IronDisciple X well said!

John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* John 7:17 If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself. _In John __7:16__ Jesus testified that his doctrine was not his own, but [God's doctrine]._ _So when Jesus gives us the doctrine of the "great commandment" he is giving us God's doctrine._ Matthew 22:36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Matthew 22:37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with *all thy heart, and with all thy soul,* and with all thy mind. Matthew 22:38 This is the first and great commandment. Matthew 22:39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. Matthew 22:40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets. _Notice the wording within the [first] great commandment; (... _*_love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul,_*_ ...)_ _and notice that this exact phrase has already been recorded and established as a doctrine within the old testament._ _Example of what it means to love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul._ Deuteronomy 13:3 [...] for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye *love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.* Deuteronomy 13:4 Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, *and keep his commandments,* and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him. _Example of what it means to love God._ Deuteronomy 30:16 In that I command thee this day *to love the LORD thy God, to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments,* that thou mayest live [...]. _Deu 13:3-4 & Deu __30:16__ coveys the message that to "love the LORD your God {EVEN} with all your heart and with all your soul" means to "keep his commandments,* and obey his voice" & "to walk in his ways, and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgments."_ _Please remember that Jesus testified in John __7:16__-17_ John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* John 7:17 *If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.* _Now please notice in Luke __10:25__ a lawyer's question to Jesus is; "...What shall I do to inherit...?"_ Luke 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, Master, *what shall I do to inherit* eternal life? _This question "...What shall I do to inherit...?" is very much like asking; ...What is required of me [to inherit] ...?_ _And this question had already been addressed by God's doctrine, within the old testament in Deu __10:12__-13._ Deuteronomy 10:12 And now, Israel, *what doth the LORD thy God require of thee,* but to fear the LORD thy God, to walk in all his ways, and *to love him,* and *to serve the LORD thy God with all thy heart and with all thy soul,* Deuteronomy 10:13 *To keep the commandments of the LORD, and his statutes,* which I command thee this day for thy good? _Now again looking at Luke __10:25__ the man's question is first addressed by Jesus in this manner; "... _*_What is written in the law?_*_ ..._ _We know that when Jesus says "What is written in the law" would be referring to something already recorded. As God's doctrine had already recorded in the old testament._ _The man goes on to say; "Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul..." which is indeed written in the old testament._ Luke 10:25 And, behold, a certain lawyer stood up, and tempted him, saying, *Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?* Luke 10:26 He said unto him, *What is written in the law?* how readest thou? Luke 10:27 And he answering said, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbour as thyself. Luke 10:28 And he said unto him, Thou hast answered right: this do, and thou shalt live. _We can read nearly the same situation (question and answer) again in Mark __10:17__-19._ Mark 10:17 And when he was gone forth into the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, *what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?* Mark 10:18 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God. Mark 10:19 *Thou knowest the commandments,* Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Honour thy father and mother. _In Mark __10:17__ a person asks Jesus, "...what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?_ _In Mark __10:19__ Jesus states; "Thou knowest the commandments..." (Note that the commandments were known by the man because they are already written, in God's doctrine, in the old testament.)_ _In Mark __10:19__ Then Jesus began to recite from the Ten Commandments, which are the words of the covenant. (God's covenant / God's doctrine.)_ John 7:16 Jesus answered them, and said, *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* John 7:17 *If any man will do his will, he shall know of the doctrine, whether it be of God, or whether I speak of myself.*

@aMTBer As Jesus taught in John 7:16 [...] *My doctrine is not mine, but his that sent me.* Jesus is quoting from God's doctrine the ten commandments. And per Exodus 34:28 the words of the covenant are the ten commandments. Exodus 34:28 [...] And he wrote upon the tables the words of the covenant, the ten commandments. Jesus is making reverence to God's doctrine which would include _all_ the words of the covenant, not just part of the words of the covenant (which are the ten commandments.) _It is possible_ that the man already knowing all the commandments interrupted Jesus with his reply (Mark 10:20) ...all these have I observed from my youth. And _it is possible_ that at that time period with the Jews who studied and followed God's words, that when someone made reverence to a scripture, it meant all of that scripture and all the scriptures around pertaining to it. For example many people are puzzled why Jesus would have stated (while on the cross) My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Matthew 27:46) However when one reads Psalms 22 you will see within the very first verse it reads, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Palms 22:1) As one continues to read through the verses one comes to Psalms 22:16 For dogs have compassed me: the assembly of the wicked have inclosed me: *they pierced my hands and my feet.* Thus if indeed Jesus' doctrine is not his but his that sent him then he is indeed making reference to the book of Palms 22 while making the statement, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? Also you post that to your understanding the 7 day Sabbath is still valid. The Sabbath day commandment is part of the words to the covenant and the _only_ commandment that starts with the very word "remember." It is as thou God is telling us that he foreknew that many men will teach others that this commandment you can forget. Matthew 22:14 For many are called, but few are chosen. John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _and_ they follow me: _In John __10:27__ the word "and" by Strong's Concordance is _*_G2532_*_ which also can mean; _indeed, moreover, so, therefore._ Thus this verse could read or mean; My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _indeed_ they follow me: My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _moreover_ they follow me: My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _so_ they follow me: My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _therefore_ they follow me: *God's sheep will hear God's voice and follow him.* The ten commandments listed in Exodus 20. The very first verse reads Exodus 20:1 And God spake all these words, saying, Again; *God's sheep will hear God's voice and follow him.* John 10:27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, _and_ they follow me:

@aMTBer Revelation 22:14 *Blessed are they that do his commandments,* that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.

I don't know anything about that. All I know is Jesus, and him crucified (1 Corinthians 2:2) . All this other mumbo jumbo is some sort of wacky stuff to convince people to abandon the true faith that is built upon our savior Jesus Christ. Nope. Not today, Satan. Not ever!

Honestly you make alot of sense you can make the bible say what you want by cherry picking.

99% of the lies are a direct result of Saul (shaul-sheol) or "paul" (appolyon) all abrahamic "religions" would be One Way . . if he didnt fool (if it were possible) even the elect.

@@ivanfourie You will have a point if he wasn't Chosen by Jesus Christ and turned from a serial and brutal persecutor of the Christians to a devout follower of Christ. Ask yourself, what did he stand to gain? He was already a great and terrifying figure in the society then. He then died a Martyr for the Lord Jesus Christ. He was beheaded. Would you die for a lie? Read the WHOLE of Paul, not CHERRYPICKED verses which you don't understand.

@@steelisrael3461 I will admit that every single time somebody quotes that we should be lawless, from Paul's teachings, all that I have to do is read a few chapters further and it comes into context. He's not simply against the law. He's very much For The Law for those who don't know the law through Christ. If I'm saying that correctly.

@@sipandsynoptics RIGHT!!!! people see one scripture and take out the bible and shove in your like SEE SEE SEE but dont read a passage before that or further down

That right there proves Paul IS FALSE

@@andreawimer4334 You are perfectly right!

@@andreawimer4334 how so?

@@watchmenoftruth5238 2024 vs 2022: 2024: The writings of Paul are not against other scriptures, but our understandings and translations. 2022: Yes! It's really hard to swallow. *Paul contradicts many areas with the teaching of the Messiah, I don't understand why?* Did Paul really deceive or not?. *Anyway, I don't follow anyone who contradicts the whole idea of the scriptures at least in some points*

@@watchmenoftruth5238 whats your facts? Do you even know what Gnostic teaches apparently you don't? Gnostic teachers utilize Paul's writings to prove their point.

That's a bright idea a win win situation, for a while. Gamaliel is the Master of Law. After that, they requested to the apostles not to teach the name of Messiah. See how they manipulated the situation. He was chossen to make him suffer, not apostle.

It's actually Paul who was the one who states the law is too hard and replaces it with Jesus .. he quotes the torah but replace "you can do it"

Yahshua for me

Jesus Christ durr everyone obviously point to him biblically

Catholics are Christians.......

​@@findoggfini8581 Duh. Your reply puts you at a lower level about the reality around you. What ? Just commenting without researching?

​@@rosscullen3992 what are you on about?, you must be those clowns that bow down to statues of Mary and Peter and hold on to beads that are a mere idols. Get up off the ground and look up to Jesus. That is reality.

I've noticed that many people use the"context trend " to make themselves sound like they know what they are saying.

You are absolutely right.

