K.C Rongmei humility? He is one of the most hypocritically arrogant idiots who voices idiotic apologetic arguments in the world.

Michael Wilmot nothing could do more to destroy any reputation than the diarrhoea that flows from lennox’s mouth.

Τεεβμαιτανεκ That spoke volumes to me

Just like Nothing remains nothing unless....! 🧐😉

Like a Theist can speak anything but nonsense.

@@con.troller4183 Literally all the Scientists of the historical Scientific Revolution were Theists, most Christians. Furthermore, more than 50% of today's scientists are still Theistic to some degree. You were saying?

@@GhostBearCommander "Literally all the Scientists of the historical Scientific Revolution were Theists, most Christians." Ad populum logical fallacy. Almost everyone was a theist, on pain of death and later being unable to hold elected office or attend school or receive services or attain housing... Besides, what scientists believe in their spare time is irrelevant. Produce a single piece of actual science which lists god as a data point or as a factor in any way. tic tic tic... "Furthermore, more than 50% of today's scientists are still Theistic to some degree." And 83.4% of statistics are made up on the spot. "Lies, damned Lies and statistics".

Amen!

The planet is turning..

Ryan K Myles if your god exists, why does he need morons like Lennox to undertake the most breathtakingly hypocritical mental gymnastics to fight for it?

Michael Wilmot the truth is that your imaginary friend is nothing but the delusion of a weak mind.

THE WRESTLING FAN Hey man, your openess to this could be God calling your name! Give it a try :)

Hey friend how's your study on this going :)

He knows how to " come across " as something.

Indeed..... people can try to deny their claims and prove them wrong, but they have nothing to say against their conduct. Delightfully Christ-like.

Tim So.. it can be proven that they're completely wrong and misleading people... But they're nice about it?

Roper... well, I linked the word "try" to both "deny" and "prove," so no, I do not believe that what you said is the case. But yes, they are very nice about it.

Tim Con men are usually very nice too. I don't find Lennox humble and nice at all. Here he's trying to undermine someone days after their death, and insisting that he is right and the person who can no longer defend himself is wrong. Pretty much the opposite of humble and nice... but he gives the impression humble and nice while he's doing it.

Isaac Newton believed in God, so you are certainly not the true Isaac Newton. So, because you believe God is imaginary which means that you came from nothing out of nowhere, or have self-creating capabilities. As such you need to contact the Nobel Committee. Let us all know how it works out!

John Heininger very well said! hawking made up a lot im sure. all is unproven bs.

Spoken like a true person with common sense that’s what science is common sense .

Hawkings's questions are closer to the truth than those "answers" of Christianity.

@Wong If one does good deeds simply because one is hoping for heaven as the reward, and if one avoids sins simply because one is scared of going to hell, then heaven will be full of businessman (who knows what is beneficial) and cowards (who knows how to avoid risk). Seeking truth is a live long complex pursuit to improve oneself, not to selfishly benefit oneself. The reason why I distant myself from the Church in the past was because of the high number of followers who think that believing is all there is to it in living a religious life.

what I would say brother is that religion just isn't the answer. Seek Jesus by your self, pray to him and ask him to reveal himself to you. This is what I did and He revealed Himself through a manifestation of His Holy Spirit to where I was brought to believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that He is in fact lord by the encounter with Him. Religion just can't give you the 100% truth, only God can. Ask for the Holy Spirit to come and He will reveal Jesus to you. God bless brother.

Good arguments also need good evidence to back them up

walkingphilosopher keep searching 4god!!! your benefit!

