I’m 63 🙏

I read it a total of 4 times without help then found teachers like her and Flipped Out!!! On the shoulders of our Mothers and Fathers….God bless her!!!

I turned 70 yesterday, just found this, 2022 June 7th

@@RonnieWilliamsGooglePage That’s awesome guys! What a beautiful tread!!! The more we know the more we grow!!🙏🏽😇

The Lord be with you sister. I’m 77 and was saved when I was 12. I have done so many things I wish I could do differently so I’m glad that you came to Jesus. I’m in Atlanta and I will pray for you.

@Timothy Marchex that's very kind of you, I've worked very hard to be heaven material, but encouraging remarks such as yours. Is a constant reminder that my work is not in vain. I hope you have a fantastic day, keep the mindset you have it's a great one.👍

That is wonderful! I love this book!

We're so glad you found it helpful. Sandra Richter is a great teacher and we hope you continue to explore her videos and resources!

Now, that didn't actually happen, and Isaiah gives us a clue right in Isaiah 1:9: "Unless the Lord had left us with a very small (righteous!) remnant, we (Jerusalem) should have become like Sodom and Gomorrah"! Wait a second! What "remnant" was that? Is Isaiah telling us that there are barely enough people left to prevent Jerusalem's destruction? If so, then why does Isaiah 6 give a message from God to make the people even MORE hard-hearted than before? I think what we have here is Jerusalem NOT having enough people left...and this righteous remnant aren't actually Jews from Jerusalem at all! How do we know? Well, let's flip over to Isaiah 10 and see what verses 20-22 say: Now on that day **the remnant of (northern!) Israel**, and those of the house of Jacob who have escaped, will no longer rely on the one who struck them, but will truly rely on the Lord, the Holy One of Israel. **A (righteous!) remnant will return, the remnant of Jacob, to the mighty God**. For though your people, (northern!) Israel, may be like the sand of the sea, **Only a remnant within them will return**; A destruction is determined, overflowing with righteousness. What's going on, here? What remnant of northern Israel? Well, when King Ahaz died, his son Hezekiah took the throne in approximately 716 BC. This was AFTER Assyria had conquered Samaria, the capital city of northern Israel, in 723 BC. Nevertheless, the rest of the Israelites remained in the land for decades, and weren't deported to Assyria until roughly 65 years later (Isa. 7:8; cf. Ezra 4:2 and 10), so they were still in the land when Hezekiah took the throne. What Hezekiah immediately did was to **send messengers throughout northern Israel to invite them to keep a national Passover observance at Jerusalem**!!! (2 Chron. 30) At that time, a small remnant of northern Israelites DID repent and come to Jerusalem, to keep the Passover (2 Chron. 30:8-11). It's because of this righteous remnant that Isaiah is telling us that Jerusalem was ultimately spared total and complete destruction! That's critically important to understand. Unless you understand that, you won't get how this foreshadows not only aspects of Jesus' own ministry, but also things in the future that haven't been fulfilled yet! In order to see the connection, we need to look at the famous prophecy in Isaiah 7 about the child named Immanuel. Let's read verses 14-16: Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the young maiden (in Hebrew, "almah" which means a young woman of marriageable age) will conceive and give birth to a son, and she will name Him Immanuel. He will eat curds and honey at the time He knows enough to refuse evil and choose good. For before the boy knows enough to refuse evil and choose good, the land whose two kings you dread will be abandoned. Matthew 1:23 tells us that Jesus was named Immanuel in fulfillment of this prophecy...but what's the connection? What does the historical situation at the time of King Ahaz have to do with Jesus? Isaiah was giving this prophecy in 735 BC, when King Ahaz joined his father Jotham as a co-regent on the throne. (This is coming from Edwin Thiele's reconstruction of the chronology of the Israelite and Jewish kings in his book, "The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings.") At that time, a young woman - Isaiah's wife! - HAD ALREADY CONCEIVED, and would later give birth to a child. The tense of the verb "conceive" in Hebrew here is past tense, and that's absolutely crucial to properly understand what's going on, here. Before that young child would be old enough to follow the Mosaic Law - to "refuse evil and choose good" - northern Israel and Syria would lose their kings. Traditionally, an Israelite male child wasn't held accountable for following the Law until age 12, when he would be Bar-Mitzvah-ed. So what this prophecy is telling us is that **Immanuel's conception and birth was like a countdown clock for northern Israel's judgment**!!! Twelve years later was 723 BC - and that's the very year that Assyria conquered Samaria and Damascus, the capital cities of northern Israel and Syria. But again, how does that have anything to do with