It's a really good lecture. Simple language, to the point but still maintaining the rigor. Great work Clayton!!!

It is such an amazing video that provides details in a simple manner. Great job Clayton. Looking forward to more videos about FEA.

Excellent explanation and programming, clear, patient and concise, i think that for all of us who study a bit of computer mechanics, you made our day's when we found your chanell, Thanks!

Thank you very much Dr. Clayton for your lecture. God bless you and your family...

It's a really good and very interesting lecture in a step-wise manner. Great work Clayton!!!

Thanks Dr. Clayton.

Good video, Very organized. I give a score of 10 out 10 for teaching. A lot of material covered.

You are amazing, thank you very very muchhhhhhh, i need to write a subroutine that is why trying to understand, thank you very very much

Hey Clayton, thanks for such detailed and on point presentation. Though, I have a question, why do we choose to look stresses at integration points rather looking for their values at nodal points?

Nice video! Can you tell how it would look like in the axisymmetric case?

Excellent explanation of FEA. Good Job Clayton. Can you explain what are relative Jacobi, Jrel, and min Jacobi, Jmin?

Amazing lecture series Clayton :) I have a question regarding what you mentioned at @35:15 where we claim that the Elasticity matrix C is only a function of Young's Modulus and Poisson's ratio and is constant respective to coordinate variables. While that makes sense, it's still a 4th order tensor that must transform with a change in basis (from x,y to eta/xi), even if it's components are all constants. Do all the basis transformations cancel each other such that we're left with the same constants in the eta,xi coordinate system?

Sir your lecture is amazing to learn. Can you provide the assignment problem questions that you have shown in the very first part of the video. Thank you.

thank you very much is there any way to download the presentation slides?

Could some kind people tell me why direct integration of polynomial takes more time?? For polynomials says x**4+2x+1, the integration is immediately 1/5 x**5+x**2+x, then we only need to plugin the value at 1 and -1 and subtract them. It takes one division to do integration and one subtraction to find the value. But full integration takes 3 addition.

"The Jacobian is a big pile of hot garbage" Hahaha. Great video...

Hi Clayton, thanks for the nice lecture. Wouldn't our integrand be quadratic (not cubic) when we consider linear isoparametric quadrilateral elements?

can u please share the ppt from which u are teaching

would you to like share the material, please?

A note to start at 58:20

Your explanation was very helpful to me, where can I get your teaching documents and codes, free or paid?

If charisma was the main currency in the world you would be Elon Musk