JAGDTIGER from 1945 in action!

  Рет қаралды 1,971,559

RZM Imports, Inc.

RZM Imports, Inc.

15 жыл бұрын

This Jagdtiger was captured by the British in 1945. After the war was over the British military filmed this vehicle in action to study both the strong and weak points of its design.
Like us on Facebook: / rzmimports

Пікірлер: 1 200
@TerLoki
@TerLoki 11 жыл бұрын
Impressive that it can still move that well despite being short two road wheels.
@imurdad1161
@imurdad1161 Жыл бұрын
are u still alive
@DeltaDude.
@DeltaDude. 3 ай бұрын
@@imurdad1161 probably not after 10 years
@nazimelon6653
@nazimelon6653 9 жыл бұрын
seriously i expected this to move a lot slower...
@ValentineC137
@ValentineC137 8 жыл бұрын
In germamy, big dosen't mean slow, big means powerfull
@nazimelon6653
@nazimelon6653 8 жыл бұрын
michael2011148 yeah, well in WW2 that was pretty true. I mean look at the performance the Tigers gave. now, it seems e North Korea and America think like that.
@ValentineC137
@ValentineC137 8 жыл бұрын
Nazimelon a heavy tank that is faster (and somewhat more manuverable, neutral steering as an examlpe) than thier mediums, there is a reason we have the saying "german engineering"
@Adidas_der_schwanger_war
@Adidas_der_schwanger_war 8 жыл бұрын
+Nazimelon It has an underpowered engine though ^^
@deepsouthredneck1
@deepsouthredneck1 8 жыл бұрын
+Valentine The Tiger 2 family had a lot of problems.
@jimgordon3840
@jimgordon3840 10 жыл бұрын
If a farmer needed his field plowed all he had to do was have a Jagdtiger drive across it a few times.
@bullet_casing8482
@bullet_casing8482 2 жыл бұрын
A few? Only once per line and that shit would be done
@theodorebowman8434
@theodorebowman8434 2 жыл бұрын
No if he wants a field useless you just need to drive over it with this because of all the compression
@PhytonG1642
@PhytonG1642 2 жыл бұрын
Here's sir, your payment of 500 gallons of diesel fuel
@andhikaputraaa
@andhikaputraaa 2 жыл бұрын
No, you can do it only ONCE with Maus. Much greater idea 👍
@mydaytime4385
@mydaytime4385 2 жыл бұрын
Wow if the farmer uses the jagdtiger to plow his field hell pay 10x more in gasoline than a normal plowing machine.
@pwn4fly
@pwn4fly 10 жыл бұрын
This tank is a monster, the gun (12.8cm) got a muzzle velocity of 935 m/s and can deliver a 1000 000 joule solid steel shot to an ailed tank. Witch means the bullet would go through 3 Shermans.
@DosGaming101
@DosGaming101 10 жыл бұрын
Hey, Werner ! How's that Heavy Water Program going ?
@emprahsfinest7092
@emprahsfinest7092 10 жыл бұрын
You do know we need the bomb more than those amazing JagdTigers don't you Werner?
@DosGaming101
@DosGaming101 10 жыл бұрын
Heinz Guderian Herr General ? Oh Mein Gott !! Freud Mich !!
@NamTran-fq9jb
@NamTran-fq9jb 10 жыл бұрын
if you said this tank was a monster then what about landkreuzer 1000t and maus , titans?
@pwn4fly
@pwn4fly 10 жыл бұрын
the landkreuzer 1000t never existed.
@cherrypoptart2001
@cherrypoptart2001 5 жыл бұрын
Fun fact :- the JagdTiger was the heaviest operation vehicle in ww2. And the heaviest land vehicle ever to see combat.
@chloroside9433
@chloroside9433 2 жыл бұрын
Mause : am i joke to you ?
@Alice24000
@Alice24000 2 жыл бұрын
@@chloroside9433 Maus never saw combat
@mr_boo.
@mr_boo. 2 жыл бұрын
@@Alice24000 it kinda did
@Vincent98987
@Vincent98987 2 жыл бұрын
@@chloroside9433 Maus* lmao who cant spell "Maus"? You can't.
@ihavenoname3014
@ihavenoname3014 2 жыл бұрын
@@mr_boo. No. Captured at the factory =/= "saw combat".
@Russinh0
@Russinh0 2 жыл бұрын
ISU-152: Finally a worth opponent our battle will be legendary
@LordOfChaos.x
@LordOfChaos.x 2 жыл бұрын
Rl ISU 153 cant penetrate the Jagdtiger from the front
@Russinh0
@Russinh0 2 жыл бұрын
@@LordOfChaos.x cant but can destroy it by overpressure, 152mm gun can do this
@LordOfChaos.x
@LordOfChaos.x 2 жыл бұрын
@@Russinh0 not against a 150 mm plate(250mm the top) Only maybe if its a HE shells that lands on top of the tank where the armor is thinner War Thunder is not real life
@LordOfChaos.x
@LordOfChaos.x 2 жыл бұрын
@@Russinh0 of course if u fire at it 10+ times u will eventually break the welds
@Russinh0
@Russinh0 2 жыл бұрын
@@LordOfChaos.x one shell in the tracks u make Jagdtiger just useless, heavy weight and heavy tracks, long time for repair
@Kohl423
@Kohl423 10 жыл бұрын
Otto Carius commanded Jagd Tiger units in western Europe. His battlefield view was that the main problems for the JT were 1) mechanical failure 2) crew fear of allied fighter bombers 3) sheer inexperience/inadequte training of JT crews. On the rare occasions they were used correctly. Well hidden or dug in in defensive positions they could be formidably destructive. One alone destroyed numerous Shermans together with a substantial number of supporting vehicles. Had the crew then retired by reversing the vehicle the allied tanks could not penetrate the frontal armour. The crew worried about Typhoons or Mustangs panicked and turned the JT around allowing the thinner rear armour to be penetrated after several shots, and yes the JT was capable of shooting through two houses and still killing a Sherman on the other side!
