"So it is written" announces that someone wrote something, but does not in any way confirm a fact. "Adam" being a truth is something that requires evidence, something you nor anyone has ever presented.

Just read your comment about ditching intellectual laziness. Totally agree and want to amplify your point about God's word being so accurate, it's awesome and humbling if you invest a bit of time and effort.

@@bootycalled2780 Aww, I picture your blissful life sucking on the teat of consensus, bedazzled by science and its manipulated biased slant used to trick the masses into believing everything comes from nothing and complexity does not require intelligent agency, hmmm, doesn't observation play a big role in science? I seem to observe every single day that purposeful complexly ordered information always emanates from a mind, like your attempt at wit, did it require a mind to compose and type that or do you propose it just popped into existence like your entire paradigm. Complexity in this realm requires a mind, danmurphy7429 believes that complex life requires a designer, you on the other hand think the opposite of observation, which is not science.

@@bootycalled2780snarky potshots rather than well-thought out discussion is the epitome of intellectual laziness.

@@bootycalled2780 So says the one whose religion can no longer tell the difference between men and women.

@@bootycalled2780 Is this the part where you tell me biology teaches that men can be women and vice versa. Sorry lady, there is no biologist in the world willing to convert to your nonsense. Apparently neither does the U.S. govt since the men parading around as if they aren't men still have to register for selective service. Let me guess, you don't know what that is? Too much time wasting away on tick tok?

How can one not mock creationists? They start with a conclusion that cannot be doubted or contradicted, and then try to come up with supporting arguments (nor even evidence, because there is none). Scientists start with what they observe, which is full of mystery and unanswered questions, and slowly and painstakingly (and accountably) try to find answers which might explain it.

Thanks for sharing! We appreciate the support.

Look up Hebrew Golem spell

Amen 🙏 to that !

Jeanson does no real research, he says what Ken Ham tells him to say under contract.

​@@captivedesk3168 and your scholarly critique of 'Traced' appeared in what journal? We are all dying to read it...

@@theHentySkeptic Jeanson can wipe his tears and unblock me if he wants to chat again. I am happy to shut down his claims as he found out when he engaged with me, till he threw the proverbial game board in the air and stomped away. Later after he blocked me super genius posted a whiny responsecto me I couldnt see cuz he is so smart. Someone else screen shot for me. Hillarious how thin skinned he is against any critique and why he prefers his ken ham cubicle to hide away in. I have seen him engage in one talk with a biologist and he cried about that one in a video with ken ham as his claims are all bad. His bubble bursts outside of AIG s echo chamber.

​@@theHentySkepticTruth does not need worldly, compromised confirmation. Truth resonates. It stands upon its own merit.

Well it won't be that many because a literal interpretation of the bible has long been abandoned by most of the rest of Christianity. It's mainly a problem in America and Turkey where people with political motivation seem to want to deprive people of a rational education. Love from the UK xx

American christians, the least persecuted people on earth.

there is no sources because they dont want anyone to actually examine them... They are bogus of course.

Exactly. No explanation for evil, suffering, & death. But then “deep time” can be accepted because ppl don’t perceive the dissonance. Chipping away of Genesis… Spiritualization of Revelation… Set up for end times.

God created Evil, suffering, and death. You know. the guy who loves you! The proof of this is that God created The Evil Serpent and placed him in the Garden. So Evil EXISTED way before Adam's Fall. And then God punished the Serpent for acting exactly in the way that God created him to perform. What a hypocrite!

@@user-xp4fm2st8u you show great lack in understanding the scriptures. God didn’t create those things. Suffering and death are not physical things that can be created. He allowed them to happen because of our rebellion against Him. It shows our need for God. We by ourselves have no control over what happens to us. We can only control how we respond to those situations. We are supposed to realize the folly of our weaknesses and turn to God for help and salvation.

@krakoosh1 And you show a great lack of logic! The Evil Serpent was in the Garden BEFORE Adam's Fall. Only God could have created him, and He knew exactly how the Serpent would behave.

And so it is written, “The first man Adam became a living being.” The last Adam became a life-giving spirit. However, the spiritual is not first, but the natural, and afterward the spiritual. The first man was of the earth, made of dust; the second Man is the Lord from heaven

Actual interpretation of the Hebrew text is thou Shall not Murder killing for food or in self protection is not murder. Killing out of anger or just plain evil Is murder

You are literally listening to false teachtu

Amen brother

Population bottleneck

The bible doesn't say that creation is ever bad, but it is cursed by God himself and then judged. Adam and Eve were meant to tend the creation with the Lord but whatever world that then existed was all fundamentally changed the day of the fall. Perhaps it was that entropy and decay was introduced. But God certainly condemns it. First at the flood where everything alive at the time is destroyed and wiped out, except for those on the ark. The bible says that the world will again be be destroyed but this time it will be by fire. The future is described as Christ returning and making a new heaven and a new earth where all sin has been removed. Here are a few of many passages: Genesis 3:17 "“Cursed is the ground because of you" Romans 8:20 "For the creation was subjected to futility, not by its own will, but because of the One who subjected it..." Hebrews 6:8 "But land that produces thorns and thistles is worthless, and its curse is imminent. In the end it will be burned" 2 Peter 3:10 "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up."

