You might be on to something here

That's the idea of voting for a third party. They won't win but it will show other politicians that they can get support for those ideas.

you have, just make 20 X's and draw a dick on the voting sheet, your vote counts but its invalid.. actually I don't know if thats possible or if it accomplishes anything in the US with its 2 party system.

@@butter_nut1817 I've voted libertarian in the last three elections. Maybe four. Going back to Michael badnarik. Whenever that was.

Ranked voting would be better

Larry elder is a force to be reckoned with. The race baiters need to fear him

@@92MojoJojo You'd be surprised I think. In his most recent interviews (past year(?)), he seems totally on the ball. Unless they were merely old clips that were re-up'd.

Yes get Tomas Sowell on now he's still here! He ís the man of the subject.

The internet can’t handle that...

That will be too racist

I was literally just thinking the same thing…I assume you were talking about the George Floyd section.

How about now? Do you still think it aged well after the last year?

Yeah, I do think it still ages well. Not to say every notion is correct, and we shouldnt expect it to be. However, it is still very refreshing to hear valid articulated points and then a genuine discussion. Rarely happens anymore imo.

Bret has always been,bravely, sounding the alarm. When 1 set of ppl own the language they then enslave discourse. Free speech & reason” are not on the menu. You are.

Joe “IM OK WITH A PRIOR VIOLENT HISTORY & DRUNK DRIVING PEOPLE AND JUST CALLING THEM AN UBER” Rogan

@@SFbayArea94121 I have to agree with Joe on this one. If they're not threatening anyone (regardless of their history [unless they have a tendency towards violence and are in possession of a deadly weapon]) then I don't see a problem with them being driven home, or even charged with disorderly conduct and booked...But KILLING them? That's not right.

@@chrisadkins6394 Not threatening anyone?? How many people do drunk drivers kill per year, f***wit??

@@chrisadkins6394 He got behind the wheel drunk. So, umm... no to the rest of it. You get behind the wheel drunk, you know the consequences. Tired of the stupidity. Enough. I've paid way, way more than I wanted to for an Uber - home and back - before. But guess what? I made the choice to drink too much. Choices have consequences. Had he made the right choices, he'd still be alive. End of story.

Exactly!!!! Tens of thousands lose their lives every year due to drinking and driving.

No one's saying that he shouldn't have been punished for what he was doing, just he didn't deserve to die for it.

---- True. Joe Joe got off the rails for a minute.

@@admonishedAlligator When you get caught drunk driving, you get arrested. When you RESIST arrest, you risk your life. What's the problem?

@@admonishedAlligator he didn't get shot for drunk driving. Joe talks about how polite he was but failed to mention that the 2 police officers were also very polite and respectful to him. Up until he started beating the shit out of them, stole their weapon and fired it at them.

Not to wise on brooks though. Getting so drunk that you pass out while driving isn't a victimless crime. It's not like smoking weed in ur house. His opinion would absolutely change if a drunk driver drives over his daughter.

Ditto ☝️😉

@@jasonwitt3423 ?

@@davidchambers420 what's the ? about?

@jasonwitt3423 what point were you trying to get across? Am I missing some serious context here?

He's not going to go on this, he barely does interviews, he shies from the spotlight.

Yes please

Oh lord, prepare for Joe's first 5 hour pocast!

Rogan really needs to talk to Thomas Sowell. Walter WIlliams or even Larry Elder would be good substitues, though.

@@elijahrusso5403 i second Larry

Neither is Trump,...unless it's in reference to the "perp" in a variety of investigations.

Hahaha the fact that joe Biden is even in the presidential election is embarrassing to America.

@@dallasbillet8273 twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1273977953462951937

Since when was objective truth an insult? Happy coincidence, I suppose.

My family still living in Germany don't like Trump but they're realizing they agree with him about a lot. They cannot understand what happened to the Democratic Party? The Berlin Wall DDR just came down in 1989 but American DEMOCRATS are pushing socialism or the beginnings of what always becomes socialism! That post modernism for you! Failures of the past can be explained by intersectionality of postmodernism as it rejects the entire idea of free debate, science, or TRUTH INDEPENDENT OF WHITE MALE POWER.

The autopsy reports show this is not a murder

It isn't. The absurdity of a Yang-Generic military man ticket is beyond stating.

@@johnstrawb3521 could you elaborate yang-generic?

@@julianfischer1485 I would drop a time but that would give the option to not watch this entire episode. The last 20 minutes are the most essential to what Bret brought to the table.

