They did Tanks for like's ❤🫂✨

No respectable director would touch it with a ten foot pole. You’d have better luck trying to show a visual representation of a black hole on film. No director is that foolish. Can’t be done

​​@@noBearAdventureshat the hell are you talking about?? Tomorrow is releasing the Oppenheimer movie and made by Christopher Nolan with Oscar winning actors.... Trailer link - kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7-AlcWc2LDceZs.html&feature=share8

Tomorrow it's releasiny

@@noBearAdventures imagine if someone tried to attempt both a movie on black hole and atom bomb….its like a dream within dream

24:00 There aren’t secrets about the world of nature, there are secrets about the thoughts and intentions of men. Sometimes they’re secret because a man doesn’t like to know what he’s up to if he can avoid it.

@@get11net I missed it, thanks for mentioning. Listening to him speak about the advancement people of science thought of doing with this study and reading his works in university, makes you wonder... "Will the intentions of men ever consider science for the benifit of greater good and not individual profit ?"

@@akhil.bhardwaj This thought came after watching this lecture: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qNFjiJuXusC7iH0.html 36:33 I enjoy watching his speeches… In terms of world harmony through the collaboration of science he states, “If biologists or astronomers or physicist can work together so effectively across national boundaries and countries with different cultures and different politics and different religions; even countries with great hostility. Is this not a way to bring the world together? It certainly is one of the few things we know how to do. We are doing a light of, it we should certainly do all of it to promote international collaboration of the most intimate and direct kind, but it is a very fragile and limited way to bring the world together.” - J. Robert Oppenheimer - Lecture at Colorado University 1961 …… A part of me wishes this could be the case, but I am lead to believe that such a reality requires men to have a common understanding to having in possession such a great power. To wield it without obstruction from outside entities who would wish to do harm. ( example: Iran with Nuclear enrichment but also their support of Hezbollah). Think in terms of nuclear technologies which offer many benefits but also possess capabilities that are 4,000 times more powerful than Hiroshima and Nagasaki. My belief is that the nature of man is set on the an in balance that has been greatly sped up by globalization. Through the intermingling of international affairs in the name of various causes both morale and not. The focus isn’t on morale ambition of nations, but rather that the scientific community should strive to create technologies and find secrets in physics and chemistry which would progress mankind towards a more sustainable future. I think these scientists will continue to unlock the world of nature but at a great cost to our way of life. These progressions will be used not only for health but also in seeking the destruction of each other. I suppose the balance of nature must always exist as it always has. The doctor says it best These high hopes for the relation of man himself to his knowledge and his environment have I think not, been nearly as well fulfilled and from everyone you hear that the progress in knowledge has not been matched by a progress in wisdom, by a progress in humanity, or by a progress in virtue.” [off-topic: your funny playlist 🙌🏽😭😂🤣]

@@get11net Most of the wars or I guess all of the wars that we fought/ fighting are based on this very Idea of attaining superiority over each other using Science & Technology to create either fear or an idea of fear that will raise the standards in terms of power. Every country these days focuses on mobilizing themselves with heavy weaponry (not that it's not required ) to stimulate balance and the people who create those weapons die or live in despair much like J. Oppenheimer. A man who researched about a way we could harness energy using fission/ fusion reactions to create an ultimate source of energy, never did really knew he would be subjected to make a weapon to kill the fellow humans, disregarding every principle known to mankind. That's just borderline shattering. I love weapons and how they function, small arms really do grab my interest but thinking about the fact that this is something which will one day take away a life does make me wonder, it's all just an elaborate plan to keep the world working. Terrorism, weapons, wars, Trade... everything is intertwined. [ P.s. Thanks 😂...I actually saved your playlist of great documentaries too, will watch gradually]

