is The Bible Historically Reliable? | Atheist Biblical Scholar Francesca Stavrakopoulou

No video

is The Bible Historically Reliable? | Atheist Biblical Scholar Francesca Stavrakopoulou

Рет қаралды 5,092

Cognitive Dissident

3 жыл бұрын

Пікірлер: 54

@bryanwhitehouse4141 7 ай бұрын

A wonderful analysis.

@carloscisneros8887 7 ай бұрын

The biblie is a fairy tale. Period

@AGR091 7 ай бұрын

I wonder if she believes that Alexander the Great was a real person.

@bobmusil1458 2 ай бұрын

Of course she does. Why? Because there is abundant evidence supporting the existence of Alexander the Great.

@paulcarey1708 Ай бұрын

Alexander the Great? Yes. Peter the Great? Yes. Gandolf the Grey? No.

@AGR091 29 күн бұрын

@@paulcarey1708 what’s the evidence that Alexander the Great or Peter the Great were real people? The accounts of Alexander also where written 300 years after his death.

@heidifarstadkvalheim4952 2 жыл бұрын

Abraham, Moses, David - its all made up - by old men i power.

@shawngegen8768 7 ай бұрын

We have inscription in Arabia of biblical tribes . They were real historical.. she has not knowledge what she's talking about .

@johnbarnesNnaptown 7 ай бұрын

I've been meaning to ask my Luddite I. T. guy what he thought of the Bible

@kenmcclellan Жыл бұрын

Manetho says Moses was a Heliopolitan priest of Osiris names Osarseph. Jonas & Jesus taught us about a coming star sign in Cetus (the Whale) they had witnessed. The OT was apparently cobbled together from centuries of oral tradition around 273 BC Alexandria. There was definitely more than one Exodus. Manetho mentions an early one. Moses was #2. Jeremiah probably #3 ...

@berglen100 12 күн бұрын

She Franceca Stavrakopoulou still kindergarden to Neville Goddard very good coaching for MAN some good and dam plays flesh and blood bodies obey I AM.

@anupjims Жыл бұрын

When you do research by being biased then you''ll see only what you want to see which is not the truth

@ivandarmawan9372 7 ай бұрын

She has a PhD in theology from Oxford. You don't get a PhD by being biased, my dude

@MiltonMoJunction 7 ай бұрын

That's exactly what religious scholars do because they believe the bible is a true version of what happened, rather than a comic book full of unbelievable fairy stories.

@poorbanishedchildrenofEve 7 ай бұрын

@@ivandarmawan9372look into her history and you will find why she is saying what she is saying. Academia is a profitable enterprise.

@galadine12 7 ай бұрын

@@ivandarmawan9372 You don't get a PhD by being biased? Haha. You clearly haven't done a significant amount of higher education. Almost EVERY high level degree has tremendous bias baked in.

@talover403 7 ай бұрын

@@galadine12 And how do you know that statement is true unless you are biased yourself?

@ladym7852 Жыл бұрын

So what is she trying to say about those heaps of people who do believe in the Bible? It would be nice to see her talk about it with a biblical scholar or historical scholars who don't agree with her claims.

@mancatYT Жыл бұрын

delusional. there’s no other explanation.

@ladym7852 Жыл бұрын

@@mancatYT I wouldn't call her delusion. It would be nice to see that interaction.

@mancatYT Жыл бұрын

@@ladym7852 she’s not the one i’m referring to as delusional lol

@ladym7852 Жыл бұрын

@Mancat Oh, so you're referring to yourself. I understand. You shouldn't look at yourself that way buddy. Maybe you should chat with a friend or therapist about your low self esteem. Hugs! 🤗

@LBS722 7 ай бұрын

She is saying that people are believing claims that are not verifiable or rooted in historical accuracy. Belief is not at all the same as historical accuracy, and belief is especially delusional when the belief does not account for the historical accuracy upon which the actual belief is based. She is a biblical scholar and much of what she says about biblical history is pretty much consensus, so since you are wondering about the heaps of people who believe in the bible perhaps you mean it would be nice to see her talk about it with theologians instead, which is also a totally different subject being that scholarship is based on verifiable evidence and theology is not based on verifiable evidence but rather merely unverifiable claims and belief (faith).