@@ClarkHathaway3238 The last 20 minutes is very interesting and gravely important stuff, but so is the rest of it. Beginning, middle and end.

@@julianfischer1485 Somewhere around 40 minutes in. Sorry I didn't tiimestamp it. My bad.

The job training major for lgbt nambla glaad blm and antifa.

You better believe there was no Uber called for me

... and resistin arrest and assaulting a cop ....especially when you are already on parole and should know better

Exactly, but you don't get murdered.

@@NY51663 you do if you fire a taser at cops

@@pablorages1241 Not only that but he was hitting cops.

That’s because he consumes MSM propaganda like a good little liberal. Joe is a POS and a sellout

@@RagnarLothbrok2222 He totally is a pos, he' irrational and very biased, even though he tries to hide it

Joe loves the money not the country.

Please enlighten us?

Did you see the video? The officer shot him after he missed with the taser.. the taser only had 1 shot.. he shot him out of anger to punish Mr. Brooks for running.. I am sorry bro that pig should fry...

you liked that one huh

Dion Martinez “quote of the year” 😂

Joey Jacklin 😂 right when he said that in the video I’m like aw hell nah they’re gonna eat that one up.

Unless there is a boogeyman.. that ppl who r woke n can admit is true, And only operating because we are divided and can't see where this is going..

Other then the obvious abuse of power in the pass.. we see the obvious reason for worry when the ppl in power can at any time make us all slaves again.. like was said in this podcast we act like everything is ok and good but we see the trends.. the rich and powerful only care about themself, the less rich we r the more powerful they are.. you are 2 blind to see the boogeyman because it moves in the shadows until it attacks

👍

Yeah it rings very true that something like this could happen. I work in the scientific industry and it’s not what people imagine- labs are doing certain tasks that have been assigned to them , with established tools (ie. mice as model organisms) , they are not checking those tools, that’s not the job... there is no bandwidth. Animals for testing are strictly controlled and there are limited approved suppliers, species, etc.

Money is power. Follow it and you will find the evil that lurks in the shadows. Corruption is the leading cause of all problems we experience, and that is the desire for more wealth, for more power. Deception is the favorite tool to obtain more of it. The FDA is by far one of the most corrupt. The crappy food we consume, the food pyramid that is way wrong makes us sick. The reaction to this manufactured problem is to find medical help, to find drugs to only mask the problem but not fix it. To mask this problem costs $, to fix it costs way more, but to teach people other ways to prevent and treat illness is to lose money. I mean peanut allergies didn't just pop up out of the blue!!! How much does that EpiPen cost? My grandmother whose appendix ruptured and caused gangrene should have killed her. No, she was kept alive and put on so many drugs for 7 years. Her quality of life went from 10 to 0 and it tormented her for 7 whole years. The lovely smiling mother and grandmother my family adored had turned into something vile from the medication she was prescribed, something that overshadowed her true loving nature. She was unrecognizable. She had been turned into some sort of cattle drug companys and insurance companys made wealth off of. I completely and disdainfully condemn the FDA and the pharmaceutical industry, and I passionately refuse to seek medical help. I resort to holistic means of preservation and restoration.

@Sunny Times nano virus goes through it like a charm. If you spray water through a mask it goes aaalll to the other side. Joe is pathetic

Coffee Sploosh I am sorry for what you went through. But please be careful. There are many, many “snake oils” touted as holistic cures that do not work and are also just out there to separate consumers from their hard earned money. There is a middle ground.

The answer is - Bret is extraordinarily intelligent, however, it is worth nothing that he is also equipped with the best tools a person could have, and he is a master at wielding those tools. I am talking about the tools of science. Evolutionary Biology in particular is probably the very best proving ground for understanding of many things, including human sociopolitical issues.

Dude, great call. He's such a riddle-talker. After each piece of riddle-speak, he tends to pause and look at his conversation partner as if to say, "Confused, right? Oh, you... Let me continue now to explain my amazing point." This reads as though I don't like Eric, but I do love him; just one of those idiosyncrasies.

Eric seems to have more sociopathic intellectual tendencies when speaking...almost as if he’s trying to confuse you even. One of his best qualities is thinking outside the box and coming up with unique ideas, which makes for a more entertaining listen but he can often become incoherent and absurd.

Biology is closer to people than math.

It's possible that Eric is on the spectrum lol

Brett is a teacher so i’m sure he has more skill in explaining things in a succinct way

Same!!