Now you can give an actual and honest chance to Christianity and the Bible mate, it is so misrepresented that I think most of what people think about the Gospel message is wrong. God offers salvation by FAITH alone, apart from your works and hypocritical self-righteousness... Most "Christians" don't trust in God's righteousness, but strive to establish their own, which is what religion is all about. You can know you have this gift, if you believe, and if you are an intellectual type of person, the God of the Bible is logical and his ways are always right. Let me just give you a few things that you believe about Christianity, that are actually wrong: 1. We are all sinners, even as a Christian, we all fall short and don't ultimately deserve to be glorified by God, that is why he saves by FAITH ALONE, so that even the worse people can have hope of eternal life. 2. God absolutely hates the ways of the world, especially when it comes to religions. Jesus spoke mostly against the religious leaders of his day, rebuking their hypocrisy. 3. God hates all idols and images, especially if people bow down to them, which is logical. 4. God deals in absolutes - he is a perfect judge and a perfect saviour - it's up to you to choose in which role you want to meet him - he absolutely has to punish us in hell, but he doesn't want to, so he provided a way, so he is both righteous and just, and merciful at the same time. 5. Your works don't matter, your faith and understanding is what does. I myself was a mindless new ager and hated the Bible and religion, because I believed they are the same, boy was I wrong!

Larry Steimle anything outside of science,as David Hume puts it,is nothing but sophistry and illusions. Science is knowledge. All else are beliefs.

One could then argue that Richard Dawkins and the like should also stay away from anything faith-related. AKA debates on God.

It would also seem to me as a once fallen away Christian that science and what we DO know actually DO point to that which we do not know. Faith based on something, not blind faith.

Andrew my friend that is not a scientific statement. If it's true then it's false. That is a philosophical statement dealing with the nature of truth. So then, is your statement true or false? No matter what you persist on, your statement contradicts itself at its very core. Have a wonderful day friend 😃

He sounds like Andy Stanley but not him

God chooses the fool to confound the wise. That no flesh shall glory in His sight.

Which god?

@@danieljoseph6404 the God your ego is terrified of.

@@gerardjones7881 Exactly. Thats why im an atheist.

@@danieljoseph6404, you need more rational reasons to be an atheist.

i agree with you sister

Riya Mitra he roasts in hell rn

@Leo Wong a man in Hell currently" Besides that fact that the Bible is just BS, even if you were to try to make sense out of it, you would realize that your god is evil. A god who punishes someone eternally for a mortal crime is not just. "A man who rejected Jesus is a wicked man." I love that you just make things up.

Amen

Unbelievable. Everyone saying he is in Hell. It is not for us to judge but for Jesus. He will judge us on our thoughts and these alone. Jesus loves all people despite their sins and it is for him alone to judge if we are worthy of Heaven. I know I am not for I am far from perfect but I live in his grace with the hope of his forgiveness.

@@iain5615 EXACTLY!

No one ever said that it necessarily does hinder. But interestingly Newton tried to use god in his descriptions of planetary orbits, and was quite wrong. So yeah it did affect him negatively. And I imagine Galileo would have something to say on religion and science. That was in Stephen Hawking's book... which I'm guessing you didn't bother to read

Roper122 You say Newton “was quite wrong” regarding God & planetary orbits; hindered scientifically by his faith. What are you referring to? Did you have to read Hawking’s book to get that Galileo would ‘have something to say about science and religion’? I certainly don’t. But it’s a moot point; he was a devout believer in the Bible. "God is known by nature in his works, and by doctrine in his revealed word."

Alex What am I referring to? So you didn't read Hawking's book? That seems odd... you're so quick to criticise him. Newton tried to explain the orbits of the planets, and when he couldn't, he included in his theory the suggestion that god makes adjustments every once and awhile so that it works. Not very scientific, wouldn't you agree? And in fact wrong too. Pretty much everyone on Galileo's day was a believer, its nothing spectacular. But if you want an example of how belief in god hindered science... go no further that what happened to him.

Roper122 -I didn’t criticise Hawkins once -Newton was wrong about something. Who cares? He’s arguably the greatest scientist in history, and a Bible-believer. -Galileo was a Bible-believer, his murder doesn’t change that.

Alex Oh really? You just came here to write random quotes? Where'd the quotes come from? Newton was wrong about something, because of his religious beliefs... the exact opposite of what your quote says. You should read up on Galileo, I'm not saying he was religious, in fact I made that point clear.

