Just missing dana

lol and Jon aint even a true baldy. He has a full set of hair!

Joe Rogan, Dana White and Matt Serra?

Anik has hair just he chooses to be bald

I’m the 4th outside the ufc ✌️

Bro barely even reacted he was dead inside lmao

Hes good friends with Justin

​@@cody7149I mean, he's also good friends with Max. Like, there's tons of Max and DC content

​@@Metalhed1300p DC loves both, Joe loves both. The one time I feel for these guys (besides DC fighting) Having to watch one of your best guys knock out the other

I tought the same thing he looked like he was dying inside

Antony smith is also legendary on the paper

Absolutely. People hate on DC, and recently I’ve seen a ton of Anik hate. But this is the dream team UFC trio, and there’s a reason they represented UFC 300

Yeah I was skeptical when they released Goldberg, probably just because I grew up listening to him. But man, they did it right. Anik is a great hype man “that’s not the cloth from which he’s cut”

Why hate on DC? I dont get it. ​@@CompleteProducer84

Facts! Great to be ALIVE to see and hear them...

Have never said this for a UFC event before, but for me this was the best ever, like stacked from the prelims to the main card. Even poor Aljo got the shine taken off his massive win against a top contender all because the card was so stacked that his win was considered “boring” and made fun of lol. Man i was hooked from the prelims for almost every single fight this time, kudos to the UFC

@@devshashOGi mean his win was boring but a win is a win, but Yh I agree the best card I’ve seen in my 9 years of being a fan, people will say otherwise just to stand out but it’s true

Everrrrrrrrrrrr

Best since pride😅

Get a room dude

beat aldo in rio

The 10 seconds with Ricardo And some believe he won one of the Volk fights…even Dana

​@@jakemorrison548Arnold Allen fight as well

these are the moments izzy wish he had

@@earthlink9998tbf izzy had some crazy moments too like against Costa, gastelum or the 2nd pereira fight

That was pretty much the same lol life is a b1tch sometimes

Jamal caught him in temple while Alex pinky knuckle connected on Hill's nose

​@@cricketcavalry1824Doesn't really matter where he hit him. It's the way jamahal fell that makes it look similar to the walker ko

now aspinall gonna ko alex like that hehe

​@@ComandoCA I doubt it

He’s Hall of fame in Glory too

@@mariovitorlauande2706 just a freak athlete for sure. He might be the best striker the ufc has had. He hits so dam hard lol

@@ronrammer4666 not just UFC, Glory has made him the best kickboxer ever. The only guy achieved 2 division Glory champ

@@babayo3115 glory and pride were so dam underrated. I’m just happy I’m alive to witness this phenom

@@ronrammer4666 I don't think people understand how thick his resume is. The experience he gained and has been able to transition to the UFC isn't difficult for someone of his caliber

Freak explosive athletes are the best to watch

3 seconds between the knockdown, but herb waving off for the official knockdown was around 10 seconds

It wasnt the official TKO.

He literally takes one single step and boom 💥

​@cubodesigncomunicacaovisua1 830 so why Bruce announced that was KO

@@jhonvitor-gq9vq What? TKO/KO are the same. The official TKO was after he delivered the hammer fists to Jamahal head. 11-12 seconds after the knockdown

Lmfao

😂😂😂😂

It's like able-bodied people who want to chop off a limb for no reason!

This was Dustin Poirier during his baby days in the ufc haha.

@@okano186he shared before his most recent fihht

Bro was hyped lol I don’t think I’ve ever heard him drop the F bomb before that was too good

😂😂😂

opposite effect on mcgregor

More like heartbroken Pereira 😂

Trt club

that was attached to a sledgehammer of a hand

Well that makes sense now haha ​@@Bryponce23

They might mean after the shots on the ground too but either way thats also like max 8-9 seconds

Everyone was, he was in brutal pain the entire fight and still got knocked out

I think I saw him running after Jaguar Paw at the end of Apocalypto lol

@@trendybistro 😂

OH BRO... ITS TRUE, I THOUGHT ONLY I SAW THIS

@@ericktiburcio6024 not nearly as bad but reminds me of Andrea the Giant holding a beer can🥴