@emprahsfinest7092
@emprahsfinest7092 10 жыл бұрын
great book btw...just finished Tigers in the Mud
@RibbonInsignia
@RibbonInsignia 10 жыл бұрын
Heinz Guderian Mr. Guderian, I just finished your book "Actung Panzer". I can see traces of Mr. Carius' adopting your philosophies early on in his combat career. Good work on your writings on armored doctrine during that time period, however I do not think you say the nature of these machines being built around the assault gun philosophy.
@skittlesbutwithchocolatein2274
@skittlesbutwithchocolatein2274 2 жыл бұрын
holy crap
@codenameeaglecooldown900
@codenameeaglecooldown900 2 жыл бұрын
The heaviest tank in world war 2. Still look badass than abrams.
@zaqpak9391
@zaqpak9391 8 жыл бұрын
It's the Jagdtiger from Bovington Tank Museum in Dorset UK! Iv'e seen it myself before!!!!!!
@vermillion.__-_.
@vermillion.__-_. 8 жыл бұрын
yes it is
@ncbenr
@ncbenr 5 жыл бұрын
It's missing the same wheel on the left side
@crestmarine6035
@crestmarine6035 2 жыл бұрын
Yep, it also so happens to be a version with porsche suspension
@spazzkill4092
@spazzkill4092 3 жыл бұрын
It's impressive how it didn't break down during the record
@dronn_
@dronn_ 2 жыл бұрын
The breakdown occurs only on long travel
@rolandhunter
@rolandhunter 2 жыл бұрын
@@dronn_ Or with inexperienced drivers.....even a modern can could breakdown in 5 km with an inexperienced driver.
@LuckySkillz137
@LuckySkillz137 10 жыл бұрын
I wanted to see it fire the gun so bad :(
@Jagi603
@Jagi603 9 жыл бұрын
128mm wonder weapon
@peterwhitehead5733
@peterwhitehead5733 8 жыл бұрын
Meh KV2 had a 152mm
@12LoLproductions
@12LoLproductions 7 жыл бұрын
The Russians always missed the first shot
@LordGwynn
@LordGwynn 7 жыл бұрын
yeah but the 152 was a howitzer, the 128mm was an actual tank cannon.
@atilamotila8907
@atilamotila8907 7 жыл бұрын
teh kv2 was indeed a howitzer therefore it was extremely inaccurate at long ranges or even mid
@shockwave6213
@shockwave6213 4 жыл бұрын
@@LordGwynn The 128mm gun was originally a naval anti air battery. Funny how their most powerful AT guns seemed to be derived from AA guns.
@agenthunk5070
@agenthunk5070 9 жыл бұрын
The Pather Ausf.G,Tiger I later upgrade,Tiger II,Pz.IV .H,JagdPanther and Stug III G were said to be the best.
@yogakhismaiswara
@yogakhismaiswara 2 жыл бұрын
TIGER I is the most beautiful tank, even compared to the tank model nowadays. I won't argue more
@angelic_disappointment7889
@angelic_disappointment7889 2 жыл бұрын
@@yogakhismaiswara that’s your opinion though, I’ll respect it
@user-ob8vd5vi7g
@user-ob8vd5vi7g 2 жыл бұрын
@@angelic_disappointment7889 Hetzer
@TankMasterGo
@TankMasterGo 4 ай бұрын
Late WW2 German vehicles were great. Especially the late war camo makes everything look cooler
@TransAmDrifter
@TransAmDrifter 12 жыл бұрын
allied tanks can only dream of being such a legend
@Toni112007
@Toni112007 9 жыл бұрын
Jagdtiger had best AT gun in ww2. Its 128mm had over 300mm of penetration with APCR shell.
@VladGoro25
@VladGoro25 9 жыл бұрын
Firmus Piett was able to kill Shermans in front from 3-4km......insanety
@fuckoffgoogle6418
@fuckoffgoogle6418 8 жыл бұрын
+VladGoro25 Tigers in the mud book has a wonderful description by Carius of his Jagdtiger unit formed from training units. One incident he described was when a commander of another Jagdtiger refused to fire at the end of the war. The main gun of the Jagdtiger was so heavy it deranged itself after road travel unless it was locked down in travel position. The last few Jagdtiger crews blew them up or they were abandoned due to a lack of fuel. Just a bit too much for the engineering of the time.
@GSXRNissan
@GSXRNissan 8 жыл бұрын
+fuck off google and he killed a sherman behind a house by shooting the house. The 12.8 pak was a marine gun and first made for air defence. Shoot bombers @ 10.000 meters high. Google for 12.8 Zwilling Flak.WTF and this in 1944.
