Yes, there is, and it's still going on

Yes, but the West also doesn't seem to know what it wants to be anymore as well. Times are changing and both worlds will have to figure out what their direction is going to be.

always been fascinating to me how "The West" once encompassed areas of Greece / Turkey that later for various people, do not encompass "The West". if "The West" is supposed to be the Straussian idea of "Athens + Jerusalem" then would "The East" be a. "Mecca + Jerusalem" or b. "Athens + Mecca" 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

Like a lot of social conflicts, there doesn't have to be and there's no inherent reason why there should be, but people may make it happen regardless. But it should always be understood as a choice, which requires both sides to insist on it and drown on those who disagree, not an inevitability. Political Islam spent most of its existence more tolerant, accepting, and flexible than most of the history of political Christianity. There's no inherent reason it can't take that mantle again.

Its more like west vs the false image of islam they created to make an enemy themselves and not the real islam. Islam just like the west, pretty much protecting individual ownership,Islam let the rich become rich as long as zakat being paid and didnt break any rules Allah create in al-quran (no interest, no gambling, no alcohol, no cheating in trade,no free sex, no drugs,etc) . The one created the false image of Islam that many still believe sadly as the real islam, didnt like the value of islam that prohibit many value I mentions before because it will disrupt their source of money. If we care to seeking truth for a bit, all of that what islam prohibit is among the biggest money maker business in this world, like interest in banking, porn industries, gambling industries, drugs and alcohol bussiness. Imagine if Islam in rule in this world, all of that bussineses will be pretty much abolished and straight up illegal practice.

I was like damn, I thought you'd mention the 21st century 😂

It’s an art form… did you enjoy the video tho?

@@HikmaHistory Sure bro. 19th century Arab and Muslim history is right up my field. It's the one of the most consequential periods in the region IMO

It's a case study.....And the figure you call semi- obscure changed the destiny of Muslims in South Asia. Get out of your arab superiority delusion ...Arabism is not Islam....

It usually doesn’t have to do with the western parts of any regions. Sort of vague.

The way I describe it is the west chose technology innovation and modernization after a century of figuring it out, then expecting the rest of the world to immediately catch up. Which is more than just tv radio and media. If you’re a western doctor who knows how to cure a disease, and you can’t because the locals trust a charlatan who says he can cure them with snake oil or incense is aggravating. Societies can also choose to modernize rapidly, but suffer serious consequences. East Asia particularly Japan, and Korea, chose modernization without caring for the humanities/social studies. Japan and Korea experienced rapid industrialization and rapid population collapse. As a result Japan and Korea are literally working their societies to death. Also no I am not advocating for a rejection of modernization only that modernization is a reality every country is faced with and has to handle it in a unique way. The local charlatan will most likely just become a tik Tok influencer and regularly cause public health emergencies.

And then you get the 72 virgins

Not to troll but sounds like major cope.

Allah said: "والعصر " "إن الإنسان لفي خسر" "إلا الذين آمنوا وعملوا الصالحات وتواصوا بالحق وتواصوا بالصبر" By the Time! Surely humanity is in loss, except those who have faith, do good, and urge each other to the truth, and urge each other to perseverance. May Allah guide us to seek the Akhirah rather than this worldly dunya.

@@James-ip8xs cope is that you believe your white people are rich because of their values, most countries follow democracy and liberalism but yet all these countries are poor only the west and it’s military basis ( s Koreas and Japan) why is that? Because the west forces other countries to consume and not produce because if you produce you will have your independence and can have decisions, this is what the west hates, that’s why they sanction or go to war with any country that produces anything and want to gain political and economical independence. The cope comes from 👱🏻‍♂️ who play victims

It's true, it's kinda why there's so many concepts of the afterlife in menu different religions. ​@@James-ip8xs

True, both faiths are missionary-based.

Also he mentions Ottomans, and Mughals. Two Muslim colonizer/empires that did the same thing to the natives of the lands they ruled... like you realize half the shit going on in the middle east started with the ottomans.

Why do you speak as if the Mughals weren't foreign invaders who forced their religion kn the Hindu population? Maybe thats the reason the Hindu population chose the British.