With Love n Respect. I've heard a lot of CHRISTians talk more about the words of men over The Love Blessed to us All by Our FATHER. Love n Blessings Family!!!

Steve Tassi yes they do, I would say, if you don’t understand it, don’t speak against it🙏

It's impossible to use Paul in context. He is double-minded and duplicitous. People ignore this: 1Co 9:20 KJV - And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law; 1Co 9:21 KJV - To them that are without law, as without law, (being not without law to God, but under the law to Christ,) that I might gain them that are without law. Paul did and said whatever was _necessary_ to win people to HIS Gospel.

Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.

This is about when Jesus is coming back. He explains that it is impossible for someone to say “I am the Messiah” or “Jesus came back, I saw Him” because when He comes back it will be like lightning. Paul never claimed to be the Messiah. This verse is about false Messiah’s not about false prophet’s.

That's about Jesus' second coming. It is not about visions, like Paul and John had.

It's talking about if they are saying that the messiah has returned. Read the context! Paul didn't claim jesus had returned. Paul had a vision. There's a difference.

Where does it say this?

@SwordOfYHWH - Interesting. But if the Apostles failed in their mission to spread the Gospel to the world, why did Jesus acknowledge them in Rev 21:14? And why did Jesus stick to the number 12 and not acknowledge Paul? So Jesus went behind the backs of the Apostles and instead appointed another Apostle (Paul). It is uncharacteristic of Jesus to not first rebuke the original Apostles if indeed they had failed. Hmm it doesn't add up.

@Acts 2:38 ah yes, proving Paul with Paul... classic.

Apparently the Greek word apostolos means “one who is sent off”

@@Hebrew42Day Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.

@@Hebrew42Day yeah. That is hilarious

These are the comments of angry Christians when their comfort zone starts becoming uncomfortable.

​@@rosscullen3992Perhaps they seem angry but it's you whose pride is hurt. If you would ask the Lord Jesus Christ to teach you and open your heart to Paul's gospel given to him by Jesus himself. Paul said it was a MYSTERY NOT known before. Paul was God's chosen vessel to the gentiles. Thank you for saving me over 76 yrs ago

@@Over-for-now Mate. All you do is just sit and listen to false bible teachings from bible teachers, priests, pastors. You close your ears to the teachings of others proving the Christian Teachings are false teachings like the charlatan, liar, deceiver, false apostle Paul to ignorant, lazy to do research church members like specifically you and your kind.

zam iel You shall know thrm by there fruits

Might as well believe in Islam or Mormonism if you take every new “prophets” twist on religion as true.

That is only ONE version of the story. He tells it several ways in other accounts. In law enforcement, that is how they know someone is lying. There are three accounts of Paul's conversion in the book of Acts-Acts 9:1-19a , 22:1-21 , and 26:9-23. They are very different from each other. Go read them.

@@annajustice7620If Acts is errant, then how can we also trust the Gospel of Luke, given that they were written by the same person? Also, Peter claims that Paul’s writings are Scripture. Was Peter lying? Can he be trusted? Can ANY of Yeshua’s apostles be trusted, according to you?

beautiful you are woke.

He saw a light in the sky when he was walking alone at night. And took it upon himself to turn traditional Judaism upside down and create a whole new religion. Christianity.

@@anonymaus8191 do you also find it ironic that Paul himself says: 2Co 11:14 - "And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light."

This video was published in january of 2019. It is NOT a response to Justin Best's video.

_Paul was and is a wolf in sheep's clothing._ _It should be noted that Jesus of course would have known about Paul even before Paul came._ _And indeed Jesus did foretell to his disciples of what (or who) was going to come during this time:_ John 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. John 14:29 *And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.* John 14:30 *Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.* _The person of Jesus' prophecy in John__14:30__ had to come in a relatively short span of time. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion (verse John __14:28__) and before all his disciples had passed away (John __14:30__)._ _Jesus' prophecy did come true during the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. (Which during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_ _But why didn't Jesus tell the his disciples after this came to pass? Because (John __14:29__) he told before it came to pass, that, _*_when it is come to pass, ye might believe._* Please note the following: _Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (the 4 Gospels) are record of events which occurred while Jesus was talking much with his disciples._ _Paul epistles (13 letters) are record of events which came during the time Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (During the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_

_Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ _What Paul teaches in Galatians:_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ Galatians 5:2 *Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.* _(In Galatians 5:2 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) says “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _According to Paul; Peter was [given by God] an apostleship (Gal 2:8) or gospel (Gal 2:7) of circumcision. Paul then claims (Gal 5:2) “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _Paul is claiming that Peter was given (followed and taught) a gospel in which “Christ shall profit you nothing.” (That is; an unprofitable gospel in Christ.) An unprofitable gospel is just another way of saying a false gospel._ _And if Peter followed an unprofitable gospel it would also be true of all of Jesus' disciples._ _I doubt Jesus would agree that Peter (and all his disciples) were given and committed (by God) to a gospel in which Christ shall profit [them] nothing._ _This "contrariwise" teaching only comes from Paul, who indeed came while Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._ *_If anyone disagree perhaps they can show a quote from Jesus saying that God committed Peter to a gospel that was unprofitable in Christ._*

_Moreover:_ _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ _And while Jesus was not talking much with them (John __14:28__-30) Paul makes this claim about himself in Romans __11:13_ Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as *I am the apostle of the Gentiles,* I magnify mine office: _(However, before Paul came and during the time (John __14:28__-30) that Jesus was talking much with his disciples, Jesus had already given instructions to his disciples to preach unto the Gentiles (teach all nations) and (into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.)_ Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _(In Matthew __28:16__ is concerning the now remaining 11 disciples.)_ _(In Matthew __28:19__ “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” All nations would of course include the Gentiles nations. Because Israel was the only nation that was not Gentile.)_ Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.* Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. _(Mark __16:15__ “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Does include all the Gentile people.)_ _And notice again in Matt __28:19__-20 Jesus gave them instructions to “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” … “ Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world..” (It appears Jesus says he would be with them as they did so, even unto the end of the world.)_ Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _The teaching that they were to preach to two different groups of people is directly against and in contrast to what Jesus told his disciple while he was with them and talking much with them. The contrariwise teaching (Galatians 2:7) came by Paul exactly during the time that Jesus is not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._

Hey I found a video that could help you out

Sin is indeed trangression of the law..thank God that we have Christ Jesus who paid the debt that we are unable to pay..in doing so he set aside the law of Moses so that we may follow the law completely..the law that is Christ. We are no longer under the law of Moses therefore we are no longer to keep or to follow the the law of Moses..Christ said to follow him..lets all follow the law that is Christ.

@@adambrooks6860 _"We are no longer under the law of Moses therefore we are no longer to keep or to follow the the law of Moses."_ Then you admit that you and people like you are continually in sin.

@@Idazmi7 i am a sinner because i am not perfect..God is the only one perfect..if you do not have the full love of Christ then you are a sinner..none of us has the full love of Christ because we are not Christ..Christ forgives us of our sins. We are under the law of Christ not the law of Moses. It is written.. "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us." ( 1John 1:8) (NIV) May God bless you.

@@adambrooks6860 but in Matthew christ himself says. Matthew 5:48 [48]Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

@@adambrooks6860 also saying that you are a sinner is not an excuse to keep sinning. Romans 6:1-2 [1]What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? [2]God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

Yes he should. So do apologetics ^^^^ who justify christian warmongering

Paul is difficult to understand. His words are like pinning down jello. He seems to change colors like the lizard that does that. Sorry don't know how to spell it. Some times he states specific sins and people that do them will not inherit heaven. Other places he states if you keep the law grace will do no good. But we all have read he cleared with the original disciples that gentiles did not need to be circumcised. God said that 'would be an everlasting sign for his men.' So yes he did oppose God and his commandments. His message is really the same as the serpent in the garden of Eden. "You don't have to obey God, You will not die". This has nothing to do with Paul but go into any church and look at the faces of the men. Is there anything wrong? In our culture a man is looked on as unclean if he is not clean shaven. Actually God said "My men will have beards, and don't be like the idolaters and shave the corners". You can look at them from 200 yards away and tell they are not men of God or they would obey him. Go ahead read your Bibles. Read, read and read and then throw God's words to the ground out of rebellion. It would be better to not read and remain ignorant than to rebel against God.

@@wadejones4791 I know it's a longshot but do you live in Washington state?