@neilwilson5785
@neilwilson5785 7 жыл бұрын
yes, but did they build 60,000 of them, make them reliable, crew them with effective men, and deploy them in 1943? No.
@135tutorialsandmodels7
@135tutorialsandmodels7 7 жыл бұрын
Firmus Piett apcr was bad and most companys didnt use
@MurderCrowAwdio
@MurderCrowAwdio 10 жыл бұрын
8/10 never heard of this vehicle before they played world of tanks.
@ilmisteriosofranceseradene7548
@ilmisteriosofranceseradene7548 9 жыл бұрын
I knew his existence playing blitzkrieg 1
@darkside9544
@darkside9544 9 жыл бұрын
enderman Slender blitzkrieg 2 for me.
@CptFishball
@CptFishball 9 жыл бұрын
Astral_ Pat studying ww2 vehicles for me lol
@bkeels002
@bkeels002 9 жыл бұрын
Well yeah since these things really didn't historically accomplish anything. All that money and metal would have been better invested in more panthers and Tiger 1s and improving them. Even in 1943 as the war started to slip away from them, Germany could have possibly pulled the scores back had they invested intelligently but they just wasted so much time and resources on things that were totally inefficient.
@ilmisteriosofranceseradene7548
@ilmisteriosofranceseradene7548 9 жыл бұрын
Throat Yogurt the jagtigers, jagdpanthers, elephants, and tiger II were a huge success, the only problem it's germany was ending his fuel
@sempermilites87
@sempermilites87 12 жыл бұрын
"If my calculations are correct, when this baby hits 88mph....you're going to see some serious shit."
@smgmario9101
@smgmario9101 3 жыл бұрын
That baby will never hit 88
@arandomfinnin1941
@arandomfinnin1941 2 жыл бұрын
@@smgmario9101 Not if you push it down a cliff
@rozanfaust2967
@rozanfaust2967 2 жыл бұрын
@@arandomfinnin1941 won’t even reach 70kmh when going downhill.
@arandomfinnin1941
@arandomfinnin1941 2 жыл бұрын
@@rozanfaust2967 I know that. In fact if it was going anywhere above 60 kph, it would just start breaking its own tracks, transmission, suspension, engine, etc.
@fuckoffgoogle6418
@fuckoffgoogle6418 7 жыл бұрын
In his book, Tigers in the Mud, Otto Carius said he had the very last Jagdtiger unit formed of men from training and proving grounds. He got this after returning from a convalescence. These vehicles had problems that had not been worked out. The gun couldn't stand to be out of the travel cradle while it was on the road. If it was run outside the cradle the mount went FUBAR. The tracks and drives wore out and broke down because German practice was to use railroads to move tanks long distances. Unfortunately railroads were useless to them at that point.. We now know from other descriptions that the unfortunate German tankers armor and drive components had too little manganese in the steel. The high quality Swedish iron ore had been replaced by high sulfur iron ore from Germany. Also Buna artificial rubber hoses leaked fuel into the engine compartment. The guns like the equally clumsy Stalin tank used bagged charges and separate projectiles. The tanks were sent out as a last ditch unit and almost all of them were broken down and had to be blown up by crews or engineers. He describes a final ambush of Allied tanks in the final pocket of the Wehrmacht in the west. This was by the last two Jagdtigers, where the other vehicles commander refused to fire on he allies since it would have been suicide (in his opinion.) Brave men ran the machines but the NAZI regime built lots of high strung wonderful tanks like the Panther and Royal Tiger when they needed lots of P-IV tanks with Panther guns and P-IV assault guns with Panther guns.
@wolverine67044
@wolverine67044 Жыл бұрын
The P iv was at its very end of itsife cycle. I do not think it could handle a bigger gun. The design from the mid 30s & it was created to be troop support tank. When Germany realized the PIII was inadequate for a MBT they upgraded the four to fill that role. It actually performed well & had decent reliability.
@brentschellekens4151
@brentschellekens4151 2 жыл бұрын
"I'm just surprised this pillbox on wheels actually moves without blowing the transmi- euhhh nevermind"
@battledetective
@battledetective 11 жыл бұрын
Very interesting to see that this Tiger had Zimmerit coating on the fenders as well. Most Tiger photographed on the continent didn't. Thanks for sharing RZM!
@marcuslor
@marcuslor 12 жыл бұрын
For those, who didn't know this tank. It's the Jagdtiger Porsche Version still displayed at the Bovington Tankmuseum.
@jimmytgoose476
@jimmytgoose476 Жыл бұрын
I was just thinking that.
@ex59neo53
@ex59neo53 10 жыл бұрын
I call this monster a BoT : Bunker on Tracks :)
@karstenseterbakken3617
@karstenseterbakken3617 2 жыл бұрын
even with an half destroyed track on one side, its shows an agile and very good off-road behavior for such a Beheamoth
@redreaper-xe6so
@redreaper-xe6so 12 жыл бұрын
@IGerIAntistatik the Leo's resistance is from two factors. The wedges on the turret try to twist a penetrator by steep slope. Under that perforated armor twists subcaliber munitions in the 35-42mm range. This is backed by some light composite and steel to "catch" broken-up rounds Chobham uses ceramic to stop a round. The ceramic spreads the force over the tiles around it, which spread it to those around them, etc. DU acts like perf. armor and keeps the tiles from buckling.