@@feartheamish9183Mughals are Turks, not Arabs. The Turks are nomadic invaders. Just because they accepted Islam, It didn’t change their nature. The majority of the problems in Muslim lands can be traced back to a Turkic migration or invasion of the land, then assimilating, and assuming authority.

@@feartheamish9183boom!!!

We Muslims should take inspiration in using the means of resources whilst keeping our principles and foundation to not compromise it.

What you say is called exploitation. There is someting that made the West great. It is their religion. There is power, unbelievable intellect and creativity bestowed by Christianity. Judaism is even more, miraculous. Genetics also play a role in the intellect and superiority of the West. This blessing flows from the line of Isaac (Esau and Jacob). But since Satan does not rest, he tricked them into circularism which is really a term used to mask atheism or deceive people into atheism. That Atheism causes the weakening of the soul of the West and its downfall. It is happening before our eyes. Whilst islam has infiltrated them and is ready to take over.

@@angelameulemans7263 if that was about religion,the west wouldn't lost to muslims early on,west lost against muslims in middle east,anatolia,north africa and spain,they reorganised and reformed,thus becoming stronger.Now its Muslims time to reform and strengthen themselves

@@geometrix236 They lost because they were 1st weakened by the long dragging wars between the Persians and the Byzantines. So the Muslims found both of them weakened and exhausted. They were also ignorant of Islam and its tactics. I read somewhere about the level of barbarity and savagery of the Muslim armies. But the West has now atheism, circularism and ignorance of Islam weakening them. Anyway my point was about why The West and Jews are superior. Almost all the modern inventions making our lives better and scientific discoveries are Western-Judeo. What does the Islamic world give or bless the world with? Nothing! The West posses technologic and scientific edge. Add to that Jewish mastership and Christian fire and fanatism of Templers/Crusaders. They are being revived anyway. Add to that the realisation happening now of what Islam is, its intentions and invasion of the West, I fear for Muslims. Those Islamic victories are things of the past and will never happen again. The ex-Muslims are also waking the West up and they seem to be the first line of the offensive. What an interesting time.

@@angelameulemans7263 "What does the Islamic world give or bless the world with? Nothing!" You are extremely ignorant and you seriously need to look into the role Islam and Muslims played in paving the way for the renaissance which was crucial for the west.. Every great nation or empire throughout time takes what works well from previous empires or nations and then they use that foundation to build upon. Its the same with any form of science or philosophy you build upon the ideas that others either created or contributed to. thats what newton meant when he said "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants". You could literally just have gone to google and typed "how did islam contribute to the west" or "how has islam contributed to the world" and you would have had the answer instead of coming here and trying to act smart and attack Islam making a complete fool out of yourself in the process.. you should be ashamed either way because you are either ignorant and shouldnt be speaking about things u have no idea of or you are a liar just trying to attack islam.

The West would learn how to shut it out protect itself against Islam. That will be their gain from learning about Islam. Nit from Muslims because they will lie (taqqiya), but fom ex-Muslims who speak Arabic.

to be honest im a westerner the eastern nations/countries will never co exist with the west unless the east is equal to the western culture

@@mattburrito If you think that way, imagine bringing the East (enemies) to live among us in the West. Assylum, better life, etc are just a smoke screen for an invasion. They know it from their religion, but you do not know it. The question is, why would such an intelligent person of the West choose to open their borders to people who came with the intention to destroy them in the long run. Why choose for self-destruction? Who does that? Any insight?

An American would say this. 😒

@@EuropeanQoheleth and a douchey European would try and deny it without evidence so I ask you since your such a super smart person tell me exactly where islam gets along with other religions, I'll give you the whole world to choose from....

No Russians didnt try to modernize Islam like the British. British/Anglo-saxon have a weird agenda of trying to modernize cultures, religions, society, family, gender, ......

@@muhammadadeel8639Anglo-Saxon culture has essentially been optimised to be as economically efficient as possible. The British were obviously going to try to do with their colonies in order to make more money off them.