@@akhil.bhardwaj Your thoughts on the basis of war and the uses of weapons is spot on. To add to what you wrote I think past civilizations are examples of what we see today. In terms of gaining superiority over one another we can look at Alexander and his subjugation of the Persians and Egyptians by the use of superior tactics (like the Phalanx). Though he, Caesar, Genghis and many other war lords used their cutting edge technologies for great fame (amongst other things), the examples of the last century are more about nations and ideals rather than personal accomplishment. We can look to the Rebel Leader George Washington, the revolutionaries: Lenin, Hitler, Trotsky, Mao, Che, the Ayatollahs, and a host of great men. Great not in the sense of good or bad but rather that these men had a great impact on the world. I suppose what I mean to say is that with the growth of idealistic men nations have come to realize that power means the continuation of their -ism... communism, capitalism, militarism, feudalism.. etc. After WWII the Americans fought in Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, and the middle east to stop a certain ism (communism) and to keep their ism alive as it has helped the growth of industries and commerce. ( A great many arguments can be made about why the U.S intervenes in other's affairs...it is true that capitalism and democracy benefit mankind...but can what works in one place be applied to other cultures?) Your second paragraph is sadly the truth. The men who unlock and bend the rules of nature generally do so at a great price. I LOVE Oppenheimer because he speaks the truth in terms of humanity and the progression of science. If only our progression in the fields of science and technology where matched by our progressions in morality. Our dear Doctor was and is great to the likes of us but to those of his time he was thought as a communist or rebel. Though the man is dead, his spirit lives in all those who seek peace through the spread of knowledge in the arts of science and technology. Hmmm Oppenheimer was The director at Los Alamos and was well aware of who was funding the project and the potential uses of the project. Ive watched many a films on him but really ought to read books (maybe after my current book). He was the genius behind the fission bomb but not the fusion bomb. That goes to Stanislaw Ulam and Oppenheimer's greatest critic / colleague... Edward Teller. "it's all just an elaborate plan to keep the world working. Terrorism, weapons, wars, Trade... everything is intertwined. " Ah yes, as Chomsky says... the principle architects of society are our policy makers. Not the democratic presidents or puppets in power but rather the tycoons of industry who lobby, elect and feed the news to the masses, the strong man leaders like Xi, Putin, and Ayatollah Khamenei. These are the forces that keep our world in constant motion. Power, proxies and profit are all intertwined in a way that keep the consumers blind and the proletariat working. All the best my friend. May we be the living legacy of the one we most adore.

It's about precision towards the complexety of one own feeling.

It's called having a vocabulary. Something one usually posesses with an education.

I don’t know what it’s called I’m really fucking stupid

Laroac one’s

Laroac feelings*

@@chadvlad69 And your point is ......?

Reported that troll. Don't bring hate speech here. Not to science.

@@Krranski The point was that jews are good at nuclear science,like Einstein or Bohr.....no need to hate me...

@@chadvlad69 that is an unhealthy stereotype, at best.

@@Krranski Fart Farting is not stereotype, I think they are indeed gifted in it: Robert Oppenheimer - Father of US atomic bombs Leo scillard- discovered nuclear reactor Edward Teller- Father of US thermonuclear aka hydrogen bombs. Yulli Khaliton, from Russia, and was behind Tsar bomber. His name had to be Russian name because many Russians were anti-Semitic at the time.

The film about his career good night and good luck is wonderful too

The best in USA 🗿

agreed, Murrow was , and still today, considered the pinnacle of journalism.

he is good because he listens and doesn't interrupt and knows you can learn alot by listening that's why we got two ears and one mouth

@@ARCSTREAMSbest advice for mankind nowadays. To many people react and speak before listening to what someone says in its entirety.

He slept with someone’s wife

Goat Bab Couldn’t agree more

@Out Of Ideas So do plenty of bad people

He sleeved with his friend right there in his friend bed and got another girl pregnant

@ScepticalCynic How sleeping with someone's wife makes you a good person?

wholeheartedly agree. Being a Jew he wanted the bomb to defeat Hitler. With the fall of the Nazis Oppenheimer saw no need for the bomb. He was railroaded, scapegoated and ultimately ruined. Pickup American Prometheus, the definitive biography on this tragic figure.