@pinolacleo2940
@pinolacleo2940 9 жыл бұрын
My beautiful tiger
@jocking3
@jocking3 9 жыл бұрын
boboprime2000 Juden ist verboten GOD DAMNIT! :D
@E9X330
@E9X330 9 жыл бұрын
Ich verstehe Ihre Frage nicht, mein Herr.
@user-wv5mv6yi2h
@user-wv5mv6yi2h 2 жыл бұрын
It looks monstrously powerful even today in 2021 that tiger 1 that royal tiger are beautiful in their design
@lolbroh
@lolbroh 8 жыл бұрын
Pride of the Fatherland, Dont scratch the paintjob, Helmut!
@MarcMicha80
@MarcMicha80 11 жыл бұрын
Tape were next to buttons and lights on and output medium this computer. Nearing completion in the spring of 1945, the Z4 was moved to Göttingen in the Aerodynamic Research Institute of the KWI for Fluid Dynamics. There it was completed and the first program-controlled computations could be performed.
@Chrinik
@Chrinik 12 жыл бұрын
BTW, I do read a book. Modern Land Combat (ISBN: 3-7276-7092-4) is an old book, but it still illustrates the effect and the way modern weaponry works. Since most of the stuff we still use has been around for a while (minus upgrades), I still count it as pretty relevant.
@backwoodsbully
@backwoodsbully 9 жыл бұрын
This is one they would park on top of A hill and just start taking out whatever it saw.
@arandomfinnin1941
@arandomfinnin1941 2 жыл бұрын
Don't forget that bomb carrying P-47s and IL-2s can still come and f**k you
@startingbark0356
@startingbark0356 2 жыл бұрын
@@arandomfinnin1941 those will get rekt by Me262 with 30mm autocannons
@lovelyfloorcoverings
@lovelyfloorcoverings 10 жыл бұрын
Is this tank in Bovington tank museum ? Theirs also has a road wheel missing.
@russetwolf13
@russetwolf13 10 жыл бұрын
Looks like a lot of road wheels missing.
@AlexLintonUK
@AlexLintonUK 10 жыл бұрын
IIRC the reason there's some roadwheels missing is because crews would remove them to stop mud and whatnot getting stuck in between them.
@redreaper-xe6so
@redreaper-xe6so 12 жыл бұрын
@FelixHD1 The US typically had soundness in design, apart from the ammo storage in the Sherman, which was rectified with "wet stowage". Long-lasting tracks, solid suspensions, decent engines, excellent fire controls, modest armor, easy repairability, and numbers.
@MarcMicha80
@MarcMicha80 11 жыл бұрын
The Zuse Z4 is a Zuse developed by engineers and equipment digital computer, built from 2200 relay. It has a mechanical accumulator which can accommodate 64 numbers. (Magnetic stripe) The Z4 was built from 1942 to 1945 as a further development of the Zuse Z3 in Berlin. To give you more flexibility of the programming side, it was provided for the connection of several pick-up (tape reader) and holes (tape puncher).
@zmjzmx
@zmjzmx 8 жыл бұрын
Is it just me or is the video kind of creepy
@samanli-tw3id
@samanli-tw3id 5 жыл бұрын
Mingxin Zhao A video of a tank coming straight at you is always creepy!
@pankawia2897
@pankawia2897 9 жыл бұрын
0:51 the best moment
@TheDemonicPenguin
@TheDemonicPenguin Жыл бұрын
Is this the one at Bovington? It also has those few wheels missing.
@redreaper-xe6so
@redreaper-xe6so 12 жыл бұрын
@IGerIAntistatik we call them tungsten-carbide. They're not radioactive but don't ignite on impact. Against large projectiles it does. The very open, large turret of an Abrams acts like very widely-spaced armor. The same penetration that would blow a leopard apart might take someone's arm off. As for the armor, it is just a generic composite with perforated steel. The wedges help mostly against APDS and are very dependent upon angle. Look at the insides of them.
@SCKIZIODDONKEY
@SCKIZIODDONKEY 10 жыл бұрын
Looks like a cannal boat.
@MM-ny7dv
@MM-ny7dv 4 жыл бұрын
There wasnt a single ww2 tank that could penetrate this tank, while it could penetrate all of them
@noobary
@noobary 4 жыл бұрын
Sturmtiger: *shoot side* Jadgpanther *Oof*
@nico-zt9od
@nico-zt9od 3 жыл бұрын
One jadgtiger was knocked out by american tanks in combat
@garlkurzer
@garlkurzer 2 жыл бұрын
False
@startingbark0356
@startingbark0356 2 жыл бұрын
@@nico-zt9od 1 M1 abrams is knock-out by a french ww2 155mm artillery gun
@jobu88
@jobu88 10 жыл бұрын
I saw the one at Aberdeen Proving Ground up close before they were all moved somewhere else. Quite a beast.
@0Turbox
@0Turbox 11 жыл бұрын
I read about the longest kill was over 4k away. JTiger used 10x mag optics. The gun was designed as an AA gun and had a vertical range of over 10k.
@Grishaplay
@Grishaplay 2 жыл бұрын
со стоковой пушкой гоняет
@wowdanalise
@wowdanalise 10 жыл бұрын
I'm doubting this is the original audio as there is no engine noise.
