Go go go japan, a future world powerful nation and deadly Allies. 😅

History repeats itself

True we should hope it's allies don't turn again

Under US Rule, Japan is not a true Ally, One Thing All of you who don't know better, remember a nation that was ever an enemy of the US, could never truly be a friend. Now You Know ....

@@user-uu1jw5xs3u when they got the chance, better they show what they built silently

oh no there goes tokyo go go godzilla!

🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵🇯🇵

Go Japan 🗾❤❤❤❤❤

"The Japan of today is a world apart from Imperial Japan of the first half of the twentieth century.." == Deep down inside. It's the same people. Samurai spirit lives on in pacifier's cloth. Remember, 三島 由紀夫? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukio_Mishima

bro, theres no gender in countries, we ony use the term she in energy powered transportations haiyaa

Quiet. .humble and deadlier than we know.

Only china is worried about Japan

LOK USA FRY FAKYO MZOR 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈💩🤢🤮 👍⚰️🔥☢️🖐️

What's your worries ?😊 Which country have China bombed, destroyed or colonize compared to your "world" of western imperialists or colonizer ? Or are you unhappy that your world is not able to abuse China or make them your comfort women as you wish ? So all you can do now is fear mongering ??🤣🤣😁

Every normal american dude

That’s funny! US cheering for Japan against China even-though it was Japan who attacked Pearl Harbor, and it was the US who dropped two atomic bombs on Japan’s head, while China was an ally of the US in WWII, and has never invaded the West throughout its 5000 years of history ( with one exception being the mongols who was not ethnic Han Chinese)

Japan, Germany, and Italy are under US Rule for 1000 Years after they surrendered to US Government, therefore they are not ALLOWED to have a International ARMIES, and/or Produce Major Military Weapons or War-ships, or Aircraft Carriers etc.

They have been released from that!

@@jamesmarkey5946lol what does Eisenhower’s beware of mil indus complex statement have to do with this comment about Japan downsizing? 🤣

Our relationship with Japan is wildly different than it was 80 years ago. I feel that in a real crisis we would be great allies, so I am glad they are arming

Yes and white too great

I wouldn't say a lot faster. Just faster. I was an RO on DLG(N)25 Bainbridge - a nuke frigate in the Enterprise Battle Group along with the nuke cruiser Long Beach. We were designed to keep up.

Just 13 knots is enough for water skiing.

On a private tour of the Nimitz in 2013 during CVN-68’s Tiger Cruise on a courtesy call to Victoria BC, I was told that executing a 45° turn at 55 knots, they put the edge of the flight deck into the water. We were in the CIC (bridge) at the time which is elevated above the flight deck and I was thunderstruck at the thought and power of that deck hitting the ocean’s surface at that speed.

LOL dear me, the problem you have, is, just like all Americans you never even ask yourself the obvious questions? Questions anyone, must always, not only ask, but more importantly, understand, before even trying to suggest anything at all, good or bad, about any military hardware. Questions like, how can the F-35's or even the F-22's, for that matter, detect, track, or target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? -- You make the claim, you've looked into it, right? So, tell us all, exactly how these US aircraft detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? Isn't it amazing that I can tell you, that you have no idea? Yet, if you really had looked into anything at all, or even just asked yourself that one question?, then you'd start to understand the reality is nothing at all like you all think! So, let's quickly explain what I mean... The facts, (that seemingly none of you even understand), are, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does NOT defeat low-frequency (long wave radar)! So regardless of the aircraft's RCS (radar cross-section) you all believe means so much, when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and just light up and stand out like a beacon in the night. To detect, track, and target other stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes. Well, neither the APG-77 radar, used in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar, used in the F-35, have any kind of long wave radar? Hence, they can't detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR! - An obvious fact, the US Air force will be fully aware of. Only it seems the reality is, that when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat! So, what do these US aircraft like the F-22 - F-35 actually have available to them to detect any other stealth aircraft from BVR? The answer to that question is, they have AWACS (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35's in real time). Yet we find that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding your enemies real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact, as I'll show you. The reality of this (Russian rubbish), you all claim, is that Russia has a new 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR easily today. The USA CAN'T! Russia have designed, and they've developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. And this L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR. This new Russian technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types. Yet we read you all, claiming it's, what is it? Rubbish, relying on old washing machine microchips, right? Only they can detect, track, and target all enemy stealth fighters, (and detect them long before they even enter Russian airspace), from much greater distances today, with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system. Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57. We must also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35. As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR. Seeing the all-important, Russian massive advantage in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky). The truth you uneducated people all hate so much, is, this Russian 5th generation radar design, has very clear, and very real potentials to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including... Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters. High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas. High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. (Effectively, and completely, neutralising the USA's use of AWACS for their detection). This Tikhomirov NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars. -- Just Russian crap?, indeed it is, if you're an idiot. HILARIOUS!! LMAO!