I'm with you and I've been promoting alternative/new parties to end the duopoly for at least 10 years...but...and being as completely real and unbiased as I Can, I really see leftist democrats and their MSM collusion allies as the biggest danger we've seen in a long time. I'm not a huge Trump guy but I want him to succeed cuz he's our president and I want our country to do well. But leftists/msm/social media are actively conspiring to take him down and hurt the country. If they would just work to make things better I can't imagine how good things could be cuz things were very good before covid...but these crazies are just out out of their minds...i don't know how else to say it. I've just never seen a group try to hurt the people like they do

That's an interesting take - I'm guessing not a lot of this podcast sunk in?

Washington warned us about allowing political parties to rise in his Farewell Address. He saw this coming centuries ago.

Yep. Both parties have betrayed the people

Yea wtf come on joe

It’s called cite and release car gets impounded and someone picks up the driver they go to court at a later date not that crazy we already do it

@@Bradly1983 if the dude fights two cops successfully and gets a taser from them do you really think he's going to go to court for another charge on top of violating parole?

Matt "never used a 's to denote possession in his life" Tedeschi. But yeah that was kinda whack on Joe's part. Wtf.

@@tdot2413 yeah when he sobers up

They can not afford a gun. They are supper f ing poor

Talking about America. And in America poor white folks get tossed in jail and so do pour blacks at a disproportionate number to rich folks. Is that hard to see?

You are correct sir.

He was IN the drive thru. He didn't get drunk in the drive thru.... The gaslighting on this is getting crazy.

Were also suppose to forget that he just got out of jail for beating his kids. Thats why he didn't want to get arrested. It would have violated his parole.

Problem is the stupid law with DUI. Take his license and that’s it. Drunk driving should be fined and the licence taken away for a year! He shouldn’t end up in cuffs and of course not dead!

He was drunk in the drive thru. Legally blew over the limit after his drunken nap.

I think it's not a failure of reason, because in order for reason to fail it would have to be employed in one way or another. Majority of people arent inclined to think at all, so reason/logic never even gets a chance todau

Failure of reason and purpose. Especially for young men.

And racism against whites

Honestly, this is all about power and who has it. Not taking this into account gives false judgment. So, not considering this factor causes us to think that this is a lack of reason, but actually it is completely reasonable when considering that it is about power. Kind of like Nancy and her golf tour clap. She had the power and she knew it, we didn't.

@Hai Voai ahhhhhhhahahaha. toche'

It only seems like insanity when it's not your group

@@dionysusnow I’ve seen insanity by both sides last year. A liberal that drives around in his car alone with a mask on. A conservative who thinks Corona virus is myth.

Nope. They play a game of Simon Says and go on their way. Lol

Ever since MADD (mom against drunk driving) lobbied the government in the 1980s people caught DUI are arrested and heavily fined. The fact that Joe is saying the guy shouldn't have been arrested is a suggestion that we should fundamentally change how cops treat various crimes. I can only imagine how drunk driving will increase if the new rule is "drive them home"; this will dramatically increase the rates of drunk driving. This why MADD lobbied to begin with, cops were too lenient on drunk drivers and people were being killed because of it.

Nah we call them ubers

@@DreaminBig Leftist nutcases call them Ubers (i.e. see Joe Rogan). Sane people arrest them.

This guy also had cruelty to children on his record and was on probation. I don’t think it’s fair for joe to say he’s just a fine person who fucked up once and got drunk

Same🔥❤️

Sowell would be the most legendary podcast during this time

I Agree!

So true, this podcast already had me reading his page again

@@michaeld8555. Maybe that's what op ment. Either way, i definitely agree with you, but i can't say I've listened to him enough to be able to argue one way or the other.

@@michaeld8555 I listened to Sowell for an hour the other day, arguing something not much different from that. That the minimum wage removed jobs from these communities and the welfare state caused fatherless homes. This leaves young black men with no fathers and no jobs, then they get up to no good.

K.I.C. The problem is the guy took the cops taser and fired it at him as he ran away.

falls under the category of substance issues which is a category people are saing needs a different response- I say send a team for substance issues. I say a team of three: one cop with gun, one cop without a gun that is trained in martial arts, and one psychiatrist/medical person. All are good and trained in deescalation. the work together. the guy without the gun is key cause he (sometimes she) can control the situation physically cause they aren't worried about their non existent gun from being taken. medical person will do most of the interaction most of the time probably. other two people are support. dd is serious. i don't know the penalties, but it should probably be viewed as attempted manslaughter in a sense.

