Yes, the difference is really noticeable even in reality, even in AC mode the sound level difference is similar. 120 should be about 3db more loud than 110.

What's so good about auracast?

@@LukeR1Min stead of two devices connecting to eachother like current Bluetooth. Auracast is the newest version of Bluetooth 5.3. It can broadcast a signal like a radio station or WiFi and an unlimited amount of devices can connect to it. In theory unlimited speakers can wirelessly connect to one device and play music.

@@donjuandemarco4115Thanks for explanation. That's pretty much what I've been waiting for from JBL. Do you know if the older generation of partyboxes (310,710) will be able to support it?

@@LukeR1M no. Auracast only works with speakers that have Bluetooth 5.3. Auracast isn’t a JBL think. Anything with Bluetooth 5.3 going forward should have it. It’s up to each company to leave it open so any brand speaker can connect but it looks like jbl has locked theirs to only work with jbl speakers that have Auracast. Although the xtreme 4 can connect to party boost speakers but the party boxes only connect to Auracast speakers only.

@@LukeR1M it’s standardized wireless audio so a Sony can connect to a JBL can connect to a Ultimate Ears. Anything that is Auracast compatible now. Not this brand specific BS

120 is louder but not huge différence, maybe 2-3 db more loud.

I don't think the upgrade is worth it, the 110 ist still a great speaker. Only if you got nether I would pick the 120 out of the two.

Boombox has no chances.

Boombox 3 has a chance at least in some categories against the 110, like sound stage, deeper bass and openness. But against the Club 120 it sounds like these advantages are gone now. My 120 will arrive this week, then I can compare them side by side.

@@rollingslothmachine3431pls make a comparison video

@@j.bizzle11 Sadly, the delivery of the 120 was delayed and I have to return the BB3, because the time window for returning it is closing. But if you like I can still give you an update once the 120 arrives.

the 320 is not interesting, it doesn't sound louder than the 310 and doesn't have more bass.

​@@sonny9546plays a little louder, but the bass seems to be weaker, but softer, in general the 320 is more interesting than the 310

@@jenkins775 If you already have an 310 the 320 is not worth it but if you don't have an 310 then yeah you can buy the 320

yes

@@sonny9546 will you do 320 vs 310 also any plan?

@@alexdoukas I think no, from what I've heard there isn't a big difference in sound between 310 and 320. no improvement as big than 110 to 120

@@sonny9546 yeah I saw it also very disappointing cause I wanted to go for 320 since I have the pb100 for outside and modified it to play as loud as it's on ac so no reason to go for pb 120.

@@sonny9546Would you say it’s worth the extra 140$?