thanks bro 💪💪

bro you on the next level don't take my job please 💀😭

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 😀

It is possible? I mean, it is possible to make a whole game engine in HTML?

💀🔫

💀💀

thanks bro 💪

Game engines require heavy optimization since they will provide a framework for games which depending on the scale can really annihilate computer resources. You can make smaller games on Python though and if you don't want to learn a C language to make a game engine, a Python engine based on some that are already made so you have a reference could probably make you really good at Python for game dev. Just a thought. Rust is probably not impossible but it's very uncharted territory compared to Python game development, plus using Python could help you to frame your focus a bit smaller so you actually finish the thing. I will warn you though, there is a very good reason why almost all game engines are written in a C language, and that is because the game framework takes advantage of a C language's power while refining on its weaknesses such as being "difficult" to use in and of itself compared to other languages. Small scale, Python will still work though.

Rust is a very complex programming language, if you know Rust you are already more than capable of making a game engine. Some people make game engines in C which is a much simpler language than Rust.

​​@@oscarsmith-jones4108 rust and c++ may be the same at complexity.But you are confused between the language complexity vs the programming complexity.More simple languages such as c wouldd require you very high intelligence to solve the problem.I use c++ but i program in c mode most of the time,i built everythings from scratch,from bitmap loader to 3d loader,skeletal animations,optimization that combine all textures into one...etc very insane if i only used c.

sounds nice, hope to be able to help 💪

yes

😂 yeah that is ammoying, I haven't done collisions for this project. Check out javidx9 's videos on collision 💪

Just use bullet physics lib

You dont do collision stuff yourself, especially complicated collisions. Just use a physics library like ODE or Bullet etc

lol I spent a week on trying to get collision working for my game. I just gave up and used Box2D lol

Thanks for the advice everyone

I used javid pixel game engine

I am using opengl and glfw I think tha this is a solid stack but you can use whatever you like in the end 💪

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 thank you so much for the answer!

that's my job 💪💪 thanks

bugs 😳?

you can learn that if you spend enough time. I have some videos on my channel walking you through the process if you are curious 💪

the obj is kinda struggling on my laptop with my engine running, my gpu is quite old I have to upgrade my setup at some point

my laptop is kindia struggling with the recording software 😫 I kinda need to buy a new one :((

nope which one?

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 i mean computer graphics . Vfx famous for canada..

The beginning is quite difficult, I have a lot of the resources that you need on my discord channel and on my learn opengl video. Unfortunatelly you need to know all of those details but try to see some progress, aproach the beginning from a practicle point of view and try to render one triangle and experiment. Step by step youll get confortable and things will get easier. Good luck 💪💪

Getting that triangle can take a while for your first time, but it's pretty worth it to get going, then spinning, then textured, then you add more triangles to make a pyramid or cube and soon you are on your way. Honestly, if there's one thing I can say, start with some of the "easier" APIs. That means do DirectX 11 versus DirectX 12 or OpenGL over Vulkan but even more, if you're on Windows for example, don't focus on getting either of those. Stick to what you can figure out. If that means making a triangle with Windows API, do it. If you are looking for 3D, I recommend 2D first, then move into 3D. There are also other graphic APIs you could look into like Irrlicht, or Ogre or some others. I find that going with 2D first helped me focus less on the 3D complexities that I made larger than needed to be. (It's just one more dimension after all) As I wasn't understanding the DirectX/OpenGL (for the time) API stuff. In the end, going back to 2D allowed me to learn how to do basic things and understand concepts of a frame buffer (how to swap frames and render to the back buffer). How to do input, timing for animations, etc. After you get a good understanding, you'll then look at the DirectX API or OpenGL stuff with the intent to do something you already are familiar with and with intent. (I want to draw my 3D object on the screen, I have the points and data, but how do I get it on the GPU? etc.)

​@@lowlevelgamedev9330 thanks mate! also can you look at the comment i made for ChrisCalos64? those questions are for you too:)

exposed again 🤣😅

@@lowlevelgamedev9330 Da si daca intru la despre canal scrie Romania. Oricum imi place foarte mult cea ce faci si ma motivezi cumva. :)

A low level programming language is one that has very little abstraction and is close to machine code/assembly. C++ is a low level language. Definitely counter intuitive 😅 low level = harder

eh I don't use inheritance or polimorphism or exceptions in cpp so it is kinda low level 🤣😂

@@blockify Nah, C++ is high level. Assembly is the only thing that could be considered low level. Even C has a big chunk of abstractions. I'd argue that Holy C is the closest without going into assembly because it does not do any optimizations.

@@KoltPenny in 2023 pretty much every compiled language is considered low level, deal with it

eh actually the lag is because my pc can't handle both the game and the recording software 😫