Punch a cop get shot. Cops job isn’t to take blows to the head in the hopes they stay conscious and the attacker doesn’t take their gun. What is this 4th grade? God people are stupid

@@rockydelforge999 Thats a great idea! We all need to make 10% more with overtime or another job though. Treating situations like this in that way is only going to cost us 110% in taxes. Maybe just put all 3 on each street corner and free healthcare and free college and expand welfare and, and, and.......

@@genzcurmudgeon8037 whats the purpose of 2nd amendment? Specifically was to fight a tyrannical government so we would always be free🤯

Yup

I don't know the story but I'd not be amazed that people are afraid to make a stance against the mob at this point.

If you think tasers are a deadly weapon, why do police deploy it in non violent crimes?

If a white man went full psycho on two nice police pfficers and took them to the ground, punched one in the face, stole his weapon, and fired it at him.... noone would bat an eye. Seems privileged to me. Also the cop that didnt even shoot rayshard is getting charged with aggravated assault? The cops were gentle with rayshard. Thats why rayshard was able to hurt them and steal there weapon and get away. They didnt assault him at all, in fact if they wanted to they couldve beat tf out of him. A 2v1 is not winnable in a situation like that.

@@illicitlegacy3783 He kicked the dude on the ground after he was shot. You can see it in the video.

And that's just on KZfaq, not including other mediums

You must be new.. WELCOME!

I thought I was all alone for the first 1500 episodes

yes, AND it looks like some people don't mind calling this mess what it is... the deep entrenchment of identity politics in our political, media, business, and scientific institutions - and that those misguided ideologues are calling for civil war. Make no mistake about it, that's what this is leading to. We must be ardent in our commitment to free speech. We must oppose corruption, and be critical of our favorite institutions where they have failed, as well - such that this is a non-partisan movement toward empirical truth, and NOT just a regression back into politics. Here's something I wrote a week ago - why free speech is so integral to our very humanity. www.whyihatepolitics.com/2020/06/11/i-oppose-corruption/

Pretty much every podcast gets 1.5-2m on first day, its not unheard of

That’s all I was thinking the whole time.

Or at least someone with a better grasp on history and political economy. They are drawing very broad conclusions not based in historical context nor statistical fact.

I wish he did more interviews but I suspect fifty years of warning people about this totalitarian ideology has worn him out.

This guest is perfect for the times we are in and the first 20 min. uou should digest and quit overlooking everything there saying cause you disagree w one or two things. People are so strange and emotional these days.

I've commented over and over again recently on JRE but at this time - the closest public figures you can still get might be Glenn Loury, John McWhorter or Coleman Hughes. I figure John fits Joe's audience best for this affair but I could be wrong...

absolutely

They did assume that people only have the attention span for a sitcom. Lol

Also watch Bret's channel. It always amuses me how nearly 4 million people watch this in a few days, but he gets less than 100k people on his own videos. Same with a lot of other guests on Joe's show. For some reason, people are happy to watch them talking to Joe, but have no interest in them talking on their own podcasts to other intelligent people.

@@thealexanderbond To many people to follow, the amount of knowledge that can be consumed and discussed is endless - that's why Joe is a good podcast, he brings people that have real knowledge in their own field.

This fool lost me after he kept saying that watching the George Floyd video wasnt conclusively murder. Like Bret...lay off the acid.

I've definitely seen and gotten matches with women that would swipe right for that. lol

Lmao that would make you more popular than some would think.

Pornhub enters the chat

@@TylerInTraining I would. And spanking too.

you can only promote bullshit? this is present, it will change your life.

We ended natural selection, and you just cannot do that without ruining everything. If you did that with any other animal species (especially a domesticated one) it would become garbage specimens very quickly.

What's reason then?

