The new main switches are a breeeze to use tho

except with usb-c, new 2k sensor and optical switches

@@legendaryz_chI do like the new switch more, but I also think it’s personal preference

wrong

100% incorrect. The side switches may be the same original pieces but they’re more solid, the switches are much much more responsive especially for fps games. The 60 gram mark is absolutely perfect for me. 2k sensor feels so much more responsive. It’s a hugeee upgrade if you’re actually competitive and care about the feeling and responsiveness of your mouse. It’s a much better experience for people who play very competitively.

i came from g502 Lightspeed. Superhappy

tons of better options like lamzu atlantis

@@hoecage8781 there is no tons of better options......in the end its all down to personal preference

@@ernestfrigelj2876 sure but when other companies clone your shape then give better features like 4k polling then its objectively worse

@@hoecage8781 4k polling is not better feature.... Its just selling number at this point same was dpi 10-15 years ago...... But again some ppl like Logitech products.....and techonlogy of mices is probably as good as it will get in terms what humans can feel or detect and also lot of people didnt want big changes in Superlight especially pro players.....there is reason some ppl continue to buy let say BMW although there are othet car manufacturers that give more "technology" for same or lower price..... Me personally I would never buy Lamzu

What happened to my counter strike we recommending razer products now? 🤢 go get you a Zowie like god intended. Steelseries if you need to be a hipster. Do not buy overpriced Dell garbage

just recommending whats best @@williamheard8496

yeah i bought the superlight 2 last month. my last mouse was a $15 g102 and i wanted to buy an actual good mouse so instead of getting the normal superlight i got the new one

​@@williamheard8496100+ mouse is not worth it. I rather stick to my default office mouse that come with my laptop for free😂

I own a dav3 faker edition a lamzu Atlantis and have owned the original superlight, pulsar v2mini and viper v2 pro and I'll say shape is king. There's something that feels good about to superlight 2 shape for me. I'm also on a glass skypad so the slow stock skates don't really affect me. I perform good with all my mouse really it just comes down to shape preference I'd say. I really rarely notice a different between 1k and 2k polling.

So like CS2

except that the superlight 2 doesn't die after a month.

not true lol

⁠@@TheEregosCS2 is on an entirely new engine. Overwatch 2 is on the same as overwatch 1. If you put CS2 on high settings for spectator purposes it almost looks like an entirely different game especially if you look just at the maps particularly the older maps with no game play. If you compare CSGO beta with CS2 beta they are completely different worlds.

@@jakeman025 who asked?

ive had my gpx for about 1.5ish years, and i have no issues with it yet but realistically if i start seeing issues the gpx2 or gpx3 if its out then is probaly where ill go sense the gpro shape fits my hand perfectly

no "most" people aren't going for that.

This is exactly true.

@@RealTaIk Well "real talk" - I would say it's obviously sad that they can't add better stock skates to a mouse in this price range. That being said, most people who are seriously into it will. And a mouse with this kind of price tag is catered to those people. But what OP wrote is correct, timeless design and with a near perfect mouse (I used the OG superlight for 2 years so far) it's hard to imagine them changing the whole thing and making a completely different mouse

​@@Trickzyy Kinda funny that you call something "obvious" while you clearly never had anything to do with people who buy that stuff. I worked in a electronics store in which we sold high end gamer peripherals and I can tell you that most people don't have any idea of what they are buying.

Literally nobody i know ever buys aftermarket mouse feet

That’s tragically bad, worth a refund imo

Judging by the number of Powerplay users out there, not surprised to me lol

Just get a good smooth mouse and some fresh skates made out of glass and boom you’re good. Pp mousepad makes no sense the mouse goes from 0% to 100% in like 10 mins

@@GlobalEl1te skates out of glass is horrible for every tactical shooter. Don't give recommendations to people when you don't know what they are playing.

its actually the g pro x superlight that they're talking about but there aint a single soul on this earth that doesnt call the superlight "g pro"

