Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet Really Better Than ChatGPT?

Рет қаралды 5,968

Ай бұрын

In this video, we compare the newly launched Claude 3.5 Sonnet with ChatGPT to see which model outperforms the other. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is claimed to offer improved performance, speed, and cost-effectiveness, making it a strong competitor in the AI landscape.
SUBSCRIBE for more! 👉 bit.ly/3zlUmiS 👈
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is now available for free on Claude.ai and the Claude iOS app
www.anthropic.com/news/claude...
Become an Early Adopter ☕
/ @webcafeai
Business Newsletter [FREE] 📰
aitraining.webcafeai.com/joinus
-------------------------------------------------
➤ Follow @webcafeai
• ✈️ 2nd Channel: / @corbinwander
• ✖️ X: x.com/webcafeai
• 🔴 TikTok: / webcafeai
• 🥾 Instagram: / webcafeai
• 🎧 Bräunlich: / braunlich
-------------------------------------------------
Key Takeaways:
✩ Enhanced Performance: Claude 3.5 Sonnet is claimed to excel in graduate-level reasoning, undergraduate-level knowledge, and coding proficiency, surpassing its predecessor, Claude 3 Opus.
✩ Cost-Effective and Fast: Operating at twice the speed of Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is claimed to be suitable for complex tasks, with pricing set at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens.
✩ Innovative Features: The introduction of Artifacts on Claude.ai allows users to interact with AI-generated content in real-time, transforming Claude from a conversational AI to a collaborative work environment.
▼ Extra Links of Interest:
🌲 Do You Create Content?
bit.ly/bumpups
⚡ AI Services
webcafesoftware.com/
automate everything. 👇
linktr.ee/webcafe
0:25 - Comparing ChatGPT and Claude Sonnet
1:39 - Structuring output: Claude vs. ChatGPT
3:55 - Testing Claude Sonnet and ChatGPT for direction-following
5:00 - Word count comparison between Claude Sonnet and ChatGPT
8:00 - Comparing user interface capabilities
10:06 - Contrasting coding outputs
My name is Corbin, an AI developer entrepreneur behind the vision of Webcafe AI. Together we will build digital ecosystems. ☕

Пікірлер: 36

@webcafeai Ай бұрын

Navigate to key moments👇 made via bumpups.com 0:25 - Comparing ChatGPT and Claude Sonnet 1:39 - Structuring output: Claude vs. ChatGPT 3:55 - Testing Claude Sonnet and ChatGPT for direction-following 5:00 - Word count comparison between Claude Sonnet and ChatGPT 8:00 - Comparing user interface capabilities 10:06 - Contrasting coding outputs Recap by Bumpups ✏️

@wcjf01 Ай бұрын

I am a Claude-3.5 convert. It performs incredibly well for my needs, is fast, has great contextual understanding, is very substantive, and even offers suggestions proactively. Love it.

@TheRealMadridVEVO Ай бұрын

Bro whats the message cap for pro users?

@snowdolphvov4193 Ай бұрын

45 for 5h if each message is around 200 sentences long. So could be more@@TheRealMadridVEVO

@carsongabriel1949 Ай бұрын

It's a fact I'm not renewing my chat gpt 4o subscription 😮😅hello Claude 🎉

@exclusivenote Ай бұрын

@@TheRealMadridVEVO it's around 25-30 messages every 5-6 hours

@user-kl6fb4lc9d Ай бұрын

GPT4o has trouble understanding my prompts in a frustrating way but GPT4 and Claude 3.5 don’t have at all.

@user-ni2rh4ci5e Ай бұрын

Claude 3.5 isn't just marginally better than GPT-4o; there's a significant hidden gap between them. You might think GPT-4o's output looks better in some aspects. But this doesn't mean it's actually better or smarter. GPT-4o's streamlined results come from preset, user-friendly outputs rather than independent, thoughtful processing. Except for a few minor aspects where GPT-4o seems better, Claude 3.5 is clearly smarter overall. It appears to have surpassed a threshold that no other existing LLM has reached.

@CosmicCells Ай бұрын

Nice video! Tip: Turn on the artifacts feature in Claude 3.5 sonnett, in there you can really adjust, enhance and run your code, you can also create tables, graphs etc. There is also the projects feature now where you can collaboratively work with a knowledgebase

@webcafeai Ай бұрын

Interesting, I will check this out. Thanks for the tip!

@PseudoProphet Ай бұрын

Dude are you seriously pretending you didn't know it existed? 😂😂😂. @@webcafeai

@jasimdev0 Ай бұрын

claude 3.5 can code and run the code , build ui and display it

@webcafeai Ай бұрын

Super cool feature I noticed recently, as well!

@Sandy_Isadora Ай бұрын

Can someone tell me if you know how he edited the video? What tools do you use please?

@synen Ай бұрын

Kdenlive

@codecode360 Ай бұрын

Claude has so much more than you think. Definitely keep using it daily, you will notice some of the gems.

@Furnabulax1 Ай бұрын

U sound fine in the video, Corbin! Looking forward to the Apple Intelligence and ChatGPT Mac integration when i get the Macbook im saving for.

@MrArdytube 15 күн бұрын

i had a grid of information furnished as a traffic study. I wanted a summary and analysis. Claude did a great job… exactly what i needed… GPT output was useless. . I also had some meeting notes. Again, claude prepared an excellent summary. Mostly i use ai for philosophical chats. Again i find claude much better

@mrcaraballo6975 Ай бұрын

Bro you cant look at sonnet 3.5 without using the artifact , especially for coding!

@webcafeai Ай бұрын

I will check out Claude's artifacts tomorrow!

@chowmonkey2002 Ай бұрын

I like both but 4o does an amazing job helping me out create frameworks for a powerpoint presentation. It does write good business letters. It is accurate in matching applicants to jobs. But there is a big but. It is terribly buggy. Systems are overloaded. Claude was my favorite when I started using it as a virtual assistant and 4o looked like the best solution. But I’m considering to convert. Feedback on which of the the two fits the best industries. That would be a great video.

@ebandaezembe7508 Ай бұрын

Thanks for this video, Claude 3.5 sonnet is truly amazing

@webcafeai Ай бұрын

How does my audio sound? 🤔

@byronhorde5892 Ай бұрын

👍

@MichaelBoyens Ай бұрын

Thanks for another excellent video.I am a pro subscriber for Claude and a Teams users for ChatGPT. I've been testing both across a range of use cases this past week. I've found Claude is a better writer and coder, yet ChatGPT is a better analyst and surprising much more accurate in extracting information from "knowledge files". Initially I found Claude better as it supposedly has a 200k context window vs 32k? for ChatGPT. When I fed a precisely formatted 75k token document into a Claude Project (consuming 49% of the available knowledge capacity?) with the exact same prompt as GPT, I found Claude became less and less accurate as the conversation continued. With a custom GPT I found the responses super-accurate. The other big issue for me is that I'd reached Claude's usage limit within a dozen of so prompts so had to wait hours to continue the conversation. Got no-where near the limit with GPT. Given that 3.5 Sonnet is meant to be much cheaper via API than Opus, looks like the pro limit has not increased.