Intro to the Finite Element Method Lecture 3 | Virtual Work, Rayleigh-Ritz, and Galerkin Methods

  Рет қаралды 28,199

Dr. Clayton Pettit

Dr. Clayton Pettit

Күн бұрын

Intro to the Finite Element Method Lecture 3 | Virtual Work, Rayleigh-Ritz, and Galerkin Methods
Thanks for Watching :)
Content:
Introduction: (0:00)
Rayleigh-Ritz Method Theory: (3:06)
Rayleigh-Ritz Method Example: (33:51)
Virtual Work Method Theory: (59:04)
Virtual Work Method Example: (1:31:05)
Point Collocation Method: (1:55:57)
Weighted Residuals Method: (2:06:39)
Questions: (2:23:18)

Пікірлер: 35
@Prashanth-yn9zd
@Prashanth-yn9zd 2 жыл бұрын
This is the best lecture I have ever seen. Thank you so much for posting this on youtube!
@pranav9339
@pranav9339 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Dr. Clayton for your intuitive explanation.! Probably the best resource for FEM on the internet. I appreciate your emphasis on engineering application of FEA rather than bunch of useless math and cumbersome handwritten equations.!
@biswabhanupuhan7036
@biswabhanupuhan7036 2 жыл бұрын
These video lectures are treasures in the internet!!!!!!! Thank you very much.
@iputuwidiantara2919
@iputuwidiantara2919 Жыл бұрын
Dear Dr. Clayton, your video has been helpful for me. I watched it over and over. In the end it was brilliant.
@YuanchunQi
@YuanchunQi Жыл бұрын
Thank you very very much, Clayton. It's my favourite course. it's very very clear and the slides are perfect!!!
@jorgemarioamellsalcedo3677
@jorgemarioamellsalcedo3677 Жыл бұрын
-the best video about to FEM ever.
@carlkohweihao9584
@carlkohweihao9584 Жыл бұрын
Best lecture ever! I'll absolutely recommend this!
@mesuttekgoz7076
@mesuttekgoz7076 Жыл бұрын
the best lecture ever on this topic, thank you.
@shivaanshgusai2555
@shivaanshgusai2555 2 жыл бұрын
Gem of a teacher!
@sepd9114
@sepd9114 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the great lecture 🙏🏻🙏🏻
@rehanakber1964
@rehanakber1964 Жыл бұрын
Well explained. Thank you very much.
@lokeswarimalepati867
@lokeswarimalepati867 Жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much for the course. It's really great
@TheRussianTourist
@TheRussianTourist 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks to you Clayton, FEM stands for Fun&Easy Method.
@ClaytonPettit
@ClaytonPettit 2 жыл бұрын
This made me laugh! Thank you so much :)
@guangzhu3690
@guangzhu3690 Жыл бұрын
Merci beaucoup!!!
@mohsen0619
@mohsen0619 Жыл бұрын
super course!
@MG-yg3fn
@MG-yg3fn 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the beautiful lectures and thank you for using the term dogshit when talking about trial functions.
@zaydonali1464
@zaydonali1464 2 жыл бұрын
very nice explanation thanks a lot
@ClaytonPettit
@ClaytonPettit 2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it :)
@1970mza
@1970mza 2 жыл бұрын
Hi Clayton, Very good presentation. Are your mathematica files are available for download.
@swampwiz
@swampwiz 4 ай бұрын
I don't see any video in the set that covers beam bending, and the inevitable beam element that contains bending, axial & torsional stiffness.
@kangliu6665
@kangliu6665 Жыл бұрын
great lecture,can you share the codes of mathmatics
@jiandonglu2103
@jiandonglu2103 Жыл бұрын
In the Euler-Bernoulli beam case, why don't we consider the shear stress when we calculate the strain energy? I understand that the Euler-Bernoulli beam kind of ignores the shear stress. Then, is the shear stress calculated from Lecture 2 just an approximated value?
@mennaturals9776
@mennaturals9776 7 ай бұрын
I Wish you can share your code here on youtube too
@muslimsreview150
@muslimsreview150 Жыл бұрын
