LOL! Watch this nonsense project go nowhere!

I will do my best

Thank you and I will do my best

wow this is first ever compliment about my English Thank you so much

thanks and ouch I know the feeling I was fooled too but you are learning and seeing things with a critical eye you have already made massive porgress . Good luck

define " heavy " well lets see how it goes

@@s2tenglish We need to move hundreds of tons per car. Do the calculations and you will find that you are going to need massive magnets. That means that any movement faster than a snail's pace is going to cause the rails to heat up like they were put in an induction forge and the resistance to motion from the counter electromagnetic force caused by the eddy currants is going to be just as massive. This is good for moving a door or other object that weighs a few hundred pounds at a slow speed on less than 1 MPH very rarely, like a residential door. Not really many other applications for it, but I could see maybe a couple others where it could replace air cushions.

happy to help

@@s2tenglish I recently saw another video that shown the system being considered for just people moving, on one rail. It shown the "car" as only 2 passengers. The only use I can image this for is maybe airport terminal transfer. Maybe this kind of system could be useful for dock systems that only go back and forth short fixed distances. Like part of a container ship?

fair point It could work

yea I was shocked how they just ignore this core points

puppies are everywhere

Thank you and Happy to help

fair point

Glad you enjoyed it

doubtfull but lets see

Glad you enjoy it!

@@s2tenglish I appreciated, especially when you talked about eddy current effect.

Turn as in track bend radious or railway curve radius ? Solving a problem is never an issue the cost to do so and the complexity of maintenance that follows that is the core problem

low carrying capacity + high flux permanent magnets are a very recent development + it has self limiting speed which is much slower than 150kmph

Thanks for noticing

It's a system that needs too much clearance on both sides of the rail . The railway is built around a very tiny flange and only on the inside so u need to move this u have use system where the whole track is switched like meglave

complexity is the enemy of Reliability that will add too much mess

@@s2tenglish I agree, and I am curious to see if and how Ironlev will address the matter.

this info can only be gained by time and real world test & 2nd NO HECK NO HELLLL NOPE the power draw of levitation is very high

yes they do make it sound like magic

BS is saying time and time again it works on "existing rail" that is an issue

dont think it can be done with reliability needed for a locomotive but lets see

that is the missing detail

fair point

Germany abandoned maglev technology. But this is a very interesting approach in my eyes.

Japan yes but China nope

different and I will cover it soon

just a "BIT"

I will not bet money on it as switches took centuries to develop

@@s2tenglish again we will have to see what will happen in the future

Cool

Nevomo MagRail Explained {Future Friday Ep272} kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rLB9pdOSnr64gnk.htmlsi=2dvHxMYC2t4h_GqL watch this for clear Idea

Wowwww 😮

nope edde current will limti it may be less than 150kmph

@@s2tenglish so you can't compete Japanese LO Maglev?

heck no not even close u can try using Nevomo MagRail not this

So in other words Ironlev is not sutable for world existing railways?

@@goranz9446only for urban maglev speeds not high speed

hummm

sound pollution would be BRUTAL

@@s2tenglish That's OK, then switch to Linear Induction. see Rohr Aero-Train, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kMB_lt2SqcrSYoU.html

Linear Induction who will pay for it ? See u can solve all the problem hard part is to do it in budget

@@s2tenglish You r looking at things from an Accountant's perspective. Traditionally, when Accountants run a business, the company shortly goes under. The Linear Induction method used by the Rohr Aero-Train setup, had an aluminum rail or spline running along the middle of the track, with a powered conductor at the edge. A pick-up on the craft would acquire the induced current. Therefore, a modification of the track with the spline would be a minimum requirement. For power, as a go-between, a generator could be mounted on the craft. For each power advance there are trade-offs. A motorized wheel is limited to the rotation limits of the motor. The jet engine approach has a higher upper limit, but a momentary [15 second] high sound as it passes by-standers. The Linear Induction approach has NO UPPER LIMIT, but would require track modification. To get more, you have to pay more. Current MagLev prices are between $17M and $25M per mile. Things are great when they are gold plated. As for payment, the Chinese are renowned for their High Rail Systems. However they are built on $XB government loans, with the public opting to use instead the slightly slower but less expensive existing rail systems. Therefore, testing the market for potential ridership is a key aspect.

there is only one RULE system by which I test a systems viablity . Physics < Engineering < Economics . dady layer is Economics {Does not mean accountents should run everything HECK no } But if something that breaks Economics generaly Economics kills its slowley and alwasy comes out on top . Hyperloop , Concorde , maglev List is very long and money burnt is in billions . We have warfair for that kind of gambels . [15 second] high sound as it passes by-standers the f man thats not how it works , Please think through you IDEA crunch pros and cons never ever dump the first Idea that comes out of your mind .