So do explain, why it is we read so many of you Americans making comments just like yours, that are all completely wrong, really illogical, and so bizarre it only ever shows you all up, as incredibly naive, and completely immune to such obvious propaganda? What is it all about? Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, and fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in A2A combat. It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15?, we find that none had any offensive capabilities, and most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down. So it really is, once again, and as always, just a very silly, and meaningless remedial propaganda claim. Yet, there is another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in A2A combat, and has faced off against aircraft just as capable as itself? Only we don't hear about that, because it's not American! This is how pathetic you people really are. The British Sea Harrier is, actually, the only aircraft unbeaten in A2A combat, that has faced off against worthy, viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed. You should all be questioning why the US made it illegal to sell the F-22?. The US government seemingly wants it believed, it's because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it?. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense. As the facts are, they've no idea what's around the corner in modern military technologies, and with the speed we're seeing new military tactical hardware being designed, developed, and created today, it could well have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works)? If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit. Only, there's another, and much more likely reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22? If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense to build them, they can't just write it off, so the USA have then only used the F-22, for propaganda purposes? Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell? Logically, that's the only possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft, that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft. Well, 19 years, the US have had the F-22 in service, (and they've been in wars the entire time), yet they've never used it?, not once! And more interestingly and very telling was, just after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the USA removed every one of their F-22's from right across the Middle East, Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan. Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee we'll never see the F-22 involved in any sort of real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk. They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.

Just read what you try to claim? It's idiocy, idiocy on a scale of idiocy, not seen before. If, as you claim, "you've been looking Into the F-35"? Then maybe you can explain, that we also see the USA, still unable to produce and build a VTOL capable fighter aircraft? Yet, they are trying to lie about this? The F-35B was claimed by the USA, to be able to do what the Harrier could do, while also being supersonic, stealthy, with modern avionics systems, etc, this is what we were told, and it's exactly why we designed our new carriers without ramps. Only one of the biggest technical headaches, the British always had when building the Harrier, was the VTOL, - transferring from ''lift'' (downward nozzles) to forward flight (rear-facing nozzles) and flying away from the lift-off. Apparently to achieve it took the British a hell of a lot of technical work, (three - four months at a time, over 3 years). Look up all the variants they made, but they never gave up, and they finally figured it out. I said long before we ever saw the F-35B, that it wouldn't be VTOL capable, (even with the Rolls-Royce lift engines), because the USA has tried many times before, and failed each time, only ever managing to produce and build the British Sea Harrier, able to do so. Every US airframe (and there have been many), have all failed. I'll show you what I mean, as otherwise so many of you Americans get confused, it's bizarre! LOL At 7 mins 50 seconds, you'll watch a Harrier perform a proper VTOL. Copy and paste “2013 MCAS Yuma Air Show - AV8B Harrier Demo” into KZfaq search. Watch it from lift off, to more importantly, flying away from the lift-off, and you'll see the transfer of nozzles take place. You'll not find any footage of the F-35B doing this anywhere. Yet we do see Lockheed Martin trying to suggest it is VTOL capable?, when it, so clearly, is not. Copy and Paste “First F-35B Vertical Takeoff Test” into KZfaq search. You'll only see it lift off, hover, then return straight back down. You'll never see it fly away from the lift-off. Believe me, if it could, we'd see it doing so in every piece of footage we have on the F-35B - like we still see on all the footage of the Harrier doing so. But you'll never find any footage anywhere of the F-35B doing that. Oh, and please, anyone that wants to try and show me the F-35 fly into a hover, and fly away from that hover (as a way of proof it can VTOL)? Please don't, because that has nothing at all to do with a VTOL. To hover, and to fly from a hover doesn't require the transfer of the nozzles, as hover, is achieved while remaining with forward flight (rear facing nozzles) with pitch and yaw, to find your centre of gravity to control the hover (all CPU controlled today). No transfer of nozzles is required to fly from a hover. And we don't want or need to read any Americans trying to claim it's not necessary? LOL, (while forgetting, they're to be carrier-based aircraft), meaning any slight damage to the deck or ramp, and they can't get any jets airborne? Defeating the entire purpose of having the aircraft in the first place! You can't ever lose an entire carrier in battle, for only minor damage?, whatever next?. So, why do we see the USA doing this? It's obviously because, the US is still a country that's never managed to produce & build a VTOL fighter aircraft. Britain did so in the late 50s, Russia did so in the late 60s, the USA has tried and failed numerous times, so it seems this time, they're going to try to lie about it LOL. That country is a travesty, man! But it does show us, that Lockheed do indeed produce propaganda aircraft, as the F-22 is exactly the same... A failed aircraft, so today, only being used for propaganda purposes!

