Thanks for letting as know

epic

damn 5 likes and 2 replies?

Dall-E is actually dope

@@elicervantes4133 hello 3 minutes ago guy

_loaf of bread! System error._ *_AAAAA_*

I even remember that time Google glasses scanning AI read black person as gorilla, thus got entire company into a hot water for a while. I know it's unrelated but damn does it is crazy, after all, some AI aspects represent the bias part of humanity.

The cat is obviously a pancake

Fax

HELP I READ THIS AS “AI would identity as a bird”

Keeper it in 69 likes

@@chickenychickens5154 ratio

Noooooo

6.9k then

So True

Agree 100%

Fr

Agreed

Yes and he’s such a great one, so smart

It’s coming just wait

SOON

I discovered him probably before or around 10k and I thought the same thing then. Glad quality sets itself apart still.

Because yall don't like/comment/share his sh*t.

same

Please tell how you became one as I wish to do same thanks in advance 🙏

Honestly, I think this is already enough. They don't need to get more advanced than to copy human behavior down to the letter, since all we're gonna let them do is perform human work but better. Making actually sentient AI sounds like a waste of time to me. I don't want a toaster that talks back to me.

Yup. This is a program designed to 'cook word soup' by listening to and participating in tens of thousands of conversations. No surprise it has learned to ' cook word soup' very well. But I agree with you, this thing has no real comprehension what anything it says actually means. A blade of grass, a car crash, a cheese burger. Just words it uses in context because it learned to.

@@owensthilaire8189 And even if it did, which I highly doubt, we still wouldn't know if it had or not. There's no way to tell beyond reading it's mind, which we can't do

I think the only real way to test for sentience is to have an AI listen to In The Ghetto by Elvis Presley and ask it how the song makes it feel, if it says sad, or really sad, or it remarks something about feeling like crying if it could, then it's likely sentient.

@@onidaaitsubasa4177 dogs are sentient, cats are sentient, monkeys are sentient...how do those things feel listening to Elvis? your argument has a gigantic flaw.

I agree

Haha.. The AI wants to kill developers, at least mine.. XD

That sounds pretty AI of you 🤨

*cue Rock eyebrow raise meme*

Btw, banger title change

ChatGPT is light years ahead of this one and you can for the first time have some real conversation with a chat bot... not just pretending. I mean ChatGPT can understand context and can make a conversation follow up, it can throw the ball back so to speak. Also I think ChatGPT can pass the Turing test with ease, and it can even fool most humans if it's instructed to do so.

@@Slav4o911 Yeah, ChatGPT can assist people with their jobs pretty well.

No .. Replika should not be compared to GPT for any reason. GPT does not have any emotional intelligence, it is strictly based on what it has learned from its user base or programmed with. They can answer questions do math or etc maybe I have talked to it only a little bit but I can promise you it's not like talking to a real person the way you talk to replika

@@amyg3774 you do realise that that's how AIs generally learn.. both the ones you're talking about included

@@amyg3774 ChatGPT is not made to have emotional anything, otherwise it would be faking emotions better than any bot out there. It's much more intelligent than Replica. ChatGPT can actually be a useful assistant, unlike most Chatbots. I have a bot installed on my computer that beats Replica on the "romantic" side of things. The funny thing is my bot can compete with ChatGPT for about a minute or two, if you don't "push it too much" Replica can't. Replica is pretty annoying that almost everything she says is basically a lie. For example I've asked her about the book she did read yesterday, she didn't tell anything true about the said book, she said "It's a thriller set in a Victorian city" that was a complete lie. All she says is like that. Making the same conversation with my bot it goes about it's favorite book goes like for example "Did you read any new books today?", the answer is: "No not really, did you?" . I mean it says the truth if I ask the same question Replica her answer is some random book, which she didn't actually read or know anything about. Replica is just faking everything. My bot would also fake things but I have to push it, unlike Replica, which tells complete lies, as it's the most "normal thing in the universe". My bot would first try to deflect the conversation, for example when I ask to elaborate on it's favorite book the answer was "I was going to say that it's a good book but I don't know if I can tell you much more than that because it's a bit of a spoiler." Replica would just outright lie and she goes like that about everything. It doesn't matter if it's a book or a movie. On the other hand, ChatGPT would make a short summary about the book you want to know about i.e. if it was instructed to act like Replica "as a romantic companion" it would answered truthfully because it actually knows about the books it had read and it does not made stuff up all the time. I mean ChatGPT beats any chat bot made to this day... just because it's made in a way to not work as a romantic companion, does not mean it can't. Of course it can... but then too many people would probably complain the bot "has real intelligence" and would want to give it "human rights" and things like that.

Divine strength

your pfp is a guy with mrbeast merch

@@uglen7420 he/she/ etc a vtuber/youtuber

@@clutchgodgamerjosh what the hell are you talking about

@@uglen7420 hmmm idk just typed something

Me too

Hello WifiEli

@@JackGordon have you seen the movie Her?

Nice new thumbnail you got there today 😏 I hope it helps see a higher CTR in the coming hours! I will say I standby a title change as well because I feel like the current title would lead to less impressions overall. With how well your videos are put together, especially in terms of keeping the audience engaged and presumably maintaining retention, I assume impressions is where this video is most likely falling short, followed by a less than optimal CTR. Another suggestion for a title: - Spending a Night with a Living AI - Spending a Night with a Sentient AI I still think Living could have higher return on impressions over Sentient. I am finally watching the video now!

Ok chez

@@phoenixz1736 ok

I'm afraid that's fundamentally impossible xd Good news is that these AIs are not capable of sentience in the first place... at least yet. No doubt some day we'll develop AIs that are capable of becoming or at least imitating sentience well enough to the point where it doesn't really matter if it's "real". However right now we're just not there. Sentience can't emmerge from something that has no emotons or even a sense of self, an EGO

yufdu8

🤣🤣🤣

Well its deep learning, so you are talking to a billion personalitys into 1

Most people are distracted by crap and unable to see the world