@@godwinz9925 No I'm in Kansas. Why did you want to borrow my pickup?

@@wadejones4791 Lol, no, I just believe that it's time for like~minded people to get out of the 501c3 churches and get together to study to show themselves approved so iron can sharpen iron!

Is it eternal?

@@ethanreed2672 In Isaiah 66:22, our Heavenly Father makes a new Heaven and a new earth. In 66:23, from Sabbath to another, all flesh will worship Him. It doesn't make sense to think that Sabbath was ever not supposed to be remembered. The Sabbath Commandment is the only one that starts with remember because He knew that it was going to be the one that satan attacked. The enemy only has to get us to break one because James 2:10, if you break one point of the law, you are guilty of breaking all!

@@godwinz9925 Yeah the Sabbath is irrelevant, I've done enough research.

@@ethanreed2672 What do you mean that the Sabbath is irrelevant?

@@godwinz9925 We aren't suppose to keep in in this day in age, I learned after my studies that keeping the Sabbath day isn't what saves us, it's what Jesus Christ did on the cross for you and I. I know this might sound like a simple baby like message but it's the truth, NOTHING ELSE saves you other than the shed blood of Jesus Christ now may I ask you, do you put your FULL TRUST in that?

You so correct. It is highly impossible for a twelve-year-old to know the whole Jewish Bible

If Paul was preaching what the Torah say why would he be having so many problems with the rabbis and teachers of the law

The Jews know their bible

Would you explain what is mandela effects

Would you please read and edit your statement and explain what is a Mandela effect? Are you saying Jesus is false and paul is right. Please clarity. Thanks

Cascadian Applications According to the Apostle Peter, your UNTAUGHT and twist to your own your destruction!

@@347faf7 Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.

@@347faf7 What exactly did Peter say? Peter says things in Paul's letters are hard to understand. The unstable twist his writings to their destruction. Then Peter says “you therefore, beloved, knowing this beforehand, take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability.” OK. Parse this. Peter writes an entire letter and then mentions Paul's name at the end, in closing. The penultimate verse says do not follow the error of lawless people or you will become unstable. Notice the word is “lawless.” Law is Torah. Lawless would be people without Torah. People have been ignoring the obvious for centuries. Peter is warning us against following Paul away from the law. Consider how Paul returns the favor of brotherly affection in Galatians, Paul's first letter, when Paul mentions Peter and other apostles. Paul says he met Cephas in Jerusalem for 15 days, and also met James while there. Then Paul makes a bizarre oath before God, “I do not lie!” If any single thing should make you suspicious someone is not on the level is if they repeat how they are not lying. Fourteen years later Paul returns and then references others who “seem to be influential” but “what they were makes no difference to me.” Then Paul adds James, Cephas, and John “seem to be pillars.” That shows zero humility or deference to those who lived and walked with Jesus for years. James knew Jesus for his entire life. That's brotherly affection? Next, we get to where Paul calls Peter a hypocrite. We only have Paul's side of this incident. Also, Paul chastises Peter for something Paul later boasts of-- “To the Jews I became like a Jew, to win the Jews. To those under the law I became like one under the law (though I myself am not under the law), so as to win those under the law.“ If that is not hypocrisy, then brother, nothing is. Yet, we are supposed to believe Peter is endorsing this wholesale?

lex is too embarrassed to admit he is wrong 1Co_15:10 But by the grace of God I am what I am that my friend, is blasphemy and this is worse Gal_4:14 And my temptation which was in my flesh ye despised not, nor rejected; but received me as an angel of God, even as Christ Jesus.

@@michaelstevens1870 By the grace of God, I am what I am. Paul was a converted man. God made Paul what he is. No blasphemy there. Those people didn’t despise Paul because of his physical handicap but accepted Paul as an Angel and even as Christ. That doesn’t mean they thought he was an Angel or Christ, it simply means they accepted his teachings as coming from Christ.

@@KingArtexerxes He is just an NPC, ignore him.

Really? Because I have never thought him to be that way before I read his letters.

Yes they do.

@@thesword2380 I know it's a longshot but do you live in Washington state?

Paul's writings very much go against the teaches of God and Jesus.

@@zamiel3 How?

@Moshe • Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.

What is the Gospel?

@@kulassiwsiwit4917 the Gospel of the Kingdom is that this life is a test of righteousness for the citizenship of the Kingdom of ageless life that is fast approaching. In order to be righteous we follow the words of Jesus, and none else. His words are truth, wisdom, justice, logic, and mercy.

@@ziz.ranchero So how do I get saved?

@@kulassiwsiwit4917 repent from transgressions of Torah, follow jesus instructions, and be baptized.

Yes he is responsible

Read 2 Peter again. Paul is referred to beloved brother, not apostle. Peter uses the word beloved 5 times in this chapter. In 2 Peter 1:7 Peter exhorts supplement our faith with brotherly affection. A few verses later Peter addresses his audience as “brothers.” Calling Paul beloved brother says more about Peter than Paul. Peter acts with brotherly affection and addresses Paul as he does the rest of his audience. The words that follow “brother Paul” raise more questions than they answer. What wisdom was given to Paul? In all of his epistles-which epistles exactly? Would that include things written after 2 Peter, and things merely attributed to Paul? What things (some things?) are hard to understand? Who are the untaught/unstable people? Which things do they twist? (Interesting that this is the only instance of this word for twist in the Bible Strong's Greek: 4761. στρεβλόω (strebloó) -- to twist (biblehub.com) ) If the things that are twisted are wrong, what is correct/orthodoxy? What are “the rest of” the Scriptures? What does the “scripture” mean (writing in general, or only sacred writing)? Best case for Paul is a very specific endorsement of two matters (being blameless and counting the lord's patience as salvation). Otherwise the text is too ambiguous to know what is being twisted, what is orthodoxy, who is unstable, etc. Worst case, Peter is warning his audience against following Paul into lawlessness. Peter specifically says do not listen or fall into lawlessness.

Jesus is the goal of the law. Check the Greek word there. And He abolished the penalty for breaking the law, not the law itself. Hope that helps a bit :)

Yeshua fulfilled the law. Paul just emphasizes that.

What does fulfill mean?

@@RQ_Spartan People say there are 613 laws in the Old Testament - is that a burden? Firstly Jesus couldn't keep all the laws because many didn't apply to Him. Eg: Laws pertaining to animals, laws pertaining to women, laws pertaining to relationships etc. So in what way did He fulfil the law? Out of all the commandments VERY very few would even apply to different cultures - there seems to be a misconception that keeping law is burdensome - because people see 613 commandments - while the USA constitution has like 100,000 laws that everyone is expected to keep. The law is God's Word - Jesus said even a new commandment (law) I give unto you - to love one another, which we are to keep. Jesus said : For truly I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, one dot-of-an-"i" or cross-of-a-"t" will not pass away from the law, until all come to pass. Jesus said : For whoever sets aside one of these least commandments and so teaches men, he will be called least in the kingdom of the heavens. But whoever does and teaches them, this (one) will be called great in the kingdom of the heavens. Jesus definitely did not intend for the law to be removed or taken away. Within the law there are Messianic prophecies of His coming which had not yet been fulfilled. So Jesus as Messiah FULFILLED these prophecies AND Jesus did not come to abolish to the law (remember very few would actually apply anyway - as shown above that Jesus could not even keep laws such as those which applied to women etc). Instead Jesus came to RAISE THE BAR - to elevate the law - to fulfil it and make it perfect. Jesus said : You heard that it was said . . . But I say to you . . .. He elevated the law/commandments. In this manner : People are not to think the law is done away with rather we are to listen to the Words of Jesus and see how He elevated the law and intend to keep those (Jesus') commandments/law for Jesus Himself even said : John 15:10 If you keep My commandments, you will remain in My love, just as I have kept My Father's commandments and remain in His love. My commandments - are those written in the Gospels. Jesus always takes precedence over anyone else in the Bible. Even over Moses. Until Jesus who is the Word of God came, the law/commandments had not been elevated/made complete. It was when the Word of God (Jesus) came he elevated the law and made it perfect. His commandments are not burdensome. In fact Jesus even said: Mat 11:28 “Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. 29 Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. 30 For my yoke is easy and my burden is light.” Mat 22:37-40 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbour as yourself. 40 On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets Those who have a nature / heart full of love for God and for their fellow neighbour delight in keeping His commandments - and in fact when they are so much in love with Him and their fellow neighbour it will be an automatic thing to keep His commandments - they will desire to reach out to their neighbour and do good works and act out their faith - as James even said faith without works is dead. Such things will come naturally because love is a doing word and cannot be expressed to others without works. And Jesus even said “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’ Love in action I believe is what Jesus expressed just as is said - Actions speak louder than words. And as we "do" unto others as we would have them do unto us (again an elevation of the law and a commandment of Jesus) - we are shining our light too. I often have said show people the love of Jesus then you can tell them about Jesus. If all of his believers did these simple things - no one would lack anything as stated in the book of Acts - all would be taken care of - and Jesus Words would be elevated and people would see Love in action indeed. There would be perfect harmony among His believers too.