@@herrdocjdm Oppenheimer was his own worst enemy by often making poor choices. While he got caught in the Red scare craze of the mid 1950's, he certainly proved his loyalty to the United States through his service as the first Director of Los Alamos Laboratory. In fact, Leslie Groves vouched for him, was a lifelong friend and attended Oppenheimer's funeral. As for the use of the bomb - Oppenheimer and other physicists were given a chance to come up with a demonstration of the bomb to convince the Japanese to surrender. The answer the group sent to the Secretary of War was that they could think of no demonstration, other than military use of the bomb. Oppenheimer knew exactly how the bomb would be used.

@@herrdocjdm Not really true. He was under tremendous pressure to stop the Project after Germany surrendered. But Oppenheimer resisted this pressure, opting for the July "Trinity" demonstration in New Mexico to convince the Japanese to surrender without having the nuke to be used against them. It is true that he was against the much bigger H bomb, for he thought that his relatively smaller bomb would deter, at least, the next world war. Edward Teller then sought to destroy his former boss. And since FatMan's implosion detonated Plutonium bomb needed to be tested, it served a two fold purpose, one being to frighten the Japanese to surrender in July.

Yes many people don't know about him

The most evil man that no one knows of.

He was just another evil man, a mere sheep for a government.

Great to hear this genius speaking. Its a great interview yes.

Literally a communist

fun fact: he was actually a man who smiled often. cillian murphy did an INCREDIBLE job portraying oppenheimer, and i have my fingers crossed for him winning that oscar, but a small (minuscule, really) gripe is that he played a much more serious version of him. in real life he had his many days of seriousness. but people knew him to be generally charming- at times fun to be around, at times too stimulating to be around, and at times both simultaneously. but i do wish murphy smiled a bit more in the film.

​@@sophiewooloo True though. I've been reading American Prometheus recently, and yes, he did smile, was charming and had fun.

Gordon freeman in the flesh.

Me too!

...is that where they got the idea for G Man?

Can you explaine this a bit more please ???

@@duckbuck1830 it's a reference to the opening of Half life 2 game

Well stated. Isn’t it refreshing? Listening to intelligence and vocabulary has become a yearning we must seek out. This gentleman seems to have so many qualities. Sad outcome.

I don't think his wife was lucky at all, considering how much he cheated on her. A Great scientist but a bad, unfaithful husband.

I was born a year and 10 months after he died. What an interesting man.

I was born in 1958 and heard my ww2 parents talk of him

I do wonder about people like you deifying a man who was directly responsible for murdering very large numbers of people, including women and children, often in a slow and agonizing way.

If he was that smart he would of said no

no, to what?

@@duckbuck1830 Intelligence is different than wisdom.

He was just a sheep.

@@hydraxc2478 - not enough people realize this.

Also Freeman Dyson.

He was a true intellectual. Never feared to go beyond the academic scope of what he specialized in.

@@Organelles Also George Kennan

First

Who is not flawed - whatever "flawed" means?

@@Scaw I included "flawed" b/c if it was just abject praise I would have been flooded with comments as others have...b/c, apparently, you can't just say something nice about him without finger-waggers chiming in to remind you that he was an adulterer or whatever else. So I said what I did to help inoculate my comment from the puritans. Apparently it was a futile attempt, since here you are to correct me about something else.

@@Silentsilo987 I didn't set out to "correct" anyone. I was genuinely interested in what constituted a flaw in a living being, human or otherwise. What is a flaw in a bear, earwig, human, or bonobo? Who has the blueprint for the perfect human, and where did they get it? A dog in a dog show could be said to have a flaw because it falls short in some particular that has been artificially devised. But someone who is physically sound of body doesn't have a flaw. Behaviour is just part of the tapestry of life, changing and evolving over time.

@@ScawPoint taken, I apologize for biting your head off, haha. I think I misunderstood you. It's just that the "but actually" people in comment sections drive me insane.

This interview was filmed after the bomb.

Woah

Why? Oppenheimer knew Einstein. He played a game of chess with Einstein and lost badly to him. The Institute of Advanced Study was created in 1930. Einstein was one of the first two people appointed to the Institute in 1932. He remained until his death in 1955. Oppenheimer was the Director for the Institute from 1947 until 1966. You're surprised Einstein and Oppenheimer had each other's phone number...?