Jesus? And even more importantly, is this child's birth only meant as a portent of doom, or was there more to it than that? Flip over to Isaiah 49 and read verse 1. Here's the connection that practically ALL Biblical scholars have missed, between the two halves of Isaiah! Listen to Me, you islands, And pay attention, you peoples from afar. The Lord called Me from the womb; From the belly of My mother He named Me. This description can ONLY fit one individual in the entire book of Isaiah, and that's Immanuel! His brother Maher-shalal-hash-baz (Isa. 8:1-4) was named BEFORE conception, and his other brother Shear-Jashub (Isa. 7:3) and King Hezekiah weren't named before birth! And what's Immanuel's God-given mission? TO BRING BACK THAT RIGHTEOUS REMNANT OF ISRAEL!!! Read verses 5-6: And now says the Lord, who formed Me from the womb to be His Servant, **To bring Jacob back to Him, so that Israel might be gathered to Him** (For I am honored in the sight of the Lord, And My God is My strength), He says, “It is too small a thing that You should be My Servant **To raise up the tribes of Jacob and to restore the protected ones of Israel**; I will also make You a light of the nations (Gentiles) So that My salvation may reach to the end of the earth.” Sandra made the point that the latter half of Isaiah was all about God's desire to restore Israel in the future, and that's absolutely true. But what she, like many other Biblical scholars, have entirely missed, is HOW Isaiah intended for us to understand that restoration. Isaiah 40-66 wasn't written long after that restoration had already happened. Rather, Immanuel himself wrote Isaiah 40-66, describing how God would IN THE FUTURE - from his vantage point in history - bring all of this about! To review, historically Immanuel grew to adulthood just as northern Israel was going into captivity. But God sent him to bring back a small remnant of northern Israel, at the time when Hezekiah sent a message to northern Israel to come and keep a national Passover. In the course of Immanuel's witness to the northern Israelites, some of the Gentiles from the smaller nation-states surrounding Israel - like Ammon, Moab and Edom - ALSO heard the message of PHYSICAL protection from destruction at the hand of Assyria, and came to Jerusalem for safety. Think about that for a minute, and then let's compare what Jesus' own mission was. Let's read Matthew 10:5-6: These twelve (disciples) Jesus sent out after instructing them, saying, “Do not go on a road to Gentiles, and do not enter a city of Samaritans; but rather **go to the lost sheep of the house of Israel**." They were to preach the Gospel of the Kingdom to them - and in the course of doing so, the Gentiles would ALSO hear that message of SPIRITUAL salvation from their sins! See the parallel? There's so much more to Isaiah than JUST a foreshadowing of Jesus' ministry, but it's definitely there. But if we ONLY go to Isaiah to see Jesus, we'll miss most of what Isaiah was trying to tell us! To wrap up, a righteous remnant of northern Israelites returned to Jerusalem in the time of Hezekiah, to prevent its total destruction, after Jerusalem had become like Sodom and Gomorrah (per Isaiah 1) - with the Jews obeying the letter of the Law but not keeping the spirit of the Law. Likewise in Jesus' own time, **Jerusalem had once again become like Sodom and Gomorrah** - just read Jesus' condemnation in Matthew 23! But no righteous remnant of northern Israel returned at that time...and that's why the Temple was destroyed in 70 AD, and later, Jerusalem itself was destroyed in 133 AD. The reason why prophets like Ezekiel (see Ezekiel 34 and 37) and Revelation (see Rev. 7) mention a return of all twelve tribes of Israel, INCLUDING the "lost" ten tribes of northern Israel, is because these prophecies point to a time when such a righteous remnant WILL return once more, to prevent Jerusalem's destruction when it once more becomes as sinful as Sodom and Gomorrah. That's why only SOME of the words of Isaiah were quoted in the New Testament...because much of Isaiah hasn't been completely fulfilled yet!!!

Check under playlist (Epic of Eden)

Scamdemic

Lol righttt

Not really that funny... what if the masks are part of the Luciferian agenda? Masks are part of occult practice, signifying forsaking your former identity, and submitting to a new master. Not good. Not all that funny.

@@BobbieBlair you're right I thought it was funny but yes NOT FUNNY. very serious♥️

😒🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🥱🥱🥱

It’s on KZfaq

Check under playlist (Epic of Eden)

View them here: store.seedbed.com/collections/epic-of-eden

Stop reading the book of second opinion

@@maryleo9595 Maybe you should learn a little Hebrew! I read the Hebrew, you are reading a translation, a second opinion.

@@maryleo9595 It's in the Hebrew Scriptures, was there something before that?

Grow up

🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄😒😒😒🥱🥱🥱

You missed it, civil rights movement has not worked "yet".

Why not? Scripture doesn't oppose it. Unless, of course, you have been indoctrinated with false teaching..