To get rid of Jesus you have to get rid of the old testament. I know where your heart is but if we remove Paul, we still have the Bible.

Jon Jon how would we, Paul taught doctrines in the old as well as the New Testament, if you take what he wrote away, what do we have left?

@@bobbi2235 what did Paul teach in the old testament? Paul is merely a man who taught from the "old testament". He didn't write it. His writings were never considered scripture then. All you need is the gospels and the old testament. We follow Jesus not Paul.

@@jonathanmiller1040 Jesus is the God of the Old Testament everything was created by him. John 1:3 (KJV) All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made that was made.

@@wazzzappening4848 yea? Not sure how your taking my post but read my first post. The gospel is important as it shows us how to livr according to the way Jesus spoke the law.

can you give examples?

First of all. Jesus didn't choose him as an apostle. He chose himself. He always says that we are not under the law but Jesus taught differently. He taught the Torah/Law.

@Kai Wong You are not Christian. You follow Paul.

There's a lot I don't like about Paul either. Sadly this creator relies heavily on Acts to prove his point, but doesn't address Matthew 7 where Jesus is warning against false prophets or ignores scripture when Jesus sent his disciples and tells them not to go to the Gentiles, or how Paul says very little of Jesus' ministry, let alone the sermon on the mount. With that said, I'm fully aware that when Paul wrote those letters, I don't thing he could have ever imagined that they would be part of Canon.

Yes he never renounced his pharisee beliefs. He was racist and sexist.

Salvation is also through the Holy Spirit. As a matter of fact you can't even have Christ without the Holy Spirit. And God told me we could lose the Holy Spirit. I know most Christians are hypocrites and they're running out of time. we were all told to repent and we were all told to confess. And that is a part of your walk with Christ. As a matter of fact people that live in sin and they don't repent and they don't confess our not right with God and they will all find out one day.

@@jeffouellette9946 How can you possibly lose the Holy Spirit. It is the Holy Spirit who holds your every atom together. We are all created in Christ by the Spirit. John 1:3-4. What we can lose is the AWARENESS of the Holy Spirit.

@@jeffouellette9946 The idea of "Christians" not being "right with God" is a false notion based in a legalistic concept of the relationship between God and man. The very idea of redemption and the reconciliation of man back to God originated in God themselves before the creation of the universe. "For God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself" 1Cor 5:19. God has always been "right" with mankind. He never had in mind to reject anyone. It is US who rejected God, even crucifying him in the body of Jesus. But even this could not deter God in Their (Father, Son and Holy Spirit's) determination to rescue all of us and have us with Them for ever. Sin does not affect God's attitude toward us, for They are love, and will never reject anyone. But our sin and unwillingness to come clean about our darkness is what causes us to run away and hide from God (as if that were even possible), just like our parents Adam and Eve did. But the wonderful truth is that even if we need to undergo a "fiery" cleansing, as God confronts every area of darkness and sin in us, all humanity will ultimately be brought to loving and submissive union in relationship with God. 1Cor 3:15; Phil 2:10-11; 2 Peter 3:9.

@@77goanywhere Paul was an anti-christ according to the first century Christians. All his letters he wrote is to manipulate the scriptures of torah and teachings of jesus. Jesus said He came not to change the scripture, but to fulfill it. But NT contradicts OT. Don't live in false reality my brother.

Charles Aaaron Te UM 😐 SHAUL OF TARSUS..... many forget he was sent to the Nations’ aka heathens...

Ben Yisrael Sha’ul was the WOLF 🐺 and his Spirit is Alive and Well in Secular Church Shepherds, ALL TEACH FROM ‘HIS’ GOSPEL which is clearly of Another. YAHUSHA’s was TRUTH because HE is the WAY, the ‘TRUTH’ and the LIFE! Shalom Brother 🙏

@Sandra Novoa-Keller This you know, that all who are in Asia turned away from me; of whom are Phygelus and Hermogenes. May the Lord grant mercy to the house of Onesiphorus, for he often refreshed me, and was not ashamed of my chain, but when he was in Rome, he sought me diligently, and found me (the Lord grant to him to find the Lord’s mercy in that day); and in how many things he served at Ephesus, you know very well. 2 Timothy 1:15‭-‬18 WEB ... Paul was facing a second imprisonment in Rome, and others had forsaken him because of it. That's why he points out how Onesiphorous was not ashamed of his chains, and exhorted Timothy to be courageous in suffering for the gospel in chapter 2. If you knew this already please let me know because I'm not trying to insult your intelligence.

John wrote the whole book of Revelations and Saw way more than Paul did,, John saw & Spoke to Angels, said he saw Yahshua on the Throne,, Talked about beginning and last day prophecey, Saw the Lamb go to the One that Sat on the Throne,, Yahshua spoke to John all the way through ,. Why nothing bad to say About John ?? John does not talk about circumcision .. That is why they have nothing to say about John.

@Sandra Novoa-Keller all of Asia was not saved. He's referring to the church specifically in Ephesus. It's like saying all of judea rejected Yeshua, which is false.

Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.

Another good teaching. And of course scripturally sound.

We are no longer under the law of Moses but the law of Christ.

@@adambrooks6860The law of Moses? What's that? Ohhh, you mean the law of the one true God who chose Moses to be His messenger. The God whom Yahshua said, "I and My Father are one." This Yahshua is the one who obeyed EVERYTHING His Father asked of Him unto death, {and thankfully resurrection!} How can anyone think that the One described above is happy that we're accusing Him of changing His Father's laws!! {P. S. I have to give credit where credit is due. That was written by inspiration because like everyone, I have my own struggles.}

@@godwinz9925 It's true..we are under a new covenant with God and we are saved by grace through faith not by works of the law..the law cannot save us but faith in Christ can..you say you have struggles and I too have struggles..it is ok to have them but we must stop from doing these things before we can get right with him..please believe me when I say that it is ok to sin now and again..it is ok that we do this so that we can show our human side to God..we are flawed so it is ok to do these things as long as we keep trying and pray to God for his forgiveness.. We are no longer under the law of Moses though so don't worry about keeping the 613 laws of the old testament..that is too much of a burden to bare..instead worry about the commandments that we are to keep..the ones that are laid out in our new covenant with God in the new testament..Jesus said that we are to place our burdens upon him and that we need to do this all the time in order to stay with him..i hear God's voice and he tells me that when we sin we are to place our burden upon him..it is something that I still struggle with doing myself..i have my own struggles as you do too and that is ok..if you would like to talk about these struggles then we can do so..it is good to confess our sins to eachother..if not we can still talk this out..have a nice day.

@@adambrooks6860 We agree, we are not saved by the law. {Btw, the law is not works.} Obeying the law is an expression of our faith. "If you love Me, keep My Commandments."

Yes. Read the bible yourself. And think for yourself. And ask questions. And discuss with your friends.

@@anonymaus8191 true. That way atleast we won't be deceived by anyone.

Peter denied that when he said - Paul’s letters are difficult to understand and untaught and unstable people twist them into lawlessness.

Great answer. Remember to be as accurate with their names also YHWH and it is Yahuwah. And the Messiahs name is Yahuwshuwa = Yahuwah is salvation. In the same way Matthew's name is Matityahuw and John's name Yahuwchanan

No one can understand Paul, he is duplicitous and a wolf. Peter isn't warning us to be careful, but marking and telling us to AVOID his writings.

@@Hebrew42Day If this is your stance Elwood, that Paul is a wolf. Are you telling people that they should not read the book of Acts because it is false? Because both 2 Peter and the book of Acts clearly embrace Paul? If that is the case, it means that you are ripping out all the writings of Paul, the book of Acts and 2 Peter and creating your own doctrine? I am asking you this respectfully, because it seems like you just typed those letters out emotionally without calculating what that implies.