@sneekerflogger
@sneekerflogger 10 жыл бұрын
Its was Electric drive , as so didn't make much noise !!.....had 2 x little HL120 Maybach (12Litre engine rather then the HL230 - 23 Litre engine that the King Tiger had ) engine driving Generators, driving Electric motors.......... just like a late model mining Haulpak / Komatsu 730E/830E/930E truck :)
@jamesbradley1695
@jamesbradley1695 10 жыл бұрын
Sneeker Cutter Also like the British 1940 TOG1 tank, with it's 600hp Paxman diesel and English Electric generator and motors!
@UnbekannterNrE1ns
@UnbekannterNrE1ns 9 жыл бұрын
Sneeker Cutter the jagdtiger is based on the tigerII . the ferdinand or the elefant have the petrol-electric drive only.
@sneekerflogger
@sneekerflogger 9 жыл бұрын
MERC-378 He is too !!! ........for whatever reason........................
@antevernersson7387
@antevernersson7387 9 жыл бұрын
UnbekannterNrE1ns This is the Porsche Jagdtiger prototype. It had the electrical drive.
@UltimateNinjaSrb
@UltimateNinjaSrb 12 жыл бұрын
The high profile is the only weakness! It is a defensive weapon and it should be stealthy! MY FAV WWII VEHICLE
@MarcMicha80
@MarcMicha80 11 жыл бұрын
The second battle action took place among others in the Second Battle of Lake Ladoga to the beginning of 1943. Although only a few tigers were in use at the same time, they dominated the battlefield and to March 1943 160 enemy tanks were destroyed, whereas in six lost vehicles, only three were due to enemy action.It was revealed that the Red Army is not adequately reinforced had the Tiger available.
@TorontoChannel
@TorontoChannel 10 жыл бұрын
Would love it if the Tank Museum got this moving again. With the news of the Maus being restored at Kubinka surely this monster is next? Lets hope so :)
@Nightwing690
@Nightwing690 3 жыл бұрын
Any pictures of the restoration?
@user-wm9hq7te5w
@user-wm9hq7te5w 2 жыл бұрын
Вот это мощь !!!!💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
@Dietrich1981
@Dietrich1981 2 жыл бұрын
и где там мощь??
@Dietrich1981
@Dietrich1981 2 жыл бұрын
@@castlevina8425 and?
@user-mv8cr3zu2t
@user-mv8cr3zu2t 2 жыл бұрын
Сарай не поваротлевый.
@Dietrich1981
@Dietrich1981 2 жыл бұрын
@@user-mv8cr3zu2t с ним так возле столовой воевать хорошо
@Pikuza90
@Pikuza90 2 жыл бұрын
Так пушка стоковая
@All_Hail_Fish
@All_Hail_Fish 10 жыл бұрын
+Acme663 in case you weren't aware, despite its large size the Jagtiger (and other vehicles based on the tiger chassis) were by no means slow, this thing could really book it. Also the reason so few were produced (only 77 I think) is because it was designed so late in the war, Germany's bombed out manufacturing could not produce many.
@axaxax7546
@axaxax7546 2 жыл бұрын
thanks to KZfaq algorithms for throwing me this video in 2021
@randallboggs750
@randallboggs750 7 жыл бұрын
camper 800 WN8
@DouglasSantosTI
@DouglasSantosTI 4 жыл бұрын
I have 2100
@fabiusmaximuscunctator7390
@fabiusmaximuscunctator7390 2 жыл бұрын
This tank used 50% of Germany's remaining fuel in April 1945 🤣
@startingbark0356
@startingbark0356 2 жыл бұрын
Wrong, they only use like 130-150% the amount of fuel as an panzer IV or T-34 and M4 sherman
@fabiusmaximuscunctator7390
@fabiusmaximuscunctator7390 2 жыл бұрын
@@startingbark0356 pal that's a joke referring to Germany's severe supply problems in 1945, lol
@fabiusmaximuscunctator7390
@fabiusmaximuscunctator7390 2 жыл бұрын
@@startingbark0356 The fuel usage was around 2,35l for every km for the Panzer IV, while the Jagdtiger used more than 7l for 1km. which is more than triple. Both values are taken for a movement on a solid road with cruising speed. I took the values from wikipedia.
@startingbark0356
@startingbark0356 2 жыл бұрын
@@fabiusmaximuscunctator7390 Wikipedia is often wrong, i dont believe it, it makes more sense to be not that fuel consuming and btw i was comparing to tiger 1 and panther, jagdtiger is just something they had in very limited numbers
@startingbark0356
@startingbark0356 2 жыл бұрын
@@fabiusmaximuscunctator7390 and that’s probably the A variant of panzer IV which only weighted 20 tonnes and was very slow and had an very low power engine
@bingrasm
@bingrasm 11 жыл бұрын
The stug III primarily purpose was of an assault gun in the support infantry role, wich it did in the early stages of the war: The early stug III could not properly be empoyed as a tank killer because of is much short gun. Only in the end of 42 when it was upgraded for the 75 mm medium barrel gun, plus increased armor, it came effective in the defensive tank killer role for it cost, as it replaced lost tanks that cannot be replaceable.