Eric Splodge hawking wasnt dumb he denied god out of hatred or revenge for his illness

GOD SAYS: I HANG THE EARTH ON NOTHING

"John has and shows great respect for Hawking as a scientist" If that was true, Lennox would not have straw-manned a dead scientists life work to score cheap theist points. Does intellectual honesty mean nothing to Theists?

THE UNIVERSE HAS NEVER EXIST,IT IS ONLY ENERGY GOD(AND JESUS )MADE INTO MATERIAL

Multiply a trillion by it self and now subtract a trillion multiplied by itself and you will have zero or nothing. The possibilities of nothing is infinite.

Science continues to expand human knowledge, religion is just nonsense.

Alex, science shows us how God did it. There is no other credible theory other than God and at least 7 major evidence types to support God theory

I think it's become almost like a cult for scientist, if you believe in God you can't enter

No, he is a self deluding fool like all creationists.

GaryWalker So you believe the universe started as a singularity (we’ll call it an egg, to simplify things) and this “egg” was just always there and for whatever reason decided to explode? Sounds pretty delusional to me.

He is the best mathematician

as does Hitchens

Lmao. How do you know?

:D love it

Ha! That is brilliant!

Rolf Leseratz the date is 2018 isn't it? Do you know why? Lmao enough said, TOOTLES

Well I have heard of Prof Lennox but you, who are you exactly?

You're easily impressed.

If smart people turn to God, perhaps there is something smart about believing, after all.

+megalopolis2015 Sure, if there was a God. There is no evidence for any God. Do you know how an immaterial being (God) can have a mind, intelligence, intentions & ability to think without a material brain?

+megalopolis2015 Smart Dr. Lennox can't realize that Jesus the messiah is a fictional figure posthumously glorified by fake backdated prophecies & fake miracle stories like virgin birth, resurrection & walking on water, which were all copied from previously glorified fictional figures like: Attis, Krishna, Zoroaster & Dionysos.

Atam: Very parroted and completely inaccurate statement. Mythology is what it is because there is absolutely no evidence to support the fictional god-like characters provided by societies in the past. Also, there was next to no similarities between Jesus and the mythological deities, so put the film Zeitgeist out of your head, because it is false, including by atheist scholar standards. Jesus Christ, however, has a great deal of evidence to support not only His existence, but His death, as well as the fact that many people, both His supporters and even some of His detractors, believed in His resurrection, which was spoken of immediately after the fact, and written of in most of these people's lifetimes, including by figures and historians of the time outside of the Bible, as determined by current experts in the field from all backgrounds and faiths, including atheism.

Thanks for ignoring everything I said, thus proving my point. You don't want truth to destroy your "facts".

Bea, Honey dog and me same here, I hate that many Christians joked about him going to hell.. shows how imperfect we ALL are but dang man.. we gotta try harder

I wish he could have seen God and His wonderousness. Before he was gone, I mean. What a gift he was given to be able to think as he did, but we never would have known what he was thinking had he not had that synthesizer for his voice. I still pray for mercy for those who pass without believing. God can forgive whomever He pleases. He knows the heart, but Stephen was very defiant. It's not likely he's met with a favorable eternal end.

Bea, Honey dog and me he surely did he aint dumb but out of hatred or revenge for his condition he denied HIM publicly

1thess523 Bingo. Sounds like you're awake. And, you have an awesome user name. Stand firm to the end, Friend.

+1thess *almost all of them (atheists) actually know nothing about God or theology,* would that be god or theology in general, or simply your specific god or theology? I'm interested in how you found this out, and what it is you actually found out in terms of what they didn't know, i mean the bible (for example) is accessible to anyone, right?.