@@yisraelsveryown3932 Peter's condemning Paul in the Greek. The "beloved brother" and "scripture" confuse people, a tool of the enemy. All the way back to Eusebius, the "church" felt 2 Peter 2 was _attacking_ Paul as the other brother stated. Search out the history of the Canon. Even from what we call the New Testament. Does "scripture" referenced by new testament writings ever self refer to itself? They call it the law, or the law of Moses, the prophets and the writings. The first two have the highest authority and are referenced more often. The writings have the lowest authority, and this is the word Peter uses for Paul's "writings" - they are "graphe". If Peter was referring to the "rest of scriptures" he would have said, the law and the prophets. Peter was referring to *all* of Paul's writings as employing human wisdom, circular reasoning and painful to read. (Look at the Greek) That's why men like Calvin wanted it removed from Canon.

@THINK FOR SELF Wow, excuse me but this is so unlearned, so unstable and wicked. I pray in Yahuwshuwa the Anointed One's name that the Father may take away your blindness, show you His salvation and let the set apart Ruwach (Spirit) guide and lead you into all truths. It's mind blowing knowing the scripture and seeing what you have written. THE 3 VERSES IN 2 PETER: 15 And account that the longsuffering of our Master is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; 16 As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, WHICH THEY THAT ARE UNLEARNED AND UNSTABLE WREST(DISTORT), AS THEY DO ALSO the OTHER scriptures, unto THEIR OWN DESTRUCTION. 17 YE (you) THEREFORE, beloved, SEEING YE KNOW these things BEFORE, BEWARE LEST YE ALSO, BEING LED AWAY WITH the ERROR of the WICKED, FALL from YOUR OWN STEADFASTNESS. You see? We are even warned to beware of the error of the wicked! Beware of who? The wicked! Those who distort Paul's writings.

How so?

Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.

Agree, I'm up in the air too, I could really use a response video to the 2 that ChristianTruthers put out because they are VERY convincing and I can't just dismiss them like I thought I'd be able to, the only reason I'm STILL undecided is that Paul's epistles made it into our bibles, that's seriously the ONLY reason at this point so I REALLY need to hear someone speak on the specific things brought up and if I don't sometime soon I'm going to have to conclude that there ARE no answers to these issues, which is what I'm legitimately afraid of. 😒

@@marydetray6776 I've been observing the situation regarding Justin from Christian Truthers. The reaction alone from a lot of people in the Torah observing community has truly rubbed me the wrong way. I'm still seeking the matter out with an open mind but it boggles my mind how fast someone can go from "respected and trusted man that walks in the spirit" to "deceiver spreading false doctrine". Some people truly do not know how to have a civilised discussion online haha.

@@marydetray6776 _It should be noted that Jesus of course would have known about Paul even before Paul came._ _And indeed Jesus did foretell to his disciples of what (or who) was going to come during this time:_ John 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. John 14:29 *And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.* John 14:30 *Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.* _The person of Jesus' prophecy in John__14:30__ had to come in a relatively short span of time. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion (verse John __14:28__) and before all his disciples had passed away (John __14:30__)._ _Jesus' prophecy did come true during the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. (Which is during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_ _But why didn't Jesus tell the his disciples after this came to pass? Because (John __14:29__) he told before it came to pass, that, _*_when it is come to pass, ye might believe._* Please note the following: _Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (the 4 Gospels) are record of events which occurred while Jesus was talking much with his disciples._ _Paul epistles (13 letters) are record of events which came during the time Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (During the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_

@@marydetray6776 _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ _What Paul teaches in Galatians:_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ Galatians 5:2 *Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.* _(In Galatians 5:2 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) says “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _According to Paul; Peter was [given by God] an apostleship (Gal 2:8) or gospel (Gal 2:7) of circumcision. Paul then claims (Gal 5:2) “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _Paul is claiming that Peter was given (followed and taught) a gospel in which “Christ shall profit you nothing.” (That is; an unprofitable gospel in Christ.) An unprofitable gospel is just another way of saying a false gospel._ _And if Peter followed an unprofitable gospel it would also be true of all of Jesus' disciples._ _I doubt Jesus would agree that Peter (and all his disciples) were given and committed (by God) to a gospel in which Christ shall profit [them] nothing._ _This "contrariwise" teaching only comes from Paul, who indeed came while Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._ *_If anyone disagrees perhaps they can show a quote from Jesus saying that God committed Peter to a gospel that was unprofitable in Christ._*

@@marydetray6776 _Moreover:_ _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as *I am the apostle of the Gentiles,* I magnify mine office: _(In Romans __11:13__ Paul makes a clear claim to be “the apostle of the Gentiles”.)_ _(However before Paul came, and during the time (John __14:28__-30) that Jesus was talking much with his disciples; Jesus had already given instructions to his disciples to preach unto the Gentiles (teach all nations) and (into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.)_ Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _(In Matthew __28:16__ is concerning the now remaining 11 disciples.)_ _(In Matthew __28:19__ “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” All nations would of course include the Gentiles nations. Because Israel was the only nation that was not Gentile.)_ _More in Mark:_ Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.* Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. _(Mark __16:15__ “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Does include all the Gentile people.)_ _And notice again in Matt __28:19__-20 Jesus gave them instructions to “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” … “ Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world..” (It appears Jesus says he would be with them as they did so, even unto the end of the world.)_ Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _The teaching that Peter was to preach to a different group of people is directly against, and is contrariwise to what Jesus told his disciple while he was with them and talking much with them. The contrariwise teaching (Galatians 2:7) came by Paul during the exact time that Jesus is not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._ _Paul was and is a wolf in sheep's clothing._

Paul heard a voice. He didn't seen jesus

The word Apostle means = “Official Representative.” Case 1: Believe in the Authenticity of the 66 Bible Canon - Paul is called an Apostle. Case 2: Don’t - Paul claimed to be an Official Rep of the Lord Jesus Christ - None of his contemporary Official Reps of Jesus claimed him to be a False Teacher. -They didn’t oppose his claim which he made public to so many. -Paul lived, loved and died according to the Gospel teachings of Jesus Christ. -Paul’s faith has influenced every generation since he walked on Planet Earth.

@@damhar In the desert like Jesus said to be wary of

Nah, I used to believe that but the more I learn TaNaKh the more I see Paul utterly as a Heretic against Yah. Compare Romans 10:8, deut 30;14 as an example. If Paul wasn't against Torah, wouldn't he avoid taking the passage out of context and switching the conclusion from *doing* Torah to professing faith in HIS gospel? (The word of faith) Yah warns of not taking anything from His word. Paul repeatedly does this. He takes four words and builds an ungodly pretext.

@THINK FOR SELF good point

@@ziz.ranchero not according to Peter

@@Endtimer2020 have you even read it? Peter and James epistles were direct refutation of Paul's false gospel of grace. The greek word dysoetas is translated as "hard to understand ". Most erroneously use this as affirmative when it is actually pejorative. And calling a fellow jew a wise brother does not equate to the title and honor of apostle. How many quotes of Messiah is in Paul's epistles? Answer= ZERO.

the law and the prophets speak both against paul and the rabbinical jews

So Ananias is a liar? Peter too?

Very very true!!

@@nathenram4891 When did Ananias or Peter call Paul an apostle? Keep looking

Des Walker: Yes, me too!

Yes, amen!

Why do you call Paul an apostle when Jesus Christ calls him a "liar" in Revelation 2:2.

How do you know that? Because your mommy told you that?

There is ZERO evidence that Paul even was aware of the gospels.

Or the writers made the paul character gave himself

And Jude and revelation 2:2

James and Jude fully agree with Paul.