@@mmmmm1010 Except people who actually know their stuff regarding computer mice. I mean, seriously, the two mice could hardly be more different. The same thing with DPI. Printers and scanners have DPI (Dots Per Inch). Mouse sensors have CPI (Counts Per Inch) to determine resolution. The former is the more widely known, but it's wrong. Tbh I'm not a fan of propagating incorrect technical terms. It's misleading and not nice, especially if you have a huge audience. Let's not teach bs to the masses; the more educated the people are, the less crap manufacturers can get away with! : >

@@zatozatoichi7920 I know my stuff and i dont use full model names whenever i talk about mice. Its redundant to use full names unless specifically talking about the older mice. No one thinks of the wired g pro when they hear "g pro" because no one should think of it in the context of current mice. Same reason that no one thinks of the first deathadder released almost 20 years ago when they hear "Deathadder"

@@mmmmm1010 I think you are mostly interacting with Gen Z then and/or you don't talk about mice that much with people, for years and years on. My point still stands. Inaccurate technical stuff is lazy, unless you like guessing. If you say, 'DeathAdder', I'll ask which one? Because there're quite a few, and there're not small differences between some of them, so that's the sensible question. The last two doesn't even have the same shape as the old ones. Why won't we spare ourselves a round, and being exact in the first place?

@@zatozatoichi7920 its a video on the g pro superlight 2, theres no reason you should be thinking of the wired g pro when they say g pro

this is true but a good mouse for you does wonders and this is what the job of a reviewer is it's to help choose which will be best for you both money wise and playstyle wise. Almost any mouse will be good nowadays but the reason reviewers complain about 2k and not 4k is bc 4k is better and they want the product to be at the best it could possibly be, sure you can play well with 2k and 1k but a top of the line brand should have atleast 4k by now (considering every other brand is going for it and they're already a year late) and bc they use almost everything on the market they're able to say where certain mice are better or which one feels better in x department. Shape is the most important thing though so the mouse being 2k or 4k shouldn't be your main thing but most of the g pro x 2 hate is just it's a good mouse but could be better for the price bc of the long wait and the fact that the superlight 1 already exists which still holds its own against 4k mice so the 2 isn't really a good purchase unless you dont have a superlight 1. Reviewers are trying to get the most bang for your buck and the best mouse for you in your hands they care mostly about how the mouse compares and not if it would be usable since almost every mouse is atleast usable even at the top level nowadays

what you said is literally just common sense though. good players can make the most out of anything but they want to optimize their strengths by choosing what's best for them. most reviewers always say that shape is king, but that doesn't mean that reviewers won't be objective in their thoughts about a certain device. these videos are made for consumers and consumers want what's worth their money and what they should expect upon purchasing a product.

I also soldered new switches based on Optimum’s recommendation.

usb-c, new hero 2k sensor, new optical switches = almost nothing

​@@HeK.and none of that makes any difference in comparison to the original superlight. I have the original one and I dont see a reason to spend more than what i spent on the original one to get nothing in return

@@HeK.99.9% of people will not notice the new sensor or optical switches. If you have an original superlight, there is no reason to upgrade.

@@HeK. usb-c should've been included in the original GPX, "new" optical switches for mice had been done and done well by other companies as well. 2k sensor is just them inflating what is barely noticeable especially in modern competitive video games much like how every company inflates other specs of their mice. Like what op said, NOTHING CHANGED

@@Drewbert__ i mean, what did you guys expect? sure, they could've improved the side buttons. but the first superlight was almost perfect. so why change the formular for the best selling mouse of all time? nobody cares about stock skates anyway and replacing them with corepads. 2k is more than enough for 99% of the customers and the optical switches seem to be better than razer's. the price will drop in a few months and if your old gpx dies or starts double clicking, you'll be happy that a newer updated version exists on the market.

I wish they would make a g703 super light

go for a x2v2 with the 4k dongle, imo a much better mouse, feet feel solid, side buttons great too, lighter and the stock skates feels good

@@Ottoni174 horrible qc

I have my GPX Superlight v2 and have been using it over the last few days. It's much more comfortable than my G502X and I improved my highscore on YPRAC 360 Aim Test map from 29 to 32 indicating that I can actually aim much better with it.