Mark Douglas For what it's worth, I can attest to his statement. The ex-"Christians" I hear on youtube make it clear they were never actually Christians, deeming their critiques of their former religion non-applicable. Dr. Michael Shermer is a perfect example. He makes fun of the Trinity because he simply doesn't even understand the concept, and I'm not convinced he wants to. Again, I'm just one voice with one specific case, so take from it what you will. Thanks for the good question mark, Douglas.

I saw your next response before you deleted it, and I must say, you ask good and vital questions. Especially that last one: "How do you know you're a Christian?" If only more people would listen to a question like that (about anything they believe!) But I will be glad to continue if you wish, Sir Douglas.

Hi Tim I didn't delete my comment, it must have been 1thess I make it a habit to sign out and see if my comment still shows, and it didn't, so 1 thess deleted it

So you think God will punish him for this? isn't that kind of horrifying?

You'll find out sooner or later.

Oh, I agree, Momo! Believing in "fairy tales" would truly be a tragedy!

Jaikee Berlin, pray and ask God to reveal to you the truth that the Old Testament contains copies of much older writings (such as the Epic of Gilgamesh). Also ask God to show you if the Theory of Evolution is accurate. Then show us how honest you are. Either come back later to say: * God doesn't answer prayers. * God confirmed that what non-believers tell you is true. * You went and studied the evidence and now understand the Bible contains myths.

Jaikee Berlin. If God loves science so much as you claim he does why didn't God tell us all about the universe in the Bible? Black holes, other galaxies (billions of them) that the sun was the centre of the solar system, dark matter, that the sun works on nuclear fusion, that stars are suns but just far away. The reality is that men wrote the Bible and those men who wrote the Bible understood less than a five year old does now.

Bungdit, you fool, you left out that Lennox is a liar. (Keep up the good work!)

Please don't think that I judge you but perhaps you just walked away. I don't know a whole lot but I just can't deny God. His existence. His sovereignty. When we put him first He in return proves himself to you. This is hard to explain in a small space. Proverbs 1:7 & 3:5-7. Luke 15

Well, you would still have left christianity. If you question your faith, the step to leaving isn't that far away, and not much will stop you from leaving. Lennox is a moron, how you would ever think otherwise is weird AF.

good sir, for those of us who perpetually seek truth, it is never too late to embrace truth even, and especially when, it contradicts our comfort zone or our previous notions. My only encouragement to you is to study the claims of the Bible and if you take seriously investigating if God is, I believe that would require praying to said God and being humble enough to ask Him to help you realize Him and understand Him and His words. I do firmly believe the Bible is God's word, and I came from opposite side of the tracks as a boy raised by a single atheist mother who encouraged us to seek the truth and feel free to come to whatever conclusion, and I myself became an atheist for many years. I ended up a believer in Jesus because the truth couldn't be suppressed by my false reasonings and warped perspective any longer. It became too obvious to me. I could list reasons and experiences and truths and prophesies, but I won't. I simply encourage you not to abandon looking into Christianity and giving it some humble examination and pursuit to see if what the Bible teaches is the truth, because whether we like the truth or not, or even believe in it, we ultimately will be dealing with it nonetheless. Thanks for your time, sorry I wrote a lengthy comment. :/

I sense you have never really been a Christian if you depend on your circle in order to stick to your faith. Why didn't you tell God about your doubts? It's not too late.

He's a professor, you're a belly dancer :)

I'd rather have Stephen Hawking as my grandad

@MomoTheBellyDancer I would be beyond happy to have such a bright, honest man who has never done anything to cause harm in this world

@MomoTheBellyDancer Richard Dawkins has told more lies in any of his books then Lennox in his whole life

Here we go. “You claim…” I claim? Seriously? Perhaps you need to actually read my comment again-this time with the motive to actually understand it and not be overly defensive! “Hawking's philosophical conclusions are overreaching…” Lennox (and others both atheists and theists share that conclusion) argued that, not me, though I see the validity of that criticism. You simply provide a classic illustration of the point I made when you state that I “defend the religious position”! Man o man! What “religious position” did I defend again? Did I even make any? Why be so defensive? Why not engage the dialogue in a way that shed light than simply burn more fire (as SJW tend to do)? I’m tempted to return the compliment, “Get real, fool.”