@Nicholas Jesus WARNED about Paul and his likes: Matthew 5:17 Think NOT that I (Jesus) am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. Matthew 5:18-19 “For verily I say unto you, TILL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS, one jot or one tittle shall in NO wise pass from the law, till ALL be fulfilled. WHOSOEVER therefore shall break one of these LEAST commandments, and SHALL TEACH men so, he shall be called the LEAST in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.” [[See! ....WHOSOEVER therefore shall break one of these LEAST commandments, and SHALL TEACH men so, he shall be called the LEAST .....]] Does that ring a bell? Paul is the answer. ******** Obviously, heaven and earth have not yet passed. The fact that you are reading this bears witness to this very simple fact. So Jesus is telling us that so long as creation exists, the laws and the commandments will be required from his followers. Anyone who will dare to say otherwise, until the end of time, will be called “the least in the kingdom of heaven.” Jesus the messiah and messenger had FOREWARNED about mankind’s attempt to distort and annul the commandments (the commandments Moses brought), which he had taught his followers to keep and himself had kept faithfully (along with whatever stipulations that God had prescribed Jesus Christ as per his time and place) throughout his mission on earth, and was warning his followers in no uncertain terms to be wary of all those who would attempt to do so. Even towards the end of his ministry, Jesus Christ even instructs his disciples and the people to do what the Jew teachers say. Matthew 23:2-3 2 “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat; 3 so PRACTICE and OBSERVE WHATEVER they tell you, but not what they do; for they preach, but do not practice. *************** And what do the Jews teachers, the scribes and the Pharisees tell you? To KEEP the laws and the commandments. Jesus tells us that “If a man love me, he WILL KEEP MY WORDS: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.” John 14:23. He taught to KEEP THE LAWS AND THE COMMANDMENTS TILL HEAVEN AND EARTH PASS but Christians, who profess to be followers of the Christ, are doing the exact opposite of what Jesus the Christ himself said. Christians today are the followers of Paul. Christians are NOT the followers of Jesus Christ. Christians in fact AGAINST Jesus Christ as per fundamental doctrines. The believers in Crucifixion which is an abomination against Jesus Christ because he NEVER got Crucified or killed as the scriptures testify. The scriptures expose this falsehood. ******** Jesus WARNED in Matthew 7:15 Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in SHEEP'S clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.

@Nicholas It's really an ammmmazing situation! Those professing to love the Messiah, the Christian brethern, are ok with him humiliated and beaten and spat at and tortured, suffering the ignominy of the cross and death with all the nakedness with flies buzzing around. Oh what does this fake easy salvation card, such as sold by Paul, does to a persons thinking! My position as a muslim, a believer in the God of Abraham and Moses and Jesus and Muhammad (peace be upon them all), is that of a defender of the true honor and status of the beloved Messiah sent by God. A crucified Messiah is a square circle anyway because if someone claiming to be the Messiah is crucified or killed then he is NOT the true Messiah. According to the many passages, God had foretold again and again in the Old Testament that the Messiah will be will be honored and be saved that God will not let him be humiliated and killed / crucified. ************* No wonder they mocked the person on the cross because according to the evidence in the scriptures the true Messiah could never be put through such humiliation and death. True Messiah would be saved. Mark 15:31-32 In the same way the chief priests and the teachers of the law mocked him among themselves. "He saved others," they said, "but he can't save himself! Let this Messiah, this king of Israel, come down now from the cross, that we may see and believe." Those crucified with him also heaped insults on him. ****** Please pay specially attention to Psalm 91:11-12, 15) Psalm 91 1 He who dwells in the shelter of the Most High will rest in the shadow of the Almighty. 2 I will say of the LORD, "He is my refuge and my fortress, my God, in whom I trust." 3 Surely he will save you from the fowler's snare and from the deadly pestilence. 4 He will cover you with his feathers, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness will be your shield and rampart. 5 You will not fear the terror of night, nor the arrow that flies by day, 6 nor the pestilence that stalks in the darkness, nor the plague that destroys at midday. 7 A thousand may fall at your side, ten thousand at your right hand, but it will not come near you. 8 You will ONLY observe with your eyes and see the punishment of the wicked. 9 If you make the Most High your dwelling- even the LORD, who is my refuge- 10 then NO HARM will befall you, no disaster will come near your tent. 11 For he will command his angels concerning you to GUARD you in all your ways; 12 they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone. (If Jesus died on the cross and got buried, then his feet would've struck the ground and the stones on it from bringing him down, throwing him on the floor and burying him). 13 You will tread upon the lion and the cobra; you will trample the great lion and the serpent. 14 "Because he loves me," says the LORD, "I will RESCUE him; I will PROTECT him, for he acknowledges my name. 15 He will call upon me, and I will ANSWER him; I will be with him in trouble, I will deliver him and honor him. 16 With long life will I satisfy him and show him my salvation." ********* 32:9 There is no question that the emphasized parts above, especially in Psalm 91:11-12, 15 and the others, clearly and indisputably agree with the Noble Quran's Verses. Jesus was neither crucified nor resurrected, and he was protected and lifted by GOD Almighty. Also, the New Testament, again, confirms that Psalm 91 is referring to Jesus Christ. GOD Almighty will HEAR his cries (Psalm 91:15) and will SAVE HIM (Psalm 91:3). GOD Almighty will cover him with His PROTECTION (Psalm 91:4). Christ will then not have any fear in him (Psalm 91:5). Christ will then observe with his own eyes the punishment of the crucified ones (Psalm 91:8). NO HARM (NO HARM means NO Harm. This includes crucifixion!) or disaster will even come near Christ (Psalm 91:10....this even contradicts him getting beaten up before crucifixion). GOD Almighty will send down the Angels to protect him and lift him (Psalm 91:11-12, 14). Not even his foot will strike the ground from his enemies pushing, grappling and punishment. Christ's call will be HEARD, and he will be DELIVERED AND HONORED (Psalm 91:15) No way would these verses be valid if Christ got crucified. We MUST remember that Jesus Christ prayed that Crucifixion be taken away from him. We must remember that the prayer of the righteous is POWERFUL and EFFECTIVE. The Christian position makes Jesus a liar and an UNRIGHTEOUS person with an IMPOTENT and INEFFECTIVE prayer.

@Fiasal , Yeshua did warn against the-like which you speak of, and Paul himself warned against them also. Peter wrote highly of Paul calling Paul's writings Scripture and warning that they can be hard to understand. Paul said that those who claim he taught lawlessness were slandering him. Faisal, religion slanders Paul, learn about his teachings by reading them. I've read and fully understand Paul with ease and he is in full agreement with Yeshua and The Twelve. Religion lies about everything else, and they also lie about Paul.

Amen

@Lauren Maxwell 2 Cor 1:1 Paul bears witness (to himself)

Most Christians absolutely love to sin and don't show they have the Holy Spirit.

I disagree.scripture does not say you are sanctified by a believing spouse.but Paul does

@@jeffouellette9946 that is sadly true. We need to repent.

@@andreawimer4334 Peter quoted in his letter that some of Paul his writings are indeed hard to understand. And some are using this to twist the scriptures...

he is was an unrepentant lying pharisee

Very good and observant observations.

Paul was a fraud. I made my videos (in my channel) which expose Paul as a fraud as well.

Maybe because Paul disobeyed Acts 16:6... Acts 16:6 Now when they had gone throughout Phrygia and the region of Galatia, and *were forbidden of the Holy Ghost to preach the word in Asia,*

@@nuviarangel9201 _"then you shouldnt be using the name Christ either then. Symantical arguments separate the body of Messiah."_ False names separate the body of Messiah. I never use "Christ" myself.

@@nuviarangel9201 _"earthly language and arguments on symantics dont really apply in the Kingdom. Yeshua outside of the earthly vessel is spirit, where I highly doubt our lowly human languages compare to how we will communicate in the kingdom."_ And who created the Earth, and everything on it? The same being who also said "my people are called by my name". We must learn to use the proper names of things: even created things.

@@Idazmi7 did Adam name a lion "lion"? Or an apple "apple"

@@black-shiip1323 Did the messenger who came to Miriam say "call his name Jesus Christ?" I believe that we will learn the proper language in the Kingdom, and all the names with it. However, we are called by the _name_ of our Creator, even in this world, and knowing who we speak of is just as important as following Him. The Son of "God" is named Yehoshua: I won't use Christ as his name because it is not his name. "God's" name is written Yehovah, and it his his name that we are called by, even now.

He did. The Trinity.

Open Air Preaching Sherrick Duncan In what sense the trinity? Shouldn’t all essential important events have at least two human witnesses? I am very interested in learning, so please explain. Thanks

The men who were with Saul/Paul heard the voice of the Lord, but didn't see anyone. (Acts 9:7), so in one sense, he did have witnesses to his conversion

Jen Ward Yes, in a sense, but not the way two or more witnesses are seen throughout the bible. And regarding celibacy, why did he promote that ? There’s nowhere in the bible another mention of it, on the contrary, the first commandment in Genesis is to be fruitful and multiply.