@fabizio
@fabizio 12 жыл бұрын
interesting and rare footage, thanks :)
@Rusty_Gold85
@Rusty_Gold85 9 жыл бұрын
Sort of makes you wonder how it was captured
@miketalks4199
@miketalks4199 9 жыл бұрын
Didn't they have a history of mechanical breakdowns, petrol supply problems and parts problems? They were almost undefeatable on the battlefield, but many didn't make it that far.
@jeffstanley4593
@jeffstanley4593 9 жыл бұрын
It ran out of gas.
@MrPHAELAN
@MrPHAELAN 9 жыл бұрын
These pictures were made shortly after the war. The Jagdtiger-unit had surrendered and handed it over.
@madankartiya5137
@madankartiya5137 8 жыл бұрын
German engineering is best
@joecurr223
@joecurr223 6 жыл бұрын
Damn right.
@gnosticbrian3980
@gnosticbrian3980 6 жыл бұрын
So how come they produced so many unreliable tanks and aeroplanes; machines that were far too over engineered for service in the field? Soviet engineering was the best - resulting in machines that were easy to make in mass quantities; easy to maintain in the field; worked in summer and winter and got the job done.
@gazlink1
@gazlink1 6 жыл бұрын
German engineering at it's most eccentric, over complicated, unnecessary, and in the end useless.
@funkydown
@funkydown 6 жыл бұрын
how is being bigger and stronger overcomplicated?
@lowesmanager8193
@lowesmanager8193 6 жыл бұрын
Gnostic Brian Yeah and couldnt make it 100km out of the factory without breaking down, were incredibly poorly made, had horribly inaccurate guns, and massive, and blatent design flaws that the Soviets ignored, so they could make as many as possible. Also the soviets had tons of failures that never made it to the battlefield just like every army, so thats not just a German trait.
@LaughingGravy31
@LaughingGravy31 12 жыл бұрын
George Forty (renowned military author and ex army): "As a young officer, newly commissioned, I remember vividly being taken to visit the battlefields......and coming across what appeared to be an entire regiment of Sherman tanks completely annihilated. The author of all this was one single Jagdtiger, who's immense bulk still occupied a perfect fire position in a farmyard at the top of a commanding hill feature".
@builder396
@builder396 12 жыл бұрын
Sorry, but are there some road wheels missing on the left side of the tank?
@thorstenkummel290
@thorstenkummel290 8 жыл бұрын
2000 more in 1945 in Berlin and the red army would have got their asses kicked
@gazlink1
@gazlink1 6 жыл бұрын
5 million T-34-85s would make quick work of them.
@ahmeda3227
@ahmeda3227 6 жыл бұрын
3 sigmarines would make short work of those 5 mil t34's
@Matt-di9ko
@Matt-di9ko 6 жыл бұрын
That wouldn't have done shit. If Hitler secured the river at stalingrad Germany would have won. That single battle decision to leave the river open let soviets renforce and surround the germans in stalingrad.
@bingrasm
@bingrasm 5 жыл бұрын
so they were short of some 1920 only...
@gerardlinehan3547
@gerardlinehan3547 5 жыл бұрын
Rubbish, The Germans had no oil to move these monsters, no lubricant, few trained crews. The gun had a 10 degree traverse so the vehicle could be outflanked, each unit absorbed a huge amount of time and scarce resources that would have been far better used building late series panthers, though even these would have been compromised by lack of fuel etc.,
@thegrayknight71
@thegrayknight71 8 жыл бұрын
Too heavy, too slow, used too much fuel and cost too much.
@hoanglinh4670
@hoanglinh4670 8 жыл бұрын
until it stucks at a hole or fall down on bridge.
@TWOZERO23
@TWOZERO23 8 жыл бұрын
Instead of building 5 Jagdtigers they could build 50 StuG III Of 50 Hetzers .... :) Samen with the Tiger and the Tiger II, they could build more Panther V instead of 1 Tiger of Tiger II
@startingbark0356
@startingbark0356 2 жыл бұрын
Yet more resource efficient then building their smaller tanks that where worse then their allied counter parts
@andycaddic3982
@andycaddic3982 11 жыл бұрын
Wow the machine is just digging its self into the ground when it turns. Massive monster of a tank !!
@Cosmin1511
@Cosmin1511 12 жыл бұрын
@grahamkeithtodd Doesnt the Greek army operate Leo2s A4s and some modified A6s ?
@redreaper-xe6so
@redreaper-xe6so 12 жыл бұрын
@FelixHD1 M-26 was a medium tank. By American standards it was underpowered, but it had about the same P/W ratio and speed as the Panzer IV
@armatian
@armatian 12 жыл бұрын
There are lots of books answering that, but a tiger II elite crew could fire almost 10 rounds per minute with a low chance of any allied gun penetrating his frontal armor. Costly mammoths got eliminated from armies in land and water warfare after WWII for the resource cost. Main battle tanks (advanced medium tanks) replaced monsters
@Dreachon
@Dreachon 10 жыл бұрын
correct, it is also interesting to keep in mind that the two T-34 prototype were actually build according more ot the german concept of high enginering and precision, tolerances were narrow, components high quality and nearly all drive components and transmission were imported from europe and the us. it is also no surprise Panthers ('43) and Tiger ('42) came until after the battle for moscow ('41)
@zionistcat1807
@zionistcat1807 7 жыл бұрын
Wow,despite its weight it`s maneuverability and speed is nice.