@Bungdit Din . . . Excuse me, "cleverer"? Dead Zeus, need I say more? Wow.

@Bungdit Din: Secondly, please, oh please do show me the clear "evidence" from science that there is "no God/Creator", no less. If you're honest, you can't and NO atheist can, for that matter. Period, the end. -_-

Jesse Hake, evidence there is no God/Creator? The burden of proof is on the one making the claim. Also, it is ridiculous to ask someone to prove a negative. Can you prove unicorns don't exist? Side note: people don't have to pick one or the other. You can understand the Theory of Evolution and the Big Bang are valid and still believe in a god.

Zgob ermn When I think of Hawking I think of the passage in the Bible : ”The fool has said in his heart, ‘There is no God’” (Psalm 14:1). Hawking was a brilliant scientist in his field of expertise yet he was a fool according to the standards of the Bible. Wonder what Hawking has to say to the Creator now...

Nope,He has published over 70 peer-reviewed articles on mathematics and co-authored two Oxford Mathematical Monographs,in addition to his fellowship in philosophy so he has the right to discuss and contradict Hawking in his religious view.

what do you say about Martin Rees who is also an atheist cosmologist and astrophysicist?

who told you that Lennox did not? what fact in Hawking’s view prove the non-existent of god? Provide evidence for the non-existence of any god, and then we'll talk,same applied on you.Even R.Dawkins the most famous out spoken atheist scientist has gave a probability on god existence.

Sir Issac Newton has took the gravity to prove the existence of the god by asking the questions who and why,not just how; in contrast to Hawking ( whom I a also admire as a great scientist) who only asked how.

Did you finish the video to the end or it is just when you saw Lennox you became so angry ( some of my replies also mentioned in the video itself ).

It doesn't get much more personal than telling someone they deserve eternal torture, and being glad when someone dies because you think that they are now receiving that torture. Just to let you know where some of those atheists might be coming from.

The Stig Any good Christian wouldnt be glad at someone else’s damnation. Not sure who is doing that but this guy definitely doesnt.

@@bethoumyvision1346 First, No True Scotsman fallacy, many many Christians rejoice at the thought of their God punishing unbelievers, but no worries. Forget the latter half of what I said. Do I deserve eternal torture?

The Stig well, they will be in for a rude awakening methinks. I don’t know ya, sir. Hope not :)

@@bethoumyvision1346 Once again, a Christian dodges my question. I don't blame you though, the only ones who give me a straight answer to that are Calvinists. They may believe wicked things, but at least they'll tell me straight up that yes, I deserve eternal torture, and so does everyone else. At least they aren't politicians about it. Appreciate the answer.

L L Amen

You & John Lennox are simply hooked on a feeling.

And let me say, You know absolutely nothing regarding the matter and are only repeating ancient nonsense.

Who are you to say that? God in his infinite mercy reveals himself to those who seek him diligently. Two man were crucified with Christ, one mocked him while he was dying and the other scolded him saying Jesus did nothing wrong but he did and so did the other guy, then he turned to Jesus and said remember me when you enter into your kingdom, Jesus told him this day you will be with me in paradise. God is merciful and you should think this way too. Many muslims are having dreams of Jesus visiting them and saving them, why? Because God is merciful and many do not know how to read so God shares with them the love that he has for them.