@@Apathy.Apathy. Its not the anglo-saxon culture --- its the banking elite that chose Britain as a stable secluded Island that would be safe for their investments. 1697 -Bank of england was taken over by globalists. 1648 revolution was also Funded most probably by those elites, like French rev was funded by secret societies funded by banking elites.

@@muhammadadeel8639 No , the just outlawed it outright..

@@ZubairAhmed-od2xv Yes the communists (Atheistic jews) banned all religion, but the tsarist russia didnt, nor did modern russia.

Thanks bro!

Cope

?

Christianity was destroyed by Reformation and secualrism. Muslims are wise to reject reformation and secularism, this has protected the religion. Worldly power is not the first priority of any religion

Love thy content

Dude 😎

The man himself

gay

Real Goofy Goober hours

Anything specific? Most of my recent vids have been about Middle Eastern history 😅

Can we talk about this more, please?

Westerners were cheering when romans conquered most of middle east Spain etc, same westerners started crying when middle Easterners were liberated by other middle Easterners from south from roman western rule and wanted to reoccupy

@@jahinsadman1505 exactly, these guys only thing they have a right to have power and protect their regions.

Muslims track record of invasions are nothing compared to wests track record if you look at mainstream history. West's shinanegans still have an effect on problems around the world today and they went more ham than anyone else in exploitation, supremacist behavior, discrimination, genocides, starvation, and still have not stopped completely

@@jahinsadman1505 Spain was liberated from muslim. Muslim occupied that place and then liberated back and given to original people.

@@Adsper2000 the one that's not a dragon.

@@Adsper2000 Israel

how so? when westerners have been penetrating and interfering in the Islamic world for the last 200 years?

Self criticism - no Blaming someone else - yes

@@puraLusa because the west is reponsible, we are only responsible for not responding appropriately to western actions.

@@Handle0108 that kind of victim atitude denotes indoctrination and an inability of nuance and grey zone. It serves 3rd parties in world play. "muah murica bad" goes along with using an ad-hominem to shut any criticism or dialog and thus any improvement or progression. In fact, it's the basis for bad ideas to get to power, an example being nazi germany emergence as a reaction to the victim atitude of germans post wwi. It completely lacks depth and agency, it's a phenomenon that gives way to the racism of low expectations or self-hatred. It's a very distructive and dangerous mental state.

​@@Handle0108that is called pot calling cettle black

@@TheCat48488 how? When have our governments interfered/intervened in your internal politics?

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂... Okay Pakistan history... Its just less than 80 years we are talking about history like you know like 1000s of years that shape not like 80 omg 😂😂😂😂

@@FantomwithanEff Hindu nationalist bot spotted

@@magma9000 🤣damn bro I am neither indian not Hindu

​@@FantomwithanEff Then why western world see Pakistan as a threat to their dirty colonial ambitions?? 😂

@@KanuniSuleyman4857 who in this world is telling you that... In the western world where I am right now, no one sees Pakistan as anything more than something holding great nuisance value.. that's it..

The west has had the power to destroy/convert/replace every other civilization on the planet for 250 years. If Islamic civilization had that power, there would be no other civilizations, we’ve all seen what happens to people at the mercy of Muslims…

No immediate plans but at some point in the future, I don't see why I wouldn't make a video on Iqbal or the Pakistan movement.

Yup.. they lie constantly

because India was ruled by muslim dynasties for 800 years with armies who fought for islam. That is more than enough to call it islamic world.

False - 2/3rd of India was ruled By Maratthas (Hindus), by the time British arrived. Britain invaded and defeated Hindu empire to colonize 2/3rd of India

@@muhammadadeel8639 when people refer to Muslim India, they refer to territories ruled by Muslims for centuries with an undeniable Muslim history. Not southern Hindu territories or later conquests of Marathas towards the beginning of Colonialism.