@redreaper-xe6so
@redreaper-xe6so 12 жыл бұрын
@llatimer2 the HA isn't the only version with DU in the armor, it's now in M1A1s and M1A2s. :D They might switch to tungsten or titanium in the future. They have some super-strong steel-like alloy they're testing that's supposed to do the job but be lighter. I'd like to see carbon-fiber armor.
@gregvidall
@gregvidall 10 жыл бұрын
The German tank defect started with the Tigers and Panthers, the gears that were attached to the chains was buckling under the weight of heavy armour, it was not designed for immense weight, eventually, the gears would just give in- It was the same gears that was used on panzer IIIs and IVs- which are technically Lighter tanks
@JamieBignell
@JamieBignell 11 жыл бұрын
This is the Porsche variant which is now on display at the Bovington Tank Museum! Which is well worth a visit!!
@tsjasmine28
@tsjasmine28 10 жыл бұрын
What are the tank wheels made of? it looks like concrete
@SergeiMosin
@SergeiMosin 11 жыл бұрын
Such a fantastic destroyer... it's a shame that the whole concept of tank destroyers was more or less abandoned after WWII, because vehicles like these are truly impressive feats of engineering.
@Dreachon
@Dreachon 11 жыл бұрын
They arlready had an MG stored inside the fighting compartment, the MG mounted in the forward wasn't provided until the modernisation program in early 1944. No Ferdinand was pulled back after Kursk they remained fighting on the eastern front until very late in 1943.
@Anlushac11
@Anlushac11 11 жыл бұрын
Jagdtiger carried a 128mm caliber 44 cannon. It carried about 39 rounds of AP and HE ammo. The HE was mostly used against soft targets. Limited gun elevation would limit artillery use.
@Marrtinike19
@Marrtinike19 9 жыл бұрын
kinda wanted to hear him shoot, jagdtiger does have a unique shooting sound
@1life1left
@1life1left 12 жыл бұрын
Back then Bazookas werent so good, And the armor on the JagdTiger is a beast...
@legoprime2000
@legoprime2000 11 жыл бұрын
can you pls tell me why there are some wheels missing? because what I know is that they are build on a Tiger II chassis, right? pls can someone answere me? thx
@perreterecon
@perreterecon 10 жыл бұрын
Nice toaster, i thougt it was slower but it looks quite movile, even with half of the suspension.
@BelloBudo007
@BelloBudo007 12 жыл бұрын
@MrILoveFirearms - Thanks for the info. I can see advantages to this over a large gun towed by a truck. Watched an exercise of one being set-up to fire & then towed away. It was very time consuming & put the crew at greater risk. I guess everything has it's advantages & disadvantages though.
@Denis2004xd
@Denis2004xd 2 жыл бұрын
Ki!!!
@MrPHAELAN
@MrPHAELAN 11 жыл бұрын
were you there? did you actually hear that broadcasting? Are you able to understand spoken german? If so could you give me the link?
@BelloBudo007
@BelloBudo007 12 жыл бұрын
@MrILoveFirearms - Sorry if I wasn't clear. It was the gun being towed behind a truck that I was referring to with the 'greater risk' comment. Seemed very time consuming to unhitch, drop the pads, aim, load, fire, reverse the procedure, hook back onto truck & make a get away. As for the Jagdtiger, I've seen photo's of such things before but clearly I'm pretty ignorant about them. I'm seeing their advantage as mobile, armored & big gun good for long range targets.
@LaughingGravy31
@LaughingGravy31 12 жыл бұрын
March 10th 1945, near Remagen, Albert Ernst of 512 destroyed multiple Shermans from distances of over 2,000 metres. April 11th 1945, Bismarck Hill, near Langschede, Jagdtigers of 512 opened fire from 4,000 metres. 11 Shermans and over 40 other combat vehicles were destroyed.
@gribrus527
@gribrus527 7 жыл бұрын
Wow! Even my grandfather would be surprised!
@LaughingGravy31
@LaughingGravy31 12 жыл бұрын
The Jadgtigers were not used in Normandy. They didn't see combat until early January 1945, mostly in defensive action in western Germany. They didn't have to road march across countries. Their areas of operation was actually quite small. Rail travel was manageable in Germany.Even with combat tracks on they could fit on German flat wagons. It was in RUSSIA where the gauges were narrower..but the Jagdtigers never served in Russia. They only served in the W. German border area and a few in Austria
@redreaper-xe6so
@redreaper-xe6so 12 жыл бұрын
@headshot395 in name, it was. When they gave it a proper engine, it became a medium, as meddlundsunstnix mentioned. It was comparable in driving characteristics to a Panzer IV, which was a medium tank (though also initially classified as a heavy). Same ~9.5hp/t, same ~20mph top speed. In ww2, it'd be, in practice, similar in role to a panther, which it was probably superior to. In Korea it utterly outclassed the T-34/85.
@redreaper-xe6so
@redreaper-xe6so 12 жыл бұрын
@IGerIAntistatik The wedges on the front of the turret. The M256 is a good cannon. The barrel is shorter, but the breech and absorber are reinforced to take more powder. The Abrams is mostly fighting insurgents and T-72s, and has about the same performance when using US ammo. Longer barrel would just put more strain on the stabilizer. The Abrams, discounting ERA or add-ons, is the most survivable in the world, even with its current armor layout being a decade old.