@@buckhorncortez No of course not. They were colleagues. I wanted to try to make people think about what they would ask Einstein if they got a call from him when he was alive. It's no big deal if you're friends or coworkers with someone famous or high ranking in a field and they interact with you regularly.

It’s pretty darn cool

Mr Rogers invented the atomic bomb!!! Wtaf. Ruin my childhood why don’t you?? Next you’re gonna tell me the Easter Bunny had nothing to do with Jeebus

Why do bands always have this overly edgy and corny names. Why not get a actual good name and stop tryna for the status quo i thought that’s what rock was about.

He killed people.

reminds me of Mr. Rogers

Same. Didn't expect any comment about it here though

Same

You sought out learning after being intrigued by something fictional. I really respect and am impressed by that.

Same

same

No captions made it difficult to understand this movie, I feel it was too long.

@@rogerk2049 🤔 today me and my brother going to watch this movie

I would guess it was 1949 or 1950, before he was dragged through the mire by Joe McCarthy and his paranoid minions.

That is to say that the life taken from hundreds of thousands of human beings has no value according to your thinking. They are just mass murderers.

He didn’t discover nuclear fission and there is very unlikely any highly concentrated U-235 hanging around out in the universe. He lead a team of scientists engineering a bomb, not strictly for science. There is nothing natural about the bomb they make.

He also ended future World Wars. And no, Ukraine's war with Russia is not a World War, at least not to the scale of the previous two.

You strike me as an ERB man.

He sounds exactly like mr. Rogers on his hearing

Yeah a lot of his pronunciation and speech patterns are really similar.

I was just thinking that!

Evil Jester - Yes. I’ve said it before: they both spoke a long extinct language called standard American English.

100% so smart and pretty you are.

Did you have the same thought process as me where you saw that video of his infamous quote and felt the need to check other videos to make sure the guy was ok again at some point?

Holbrook Stark yes I literally had the same thoughts! :D

@@lina.998 nice. I'm glad we found this video, seems like there's not much footage of him which is understandable

Satan is very clever and used Mr. Oppenheimer's ego to trick him so he can forward his agenda. "Thanks" to Mr. Oppenheimer's accomplishment we're one step closer to the destruction of the human race. The future is inevitable and only those people who have a personal relationship with the Son of God, Jesus Christ, will survive. One should read the Bible, admit that he's a sinner who needs a deliverer to help him reconcile with the true God of this world. It's like in the Bob Dylan's "Gonna Serve Somebody" song. We gonna have to serve somebody. It's either God, or the Devil. Mr. Oppenheimer chose the latter. What will you choose? Be blessed!

ב''ה, if G-d had wanted us to have good lives we would have had them.

MAGA

OffTheBeatenPath Wow...

Ok boomer

There were always mad and bad journalists.

Yeah, McCarthy - the statesman. Also, scientists still have rich vocabularies, it's quite hard to express one's ideas without posessing the vocabulary to describe them...

I thought same about Mr rogers

I thought so too!

Same here! I kept thinking how much he sounds like Fred Rogers!

High IQ white countries having below replacement level birth rates for decades while getting flooded with low IQ non-white immigrants for decades. What do people expect? They wanted these circumstances.

Garrick Groover same

Same same

Garrick Groover same

same

Same

The interview as soon the nuclear bomb was public knowledge, he was Vishnu's prince. But his eyes ... sheer regret and devestation.