@BearTraderDan 7 ай бұрын

The books where are written hundreds of your after the supposed time are the least reliable . Everything before the arrival in the land of Canaan was not written down at the time because the Jews learned how to write from the Canaanites and the script changed again during their Babylonian captivity. The genetic evidence shows that modern day askenazi jews are close to 40% Canaanite and Palestinian jews are 70% Canaanite which confirms that there was a significant integration of the indigenous culture with the jews . Note that Palestinians and Lebanese are also 70% Canaanite which indicates the war between these nations is a civil was based on religious segregation.

@poorbanishedchildrenofEve 7 ай бұрын

The egyptian timeline is being considered to be incorrect. If so, this shifts everything historically. There is a documentary on the exodus that shows this shift, and if so, everything in the OT lines up.

@bobmusil1458 2 ай бұрын

You've been lied to

@pabloashan-deleon3088 2 жыл бұрын

My first question for this FRANCESCA STAVRAKOPOULOU, Would be the following 👇🏿 Is *CAESAR AUGUSTUS* a FICTIONAL Character in history or a FACTUAL Character in history ❓🤔💭

@jura_rose 2 жыл бұрын

Yes. Because there is scholarly evidence for his existence. For the same reason why we know William the conqueror existed and King Arthur didn't. It is a scholars job to differentiate between fiction and history, contemporaneous textural and archeological evidence being the bread and butter of such investigations.

@pabloashan-deleon3088 2 жыл бұрын

@@jura_rose Jura, Is *JOSEPHUS* a FICTIONAL Character in history or a FACTUAL Character in history ❓🤔💭

@dresscode4197 6 ай бұрын

He was indeed a real person. We know that because we have his own writing and many things he wrote was confirmed through archaeology.

@obflow8308 11 ай бұрын

Why do they think it’s so funny

@MiltonMoJunction 7 ай бұрын

Because so many people live their lives believing the bible is a true account, rather than just an old comic containing fairy stories which it is.

@michaelbarnhart8479 7 ай бұрын

She is so ridiculously wrong…whether you are a believer, agnostic, or atheist…I really hope you look deeper into this than she has. I’ve gone down a rabbit hole the past few years and my mind has been blown as far as how much of the Bible is corroborated by archeology finds and other cultures. For her to say definitively that Moses didn’t exist is irresponsible and risky…she’ll probably eat those words in the future as archaeological discoveries continue…or maybe not…but that’s kind of my point…she lacks an open mind and which is critical for a “Growth Mindset” therefore she will only see what she thinks she already knows…confirmation bias. Same is true for believers who are scared to learn something that contradicts their belief systems. I promise if you look deeper into this with an objective and logical approach…it is extremely difficult to come to her conclusions. The burden of proof for anything else taught in academia regarding “History” is so low…yet impossibly high for anything written in the Bible.

@gdevelek 7 ай бұрын

She is a scholar. You are a hobbyist. Be quiet.

@felipeepilefelipe 7 ай бұрын

Saying that Moses didn’t exist is risky?, why?, I don’t see the point, what is the risk?, for her or for Moses believers?. Did you find archaeological evidence that undoubtedly demonstrates the existence of Moses?

@itskarl7575 7 ай бұрын

It would be unbelievable if the Bible didn't get _some_ things right, because for a great deal they are describing the near past from the authors' perspective. However, the Bible does not get it right any more often than you'd expect - and indeed, gets it wrong _even more often_ than you'd expect.

@That_one_introvert. Күн бұрын

@@felipeepilefelipe Bart D. Ehrman is an atheist and biblical scholar and he says the biblical characters are real people, Francesca is a bias she leans more to her atheist beliefs she doesn’t read the Bible for truth. She reads it to disprove it.