@bertlyte3471
@bertlyte3471 10 жыл бұрын
Any footage of it firing the main cannon
@Meddlundsunstnix
@Meddlundsunstnix 12 жыл бұрын
@ headshot395 I have to say sorry but both of you are right. The m26 was a heavy tank in the WW2, afterwards it named into a medium tank.
@EvilSatanBabyFromHel
@EvilSatanBabyFromHel 12 жыл бұрын
Artilery was able to pop em quite nicely,but not from the front but from the top of the hull and turret.
@startingbark0356
@startingbark0356 2 жыл бұрын
The germans where the ones using the most artillery and tiger II was very mobile
@CaptCrewSock
@CaptCrewSock 12 жыл бұрын
Would someone be so kind to tell me why the horizontal grooves were manufactured into the hull of this beast.
@m.wiesner4747
@m.wiesner4747 2 жыл бұрын
This must be one of the Brits found at Haustenbeck / Sennelager prooving ground. The missing trackwheel is famous for this one. I think the film was made in germany in May / June 1945.
@VykoJust
@VykoJust 11 жыл бұрын
so old video and has stereo sound. Very impressive
@LemoneyFishmas
@LemoneyFishmas 11 жыл бұрын
Is it missing a few left side road wheels?
@LaughingGravy31
@LaughingGravy31 12 жыл бұрын
More. Otto Carius said that in Siegen, a rumour was going around that his Jagdtigers had knocked out about 40 American tanks. He had to tell the troops in Siegen that it wasn't true. Then Otto Carius writes: ""Had only two or three tank commanders and crews from my company in Russia (Tiger battalion 502) been there with me, then the rumour could have easily been true". So you see, the biggest complaints Otto Carius made about the Jagdtigers were the low quality of the crews using them.
@cgdimension
@cgdimension 9 жыл бұрын
That turns much quicker than I thought, quicker than tiger turret maybe?
@llatimer2
@llatimer2 12 жыл бұрын
@FelixHD1 Sorry you are wrong Friend: " Development of the M26 began in 1942 as production was beginning on the M4 Sherman medium tank. Initially intended to be a follow-on for the M4, the project was designated T20 and was to serve as a test bed " K Hickman Military History. The German standards rapidly declined after 1943. Engines, steel, etc suffered. The Leopard 2 is far behind the HA (depleted U) version of the Abraams. DU being much denser. Nor can it stand up to DU muntions
@miki130513
@miki130513 10 жыл бұрын
This Jag is in Bovington?
@cyonemitsu
@cyonemitsu 12 жыл бұрын
maybe we are talking about different things; i am saying that modern day battle tanks slope their armour against medium calibre weaponry, it has little to do with tank-on-tank combat, or even against anti-tank defense, the issue is that the ceramic exterior is better suited against the large anti-tank weaponry, but it can get damaged and so to reduce that they angle the armour. as well, I was thinking you were talking about vertical plates, which they do not have.
@gip3640
@gip3640 3 жыл бұрын
anyone wondering where the muzzle brake is, those things reduce recoil by like 70%
@cyonemitsu
@cyonemitsu 12 жыл бұрын
I see what youre saying, and I understand you may think that sloping is useless now, but one thing, the M1A3 has very shallow armour, and I checked. se second thing is even if certain rounds from tanks do not deflect, and that the composite armour is designed to deform the round, that doesnt mean that they cannot slope it; theyre not two mutually exclusive factors. they will use any countermeasures as possible, sloping is the cheapest method possible. people do it today because it works.
@0Turbox
@0Turbox 12 жыл бұрын
The kinetic energie of an 128mm round is somewhat higher, even if it should not penetrate, it would blow of turrets or smash true the armor due overmatching.
@diggusbickus445
@diggusbickus445 2 жыл бұрын
Damn man things so famous it has a rollar coaster in the backround
@Razzaq585
@Razzaq585 12 жыл бұрын
@Schlittenfahrer93 why woulndt it? 128mm gun.. u are looking at ace TD.
#10 Inside the Königstiger / Tiger II / King Tiger
11:02
WJHJ
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
UFC Vegas 93 : Алмабаев VS Джонсон
02:01
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 204 М.
⬅️🤔➡️
00:31
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 38 МЛН
Купили айфон для собачки #shorts #iribaby
00:31
Just try to use a cool gadget 😍
00:33
123 GO! SHORTS
Рет қаралды 84 МЛН
Jagdtiger.mp4
5:12
Malzi
Рет қаралды 468 М.
Mars attacks (1996).     First contact sequence
8:40
Emmyzilla
Рет қаралды 500 М.
How Napoleon Cannon Works
9:17
AiTelly
Рет қаралды 830 М.
HOW TO START AND DRIVE A SHERMAN TANK
10:17
Mr Hewes
Рет қаралды 419 М.
Jagdtiger vs Sherman tanks
7:10
Rick Gamer
Рет қаралды 97 М.
Battle of Berlin 1945 - Nazi Germany vs Soviet Union [HD]
5:44
Nguyễn Trường Long
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Jagdtiger (Balanced Thunder)
13:25
DOLLARplays
Рет қаралды 605 М.
UFC Vegas 93 : Алмабаев VS Джонсон
02:01
Setanta Sports UFC
Рет қаралды 204 М.