Manuel DeLanda - The Philosophy of Gilles Deleuze

  Рет қаралды 14,251

Intellectual Deep Web

Intellectual Deep Web

4 жыл бұрын

Пікірлер: 22
@johannesbongers
@johannesbongers 10 ай бұрын
Thank you for so much beauty!
@cthulhu7397
@cthulhu7397 2 жыл бұрын
Amazing
@AB-gw6uf
@AB-gw6uf 2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful
@brynicecream5824
@brynicecream5824 2 ай бұрын
@OjoRojo40
@OjoRojo40 4 жыл бұрын
One of the greatest leftist of the last century. Guattari too by the way, thanks for the video!
@alexistinsleypope9327
@alexistinsleypope9327 3 жыл бұрын
Leftist ??? Sounds rather pejorative - Deuleuze was a brilliant and innovative thinker.
@OjoRojo40
@OjoRojo40 3 жыл бұрын
@@alexistinsleypope9327 Pejorative?? Quite the opposite. Have a good day!
@singleoneonly
@singleoneonly 2 жыл бұрын
@@alexistinsleypope9327 He called himself a leftist repeatedly, especially when referring to his marxist framework.
@o.s.h.4613
@o.s.h.4613 2 жыл бұрын
@@singleoneonly It would be difficult to extend what he meant by leftist back then to what is leftist today-even as a “leftist” myself, Deleuze is not any more a Marxist alone than he is a Freudian critiquing Marx. What Deleuze said about himself isn’t exactly what’s important-what we should look at is his thought. Deleuze often takes and reappropriates terms, especially in his characterization of himself as a “proud metaphysician.” He’s not using it in the sense endemic to the times of Kant, but rather to Heidegger, but not in disagreement with him either. We can do much better, as philosophers, than associating an ontologist with his strict political ideology, and then fleeing the scene with a somewhat pedantic “Have a good day!”
@singleoneonly
@singleoneonly 2 жыл бұрын
@@o.s.h.4613 Are you trying to insist that this label couldn’t describe deleuze himself? His reappropriating of various terms obviously causes him to become especially idiosyncratic, but insisting that it somehow forces him out of his marxist credentials seems incredibly silly. My argument doesn’t rest with his labeling of himself but his project, which is undeniably leftist/anti capitalist/communist/marxist, etc.
@keshavnandhan1234
@keshavnandhan1234 4 ай бұрын
definetly one of the most decent lecture of deleuze ive heard on youtube. most say some vile stuff. a quick protip: one should listen and read deleuze directly or if u are like me translated and then get on these lectures.
@giordanobruno9601
@giordanobruno9601 3 жыл бұрын
DeLanda looks a bit like a lobster here.
@sounaksen507
@sounaksen507 2 жыл бұрын
Xd
@Cuervodelpantano
@Cuervodelpantano 2 жыл бұрын
One day, after a conference here in Latin America, many people were discussing this. They said that De Landa was not human, but that he was a lobster. I think we are discovering something big
@henkaipan8
@henkaipan8 Жыл бұрын
35:00
@ecstaticthunders8487
@ecstaticthunders8487 4 жыл бұрын
I have to disagree with the idea that the creationist account is at odds with a process-oriented one which includes morphogenesis as a generative principle. God has been described as a lure for feeling and appetition, or as the goal of the movement from essence and potentiality to actuality, or even as the source of all creativity. In all these descriptions He is an active creator, not a passive one. He, in fact, supplies the reason and subjective aim of all creatures - that is union with Himself. Creation in the Christian worldview also extends beyond Genesis. The universe is still becoming. Christ's life, death and resurrection weren't afterthoughts, but were built into God's creative plan. The image of Christ on the cross drawing all men towards him represents the attractive power of God (John 12:32). Prior to Christ, the Law was required to act as both symbol of the order of things, and to guide man's becomings. It was an object for meditation (Joshua 1:8). It prefigured the Messiah, who as the logos acts as the goal of all creation and images all order and rationality in the universe (Heraclitus understood this. His Logos was not static but active). Christ is the law made flesh(Matthew 5:17 + John 1) The Psalmist writes about creation praising God (Psalm 19), and St Paul writes about creation yearning for the revelation of the sons of God (Romans 8:19). There is motion here, there has been a process of change, bringing creation to some deeper 'conception' of the goal and end of all things. It might be said that creation praised God purely through the expression of identity, but Christ's incarnation brought in an entirely new metaphysical order in which nature now responds to the decaying human condition. Creation now yearns for the great restoration. It is stirred by the revelation that our identity is still becoming and being perfected. And yes, this does make us the focal point of things, but our redemption is equivalent to the redemption of all creation since it was our fall which set things awry in the first place. This is an integral vision of all things participating in the Divine. Desire for sanctification and redemption drives the engine of all creation. This places all creation in direct relation to God, not with 'life' as an animate principle. (Consider also that the atoms that comprise your body exist in this mode) As humans, we can now read a Song of Songs irradiated by the light of Christ, who entered into His own creation (the bridegroom) and is now enthroned in Heaven in the flesh. There is humanity in the trinity. God's plan was, from the start, to be embodied within creation. It might be said that having tasted this, and experienced Christ in the flesh, that all creation now groans for Christ's return. The reality of creation is far richer and deeper than many people (including we Christians) understand. I hope that I've made that a little clearer. One might say that God is allowing all things the liberty to self-create, lured onwards by Him. The end is the freely chosen union of all things in God.
@matthewjohnstone4412
@matthewjohnstone4412 3 жыл бұрын
"A dead god and Sodomy are the thresholds of the new metaphysical ellipse" - Foucault.
Manuel DeLanda. Assemblage Theory, Society, and Deleuze. 2011
1:27:34
European Graduate School Video Lectures
Рет қаралды 69 М.
Deleuze for the Desperate #9: smooth space
40:32
Dave Harris
Рет қаралды 11 М.
Did you believe it was real? #tiktok
00:25
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 52 МЛН
THE POLICE TAKES ME! feat @PANDAGIRLOFFICIAL #shorts
00:31
PANDA BOI
Рет қаралды 24 МЛН
Жайдарман | Туған күн 2024 | Алматы
2:22:55
Jaidarman OFFICIAL / JCI
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
I CAN’T BELIEVE I LOST 😱
00:46
Topper Guild
Рет қаралды 107 МЛН
Manuel DeLanda - The Origins of Artificial Intelligence
1:02:38
Intellectual Deep Web
Рет қаралды 6 М.
A Deleuzian Biography with Frida Beckman
45:43
Hermitix Podcast
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
What Deterritorialization ACTUALLY Means | Deleuze and Guattari Concept In Focus
31:02
Gilles Deleuze: The Philosopher of Immanence and Difference
24:32
Deleuze - Control Societies & Cybernetic Posthumanism
18:18
PlasticPills
Рет қаралды 151 М.
James Hillman - Myth and the World Around Us
25:45
Intellectual Deep Web
Рет қаралды 20 М.
Manuel De Landa - A Thousand Years of Non-linear History
1:16:09
AA School of Architecture
Рет қаралды 24 М.
About Deleuze - Lecture 1 and 2_1
3:04:11
DISPUK
Рет қаралды 103 М.
Manuel DeLanda. Assemblage Theory and Social Institutions. 2011
1:22:53
European Graduate School Video Lectures
Рет қаралды 12 М.
Did you believe it was real? #tiktok
00:25
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 52 МЛН