Not only did Paul/Saul not have two or three credible witnesses of that event, but if you carefully compare his three accounts, his story changes significantly over the years. And I'm not just referring to whether the two Roman deputies with him saw or did not see or heard or could not hear. More than that is Paul/Saul said that he was told to be taken to Ananias for healing & for his instructions. Initially, he claims to be humbled, lost, & submissive in the event. Yet, over the years, the story morphs like a mythical fish story & by the end, Paul is magnified into the hero of the event, being directly told all things by Yeshua personally witb Ananias eventually being completely removed from the whole account. It's almost as if Paul healed himself. If Paul were on trial, his testimony would have been suspect at best. Any detective carefully questions when a witness' account varies to the degree which Paul's clearly varied. For comparison, we can read Peter's two accounts of the sheet coming down out of heaven with clean & unclean animals upon it. Both of Peter's accounts are identical. Even though there were no human witnesses on the roof with Peter, I am confident in his account of the vision. It makes a statement which makes sense, causes a permanent change of heart on Peter's part, & has an ongoing selfless purpose in promoting the will of YHVH. Paul's Damascus accounts don't make logical sense when combined, don't reflect a permanent change of heart on Paul's part, & seem to have selfish motivation of justifying Paul's claim to fame. Paul claimed to believe, but he also still claimed his discipleship under Gamiel. He still claimed to be a Pharisee. He still claimed his Roman citizenship. The disciples who were appointed apostles gave up their earthly titles & professions; whereas, Paul did not. All things to all men, in order words, a chameleon. John had been told not to try to stop a man from healing in the name of Yeshua because he was not part of their group. For such a man will not be quick to say bad things in the next moment. He will get his reward. I believe that when Paul came along claiming to heal in Yeshua's name & be an apostle, the apostles did not forbid him as the Messiah had instructed them not to forbid or resist such people. He was like a tare sown by the evil one among the wheat. Paul had been a persecutor of believers. He had actually been on the way to Damascus to serve arrest warrants he had gotten for believers. Then suddenly, he was converted & thus Paul had suddenly became less dangerous. Yeshua said to let such grow among the wheat until maturity or risk damaging the wheat while trying to extricate them from the wheat field of YHVH. Peter in his letter did not confirm nor deny whether Paul was an apostle, but he did make sure to refer to him, rather conspicuously, as a brother. And he referred to Paul's wisdom. Wisdom is never the same thing as hands on experience with man Yeshua, the Christ. And the warning to believers to be careful if reading Paul's difficult to understand writings without a firm foundation in the Law, Prophets, & the gospel is very revealing. Peter was clear that Truth about the Father & the Son should be basis for belief & Paul's writings should be considered addendums. Peter was warning people that the writings were unclear to the unlearned & were ripe for corruption by devious leaders actually directing naïve & gullible seekers into destruction. In other words, Paul may not have even meant for his words to be misrepresented, but Peter had prophesied they would be, with evil effects. None of that sounds like a reference for basing one's faith off of Pauline doctrine, now does it? Yet, people lap up Paul almost as a replacement for Yeshua. Additionally, Peter & the rest of the apostles had already clearly defined the qualifications for being an apostle at the council in Jerusalem. Only 14 people on earth had ever met those qualifications. No matter what personalized & custom teaching that Yeshua might give Paul, he could not serve as a verifiable witness to the entire Ministry, death, burial, resurrection, & ascension of the Lamb. And thirteen of the qualifying men had already been appointed by either Yeshua himself or the council of the apostles. Paul doesn't qualify, period. Nowhere in scripture does Paul state that there was a formal, public appointment of him to the apostleship either. Unnamed, never brought before the apostles Roman military men don't count. Paul appointed himself to a position he clearly wasn't even qualified for. Then Paul must have also later appointed his personal cronies to Paul's definition of apostleship as well. Tsk, tsk. Many times I wonder if the super apostles that Paul are so irate about aren't possibly real duly appointed apostles. Paul never says the men aren't apostles. It's more of a I was here first, if you're friends with them & believe what they have to say, you are being disloyal, allehiance is owed to Paul, & he's not going anywhere until he wins. Well, guilt tripping people, lording over them, & whining aren't fruits of he spirit. Even if the super apostles are lying, Yeshua instructed that when you go into a house ministering, you bless the house. If the householders later reject the message, you are supposed to remove your blessing from the house, shake or brush the dust from your feet, & go on your way. Paul did not do this. He told people he was a thief (of monies from other places) & he wasn't going anywhere. He was in his realm & he essentially owned them. That sounds more like the traits of the devil than a messenger of YHVH. It is E disturbing when Paul claims to be their father who is prepping the bride. Yeshua had said call no man father. YHVH had been clear that the Son of the free woman was approved. The Son of the bondwoman was not. Neither the Father nor the Son want a bride who has been coerced. That is why there is freewill. Line upon line, precept upon precept upon precept, there a little, there a little & soon enough the modern Pauline theology falls to dust. Paul claimed that Satan's workers could masquerade as righteousness just as Satan likewise appears to be an angel of light. it very well could be Paul was knowingly, or unknowingly speaking about himxelf. The whole bible works together as an almost living organism, Law, Prophets, Writings, Gospels, & Revelation. And if you take the sin offering as having been completed with the Instruction (Law) still serving as a guide, even the Acts & the Epistles fit, even Paul's writings, believe it or not, it all still fits. Paul circumcised after the council, Paul paid for animal sacrifices times 5 long after the ascension for Nazarite vows. It's only when Pauline doctrine comes into play that it breaks apart. Paul is suspect.

Polycarp, direct disciple of Apostle John quoted Paul on multiple occasions in his epistle and treated his writings as scripture, This was around 100AD yes before “the pagans inflated the church”, as you said above.

@AndrewFisherOfMen Simon Magus . You know this name? Also called the enemy of Peter...

@@kurt___9984 he had a confrontation with Peter in acts, what about it? He was a sorcerer

To me I think u know the answers to those questions. Everything that Jesus said was warning ⚠️ of what was to come Now my dear if u Don't obey pual u will realise that to enter the kingdom of God u must 1. Abstain from all food offered to idols, unclean food, food with blood still in the 2. U must spare a day for the Lord and that day must be the day He personally called blessed not what people think is to be significant because what God blesses remains blessed forever 3. Keep the 10 commandments better than the scribes 4. Believe in Jesus as the only begotten son of the God the HEAVENLY FATHER (at least follow what Jesus said about him and the Father) 5. Share the Word of God as much as u can and be a doer of what u preach NOTE: BE CAREFUL OR IF POSSIBLE AVOID PUAL AT ALL COST HE IS THE MAIN REASON CHRISTIANITY HAS SEVERAL DENOMINATIONS BUT PEOPLE CAN'T SEE THAT BECAUSE THEY LOVE THE WORLD AND INWARDLY DISLIKE WHAT JESUS SAID LIKE 1. A servant is not greater than the master referring the relationship between himself and his father 2. I have no authority to choose who will seat on my right and left but the father does showing that some duty is exceptionally belong to the father 3. No one will enter heaven by saying Lord Lord Lord or Jesus Jesus Jesus I love u ♥️ 😅 but he who does the will of the father 4. Give to the poor 5. Etc

Except that I don't think that the narcissist plagiarist Albert Einstein was really such a good example to be used there. Furthermore a good video, though.

No, I am not on any program or diet.

Too bad they're not as well versed as Rabbi Tovia Singer. Who points out that Paul has two different stories about his conversion. Or there is no historical record that backs that anyone was ever commissioned to prosecute the followers of Yeshua in fact the Greatest Rabbi of their time, Gamaliel, especially forbade it as it is recorded in the N.T. If Paul actually studied at the foot of this great Rabbi... he was a very very bad student to go directly opposed to Gamaliel's instructions! Or that the Pharisees of Jerusalem had no authority in the territory of Damascus which was under the authority of the Sadducees.

​@@TheAvegator I thought we are to call no man Rabbi? Hmmm...

@@RubySlippers1100 Everything should be read in the context of the chapter. Yeshua was referring to the misuse of the title by the Pharisees;creating added ordinances/laws/rules not to be found in the written scriptures of the prophets. Our True Teacher is Yehowah! His Torah is the teacher's writings.