@@muhammadadeel8639 : I would like to know your source regarding the claim that "2/3 of India was ruled by Marathas". The Marathas did rule a large part of India however large percentage of population resides in Gangetic plains (which is also an agriculturally rich area) and it was ruled by Muslims 1) By Mughals 2) By Nawab of Awadh 3) By Nizam of Bengal, plus large land (and population) mass of South India was ruled by Muslims 1) Mysore sultanate 2) Nawab of cochin 3) Nizam of Hyderabad. The Marathas were powerful BUT were divided and as a matter-of-fact one group of Maratha clans helped the British fight against other Maratha clans and it was "only a matter of time" some other Muslim empire (I bet the Durranis since they had a large empire in North West) with the help of other Muslim rulers would have defeated the Marathas had the British not come and defeated the Marathas themselves. Anyway, don't you think that had British not come Hindus and Muslims would eventually have civil wars ??? Isn't it better to live in peace (even if that means colonialization and then partition) than to live in one civil war after another and be pons of global world powers ??

@@Tathagata-eo5tz Subcontinent area = 4.4 Million km2. India area = 3.2 M km2. Marattha peak area = 2.5 M km2 as per wikipedia. So Marathas controlled 78% of India or 56% of subcontinent (India, Pak, Bengladesh). Both the Mughals and Nizam of hyderabad were under Maratha vassalage by the time Britain invaded. The Durranis were in decline after 1761, to the point that punjab and Kpk was snatched by the Sikh empire, limiting Durranis to Afghan territory only. Sikh were also beaten only by British, not by Durranis

Muslims want to go back to 8th century because at that time Muslims where in thier golden age

You lack insight, as your ancestors found their Empire upon Islam while the people(Late Ottoman Sultans) whom you speculate as Islamic are all hedonist and away from religion, even committing Bi'dah, That's the reason Al Wahhab who was a Islamic reformist was against the Ottoman Empire, And on top of that even after adopting Kemalism what have you achieved unlike Saudis who are strict Wahabi(a school of thought) Muslims while they wield wealth, influence and prosperity, also they have better understanding of distinguishing culture, religion and prosperity, as they saved their culture, religion and achieved prosperity while becoming a power player in the middle-east, also they have better understanding of the western mentality. Islamic Republic Of Iran which succeeded the Shah regime which was a puppet ruler and an staunch supporter of the WEST ruined Iran while the rich were getting more richer poor were becoming more poor and almost sold Iran to the WEST then the Ayatollahs came and established the Islamic Republic and are strict Ja'afri, have their country's influence and power stretched across all of Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, Palestine and greatly heightened their military prowess and technology despite being in sanctions, while Taliban who are strict Deobandis had defeated the US and NATO and freed their country Afghanistan from invaders while growing their currency value above the both Indian and Pakistani currency value and slowly moving towards development. Lebanon was on the verge of Israeli occupation and Hezbollah saved it while being a newly formed organization and still protecting Lebanon militarily, providing services of Education, Health and others, But what had Turkiye Achieved by applying Kemalism instead of being in the lap of NATO and shamelessly asking for the joining of EU, All the mentioned countries above are growing in strength, wealth and prosperity without EU and while some are even in sanctions. Kemal just made Turkiye survived from being occupied and divided while his ideology totally made the Turkish nation a slave to the WEST, you are still hanging upon the one achievement of the past instead of seeing that this ideology is getting Turkiye struck at the bottom.

@@lotcam4046 3 out of 4 first caliphs were killed by Muslims, not by western puppets or seculars or zionists or by polytheists. Early decades or even early centuries of arabic history is mindblowing. Muslims razed Kaaba twice, destroyed the Black Stone several times. Etc etc.. Fitna? Well it is a handy term to cover all the crimes, shortcomings, failures or wrongdoings of all the rulers, dynasties, families.. Atatürk was a great man, and he was well ahead of his time. He was the first man who stood up and said the truth, the truth hundreds of scholars,mollahs, and so called brilliant men refrained from saying for this and that reason: Caliphate was nothing but a form of dynastynor power to abuse hundreds of millions of muslims for centuries. Islam and its teachings is one thing, using Islam for your own family, tribe, peope is another..

maybe because the fundamentalist element you mentioned didnt become mainstream up until the 1980s and later. nearly every religion,culture is guilty of wanting to impose itself on others and in the case of islam,that idea had slowly started to die out till someone across the atlantic decided that they should use radical islam as a means to thwart socialism and communism in the wider muslim world.

