided rocket - you will have an uncomfortable meeting with your local CIA or analog.

"once you have a rocket with movable fins" Huuuuuuuuuuuuge project there to have something that works. In addition to the hardware, you'll need some pretty powerful and hard de develop controllers to guide it well. "Some vision code" probably very hard hard to do correctly. That's not a video idea, that's a multi year project

Absolutely NOT, that is how you get terrorism charges or arms manufacturing. That will DEFINITELY have your door kicked in by the feds of some sort ASAP.

Scam^

@@adamcourtney7424 really? How so?

Made me wonder too, because even though I'm sure they got the patents on everything patentable, they are still kinda showing how they make "the thing" - so either they're lying, or they are extremely open (which is a good thing, just rare)

@@GerinoMorn It seems that real tech can shine now. There's a lot more advanced labs these days working independently, and yes, the best kind of people tolerate dogs. If someone cant get along with a dog while making jet fuel, they are untrustworthy.

@@Hclann1 there was this guy who was pretending to be joel but would ask for money if you messaged him he deleted his message i think

.

.

.

.

.

Seconding this. Double displacement reactions are highschool simple to run and looks like hydroxylammonium sulfate is cheap from ebay.

This needs to win a 3D printer, my guy! I was hoping he said he figured out the formula anyway.

@@TheZero715zero Haha, I appreciate it, but I actually already have a FDM and SLA printer. Better to give it to someone who could really use it.

This is actually really interesting, cause I was wondering how hard it was to really make HAN, of course I would assume the ratios of making GEM would be something not disclosed to Integza. Really would love to get my hands on this stuff for some cool Physical Effects stuff like they showed with the eSquib.

I love your enthusiasm and to be honest your not to far off but this is a bit more to the products and you have some wrong ingredients there, also there are better ways to may HAN that can be produced in much larger quantities and with less work and cleaner... You definitely can tell you know what your talking about though and don't let me stop you. you may find new things out by doing it different ways.

From my understanding they're fairly similar to how pulse jet engines operate, kind of and that's a big KIND OF lol. There's a channel called 2 stroke stuffing that touches on the subject a bit in some of his older videos. I know the distance of the expansion portion of the chamber and stinger from the exhaust port has a big effect on how much power the engine delivers relative to RPM, throttle, fuel input etc.. I.e. An expansion portion of the chamber closer to the exhaust outlet typically producing more low RPM torque and HP and further being better for higher RPM power. There's obviously a ton of other variables that effect performance as well, whether it has a reed-less piston-port design, crankcase reeds, or intake port reeds. If it has an exhaust valve which can have different designs being mechanically and/or electrically actuated effectively changing the duration and flow of expelled and resonant exhaust gases . The Intake, exhaust, transfer port timing, and squish band (portion of the upstroke where the air/fuel mixture is compressed partially dictating the static and dynamic compression ratios) ignition timing, fuel type & mixture all have a pretty significant effects on everything also. There's really a lot to unpack on the subject of 2 stroke engine operation and it's all somewhat subjective to the type of two stroke engine and relative variables in play. I'm just a lowly-laymen motorcycle mechanic though so I can't speak as to how exactly the primary/secondary forces, harmonics, and resonant exhaust pulses work as thoroughly as Integza might be able to but hope this helps a little. 😂🤙

@@WreckedRevival Thanks, I have a very loose understanding of the science behind it. A friend of mine can actually design intakes and exhausts, I don't understand that. I just thought it would be a beneficial video so people have a better understanding of how ICE's operate.

@@sporeut that’s awesome, would be cool to be able to fabricate stuff like that. I definitely agree though, more people having a basic understanding of the fundamentals of engine operation would definitely be beneficial!

Thank you !!!

​@@integzait seems i can not post my own comment. But anyway i'd like to have a 3D printer. Cheers from Italy

They don’t care much if someone duplicates it, it is under a patent.

Mr. G.C. , If you want to explore new kinds of rocket-fuels , investigate FROZEN hypergolics . The optimum combination for deep-space use is hydrazinediium with hydrogen-pentoxide as oxidizer . There are a variety of possible mechanical architectures for this , but they all should yield ISPs above 500sec.

The reason SpaceX wouldn't use such a fuel is because the rockets going to Mars need to be refueled on Mars and it is a lot easier to make methane and O2 than this stuff.

This channel is one of those that when a new video arrives , I must watch . Joel is a mad scientist teacher .

As Filonin2 said, SpaceX needed a fuel that could be manufactured on-site (methane), with Mars in mind (but has the added benefit of theoretically becoming greenhouse neutral here - or as close as possible to. Super important considering the number they hope to be launching. Rockets are "dirty", but there's not a significant number launched right now - jet's output dwarfs that of rockets right now) They currently use RP1 ("rocket fuel", specially refined kerosene basically, aka "jet fuel") for their Falcon 9 rockets, but that burns a bit too sooty so isn't viable for "rapid reuse" that they're hoping for with Starship. Hydrogen is also out of the question for reusability (I can't remember the specific reason atm, probably volume - which is it's normal fault) I'm not sure you can actually "do" anything fun with graphene. It's an incredibly weak material to work with (like a spiderweb), it's best use is as a coating for other substances (which is hard enough in a lab) to strengthen and improve their performance afaik

Gem has an extremely high ISP (specific impulse), but it needs to be noted that it also burns pretty hot... just something to keep in mind.

This link is fake. Scam

I could be wrong but I feel like I remember seeing him try that a few years ago

he did a video on it - its just ASA filamentent used for a hybrid engine

I'd imagine you could 3dp the hipep they mention in the vid, considering it's made with pva and that's a commonly used plastic for 3dp supports, it's also mixed from two liquids and then cast so if you couldn't use an fdm printer you might be able to use one of those syringe types. Not sure what the advantage to doing this might be however.

You could 3d print rocket candy or apcp propellant.