December 1860: American Civil War | Secession & South Carolina | Floyd's Conspiracy | Fort Sumter

  Рет қаралды 11,228

Jeffrey the Librarian

Jeffrey the Librarian

10 ай бұрын

December 1860 is one month after Abraham Lincoln's election. South Carolina has called a convention to consider secession from the United States.
On December 20, South Carolina secedes from the United States. Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida, and other slave states consider secession.
Newspapers across the country realize the depth of Secretary of War John Floyd's conspiracy against the union. Over one hundred thousand muskets have been transferred to the south.
In Charleston, Major Anderson knows Fort Moultrie is vulnerable. He relocates to Fort Sumter.
South Carolina militia secure Fort Moultrie, Castle Pinckney, and the Charleston Arsenal. Major Anderson is isolated at Fort Sumter.
President Buchanan opposes secession; however, he is powerless to stop it.
The American Civil War is approaching.
A short film by Jeffrey Meyer, historian, librarian, documentarian.

Пікірлер: 45
@KevinG1999-2010wasraw
@KevinG1999-2010wasraw 10 ай бұрын
love ur vids jeff
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching!
@WNH3
@WNH3 10 ай бұрын
Comparing militia numbers is interesting, but I imagine most of them wouldn't be available for service outside their state, for a number of reasons.
@lamwen03
@lamwen03 10 ай бұрын
Yes, and this is why the South was looking to a defensive war.
@Chris-ut6eq
@Chris-ut6eq 10 ай бұрын
Really like the details of the beginning events. I've not heard this level of detail before and look forward to the next installment. In hindsight, we see many things that were not understand in the critical moments. Had Major Anderson time to prepare, Ft. Sumter might have been in a much better position by the end of the month.
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Yes, the opening moves are very important, and it's fascinating to see how the conflict started.
@michaelbraxton2899
@michaelbraxton2899 5 ай бұрын
I appreciate the precision, factual content and professional sobriety of your presentation. Please keep up the good work!🎉
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 5 ай бұрын
Thank you! More to come!
@Shifty69569
@Shifty69569 10 ай бұрын
So happy to see an upload!
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
More to come!
@goodman4966
@goodman4966 10 ай бұрын
Great summary of the secession South Carolina and the overall events going on in the last month of the year of 1860( To many people at the times on both side this probably the most traumatic events of their lives) I hope you continue this series go all the way up to at the outbreak of the open hostilities between the south and north.
@taihalpern7342
@taihalpern7342 10 ай бұрын
great video like always. Your census ones are my favorite
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
I appreciate that. More census videos to come.
@Squatch_Rider66
@Squatch_Rider66 10 ай бұрын
Very interesting to see a perspective of how the Civil War progressed in the opening stages. Always knew Fort Sumter was the opening but all the intrigue, scheming and double cross add to the understanding of how events transpired.
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Much appreciated!
@Civilwarman40
@Civilwarman40 10 ай бұрын
great short doc thanks
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@midnitemike
@midnitemike 10 ай бұрын
Excellent video. I enjoyed it.
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
thank you!
@mrdinkelpuss4000
@mrdinkelpuss4000 10 ай бұрын
Thanks for another great video!!!!!!!
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@willg-r3269
@willg-r3269 10 ай бұрын
The damage done to the Union war effort by pro-Southern fifth columnists is a pretty fascinating topic, among other things because of how carefully it's been downplayed over the years in the name of promoting Northern/Southern sectional unity and whatnot. If you ever do a video on the Peninsula Campaign, I hope you impress on people just how downright... *odd*... McClellan and his staff conducted that campaign from start to finish, culminating in the mind-boggling letter to Lincoln in which he tried to spin his unforced retreat from a vastly inferior opponent as some kind of decisively hard-fought annihilation battle (in the last paragraph he literally says "I may be on the brink of eternity," as if Lee's bloodthirsty hordes were about to smash through his door and start behaving like Forrest's troops at Fort Pillow) in order to terrify Lincoln into giving in to the South's political demands.
@raylast3873
@raylast3873 Сағат бұрын
McClellan is not a fifth-columnist.
@alanrobandt6329
@alanrobandt6329 10 ай бұрын
Your graphic shortly before 8:15 misspells secession. The piece otherwise is superb.
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
You're right. I missed that one.
@TheDustysix
@TheDustysix 10 ай бұрын
Very good.
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@AlexanderWeurding
@AlexanderWeurding 10 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Thank you! Much appreciated!
@rangers7259
@rangers7259 10 ай бұрын
Brilliantly informative video… respect from the UK 🇬🇧🇺🇸…👏👏👍
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@frauleinhohenzollern8442
@frauleinhohenzollern8442 8 ай бұрын
Slavery wasn't at risk of being taken away.. Buying slaves was already outlawed. The slaves they had were theirs to keep, and Lincoln had no plans of taking that away. In fact, some of the southern states already voted on abolishing slavery on their own and it was a narrow margin. The succession was over northern states having power in the congress, all moneyed interest, and made financial laws at the expense of the south, the south didn't gave the population to out vote northern states. The north strong armed the south over and over, raking in money off tariffs largely carried by the south, and then when the south asked the north to respect their laws the north flatly ignored them. So why on earth do normie "historians" harp on and on about slavery? You REALLY think hundreds of thousands of southerners fought that war so some rich plantation owner could keep some slaves?? Only 1.5% of southerners owned slaves, most of that are smaller families who have 1-3 slaves. A miniscule portion of that measly 2% were plantation owners. So you're telling me all these states went and fought for slavery, which was already being phased out for technology like the cotton gin... The poor southerners who fought the war had every reason to not want slavery, as those could be paying jobs to Americans, but they're all being taken by slave labor. When you stop and think about it instead of just accepting whatever you hear, it begins to sound more and more ridiculous. Has the history channel ever mentioned the moril tariff? Abe Lincoln had no intention of outlawing slavery, but he did promise to uphold that tariff. That was the last straw. Almost sounds like the crown taxing colonists, and the colonists not feeling they have the political power to be represented fairly where decisions are being made... Especially when it's laws about funding the government which is outwardly hostile toward you. Nope. Against all logic it was just about slaves. Because evil white men and stuff... And the south were evil... Give. Me. A. Break. Slavery had already been slowing down, no more slaves were being brought and sold in the US. So why the hell would all these people fight fir something they had no risk of being taken away and something which they knew wasn't as valuable as it once was? Shut your brain off, hurry up! It was just slavery. And now you must get mad at me for daring to critique the official narrative. Because we know the facts, because we read about them in books over and over...
@frauleinhohenzollern8442
@frauleinhohenzollern8442 8 ай бұрын
Oh wait, I already know what someone will say... They will mention that the articles of succession mention slavery! So therefore it was over slavery! Except, it was just stating the north never respected their laws regarding fugitive slaves, but still demanded the south follow their rules. These were examples of the unfair arrangement between the states, the double standard, and why they felt the union was no longer beneficial. And back then each state was considered it's own little country. It wasn't a USA like we think of today. There was really konreason the southern states couldn't leave the union if they wanted to.. Why not? Why would the north force them to remain in and send 100,000s to slaughter because the south wanted out of a raw deal? Lincoln trampled on all the rights we are told he championed in order to fight that war. Income tax, drafts... Literally forcing people to go die and pay a fraction of the money they make to send people to die. Back then income tax was not the norm. Lincoln gave that to you. Yay. And for what? Were the huns on our doorstep pillaging our land? Was our entire civilization at risk of collapsing? Or, did a couple states just not want to participate in that legislative body anymore?
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 8 ай бұрын
The major difference between the North and South since Plymouth and Jamestown was slavery. A slave society is fundamentally different from a free society. The major legislation of the first half of the nineteenth century was about slavery. The Missouri Compromise, the Fugitive Slave Laws, the Compromise of 1850, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, etc. The major issue of the nineteenth century before the Civil War was slavery.
@Ethan54136
@Ethan54136 10 ай бұрын
What was a militia in these times? What did that mean? How "battle-ready" are such militias? You don't really hear about militias now, when did that term stop being used or in official practice when did such forces cease to exist? Is there a contemporary equivalent to the militias of this time within the state and/or federal governments?
@mustbtrouble
@mustbtrouble 10 ай бұрын
Uh, the US military became of militias. National Guard might be considered a modern equivalent for domestic state level defense.
@deepcosmiclove
@deepcosmiclove 8 ай бұрын
@@mustbtrouble A Militia is an ad hoc force made up of ordinary citizens. It is not a professional force. The National Guard is not a militia.
@mustbtrouble
@mustbtrouble 8 ай бұрын
@@deepcosmiclove obviously
@amotaba
@amotaba 10 ай бұрын
Really very interesting! Do you intend to make videos about each year of the War?
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Yes, sir. I will do a month-by-month format in addition to the detailed battle videos.
@amotaba
@amotaba 10 ай бұрын
@@JeffreytheLibrarian excellent
@edwil111
@edwil111 10 ай бұрын
am reading the book "1861". good stuff. (Goodheart)
@dsmonington
@dsmonington 10 ай бұрын
@8:22, South Carolina Ordinance of Secession not succession
@JeffreytheLibrarian
@JeffreytheLibrarian 10 ай бұрын
Yes, that's a typo I missed.
@scottanno8861
@scottanno8861 10 ай бұрын
Commenting for the algorithm
10. The Election of 1860 and the Secession Crisis
51:01
YaleCourses
Рет қаралды 155 М.