@@preoccupied4800 Exactly. Yet so many of these young Earth creationists commonly say that creation was very good until the fall and then it was bad. Bad was not my choice of word, and I argue against it because it is not in the Bible in this context. I do have a problem with these Young Earth Creationists who continue to tell people that creation was bad after the Fall. It wasn't. It isn't. We still have much beauty and goodness in the Earth with us.

"Cursed" and "bad" aren't synonymous here...

@@jennifertrussell5711 Exactly

Since there is NO proof that Moses actually existed, I guess that kind of answers your question.

That's very interesting. I've never heard of this before. Is there any supporting text (apart from Daniel 7:22)?

“…until the Ancient of Days came, and a judgment was made in favor of the saints of the Most High…” - I think the Ancient of Days is the Son (in this verse) - the Son comes & judges in our favor🙏🏻 - this is the high point - chiasma - of Book of Daniel - the Son is given dominion in v. 14 - I do not think this refers to the First Adam. Adam died. Dust. Back to the earth. - we are all descended from the first Adam. - we look to the Last Adam = Jesus. The life giving Spirit.

@@007gracie I see how you can come to your conclusions with the limited information available to yourself. But, it clearly describes the Son of Man in Daniel 7. I already put the place where the Lord explicitly identified The Ancient of Days. It isn't here. I don't know if it was computer blip or if Creation Research Institute is against people discussing evidences. "Spring Hill is named by the Lord Adam-ondi-Ahman, because, said he, it is the place where Adam shall come to visit his people, or the Ancient of Days shall sit, as spoken of by Daniel the prophet." is what the Lord said on May 19, 1838 about a hill in Davies County, Missouri.

Only mothers dna is stored in the mitochondria so only female lineage can be traced with this method

What?

I think Jerusalem is a better candidate for Eden with 4 rivers flowing from underneath the Temple Mount. That fact is not well known and flows through underground aqueducts so it doesn’t show up on a map. It would make sense for God to use this place where the temple was later built. I can’t say for certain but it’s the best candidate I can find.

Eden was wiped off the earth in the flood. God said it was the entire world, so it WAS the entire world. And now the supporting geological proof for that level of destruction is overwhelming

What? I got some of that, but not all of it. Would you mind editing what you wrote so it makes more sense?

@@jennifertrussell5711 If Eden was the entire world, then how were Adam and Eve driven from it?

They were equals before the fall. In fact Adam was standing right there watching it unfold and did nothing to support or encourage her to do the right thing.

​@@jennifertrussell5711 Neither of those claims is anything I read in my Bible.

"And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an HELP MEET for him." Genesis 2:18 KJV The unique word used for help meet is only used in a handful of other places, and often it's in the context of God being the help meet in time of trouble for Isreal. More Wonder Woman, less Joan Cleaver. Nothing of this "identifier" is subordinate. But unfortunately, she abused that power and... "Unto the woman he said... thy desire shall be to thy husband, and HE SHALL RULE OVER THEE." Genesis 3:16 KJV It was the climax of the curse on her. "Now, he will rule over you." Adam observed and mistakenly trusted Eves' lead on this one "And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her HUSBAND WITH HER; and he did eat." Genesis 3:6 KJV Other translations are even more blatant with the wording: "Who was there with her" etc Jesus was culture-shockingly scandalous about His stance on the worthiness and redemption of women. I think He was making a point that we should be careful not to miss as we identify ourselves and our roles as wives and mothers and raisers-up of the "quiver full of arrows." 🙏🏻

@@bootycalled2780 Loving sin and rebellion against God is no laughing matter. It's *asking for* the eternal lake of fire. Jesus *died* to keep you out of that fire, but you must repent of ALL rebellion and choose to serve Him, your creator, now and from here forward.

@@bootycalled2780 You have to have your head stuck in the sand and be demon possessed to think all of that.

He did

@@jennifertrussell5711 You can delude yourself should you want to. Ever thought why there are over 1000 Christian religions...?

@dongee1664 Lots of religions call themselves funny things. But straight reading from the collections of writings we were left paints a picture about our origins that's clear and accurate, unless you start weaving fake science and hybrid doctrine into it. That was my point. Theology behind the rest of our story gets messier, but this aspect shouldn't be the clusterschmuck it is.

@@jennifertrussell5711 You are strengthening my point Jennifer....

@@dongee1664 you're missing mine

At the beginning you say how can he NOT be a myth but at the end you say the opposite. In between is a alot of disconnected statements. Your position is muddled at best

And yet somehow 2 always *magically* evolved the same mutations while simultaneously diverging enough to be different sexes but not diverging so much that their sex organs or gamete were incompatible. Oh wait. And all that had to happen in close enough proximity for the creatures to seek one another out since the majority of the (non existent) transitional forms of animals would have been too crippled to get far without being eaten 😮

Sure is. Exciting huh! Do you accept abiogenesis even though there is zero evidence for it? You call that science? Jake

A provable paradigm!