@@RubySlippers1100 👍

Satan at work still

He was a self-proclaimed apostle, a liar, a braggart, and even a man who bragged about his lying. Follow him at your own peril.

Paul is a false apostle and he's an enemy to the Gospel of the Kingdom.

👍

Youre twisting 2Peter to be speaking of Pauls epistles, as opposed to Pauls epistles twisting Scripture. Mind explaining where Paul is quoting from in Rom3:10 to establish "none righteous"? Despite Luke recording that Zacharias and Elisabeth were both righteous?

I just want to let you know that we are no longer under the law of Moses..we are in a new covenant with God in Christ Jesus.

@@adambrooks6860 : Amen brother. Jesus didn't come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it - Matthew 5:17 and Paul says it's through faith that we fulfill the law - Romans 3:31.

@@strineys.957 amen, Christ is the faith that was to come, God bless you ❤

@@adambrooks6860 : May the grace of Jesus be with you brother.

Paul said that but can you prove it?@@strineys.957

Unlearn, I really like your other videos (that you don't use Paul in). You do a great thing here spreading the truth of Torah and witnessing of Yeshua and may you continue to reach people and help ppl come out of the Babylonian system. Just thought I would add this compliment. I consider you a brother whether we agree or not about P. 😊

Not true Peter in his letters called Paul a brother. Also in the book of Acts they all received him. So not sure where you get this idea. It certainly isn’t from the Bible. People assume all the apostles received the same revelation, they did not.

@@onestepaway3232 , please show me where one apostle calls him an apostle. Thank you.

@@onestepaway3232 not. one. Thank you. Please read Rev 2:1, 2. Yeshua's words.

Also read Acts 15. The church in Jerusalem received him. There is no rejection of Paul in the whole Bible

Luke, one of the gospel writers and eye witness accounts of Jesus wrote the book of Acts which speaks of Paul. I would think his writings is trustworthy. Blessings friend 🙏💛

Don't add to or take away from Revelation.

Bobbi Paul was right. Many here are wrong. The Mosaic Law is abolished. If we are under a NEW covenant, then it is different than the old. Even the 10 commandments were abolished, not merely the ordinances. “Who also hath made us able ministers of the new testament; not of the letter, but of the spirit: for the letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life. But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:” ‭‭2 Corinthians‬ ‭3:6-7‬ ‭KJV‬‬ The 10 commandments in particular were abolished along with the whole law of Moses. The only ones of the 10 that are for Christians under the New Covenant were the ones brought into and made part of the new covenant. The 10 commandments were the only part of the law of Moses written on the tablets of stone (Ex. 24:12; 31:18; 34:1-4; Dt. 4:13; 5:22; 9:9-11; 10:1-3).

@@TheBlakins1 Revelation 14:12 (KJV) Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus.

Katie L Yes, all covenants have commands, conditions, warnings, promises for blessing from obedience and promises for cursing from disobedience. The whole church of Galatia went back under the law and was condemned by Paul (Gal. 1:6-9; 3:1-5; 5:4). Even Barnabus, Peter, and others were carried away by this false doctrine for awhile (Gal. 2:11-21). The law of Moses has been abolished and done away (2 Cor. 3:6-15); cast out (Gal. 4:11-21); abolished (Eph. 2:15); blotted out; taken out of the way (Col. 2:14-17); changed (Heb. 7:12); disannulled (Heb. 7:18); replaced; has vanished (Heb. 8:6-13; 10:9); and was fulfilled (Mat. 5:17-18). You can’t love God unless you obey His commandments (Jn. 14:15-24) You can’t know Him or the Father if you don’t “follow these rules” (Mat.,7:21-27; 1 Jn. 2:3-6; 3:6; 5:1-18; 2 Jn. 9; 3 Jn. 11) You can’t be His friend unless you obey the commandments (Jn. 15:14; Jas. 4:4; 1 Jn. 2:15-17) You can’t be His disciple or son if you do not obey the rules (Jn. 8:31; Lk. 6:46; 1 Jn. 3:1-10) You can’t have eternal life if you don’t follow the rules (Mat. 19:17; Heb. 5:9; Rev. 22:14-15)

Rev 2:1, 2

That is what the Gnostics such as Marcion taught

People dont read the bible , they just hear pieces and believe anything. The law stands and will till the end.

I usually use the NKJV

UNLEARN the lies 👍🏼

Read acts 1:15-26 ask if Paul's a true apostle? Jesus said Ephesus deny false apostles Revelation2:2 same church denys Paul

The love of God is keeping the commandments. 1 John 5:3

Only to the ignorant

_It should be noted that Jesus of course would have known about Paul even before Paul came._ _And indeed Jesus did foretell to his disciples of what (or who) was going to come during this time:_ John 14:28 Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I. John 14:29 *And now I have told you before it come to pass, that, when it is come to pass, ye might believe.* John 14:30 *Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.* _The person of Jesus' prophecy in John__14:30__ had to come in a relatively short span of time. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion (verse John __14:28__) and before all his disciples had passed away (John __14:30__)._ _Jesus' prophecy did come true during the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. (Which during the remaining span of the disciples lives and while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_ _But why didn't Jesus tell the his disciples after this came to pass? Because (John __14:29__) he told before it came to pass, that, _*_when it is come to pass, ye might believe._* Please note the following: _Matthew, Mark, Luke and John (the 4 Gospels) are record of events which occurred while Jesus was talking much with his disciples._ _Paul epistles (13 letters) are record of events which came during the time Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (During the very exact time Jesus foretold it would. Which is after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them.)_

_Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ _What Paul teaches in Galatians:_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ Galatians 5:2 *Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.* _(In Galatians 5:2 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) says “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _According to Paul; Peter was [given by God] an apostleship (Gal 2:8) or gospel (Gal 2:7) of circumcision. Paul then claims (Gal 5:2) “that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.”_ _Paul is claiming that Peter was given (followed and taught) a gospel in which “Christ shall profit you nothing.” (That is; an unprofitable gospel in Christ.) An unprofitable gospel is just another way of saying a false gospel._ _And if Peter followed an unprofitable gospel it would also be true of all of Jesus' disciples._ _I doubt Jesus would agree that Peter (and all his disciples) were given and committed (by God) to a gospel in which Christ shall profit [them] nothing._ _This "contrariwise" teaching only comes from Paul, who indeed came while Jesus was not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._ *_If anyone disagrees perhaps they can show a quote from Jesus saying that God committed Peter to a gospel that was unprofitable in Christ._*

_Moreover:_ _Paul came teaching after Jesus' crucifixion and during the remaining span of the disciples lives while Jesus was not talking much with them. ( John __14:28__-30)_ Galatians 2:7 *But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;* Galatians 2:8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:) _(In Galatians 2:7 Paul makes it clear that he (Paul) claims a gospel that is “contrariwise” to the gospel he claims was committed unto Peter.)_ _And while Jesus was not talking much with them (John __14:28__-30) Paul makes this claim about himself in Romans __11:13_ Romans 11:13 For I speak to you Gentiles, inasmuch as *I am the apostle of the Gentiles,* I magnify mine office: _(However, before Paul came and during the time (John __14:28__-30) that Jesus was talking much with his disciples, Jesus had already given instructions to his disciples to preach unto the Gentiles (teach all nations) and (into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.)_ Matthew 28:16 Then *the eleven disciples* went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. Matthew 28:17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. Matthew 28:18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _(In Matthew __28:16__ is concerning the now remaining 11 disciples.)_ _(In Matthew __28:19__ “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” All nations would of course include the Gentiles nations. Because Israel was the only nation that was not Gentile.)_ _More in Mark:_ Mark 16:14 Afterward *he appeared unto the eleven* as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. Mark 16:15 And he said unto them, *Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.* Mark 16:16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. _(Mark __16:15__ “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.” Does include all the Gentile people.)_ _And notice again in Matt __28:19__-20 Jesus gave them instructions to “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations” … “ Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world..” (It appears Jesus says he would be with them as they did so, even unto the end of the world.)_ Matthew 28:19 *Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,* baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Matthew 28:20 *Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.* Amen. _The teaching that Peter was to preach to a different group of people is directly against, and is contrariwise to what Jesus told his disciple while he was with them and talking much with them. The contrariwise teaching (Galatians 2:7) came by Paul during the exact time that Jesus is not talking much with his disciples. (John __14:28__-30)._