It's insane to imagine he was fighting at middleweight lmao

@@raul5081 IDK how he made 185 when he gets up to 230+??? It's not like gets fat either. True professional

živjeli🎉

Steven segal taught him that,, Anderson Silva did the same also it's a technique used in MMA it's very legal but not in boxing

Nah jones still the best. But Alex would be easy second

Alex is definitely better than jones smh. Jones left lhw to hide from the younger contenders and went to fight only once at hw

I think Alex can do it all,God bless him

Alex can do anything he wants to do it's looking like,he is peaking,he will forever be in Izzy head like a bad migraine for life

@@Shiggystardust John "picogram" Jones

Get a grip. ! MUFC 1999

New to sports I see.

Go watch some footie bro

@@tigrantumanyan8545trying to compare kicking a ball around a field to a fight is wild

Saying best event ever is also wild

For me, the biggest evidence is that Paul followers ALWAYS QUOTE PAUL, OR THE LAST GOSPEL JOHN, as their evidences And their own scholars say John is the LEAST AUTHENTIC, written by multiple authors, hundreds of miles and years away from Jesus. And this is the book that elevates Jesus, at least tries. They never ever quote Mark or luke, the earlier Gospels, where Jesus is a prophet and messiah, sent only for the lost sheep of Israel, by his own admission. This is the biggest red flag that Paul followers are misguided. ALL THEIR favourite quotes come from the froindulent Gospel of John. Even Mark isn't safe. 16.8 is where Mark ends,as the earliest manuscripts end there.. But the 'long ending' of Mark, 16.9 to 20, has the resurrection, Jesus sitting on right side of God etc Their own academia acknowledge this, that 9 to 20 are later interpolation and its common knowledge except for the blind followers who have not studied what they are basing their salvation on 🤦

Islam didn't invent the fact Jesus wasn't crucified. In his Trallians, Ignatius, the bishop ofAntioch (who died around 110 CE, and who wrote during the first decade of the second century CE), was quite eloquent in his attack against the early Christians who denied that the crucifixion of Jesus was anything more than an illusion. The following quotation from Ignatius (italics added for emphasis by the present author) is directly to the point: But if, as some say.. .his suffering was only an appearance, then why am I a prisoner, and why do I long to fight with the wild beasts? In that case, I am dying in vain." 80 The Cross & The Crescent One cannot attack as heresy a belief or doctrine that does not yet exist. The theology of Ignatius not withstanding, his attack against those early Christians who believed that Jesus' crucifixion was only illusory, demonstrates the existence of that belief among the early Christians. Further, the fact that Ignatius even bothered to attack this doctrine suggests that the belief in the illusory nature of the crucifixion was quite widespread by 110 CEo Clearly, the doctrine of or belief in the illusory nature of the crucifixion was perceived by Ignatius to be a threat to what would much later become the orthodox position of the Christian church regarding the crucifixion. As it would take some years for such a belief to become widespread across the vastness of the Roman Empire, it can be deduced that the origin of the doctrine of the illusory nature of the crucifixion must be dated well back into the first century CE, and quite possibly right back to the time of the crucifixion itself. When considering the above, it must be remembered that Ignatius was attacking Christians, not non-Christians, although the particular Christians being attacked shared a specific belief system at odds with that of Ignatius when it came to the particulars of the doctrine of the crucifixion. To millions of Christians raised with a Sunday School interpretation of Christianity, the above may come as something of a shock. However, for those Christians, the shocks are only just the beginning. Indeed, the shocks dramatically increase in voltage when one considers the early Christian scriptures, both apocryphal and canonical. ,,😮