As someone who own all the best mouse on earth No I do not recommend it at all, what I would recommend is for you to measure your hand and I can tell you your perfect mouse for now but if you don’t want to measure your hand then I would recommend checking out xm1we, sora 4k, deathadder v3 pro, viper v2 pro and atlantis/mini (I main htx ace)

@@HeK.v1 yes v2 no

The battery came loose on my gpx2 already😂 (1600dpi 0.112 valorant)

@@shiion6711 It is an easy fix, double sided tape and undo 6 screws.

That’s very true

There is no mechanical mode, it’s either hybrid or optical only, and hybrid is power saving.

There's a reason why they don't do it, it's to avoid mass refunds.

Too much mass reduction will decrease feedback. A low 60g is optimized.

Do you mean Deathadder V3, the direct competitor of GPX2? Many players rate them similarly, in the end, it was down to which shape fits their palms better. I'd go for a GPX2. The shape suits me better. Additionally, I have a policy to stay away from companies that market many gimmick features. In this case, Deathadder V3's excessive high polling rate. Of course, you can turn it off. But the real problem is that, companies do that usually come with hidden issues. The loud marketing serves as a distraction.

I can't speak to the longevity of the GPX-SL2 yet, but I dropped Razer after having gone through 5 mice in around 10 years. I have consistently suffered issues with their mice click outright failing on me, and connectivity issues on my last Razer product just finally pushed me over the edge. Picked up a GPX-SL2 on Sunday, if it lasts 3-4 years it will have been well worth it IMO. The stats for my Razer products - DeathAdder 2014 - Back Button Clicked in one day and would never click back out (2 Years) DeathAdder 2016 - Main Mouse Click began missing clicks (2 Years) DeathAdder 2018 - USB connection became intermittent (3 Years) NagaHex V2 2021 - USB connection completely failed (2 Years) Basalisk Pro 2023 - Wake from sleep took up to 1 minute intermittently, Battery would require reseating intermittently to reconnect to PC (9 months) Razer makes some comfortable mice, but their track record IMHO for building a product that lasts... Well, let's just see if Logitech can do better. I also really appreciate that the GPX-SL2 looks like a mouse and not some bizarre spaceship. It looks like it could belong on the main stage of a pro tournament, or in the office, ready to crank out some high intensity spreadsheets.

Are you looking for a new mouse? If you are I can help you find a perfect mouse just for you now if you don’t mind telling me your hand size

Where? I don't see them on their website

@@danieldilly i already ordered them from their website. look harder.

@@danieldilly I found them on corepad European store but they are also available at lethal gaming gear which is where I got mine.

yeah where i also cant find them please i need replacement pads so bad

oh is it on ausmodshop?

optical only should be better if i am right. don't own an optical mouse though so can't confirm.

Optical.

Completely marketing tricks.

My main mouse 😍

i hated the shape when i used it my pinky would float off to the side like a british person holding a cup of tea

hf with the bad qc. god bless your soul

What were you using as your main?

@@shiion6711 i had been using the deathadder elite for about 5 years, i was hesitant on switching at first bc i thought i wouldnt like the shape, i had to switch from palm to claw grip but i can confidently say after having had it for a while the shape is a perfect fit and way more comfortable than the da ever was

Functionally not much. The latency should be about the same because it's still digital serial communication, but USBC has really become a standard connector and using that instead of stupid micro USB makes sense for a new product.

@@zanemcmorris4541 For a mouse USB-C means one thing over USB Micro, Longevity. The GPX-SL2 having a USB-C means it will survive FAR more plug and unplug cycles than a USB Micro connection. That honestly seems to be the major theme for this mouse. Optical Switches = Longer Product Life, USB-C = Longer Product Life, the only change they made that isn't going to result directly in the mouse lasting longer is the sensor, which will still indirectly contribute to a longer use since it is still better hardware with more modern (if not current) specs.

where did you get it?

it’s worth it you can tell a difference

they did change the wheel a little. it's quieter and less tactile now.

i've never had an issue with my wheels

exactly. idk what people expected.

@@HeK.people expected them to push the market like they did with the gpx release or at the very least match razer at 4k. They're already a year late on 4k so this is just disappointing for many

@@jerryyy. 99.9% of customers don't care about 4k. 2k or even 1k will be enough for the next 10 years. it's a gimmick for mouse enthusiasts. stop harassing me.