For an Exact solution in the assigment problem. we need 4 BC's because of 4th order DE. For the left segment of beam ( of point load) : We have y(x=0)=0,y'(x=0)0, and what are other 2 BC's ? Do we need to slove this beam first for the reactions and then calculate Moments and Shear at point load location and then we have ( y' ' (x=0)=moment calculated by hand) and ( y' ' ' (x=0)=shear calculated by hand - point load ) as our other 2 BC's ? And same for the right segment of beam i.e. right of point load. Looking forward to your rply or may be you have some solution you can post or a video. thanks
@ClaytonPettit
@ClaytonPettit Жыл бұрын
Great question :) Hopefully this video will help answer your question: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/etZdbKeLu7Smp3k.html
@jonathangadielramirezmarti8224
@jonathangadielramirezmarti8224 7 ай бұрын
@@ClaytonPettit Hello Dr., I have the same question, the video is not available anymore
@mohsen0619
@mohsen0619 Жыл бұрын
One question: when does the Galerkin method give the exact solution?
@rajat1960
@rajat1960 4 ай бұрын
when the residual approaches zero, u_approx tends to u
@edufer111
@edufer111 6 ай бұрын
At 2:19:25, when you ask why there is no solution, I think the second derivative of u_approx eliminates a_1, so instead of having an infinite solution, the answer is that there is no solution (you have three equations and two variables and the system is overdetermined). So there are two problems here: one is the elimination of a_1 and the other problem is the non-consideration of the non-essential boundary condition. I'm wrong?
@frederikrentzsch9737
@frederikrentzsch9737 5 ай бұрын
You're absolutely right. Great observation! On the one hand, a1 can't be determined from the eqns as it's not even in there. On the other hand, a2 and a3 can't satisfy all three eqns. Therefore, there is actually no solution instead of infinitely many solutions.
@edufer111
@edufer111 5 ай бұрын
@@frederikrentzsch9737 But when we have 2 vars and 3 eqs. it is possible to use mean square method to find the BEST approximation. I wonder if this solution has any sense in the PDE and FEM world.
@frederikrentzsch9737
@frederikrentzsch9737 5 ай бұрын
​@@edufer111 Sure, you could use least squares to find the best approximation for a2 and a3 and this would give you in fact the correct solutions for a2,a3 but there is no way to compute a1. I've never heard or read of anyone using least squares in FEM. I guess that's because it would make things even more computationally expensive but I'm pretty sure it is possible.
@farzinhosseini2667
@farzinhosseini2667 Жыл бұрын
This is so good. I would like you to speak slower. Tanx.
@Bilangumus
@Bilangumus 10 ай бұрын
You explain to much the mathematical principles and not enough visual explanation of what happens on a beam. In the first 2 lectures you did it better, especially with solid mechanics.
Intro to the Finite Element Method Lecture 2 | Solid Mechanics Review
2:34:17
Dr. Clayton Pettit
Рет қаралды 40 М.
ВОДА В СОЛО
00:20
⚡️КАН АНДРЕЙ⚡️
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
Как бесплатно замутить iphone 15 pro max
00:59
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ КОРОЛЬ
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Secret Experiment Toothpaste Pt.4 😱 #shorts
00:35
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 34 МЛН
Water powered timers hidden in public restrooms
13:12
Steve Mould
Рет қаралды 472 М.
Understanding the Finite Element Method
18:36
The Efficient Engineer
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Finite Element Analysis Explained | Thing Must know about FEA
9:50
Brendan Hasty
Рет қаралды 59 М.
Finite Element Method | Theory | Truss (Bar) Elements
37:05
Dr. Clayton Pettit
Рет қаралды 10 М.
e to the pi i for dummies
15:51
Mathologer
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН
ВОДА В СОЛО
00:20
⚡️КАН АНДРЕЙ⚡️
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН