I found that pretty strange too

say what??????????????????????????????

Beth Bartlett WRONG DIAGNOSIS, PSEUDO DOCTOR. IF YOU ARE A DOCTOR, YOU JUST VENTURED INTO MALPRACTICE, AND LIBEL. IF NOT, WE WOULD HARDLY VALUE YOUR FALLACIOUS OPINION. YOUR DELUSIONS OF GRANDEUR ARE BORING THE ADULTS WHO CAME TO OPINE ABOUT A LEGENDARY MUSICIAN.

Doug Patton My comment is fact - and regarding his behavior - His work was exceptional - a separate subject.

Eirann Lenormand My comment in no way creates a potential for litigation - he was never a patient of mine, nor in a venue that requires a confidentiality statement. His behaviors are/were on film or live (Public) - I happen to be qualified to define his Public behavior - Absolutely no different than one writing a review of his performances, which actually were quite good.

Beth Bartlett EXACTLY,, YOU WERE NEVER HIS DOCTOR, SO YOUR PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS IS OF LESS THAN ZERO VALUE. MOREOVER, YOU WERE NOT PRIVY TO ANY PART OF HIS PERSONAL LIFE. NOR, TO THE SITUATION OR MOTIVATING FACTORS OF ANY BEHAVIOR SEEN IN PUBLIC. YOUR SELF IMPORTANCE AND SELF RIGHTEOUSNESS ARE PART OF YOUR NARCISSISTIC QUALITIES. AND YOU PUBLICLY LABELING SOMEONE WITH A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS IS IN FACT LIBELOUS. YOU DID NOT EXPRESS A MUSICAL OPINION ANYWHERE IN THIS FORUM. THE ENVY OF THE TALENTLESS IS HIDEOUS. IT TOO IS A QUALITY OF THE NARCISSISTIC.

Beth Bartlett EXACTLY,, YOU WERE NEVER HIS DOCTOR, SO YOUR PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS IS OF LESS THAN ZERO VALUE. MOREOVER, YOU WERE NOT PRIVY TO ANY PART OF HIS PERSONAL LIFE. NOR, TO THE SITUATION OR MOTIVATING FACTORS OF ANY BEHAVIOR SEEN IN PUBLIC. YOUR SELF IMPORTANCE AND SELF RIGHTEOUSNESS ARE PART OF YOUR NARCISSISTIC QUALITIES. AND YOU PUBLICLY LABELING SOMEONE WITH A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS IS IN FACT LIBELOUS. YOU DID NOT EXPRESS A MUSICAL OPINION UNTIL I CALLED YOU OUT. THE ENVY OF THE TALENTLESS IS HIDEOUS. IT TOO IS A QUALITY OF THE NARCISSISTIC.