@@HeK. 4k isnt needed by any means but it's called the PRO for a reason it's aimed at that 0.1% AND is their flagship their oooo here's what we can do mouse. It should be top of the line, it's not a gimmick if it works bro. Plus nobody said 1k or 2k wont work in 10 years but if they're pricing it at the same price of the competition it's expected to compete, they could've and should've done better considering they were already late to 4k by a year, even though their 2k implementation is very very good and the mouse is overall good they could've 100% made the best mouse on the market both on paper with raw stats and in feel bc logitech sensors do usually just feel way more responsive

@@jerryyy. It's obviously not aimed at the 0.1% lol. the main customer base of this mouse is the casual gamer dad or the 13 year old kid with a 60-144hz monitor who can't even benefit from 4k. logitech wants to make money. aiming at the 0.1% would be a dumb business decision. it's called "pro" for marketing reasons.

lots of people, it's an upgrade in every way possible and for a brand like logitech people expected them to push to the max

@@jerryyy. Pushing to max does not benefit anyone. Not the players, no gain in gaming experience or feedback; not the company, decreased rev margin due to additional investment and unit cost. I certainly did not expect them do such.

Not me.

@@mengxi6157 this is not true, the benefits are there and while not worth it for everyone it is for some and as much as you'd like to disagree a higher polling rate is also a good selling point on paper for a mouse even if we're reaching diminishing returns. Not to mention the fact that they simply are not catching up with their competitors, that's disappointing to some which leads to less sales. The gpx sold so well bc it was the best out at the time and even though it had a high price people didn't care bc it was objectively the best except for shape which is completely subjective so lots of pros and enthusiasts used it which lead to an insane boost in sales bc everyone who knew anything about mice had one on their desk and buying a normal gpw wasn't really worth it anymore since it was such a big jump where you could argue the jump from the gpx 1 to 2 isnt enough to justify another 160 dollars literally every iteration of the g pro wireless was industry leading specs wise up until this one.The unit cost wouldn't be much more we can see this from razer selling the v2 pro at the same price as the ultimate was on release which is even better than what logitech is doing rn since the superlight v2 is more than a v1 was on release, people wouldnt mind having to buy another dongle and this is logitech we're talking about like i said before they used to push the industry all the time it just seems they're getting complacent.1K is enough for most and will be for a while but we're living in a time where industry standard is shifting and with how competitive the market is there's less and less reasons to chose logitech over brands who are keeping up and doing it at a good price. At the end of the day logitech made so much from the gpx 1 bc they listened to feedback and updated their mouse (lower weight an attempt at better feet still keeping their insane response time) but they didnt do that this time and since so many people own a gpx 1 it's unlikely we're gonna see the same success bc unlike with the gpx we just dont have enough of a reason to chose them anymore and even if we do chose them the gpx is still really good at a fraction of the price even though the changes are good and make it an upgrade it's not worth almost double the price, they put so little effort in when they could've done more it's lazy and again this is their flagship show off mouse where in theory you'd like to show how good you can be. I and many others who are giving this a miss would've happily got one if it had good 4k (which was more than doable especially since almost every brand is doing it now and their biggest competition have been doing it for a year) and they atleast made an attempt at fixing the god awful feet but tbf i dont mind those corepads exist. 2k would've been fine (yes their 2k does preform just as well as lamzu's 4k which is impressive but this just shows that with 4k they could've been even better and lamzu's is literally 2/3 of the price if you get 4k too so while i agree it's not all about numbers they could've done better and are still far from catching up to razer who's their main competitor i personally hate the viper shape so i'd still not get one but for those who like that shape it's an easy buy over it especially since they have better feet and are cheaper and even go on sale pretty often so you could easily pick it up + the extra dongle for like 150 which is still cheaper than a superlight 2) but with the price factored in aswell it's ridiculous, it IS a good mouse a really really good one but it's not worth it to upgrade from a gpx 1 especially at that price and just doesnt really stand out in any way to justify that price imo if you don't own a gpx though it's a fantastic buy.

I wanna know too.

Hello and that’s the Pulsar large thumb sleeve!

@@johnrey8728 thank you dear man

Artisan FX Zero Daidai Orange XL