@@ReekRendTest1 I used to think that but I'm not sure that's entirely true. Yes, anyone can procreate. NO, anyone can't just procreate with someone with sought after characteristics such as intelligence etc (and implied genetic heritage). There is still absolutely genetic selection going on, with more intelligent and successful people attracting better mates, and vice versa. We can see this play out in increasingly stratified western societies. Genes are not naturally selected against now, but certain phenotypic traits are still highly selected for/against, which determines which gene pool you are going to go into. I totally accept that this is not as severe and limiting as natural selection, but there is clearly something going on with humans. Also I really think we should be mindful of the next potential stage in human evolution, as laid out by Elon Musk and Neuralink - at some point in the near-ish future we are going to start to assimilate with our technology. This will transform humans to god-like capabilities in terms of processing and memory. At present, there is no single human who can know everything about every human specialism in tech and science. The world is just too complex now. 200 years ago, it was absolutely possible for 1 person to generalise across all specialisms, just about. But the next stage in human evolution will likely not be brought about by hungry predators, but by technology. If/when we merge with computer processors/memories, it will be possible for single humans to absorb all of the information across all tech/science specialties. At that time, analog humans of the previous 2 millenia will be looked at as cavemen. Basically what I'm saying is don't think that natural selection is the only force that can change the nature of humanity, because the future is unwritten.

Ben the intelligent are breeding less than everyone else. Who’s winning the genetic lottery now? Natural selection doesn’t care about individual characteristics, it cares about numbers. Not letting people fail evolutionarily is bad for the progress of the species. Not that progress is the end all be all goal, I suppose.

I left my comments on the shorter version. But essentially I’ve said the same deal, had a hardcore blm apologize and admit the justice is not there.

Drunk driving makes you kill people, thousands of avoidable deaths all around the world every year result from that. In most European countries you'll get banned from driving if ever caught drunk, and for good reason, but at least it's scientific - we use alcohol meters, not some silly 'walk the line' methods.

@@doommaker47 We also use breathalyzer tests here in the states, blood test too to further prove your level of intoxication if it's just obscenely high. They usually start with the whole Walk the Line, touch your nose, say your ABC's backwards and the eye stigma test to give them further proof of your physical incapacitation. If they refuse to do the breathalyzer test in field, and they failed all the physical tests, the officer can transport them back the station and get a blood draw done.

@Jen farmer the Google statistics guru. Tell that to a family who lost somebody to a drunk driver

Jen farmer there is a consensus on what constitutes a drunk driver, a .08 BAC.

@@doommaker47 There are BAC breath tests that are administered after the line test.

That would be wild. Joe wouldn't know how to deal.

No. On economics, Sowell is a total idiot.

Rico King

I think Joe's head would actually explode

@@youmothershouldknow4905 uhhh?

This is the most apt description of the podcast, which I still enjoyed.

I think most of us are playing checkers that's why Joe is a good representation of the average folk which is good because Brett have to be very persuasive and repeat himself 5 times to make his point trough.

AGREED!

@@Fabi_87 because he's talking to someone playing checkers. this is bret's babyspeak.

Not really a lot of times joe gets too emotional and acts willfully ignorant.

Same

Same, and I call BS - not gonna happen

I certainly hope you're wrong.

I hope the anarchists don't start Civil War v2.0.

Hopefully the left will cancel it.

Who has said the drunk driving is not dangerous? I've never heard anybody say that. but it's certainly shouldn't be a death penalty offense.

@@fatherplant73 Joe Rogan said that in this interview.

private parts I think a lot of the people who are arguing on behalf of the driver are somehow missing the fact he drove from the bar to the Wendy’s drive thru, where he passed out. I see a lot of people talking about it as though he was just sitting in the parking lot minding his own business when the police showed up, without realizing, or perhaps without admitting, he was drunk driving prior to the encounter and then was blocking the drive thru, which is why police were called.

@@fatherplant73 this case not included because he wasn't driving: So if you're parents, siblings, kids were killed by a drunk driver WHO MADE A CHOICE TO DRIVE DRUNK, you don't believe they should pay with their life? This is strictly curiosity.

@@fatherplant73 At the very least Joe downplayed the severity of this guy driving drunk. He referred to him as "just drunk". There is a reason there is a stiff penalty for driving drunk. What I don't see is anyone suggesting that because he was drunk, he deserved to die. Up until this guy began fighting the police and attempted to shoot them with a taser (classified as a deadly weapon in GA), there was no reason to believe he was going to be shot. None of the evidence presented at this point even suggests that he was shot "because he was drunk".

Red Bret Redemption

YangGang or Die!!!💯💯💯 #WriteInYang #StillVoting4Yang

I don’t believe I have much to add to this conversation right now but I want you all to know that I love you all! And I hope to live in a better world with you in the future

@DOGB14 you as well. those ideals are what we need. you’re a great person

Lol! I think it's a CV-19 thing. He's from the PNW where the pressure to wear masks is high -- technical compliance.

Yes!!! Would love to see Coleman Hughes on.

