Seconded

Thirded

Yeah, some good editing here.

@@michaelwestmoreland2530 pp

whatever happen God people remain prayerful faithful i.n.c. e.v.m. armand airish patriotic Vote Vote Vote Vote.

A delivery like a brick through a plate glass window? Hello, I'm from America. Let me introduce you to the .357 Magnum. My favorite gadget was the wrist-fired dart launcher.

@@ashcarrier6606 yeah the PPK was not really a step up from the beretta.. a little heavier bullet but still a mouse gun to an American.. By the was the CIA favored .38 revolvers..

@@ferdonandebull In the novel, the change made sense. The Beretta 418 is chambered in .25ACP which is really anemic, so .32ACP is a much better cartridge and the PPK is a much better design. But by modern standards, even .380ACP is underpowered. And that's why James Bond should've kept using the Walther P99 that he got in Tomorrow Never Dies.

You'll carry the Walther

​@@ashcarrier6606 😊😊😊

I am not sure about the AR 15 folding sniper rifle but I would certainly take the gold sovereigns and the Aston Martin.

Likely, or even cybernetically implanted inside him in this day/age! Regardless, JB does love his toys…

I don't think it's going to be THAT advanced. Unless you mean an intra-agency delivery service

@@Marvin-dg8vj Given how ill-proportioned transformers are versus what they pretend to be, these days Bond should be a disabled transgender woman with Down syndrome, and his cellphone should be able to transfor into a battleship where necessary.

Nobody's done it better!

Nah... Mine is always the Aston Martin DB5.

This car was sexy beyond words....

2006 Aston Martin DBS V12

The real james bond looks like ROGER MOORE not SEAN CONNERY.

say that to the laser watch lol

Almost like these are movies made for entertainment and not for pretentious nerds.

​@@alwaysOPEN4business It's less about "pretentious nerdiness" but more about seeing some of those gadgets in action more than once and in different contexts. As you said, it's all about entertainment.

Most likely because newer gadgets that did what those ones did, but better along with other features as time went one. Same with Bond's MANY watches and all they could do.

Idiot scriptwriters

Same gadget, just...smaller!

What happens in Dr No, the movie, is an absolute LAUGH RIOT! See, what Bond carries, and hands over to M and then Boothroyd is a Beretta M1934, chambered for .380/9x17 Corto. And Boothroyd refers to it as "nice and light...for a ladies handbag". And then he gives Bond a PPK....which is chambered for .32/7.65. And claims it's a heavier gun, hitting "like a brick through a plate glass window". So, he takes a heavier gun off of Bond and gives him a weaker one, with the argument that the Beretta is worse than the PPK. Not even the WEIGHT argument works, the Beretta M1934 weighs 1 lb 7 oz/660 g unloaded, and the PPK 21 oz/590 g This scene is taken straight out of the book, without making allowances. In the book, it makes sense, since the gun Bond carries is a M418, which was chambered in .25/6.35. And so the PPK IS a heavier gun. But that's not what the movie uses. In the book, Boothroyd also suggestes other guns than the PPK, both the Sauer M-38 and the Tokarev TT-33(remarkable for a British secret agent in the middle of the cold war). The movie, of course, gives no other suggestions, going straight to the Walther. Incidentally, the movie also references that the gun "jammed on" Bond and that's the reason for a replacement. In the original, from the book, the gun was "skeletonized" and rather than jamming, it snagged up in his clothes and he didn't get it out before getting shot himself. As for Major Boothroyd, he's the service ARMOURER, and is not Q. Notably, he's never referred to as such in Dr No. Q, on the other hand, is the Quartermaster(later eQuipment officer) and head of the Q-branch. Armourer Boothroyd is named for famed firearms expert Geoffrey Boothroyd, while Q is based on Charles Fraser-Smith, gadgeteer for the Special Operations Executive of WW2. These devices were called "Q-gadgets" after the WW1 Q-ships.

@@mooneyes2k478 Thank you for the very informed comment but I never suggested that the novels referred to Q as Boothroyd, I wrote that the movies did, and in _The Spy Who Loved Me_ when they pick up the Lotus, tricked out as a sub, Agent Amasova wishes Q, a “Good morning, Major Boothroyd.” Wasn’t the Mk II Welrod chambered in 9mm? Because there’d be so much of the stuff knocking about occupied Europe that a discarded shell casing in that calibre wouldn’t look out of place. If Bond was intended to go on ops behind the Iron Curtain, or they wanted to put investigating agencies off his scent, maybe a Tokarev wouldn’t have been such a remarkable choice after all.

@@mooneyes2k478 You should stick with films made after 2015.

@@RideAcrossTheRiver I don't even get the point of your comment

@@mooneyes2k478 Technically, the Dr. No gun was a Walther PP also chambered in .380ACP, so he was just using the same cartridge. lol Since Dr. No was a fairly low budget movie, I imagine they were stuck with the whatever props they could get their hands on. It's also why Bond only got a proper Walther PPK in From Russia With Love which had a bigger budget. It's also why the famous scene where Bond shoots Professor Dent is also a goof since the scene (and the original novel) is supposed to involve a Smith and Wesson revolver, but instead used a Colt M1911A1 instead. Again, probably because at the time of filming that scene, they didn't have access to one.

Exactly, now if he had pulled out a webley.455 that’s different

@@mrdynamic8678 Right. He should have had Bond carry a chopped P38 if he wanted a unique weapon with a punch. Chop the grip giving Bond the same capacity as a PPK, and shorten the barrel to help with size. Q was supposedly a weapons genius, right. It worked for U.N.C.L.E agents. After all, it was 1962 and subcompacts were just a gleam in our eyes!

Made him human you mean

Dude! New cheap and cheerful (and practical) product stocked at the tills of garden centres as a potential impulse buy! 👌🤜👍

I want to see secret agent story like JB on fantasy settings

you forgot the others

Jesus Christ, what you just said is so depressing because it's so true...🤦‍♂️😞

Thanks! This one was super fun to put together!

I wondered that myself. There's a few vids here on YT about them. Fascinating technology.

Very funny.

Thus spake Tomska

Glad you enjoyed it!

A plain old exploding pen beats all nanotechnologies.

​@@u.v.s.5583 Proving why pen is mightier than the sword

@@vigneshiyer2483 Nice one

This video features James Bond's gadgets only. You could do a whole other video for Villains' gadgets. Those two would be top of the list!

@@EVERYJAMESBOND Thankyou for highlighting this. I'm afraid I don't have your talent or expertise on creating KZfaq videos.