Ttthe doctrine of Alpha and Omega is a sad and unfortunate example of mankind’s tampering with the Word of God. It shows how doctrine is contracted by men to justify false beliefs. The phrase “Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last” (Revelation 1:11) which is found in the King James Version was not in the original Greek texts. Therefore, the Alpha Omega phrase is not found in virtually any ancient texts, nor is it mentioned, even as a footnote, in any modern translation., This phrase does NOT occur in NA28, UBS5, W&H, Souter, Majority Text, THGNT, SBL, R&P Byzantine Text, Orthodox Text, Jerome's Latin Vulgate, & the Clementine Text. The phrase only occurs in the Textus Receptus. This phrase is not even footnoted in UBS5 and UBS4. The only MSS listed as having this phrase in NA28 is the manuscript of the commentary on Revelation by Andreas of Caesarea. However, "I [am] the first and the last" occurs in P025. Therefore, there appears to be very little dispute that "I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last" is not part of the original text of Revelation at Rev 1:11. in many places, the trinitaria scribes mistraslate. e.g. they translate words that mean 'revere' or 'homage' into worship. this is truly sad that they mislead many to eternal fiya Matthew 2:11 - The NRSV correctly reads “and they knelt down and paid him homage.” The NIV has the magi worship Jesus instead of merely paying homage, most likely reflecting the piety of the translators and their audience: “and they bowed down and worshipped him.” The NIV does, however, correctly translate the same word (proskuneō) as “pay homage” in Mark 15:19, where the soldiers pay mock homage to Jesus as king. [See BeDuhn, Truth in Translation, pp. 44-45.] John 7:53-8:11, often described as “The Passage of the Woman Caught in Adultery” (passage de adultera), is famous for several reasons. The pleasant reason is that it is one of the most dramatic displays of the grace of God in the Bible. But there is also a more difficult reason that needs to be addressed: this passage was likely not in the original version of the Gospel of John, but was added later at an undeterminable time and for an unknown reason. How should the church treat this passage? The text-critical evidence is overwhelming: this passage was almost certainly not in the original version of the Gospel of John. This is hardly an answer, however, but an entirely new question. For nearly every contemporary Bible, even if the text is given double-brackets or italicized or given a smaller font, contains this passage, thereby declaring to today’s reader that it is part of the Gospel of John

Luke 24:19 And He said to them, “What things?” And they said to Him, “The things about Jesus the Nazarene, who was a prophet mighty in deed and word in the sight of God and all the people, Mark 6:15 But others were saying, “He is Elijah.” And others were saying, “He is a prophet, like one of the prophets of old.” Mark 8:28 They told Him, saying, “John the Baptist; and others say Elijah; but others, one of the prophets.” Luke 9:8 and by some that Elijah had appeared, and by others that one of the prophets of old had risen again.

Luke 13:33 . . . . I must proceed on my way. For it wouldn’t do for a prophet of God to be kwil. Led except in Jerusalem. Mark 6:3-4 Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply off. nded and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A prophet is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family”. In the above two verses, Jesus called himself a prophet. There are also many verses indicating that during his lifetime on earth the people in Judea and Galilee regarded him as a prophet.

or sandhagen 👀

Makes no sense whatsoever, let step into reality for a second bud

​@@4M2-what is that guy even talking about? Hahaha

O'Malley is not a BMF 😂

lamo hell no O Malley has enough contenders and needs atleast 3 defenses stop this bullshit...

Yeah, then Strickland knocked him down in the next fight 😮. Also he should be more powerful now without the insane 185 cut.

There’s no animosity towards them whatsoever like when dom and dc are on the mic’s. It’s like close friends watching fights together.

Agreed, would be awesome to see that. Pereiras leg kicks might give him some trouble, and they are definitely both capable of knocking each other out.

Nah, if Perriera loses it will derail the hype a little bit. If he's going up then it has to be Aspinal. His chance of beating Aspinal in the fans opinion doesn't change much if he beats Pavlovich

@@UnKnowmanNumber2 I totally agree. Because the UFC would risk playing him against Jailton or Blaydes for example. Little to gain, much to lose. If Alex goes up it has to be for the title and I'll say more... that has to happen quickly Alex is no longer a boy

The tom aspinal was the machine that was wrong, they didn't fixed properly, overall it had a decent precision

Had me dyin