Coleman would be great, and a couple similar people (in that they’re also black and have heterodox views on race) are Glen Loury, Thomas Chatterton Williams, John McWhorter and Kmele Foster

Glenn Loury or John Mcwhorter would be the best.

@Day Time lol

@CalvinSomething I agree with your take on Sowell not accepting the invitation. The more I think about it Hughes energy/flow wouldn't match well with Joe I feel. It would be more of a debate than interview.

the world saw how a man killed another man in broad daylight by kneeling in his neck for EIGHT MINUTES AND 42 SECONDS

@RandomPower I know, it’s such a turn off

agreed! No matter how clear a situation looks you still deserve a trial

@@LAYSJOSE My mom would make pancakes in the morning

@@elijahrusso5403 Thats just as relevant as what Carmona said. Too bad Aunt Jemima syrup will no longer be available for those pancakes.

Yep - Critical Theory is a target-rich environment for indoctrination candidates who can't think for themselves.

Enlighten us plebeians, Jake. Why is Bret spending his valuable time on social science?

@@pauljoda6593 ... because he doesn't have the chops for STEM

Weinstein says that ... but doesn't back it up with most of his views

pablo rages that’s correct. Bret is gives no science. Just his social ideas, based on his fear of losing control

Based.

YAHHHHH

Well said. Joe doesn’t get it because hes a ‘woke’ Californian. Im 7 hours through this audio book right now this current situation echoes the communist revolutions of China and Russia.

@@jh772 it isn't if you reject the lie early

@@jh772 What book is that?:)

I cringed sooo hard at that. Lmao

That was, by far, the most absurd exchange he's ever taken part in.

“Police should focus on murderers “ isn’t that kind of what results from drunk driving all of the time?

C W Seriously, Joe Rogan lost a lot of respect with that stupid take!

Jed Lee if you crash your car and kill someone okay you go to the hospital then jail but if you don’t why not just handle it in court and take that person home or allow them to get an Uber or picked up.you are out the same night usually anyways.

YangGang or Die!!!💯💯💯 #WriteInYang #StillVoting4Yang

I think it's from Norbert Weiner

Do you notice how that reasoning only works very narrowly? For example the critical theory folks could make that exact same claim about STEM. That is their proof that it is systematically racist. I like Brett a lot but this is an example of left-think that hasn’t been properly thought through. A nice sound bite but needs a lot of nuance to be meaningful.

@@tradcon3096 It's not left-think, it's from the founder of Cybernetics and pertains to negative feedback regulated systems

Matt Phillips, so, is STEM racist? It seems to sort folks based on race and sex.

1h17 yes Joe

it really annoyed me how Joe just REFUSED to entertain the idea that the footage isnt the whole story, purely detracting from the bigger point that, i beleive Scott Adams put it 'if you see a video, its fake'. All you have to do is look at some of Lefty twitters videos, they crop out context of certain events. We have to ask questions like 'why is the camera filming in this spot? who is behind the camera and whats their intention? are there actors or lies being done and said? what happened before and after the video stopped?' the point is the video is inherently a limited view on something, him just detracting by thinking what he saw was all he needs to know is ridiculous. Floyd was saying he couldnt breathe before being on the ground, he resisted arrest, how do we know he wasnt lying in order to try to get a window of opertunity to fight or escape? maybe thats why they didnt beleive him saying he couldnt breathe when on the floor... These things are invaluable to deciding EXACTLY what happened. 1st and 3rd degree murder are entirely different charges, overcharging lets him off, but in any case, we need to be ACCURATE if the insitutuion of the courts is to mean anything

Joe so clueless to what he's trying to say.. the video is not all of the evidence.

Please get the admiral & Yang on Joe Rogan to announce their candidacy- urgently!

Not even paraphrasing 😂

Joe missed the point so fucking hard that it pissed me off

I tried telling that to my father, and he exploded. "How is he innocent, it was clearly murder!" - Dad "Innocent until proven guilty." - Me

Aidan these are the founding principals of this country

And then your dad slapped you

@@aidan5083 I think it should be more like "Not guilty of anything particular until proven guilty of that particular"... Innocent implies something different, though it has become the motto indeed. He is guilty of something, or a bunch of somethings, we just don't know exactly of what.

Sibby Eskie innocence is supposed to be the neutral state for all Americans until found guilty by a jury of their peers in a court of law. You are innocent, all of us, until you are guilty.