No Muslims don't want the world to be all Muslims. That is against islam and prophecies of islam, Nearly every nation that becomes a muslims kept their Culture, unlike the westreners, Who did not only wipe out other native cultures but stole their whole land and genocide 80% of them, The peak examples of The peaceful west are Canada, America and Australia

If Islam had been the threat then you would have lost the achievements of European civilization which was saven in the translations made in the Abbasid Caliphate, at the House Of Wisdom, Baghdad.

But how is this different from whites wanting the whole world to be white? Your expansionism was based on your own racial predicament against other races, that of the Muslims was based on spreading a religious message and dispelling falsehoods and idols, based on that we can understand why a lot more people were ready to die for Islam than for white expansionism.

The west would never allow a pan-Islamic state! This what they are doing now to sow division, war and corruption to prevent the unity of Islamic denominations.

@@teeto5481 We don't care what you think

@@barbell4492>We You and your army of scholars?

Islam offers no contribution to the future.

now about Democracy it gives the rights to everyone specially the degenerated and rights for lobbyists who play on the country's affairs in and out and rights for people with bad intentions to reach powerful positions and divide the country in left and right and make the country stand for nothing and destroys the identity of the people ( civilization ) sound fimilar? 🏳️‍🌈🇪🇺🇺🇸 Historically speaking all countries and civilizations stood for something and if you tolerate everything than you stand for nothing. in order for a civilization to stand against hardship and all waves they need to stand for something and democracy and secularism doesn't offer this in fact both are hypocritical systems and subjective. Democracy is Hypocrisy as i explained why above. in nowhere that secularism is " good ". The UN is highly western based and most of world countries from Asia to Africa to eastern Europe to south America refuse LGBTQ refuse feminism refuses the banking system refuses the modern slavery ( salve wage ) refuses western subjective vales ,but yet they push it on all of us. using utilitarianism then the west shouldn't be pushing their values on the majority and the majority can take down the west. that's why in political science there's a famous quote " the liberal global order is neither liberal nor global " ( meaning only western based and other countries don't anticipate on it or they will be sanctioned and fought by the west ). also, this is by definition slavery because they tell us what to do and if we refuse, they punish us , starve us or kill us and we have to follow them when they are the minority. so utilitarianism doesn't work and they are enslaving us. shariah God is our Maker and he knows what is best for us. Everything God made forbidden, It harms us in individual level and collective level And everything God Made Halal ( allowed ) is good for us in individual level and Collective level. for example, Islam believes in the institution of Marriage highly. without it the society will fall as we see. Why? because without Marriage there's no commitment nor rules and Women will end up having Kids without fathers for which will produce single parent households which produces mental illness which eventually gives birth to all types of decadence. In Islam we believe our actions have consequences in individual level and collective level. In secular society, Criminals who committed murder and vile crimes, are put in Jails belt by the people's taxes and fed by the people's taxes. In Islam, People who committed Murder and vile crimes like spreading decadence which leads to the demise of the society, are put to death. In secular society, Alchohol is allowed which harms the person in individual level and collective level. in individual level it destroys his life achieving nothing and causes kidney failure, in collective level it destroys the family which leads eventually to the destruction of society as mentioned before and the birth of all decadence. In Islam, Alchohol is forbidden and the one who sells or drinks get lashed publicly. Now if you do it in your home and no one sees that's your sin ,but to do publicly or advocate for it, you go against God's rule that protect society. Sin is contagious and that is why it must not be public. God said in the Quran " You may dislike something although it is good for you, or like something although it is bad for you: God knows and you do not.’" I can see why now Shariah is the way to live and build a strong society and the only way to eradicate all decadence and isms in society. Note: no Muslim countries now don't implement the sharia now because if they did, they will be sanctioned or " freedom" will be lunched on them. But We implement shariah on ourselves and our families and society willingly and if it must, we force it on our society even if our country refuse.