yes I covered all the core topic

solar cells are very fragile high vibration environment of railway will first cause microcracks then failure will happen very early so its not as blck and white as one thinks & first lets cover easy to do then FAR OUT stuff

From an article in CleanTechnica (Tina Casey) from one year ago. “Improved battery technology plus access to cheap renewable electricity open the possibility of battery-electric rail,” the Nature Energy authors explained. According to their findings, a standard boxcar could be converted to an electric tender car loaded up with batteries to achieve an all-electric range of 241 kilometers”. The article describes how the rail cars utilize regenerative braking to extend range which makes a whole bunch of sense given their weight. Given that one of the benefits highlighted for this technology was greatly reduced vibrations due to the levitation, might the solar panels be feasible? There would be less power from the regen braking but also a lower need.

@@dadofchen see I am old and I have seen 100s of tech come and go so anything that changes a lot and does not provide a lot & I mean A LOT of benifits will FAIL. Battery rail is a GO solar on top can be done unwise but can be done . Iron lev HECK NO as i said there is no easy answer how it will switch tracks that needs to be solved first

Granted, NEVOMO is already building a system along the lines of IronLev in Europe as we speak, MagRail. Europe uses more passenger trains than American and they are talking about speeds that I consider stupidly dangerous. Here in the USA our system is built for speeds where 85 mph are stretching capabilities. I DON’T have the answers but I like to realistically hope! If NEVEMO can upgrade the existing railway infrastructure in Europe to the speed of 550 kph (340 mph) at a very competitive cost as they claim then they COULD slow it down to a safer speed and add renewable power generation.

@@dadofchen so speed is not something you can add to a existing path even if u upgrade the method of locomotion. G force is real so when the track was built all the twist and turns are baked it U cant go faster in it as that will need full five point harness per passenger . Japanese maglev is not expencive because of the TECH its expencive due to right of way as in LOW to NO twist and turns or gradients if Mountain is in the way u have to drill through . For more info on Nevomo MagRail watch kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rLB9pdOSnr64gnk.html {my video }

hard to FIND

@@s2tenglish and what about the disadvantages?

@@walterrudich2175 it cant cross any normal switch

because you cannot use that on existing rail. the entire track has to be modified for that to work

@@SentinelAerospaceOfficial The question is why. If the repulsive magnet can work on top of the rail, then why not on the sides of the rail?

@s2tenglish The sides of the rail are iron too, so why not use magnets on the side too instead of rollers?

I specify in the video if you have permanent magnet it will stick to one side or the another only way to get flotation out of it is utilising some other support that is why you cannot use magnet to support magnet otherwise we could have built permanent magnet bearings but we can't unless we have electromagnet to truly float it

@@copperpennymine magnetic repulsion does not work on the top of the rail. The Ironlev design wraps around the rail, essentially pulling up on the bottom of the thick top part of the rail. Magnetic repulsion only works between two magnets, and the rail is not a magnet.

humm lets see

@@s2tenglish come on, if some old gent got a heart attack in a Hyperloop, how do you get him out?

no u missunderstand that is a very very very low bar to clear so I dont think this is that bad as I can see some limited use case

@@s2tenglish well everyone probably said the same thing before electric trains during the steam-diesel era. Then there's the bullet train. We all speculate how will this develop into in the long run.

LOL

I dont say it is that is my core point it cant cross railway crossing points

magnet is not for propeltion you have to do that with other things . magnetic levitation is common thing U can buy it and test your self kzfaq.info/get/bejne/p8tkq5ujqtGUhJc.html and the glass stopper is replaced by Rollers or if u want full contactless by fast acting electromagnet

​@@s2tenglish That video shows a magnet hovering over another magnet with opposite poles. @kalasend asked the question, how do the normal steel train track rails force an opposite magnetic force to levitate the ironlev?

@@ChinaChuck dude just build one off maganet (I Did so Its ovious for me kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fOBnpaiBnL_Dk2g.html ) or Buy the door slider . IN words the best I can is maganet wants to stuck to the head of the rail but side roller does not allow it so it ends up stuck in a magnetic flux rubber band

I know that is why I dont have High hopes for it

​@@s2tenglishYeah, normal tracks even at 125 km/h and easy to derail, imagine with maglev tech

lol

Real person is better. I don't like the accent very much, but there is AI avatar technology, that can translate into english without accent.

@@vabaradikaal8755 yes aiko ai. You can speak through it and changes your voice into another voice. Tested it 2 years ago, worked like a charm and very hard to differenciate. I believe the technology is definately better 2 years later too.

You might get more views but personally I hate those AI voices and skip anything with them. They make things way more unprofessional even if they get more views. Keep doing your thing. I would say the presentation could have done with showing the switches they can't cross more than what they could cross. Took me a little but to realise you were showing the expensive ones they would work on.

interesting

humm where are you from ?