His prior record doesn't justify shooting him twice in the back when he took off running. The cop in this instance is being charged with felony murder. This case has nothing to do with his DUI infraction either. It's how police are unjustly killing citizens.

@@logike77 His prior record doesn't justify the shooting, it justifies the counter argument to "why not call his family" and "just let him sleep it off, he wasn't hurting anybody". Also, say what you want about the fact he was running away, he tried to use the stolen taser. "It was out of charges" and "it's non-lethal" are not valid counter arguments. It's easy to count charges from camera footage, try counting it in the middle of the road in what amounts to a brawl while there are plenty of things going on. Or here is another option to avoid this all together, don't run from cops. What justified him running? Did he think if he just touched some magical zone the cops would say "ah shucks, he got away again, oh well guess he's free"? It's lunacy to think that he had zero responsibility. To address the other problem, the DA involved can't even decide a taser is lethal force or not so saying "it's non-lethal" is beyond silly. Charging somebody with something doesn't mean they're guilty and only a corrupt judge would find the officers involved anything but innocent.

logike77 dude should have been in prison anyway but you know... covid lmao

logike77 no his record doesn’t justify it. What justifies it was fighting the officers, stealing his weapon and shooting the officer with it

Robert Phillips accountability isn’t a strong suit for men like them. They’re more childlike than adult.

Based

Gotta save him from the whale

Welfare will not assist families where the father is present.

Definitely. Brett says science will help families out the most. But I disagree, having a loving father and loving mother help infinitely more. We need less broken families which lead to anger, hate, violence and despair. People who are loved, feel that love and give love are not violent and hateful.

1:24:00

he completely ignored any action on the part of mr.brooks, he said drunk driving is "peaceful" and nothing "went wrong" until "they told him he was under arrest" what disingenuous jackass

100% right. Drunks are really good at being nice until it's time to actually go to jail.

You know this reminds me when he had Jack Dorcy on the 1st time and Joe was rightly dragged for it. The 2nd time its Tim Pool asking the hard questions and actually interviewing Jack not Joe. Joe barely says anything in that video. Just shows Joe isn't the "real" person he claims to be.

Not only that .. but nobody .. I mean nobody .. would have said that cops should let a white DUI suspect go home or order him an Uber. We all have to follow the same laws and suffer the same repercussions when we don't. The guy was on probation for child abuse. He had no business driving drunk and he should have been a man about it after being caught. With his selfish behavior he ruined the lives of two cops and caused more violence. I have no sympathy for Raychard.

Joe Rogan himself wasn't saying this, this is the $100 million spotify deal talking.

Drunk driving is an issue, you're absolutely right. However to be thrown in jail and handcuffed over a mistake that can't be right? Drunks aren't criminals they need help. Now do I think they should be left off the hook? Absolutely not its a dangerous act that can lead people to be hurt hence the idea to fine them and let their fate be decided in court.

Hauser Hooch Joe was so impressed with how polite and peaceful the guy was while he was trying to fitness his way out of going to jail. Apparently, Joe doesn't realize everyone is polite and peaceful while they're trying to talk the cops out of arresting them.

@@isaiahsevere4192 He was in a drive through WITH THE VEHICLE RUNNING.

@@TheBlackB0X He wasn't operating the vehicle, he was sleeping it off. Could have just had the heating on waiting till he sobered up. Legally speaking he was not operating the vehicle and had no reason to arrest him. Drunk driving is terrible but this wasn't it. Cops should have never taken it that far

@@kofiaddison5402 He had to have driven there to have been pass out in the driveway... people called the cops because he wasn't responding.

2:40:03 is not the competition but about corrupted studies on drugs and the fact that they prefer to ignore the impacts.

tnx...kind regards

Keep Doin what u do!

facebook.com/Worldindependent/videos/2307870802871751/

"(Bret won´t dismiss the lab-conspiracy theory)" he didnt say it was a conspiracy... he said it might be an accident

Megan Lamb did he? Where

Hello Moto basically since he rose to internet fame he has been warning against the neo-marxist postmodern ideals held by the left and where they’ll lead if unchecked. and we’re seeing it.

I think Jordan Peterson did a much better job of it. Peterson makes rational arguments without bowing to fear. Brett keeps throwing out strawman and disingenuous arguments inciting fear based on false premises. For example, no one was calling for an elimination of science. That was a one-day supportive strike on June 10th. It's done and over. Weinstein made it sound like there is an ongoing anti-science effort in place, which is completely untrue.