He wasn't destroyed by his own brainchild. He was destroyed by a corrupt, morally bankrupt and ungrateful nation that he dedicated the best years of his working life to - destruction facilitated by former friends who betrayed him. They used him, they took him for all they could get, and then they dumped him mercilessly. No trully intelligent person would want to work for such a nation after such a betrayal. An intelligent person can see what they did to Oppenheimer and they would understand the consequences of working for such a nation. As such, all this nation can attract now are the 2nd rate, bit part players, the ones who dont mind playing dirty and who just dont come up to the level of Oppenheimer. It is in the best interests of the intelligent to stay silent and out of reach to such a nation, in order to protect their own sanity. Which is exactly how you ended up with a President like Trump. America is in a race to the bottom, because it cant stand to love itself and take care of its very best interests - this is possibly because America has become something fundamentally unlovable. Instead it has developed the idea that its best interests are served by perpetual warfare, an idea pushed by the very complex that Oppenheimer's work led to the birth of. Very sad. It's a long road back to greatness. One thing is for sure, greatness is not measured by how many wars you fight, or even win. Greatness is measured in how compassionate and intelligent you can be, and whether you can find love for yourselves and others.

read American Prometheus

Same. Great book

A poor man? are you serious? He was an evil man who used science for all the wrong reasons.

Oppenheimer "I believe Nagasaki and hiroshima were far more brutal than they should have been but this is after the fact of course". Oppenheimer new the damage the threats and the benefits and that's why I dislike him and thank him at the same time. Imagine if the soviets had a monopoly on the bomb millions would have died. The world is always and may always be on a knife edge since the atom was split.

Possessing crreative and mathematical brilliance does not make someone a moral authority. The U.S. killed comparable numberrs of Japanese civilians in nights of conventional bombing in Aprril 1945; find me an Einstein quotation that indicated that he was appalled by those nights of firre bombing. Therre werre no such quotations in either biogaphy of Einstein that I have read (likewise in his personal life as recorded, I found no indication that he was an especially moral or righteous individual. Ratherr, he seemed somewhat cruel and very selfish to me.

Nukes are fake, calm down. Japan got firebombed.

​@@LeninWokeUpNo one split the atom and the soviets have done less bombing than america.

He always questioned the use of the second bomb of Nagasaki, was it necessary?

His eyes dart around the entire interview...like a smart man thinking on his feet about complete bullshit, that he knows nothing about.

Oppenheimer's life was far from simple - he made it into what it became by his own choices.

Matthew Scicluna he is indeed, he’s 96 years of age

Not any longer lol

Didn't he just die?

it isn't his quote these are the words of Hindu Lord Vishnu from Bhagavad gita

BS. He knew exactly what he was doing as the Director of Los Alamos. They were pursuing an atomic bomb. That was his job, and he pursued it enthusiastically. No one was a "victim." Just stop with the victim mentality, he was a physicist attempting to make an atomic bomb - and he and the other people did it.

@@buckhorncortez and wtf makes you think they knew what an atomic bomb was gonna do? they just knew they were making a super weapon, they didnt know it would be that disastrous

@@buckhorncortez You're misinterpreting what he said. You're forgetting that they were at war. They were paranoid the Nazi's were close to creating the atomic bomb. So they needed to create it first. So they need a scientist that has the intellect and willfull commitment to build it. And Oppenheimer was the man they needed. So of course he did it of his volition, he was a jew. Only he didn't realize the consequences of his creation. He only wanted to use it for Germany but after they surrenders he saw no use for it. He thought it was going to be a beautiful invention in physics to be used for good, but instead it was misuses as a weapon of mass destruction down the line. He realized the consequences and advocated against the use of atomic weapons for mass destruction. And he was ostracized when he didn't show support for the thermonuclear project. So he was a victim.

@@friedegg3732 Of coure they knew how disastrous it would be, they were literal nuclear physicists. They even calculated what the death tolls would be in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

What the name of the book ?

@@blueraysb6708 _American Prometheus _

Geniuses were rockstars back then, today intellectuals are by many frowned upon.

Me too

You forgot a few zeros

He kinda looks like him too.

Yes of course. Any idea of a sufficient magnitude is immediately very terrifying, regardless of the positive outcomes it could implicate, because you know that you do not fully understand its consequences, and you know that it is possible, and maybe someone has already thought of it and they began working on it.

@@ZenovarseAs well as the understanding of the needed emotional dedication and hard mental work that it will and must take to manifest those thoughts and ideas into actuality.