They still stuck there... romanticing on past history... is a long good one but passed... See budfhist confutianism ones... at least some country emerge from it like Taiwan Japan Korea etc. Don't wallow too much on those long great history if it's already stuck... The Buddhist Confuciusm ones that break free didn't. Not even 1 of islamic world break free like those...need reformation big time... to be non violence, non racist, progress😊

Christians want all the world for themselves and wanted to take revenge on Muslims for conquering byzantine lands. That's why they started the Age of discovery and Industrial revolution to combat Islam through technology because they were preciously defeated in every war with Muslims on battlefield

No, the financial empire of West is actively invading Muslim culture, religion, values, society via financial institutions, NGOs etc

Westernisation has Alcohol, Usury, Gambling, Fornication and Feminism etc. The very things destroying the West and other lands.

you do love giving credit to yourselves. this was not the case and will certainly will never be the case in the near future.

Exactly :)

@@AO00720 oh yes I forgot: there is now a new category, Muslims making big buildings in the dessert to try attract westerners to spend their money.

Their is no Christian country 😂

what christian nation? its a non-existent religion

They already did colonize most of the world, how did that turn out? You want to go back to that? Read some history before talking nonsense

There's huge difference between conquest and colonization

To most Muslims their faith doesn't tell them to conquer everybody, that's just the fanatics.

They wanna change the rules of the game now, that they aren’t playing as well. Somehow them systematically destroying all opposing religion in the region when they were on top was okay.

@@Mrchungus11C-OIR How many religious minorities lived in Europe for most of history? Same question for the Middle East after the spread of Islam?

😑

especially

Islamophobes just flood the comment sections.

Says the guy with a Hindu crackhead as a profile picture. The audacity.

:)). True

Are you a anti Muslim islamophobe?

It is 😂

( PBUH )

Christ is a prophet

Where is Christ in the West? All I see is family values breaking down: father becoming mother, mother becoming father, onlyfans sisters, materialism, churches either becoming pubs or mosques, atheism. That's not what Christ was about, but rather, Muslims will teach you what Christ was all about so that you abandon that evil system. Be patient, O westeners! .

The God/Allah is the king. Jesus, peace be upon him, is an honorable prophet of The God

You know i never understand christians. Im saying this with all respect and love. I liveed among christians my whole life. You Belief god let some humans crucify him ? Kill him ? Kill god ? Think about it. Doesnt make sense at all!

none of that is blasphemy, the Quran is the eternal testament to humanity until the end of times. The Quran speaks not of limitations on the millions of things that we may do in the future, but it merely warns us of what we aren't allowed to do for certain which is a limited set of vices.

Presentism fallacy. Go check up on Abdullah Andalusi.

Then why do you guys have to subjugate every religious minority you come across

Remind me again, what happened to the pagans

@@hazemmansour6053 Muslims justifying their violence with the actions of other groups from 1,000 years ago speedrun (any %) The Muslims did the same exact thing to every pagan they came across in the MENA. The difference is you have to reach back centuries or a millennium while Cyprus just underwent Islamization and still is, Armenia is being ethnically cleansed of Armenian Christians, the Assyrians were/are forcibly displaced and ethnically cleansed by Muslims, the Maronites were/are forcibly displaced and ethnically cleansed by Muslims, the Copts are and were forcibly displaced and ethnically cleansed by Muslims, the Somalis tried to conquer and convert the Ethiopians but failed (lol) and now live in an abject shithole (lol)

I'm guessing the word Hubris is a bit too advanced for you.

Not even Allah?

nope Islam saved the west kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eZ59Z8xqy9zVYYE.htmlsi=1hKt-wnF-hAqOLbd

Lies 😂 theybstole from persia and indian and claimed it islamic arabic

@@Powerviolenc3 they stole nothing and those persians were Muslims who worked with the arabs to expand knowledge

@@abdulHaqqqq muslims or forcefully converted zoroastrians?

@@andriyshepard3095 devout Muslims who contributed a lot to the Islamic cause. None were forced

Don't tell that to internet religious people

They are? Seems religions are just growing larger so far

@@hassansyed5036 Is that how you cope?

Where the evidence?​@@yendevus1747

Good