Over 3 years ago

@@MichaelLaFrance1 I think Weinstein's point is that the "post modern neo marxists" will come pretty hard for the sciences--as his anecdote about them shunning the enlightenment demonstrates. Not only that, but the sciences are afraid of the fact that they're mostly white males and this #shutdownscience shows they will cave to mob pressure

I don’t believe so. But regardless- the vast majority of everything we do with mice doesn’t translate to humans anyway. We just have to because it’s the best tool we have- but in reality it’s a pretty shitty tool.

I do not think that is correct. You can quite literally grow a human ear on a mice back. Also Mice and Rats DNA is very close to human.

@@RejectOneWorldGov ya. For sure. But what does that truly mean? Mice models fail the vast majority of the time when predicting human outcomes. It’s just they fail drastically less than if we experimented in most anything else. (Lol monkeys would be better!)

No. We get them an uber tax payers pay for. Then we pay for the drunk drivers funeral and his victims next time he gets out under influence.

James Morrison I agree you don’t need to be an officer if you can’t arrest someone without resorting to lethal means.. but are you aware that the man being arrested gave one cop a concussion and stole his taser then tried to flee and whilst fleeing turned and aimed the taser towards the officers to fire it at them, thus resulting in one of them to open fire. If you believe you are being wrongly arrested then you fight it in court, as evidence shows that when you fight back against it WHILE you are being arrested you just made everyone’s day more complicated, mainly your own. Plus as it was previously stated, he drove there drunk. He didn’t get there and then smash a bunch of liquor in the drive through then pass out. So yeah, he was gonna be arrested no matter how you cut it.

Sure arrest drunk drivers. PLEASE arrest them. Please do it without losing control of the weapons YOU bring to the situation. Please do it without killing a man.

Back before diu made city $10,000 basically police officers would follow you home or take you home. Dui is big business!!! Js

Mayan Ruins then don’t drink and drive then beat people up when you have to answer to those crimes

Few things in my life I'm ashamed off, but driving drunk is one of them . Was never caught but that's no excuse

Joe doesn't care. He loves it when people die... He makes money off of it indirectly.

Nicholas Flemming how?

I wish they had just arrested and handcuffed him right after he failed to the sobriety test. He’d be alive today most likely.

THANK YOU. Now I don't have to type this

@omnivore gains not at all. Joe is speaking out of emotions which are never the way to go. Especially when it comes to legal action. Bret is looking at the situation objectively and from a logical standpoint. Joe and others who share his opinion just want to lynch someone and they don't care about the details.

omnivore gains I think they both understand it pretty well. Bret just had an unfortunate way of trying to convey his views at first

@@Emmanu013 Joe is smart enough to know if he knows he's killing someone like that the cop knew too.....

"200 pounds into the concrete."

@@normalperson5487 So cop was actually intenting to kill Floyd?

"He was peaceful" REEEE Low bar to set. The guy was so drunk, he fell asleep in a drive-thru. APD was insanely patient with him, and he attacked them as soon as they put hands on him. He assaulted them, stole one of their tazers, attempted to flee, and then tried to taze them as he ran. The shooting was 100% justified, legally and morally. Joe's inability to hold completely reasonable behavioral expectations for nonwhites displays how typically bourgeois urbanite liberal and divorced from reality he truly is.

@@kevinchrist1658 What community would that be?

@@kevinchrist1658 I see. So he's not only a meathead, but he's also a shill. Lol At least he's capable of conducting a decent interview.

The police can be held liable if the guy takes an Uber home and then gets in his other car, drives drunk and kills someone. That is why people are taken to jail

@@jamieeverett9695 Indeed. Another reality that out-of-touch liberal elitists like Rogan can't possibly fathom.

The point was not that he did not do anything wrong. The point was that you can sovle the situation without escalating things.

Back in the day. When busted? Cops wouldn't let ya continue. And find a way to get chya home. . And with tech today. It would be wayyy easie to assure a driver home once caught. Madd Lobbied that one misjudgment "though can be catastrophic to other sharing the road." Is possible to ruin ones life. That's why guys run and fight. And ultimately. Could die. Saving lives on the road. Turned into ruining others targeted?

You guys are lame o's

@@lasselyng6420 Did you not see the video of Brook's arrest? Everything was civil and fine until he realized he was going back to prison. A man on parole, caught behind the wheel of a vehicle while drunk. Brooks escalated everything and got himself killed.

It's not that it's "not bad" it's more like why do you need guns in that situation.