The advent of generative AI combined with quantum computing genuinely concerns me for how this could be used to manipulate media.

Meshtastic

Yall are responding with answers not allowed by the question. Signal is way less sketch than Telegram, but y'all are right that we shouldn't exclude other alternatives.

Matrix, but its founding is also shady, ex 8200 types, but you can still self host it i guess XMPP+OMEMO, tox and briar are all better options

@@inund8 I didn't say "exclusively". I just don't have questions about using it.

Neither, no phone easy

My guess as well!

@@asksearchknock I'm not trying to pick out the AI. I'm trying to pick out Ali. I think it might be more consistent to find hints of her writing then whatever is left must be the AI.

Meshtastic

yup...

I've given up trying to detect AI and switched to trying to detect Ali. I think it's the Fido story this week.

Let ME let you in on a little secret: If you encrypt your messages with PGP standard implementation, then you too can experience an environment that can only be viewed with the decryption key... and unless a quantuum computer is used to brute-force a decryption key, you're safe. If it's good enough for military and state secrets, I'd wager it's good enough for you too...

Shannon is doing her own channel. I don't know anything about any guest appearances though.

I would argue using an authentication key as a second factor is superior but for different reasons. How do you think they will discover your credentials on the key?

@@jmr Passwordless login uses what are called "discoverable credentials". They occupy a "slot" and most keys today have only a limited number of slots. So most people will need to have several keys just to log in via passwordless methods if this catches on. As to how discoverable the "discoverable credentials" are, I have not looked into this, I know that I can list them all if I have the key, but I would assume (and hope) that FIDO2 says that the key will only return a credential for a matching account or at least domain. However, someone who has the key can see where it goes which means no plausible deniability, and if there is a bug that allows the PIN to be bypassed or the pin try limit removed, or a leak of the pin another way like by writing it down and losing it, well, now the attacker has the key and knows where it goes. However, with U2F, the credentials are encrypted on the key and sent to the server. so only the right key can use them, but there is no way to prove that a key opens an account without trying every single account and seeing which ones work... even if there is no PIN or the PIN is bypassed (sometimes U2F has PINS too though) if an attacker has access to the key... they don't know which of the several billion locks it opens... not all that helpful for them and gives me time to react by deleting that user's key.

Should also add this should all be done with a properly configured OS such as TAILS. The problem with the diy approach is you likely wind up with scratch files of plain text and if not done on the correct os also plain text fragments in virtual memory swap files. So you do need something that encrypts from the keyboard to the destination, you can't expect everyone to configure firewalls and routers so you do need some minimal backend to handle firewall traversal. Also there is just the matter of remaining anonymous so you should run this all over something like tor. Is tor still considered secure?

7:55 Elmo decided to tweet about signal, once again showing the world just how little he knows about anything

@@asksearchknock yeah thought so thx for timestamp

Don't get caught by the threat actors, not, don't get caught doing illegal stuff.

noooo

She dedicated her time to her own channel.

You know being here is not mandatory right? There are loads of other channels you could go and watch yet you come here and then moan. Why would you watch a channel you don’t like?

I assume then you also missed the part where she reminded you she’s an MIT educated software engineer and your comments are not welcome or appropriate.

Looks like someone is woke, or got roasted by shorting tesla, or maybe both.

@@asksearchknock I'm shocked at the number of people that have no idea how the world works. They must picture Muskrat rolling up his sleeves and just "building a rocket".