What could the F-16 achieve in Ukrainian airspace?, or in fact, how long could an F-16 survive in Ukraine is the only question worth asking? For me, I'd estimate the F-16 would have a life expectancy of less than 30 minutes combat service, over Ukraine, and that's extremely generous. You only need to understand what it would be facing. Regardless, that we already know it can't survive the old S-300 anti-air defences, it would then need to survive against, for example a Russian SU-35E? How could it survive, is the only real question? Actually understanding your enemies abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact. The SU-35E is classified a "4++ Generation Fighter" - though its true capabilities go well beyond the original/current crop of 4 & 4+ Generation mounts like the F-15, 16, 18, Eurofighter Typhoon, French Dassault Rafale etc. The SU-35E only falls short of the standard adopted for true 5th Generation by its lack of stealth, however, the SU35s military tactical value, has increased massively, and its overall combat ability has broadened considerably. The SU-35E, has a forward and rear-facing Phazotron radar system capable of simultaneous tracking of 34 targets up to 92 miles (148 km's), and even over uneven terrain. Its cockpit design contains a colour CRT display as well as HUD (Head-Up Display) along with digital fly-by-wire (FBW) capability, with quadruple redundancy (the onboard computers will always find four different ways to achieve the desired results of its combat mission). Its avionics also include an Irbis-E passive phased array radar system. The F-16 is, therefore, nothing but an obsolete, unusable aircraft against Russia, and in every possible way imaginable, and the US must know this, really. And that shows us the real level of desperation we really are seeing from the USA. Outclassed in every department. But hey, you all believe you're awesome, right? So good for you, you just enjoy your oncoming undeniable annihilation. -- it's going to be hot, red-hot, as well as quick and decisive. That good old arrogance, is, finally, sealing their own fate, to the history books, as it was always going to.

​@@timjamesg158Do you know AIM-120 AMRAAM???🎉

"Retired"

2005?! What the fuck! Really?

Most technology

Rise of Japan.. Empires are not really a good thing these days..! Look at (awful) Russia.......!!

You do know this is fake, right? It's BS what they're saying. I think it's pretty funny what they're saying

Yeah the Chinese hypersonic missiles are scary. I think for now we would need ships along side of our carriers, its sole purpose is to protect it.

We already have the laser's, not only mounted on ships but also on 2 types of aircraft

True. We are MUCH more advanced than the public is led to believe. Even the directed particle beam technology of the '80's (star wars) which is old technology now, was much more advanced than the public was ever told. When Trump told the world that the United States had weapons the likes of which the world has never seen, he was not kidding.@@Michael-um5pd

Well. These missiles are going to be used up with in 6 months of fighting I think China has around 3,000 of these missiles! No way of making more because of the cip in bargo so what will China do then ! Throw rocks

There is no evidence those Chinese "hypersonic" missiles can hit anything - especially a moving ship. China claims they can, but China has claimed many things that have been proven to be false. Also, American made air defense systems can shoot hypersonic missiles down as was demonstrated in Ukraine.

?

​@@FerNando-ys5hc😮😢

I take it English is not your first language 😂

Except USA is not anything near "free" nor an "ally"…

Japan can reprocess spent fuel rods, and they have enough weapons grade plutonium and uranium hexafluoride to build 300 bombs every year for the next 20 years, if they wish.That's according to the United States Government Accountability Office and the IAEA. If pushed into a corner, they could build nukes.

@@brokerhenry I believe the US sent Japan 20 tons of nuke material. They are probably hours or minutes from a bomb(s).

Where do you place your bet, made in China or made in Japan?😁🤷‍♂️

I place large bets on Japan. I feel Japan has the POSSIBILiTy of creating very high quality air and naval defense systems. It has virtually no corruption to dilute its spending and it DOES have access to the highest tech computer chips for its aircraft, missiles and naval systems software. China is losing a lot in its now Marxist leaning policies toward western business, who are leaving at an alarming rate.@@Hupamaster

the US military has not won a war in over 75 years. Good fireworks show though! Reply

Greatly enjoyed this impressive experience Jesus Love Japanese

Why

Why

I'm curious, could Japan or Australia join NATO, if they wanted to ? Or is it more anorthern hemisphere thing ? We are all allies, might be better having Japan in NATO than, say, Hungary?