Who am I? One thinking individual who does not turn his thinking abilities off (which is by the way our only tool for understanding the world) in favor of what his society or the religion he was born into says. Repeating somethings from bible won't give you any advantage in arguing sth. Muslims, Hindus and all other believers can repeat some phrases from their holly !!! books and it won't give them any advantage as it didn't give you any Even if we believe that jesus was a real man in history and the story happened as you rephrased, again it won't prove anything. at its best somebody told sth to somebody else and then they died. again you will hear similar stories from believers of other religions in favor of their belief system. Will those stories have any value for you or make you change your mind? About dreams: they prove absolutely nothing, NOTHING. All it takes is to eat too much or not enough before going to bed, have some hormones in action or think about sth for a while to create a dream at night. Do you still remember your teenage dreams? Are they proof for any divinity? Besides, again there are thousands of Muslims who are convinced that Christians are converting to Isam because they are discovering truth through dream, revelation or other means. None of these can be presented as proof to support this or that belief system But returning to the main topic: It is unethical and nonsensical to after some brilliant person's death turn out and say: Now he meets the God and finds out he was wrong all his life, or gets punished ... None of you know or have any means to understand what happens after death. You don't have a single tool to examine if your after death stories have any truth in them (beside dreams and dusty ancient books of course) If you have a leg to stand on, face these brilliant minds while they are alive and prove them wrong. Or better ask your God to reveal himself in an undeniable way and put an end to these arguments. Until that day, please be ethical enough, don't pretend to know thing you don't have slightest idea about and above all stop talking about what happens to these people after their death when they can't defend themselves

He demonstrated a mechanism by which the production of virtual particle pairs in the region of the event horizon of a black hole that the black hole will loose mass and eventually disappear. He also showed that the entropy of a black hole is proportional to the surface area of the event horizon.

Truthsabre. That is your problem, you just don't understand.

Prove that there are such things as Christ, or eternity.

You are asking for evidence where the normal rules of evidence do not apply. My religion is based on faith, as is yours. You have faith that hell and heaven aren't real and I have faith that they are. BTW, there is good evidence for the historical Jesus. If we cannot rely on that evidence, then we just as well completely give up studying history.

You need God's precious holy spirit in order to receive the evidence.

No. I don't. Go away.

And your evidence for this claim would be....? I will not hold my breath for an answer.

Alicantino, which logical fallacies do you reference? Can you point out one?

alicantino11 man do yourself a favor and seek god!

You have a LOT more faith to be an atheist than I do as a Christian! Far more questions than you have answers

Reepecheep Ad hominem and baseless, foolish assertion. Every atheists' only weapon.

I'm sorry you feel this way. It was an assertion, of course, but I do not think it is baseless. I'd be happy to discuss it further with you if you'd like, if not, I hope you got some catharsis from your own baseless assertion.

Reepecheep Your statement was pure ad hominem. How I feel about it is irrelevant.

It was simply my opinion expressed in the comment section dedicated to expressing ones opinion on the video. I'm sorry you have felt slighted by this in some way. Do you have questions for me or something to add beyond just telling me I shouldn't express my opinion?

Reepecheep Save long-winded jargon. It was ad hominem, no matter how you spin it.

Rolf Leseratz How? I just stated a comment.

Rolf Leseratz How exactly? have you ever died and seen the other side? When you do Come tell me so I can know because as for now, we don’t know okay Thank you 🙃

Rolf Leseratz How do you know? Have you died yet...No, so thank you for proving my point

Peter Salucci Oh!What if he didn't.

yash agar Don’t know maybe he just died and that’s it

Tony Mario. Thanks for pointing out how Lennox dishonestly represents what Hawking had claimed. What an asshole.

Must not sound that absurd to Richard Dawkins. He told Ben Stein that he seriously thought the origins of life of earth was aliens planting seeds here. (facepalm at the major can kicking down the road......)

rubbersole79. You can't win an argument by misrepresenting Dawkins's view on panspermia. Fail.

Not arguing, not trying to win anything. Just illustrating how clueless Dawkins is. Which wasn't all that hard.

who asked your opinion?

Roper122 if you actually listened instead of spewing nonesense you would’ve known that Lennox said that Hawking was a great scientist. Also, Hawking is not saying anything new here. Everything he said is already in his book. Hawking had ample time to reply if he really wanted, but he didn’t. So don’t come here and accuse Lennox of anything, you can ask Hawking why he didn’t reply.

Charbel Oh I listened, sorry to break it to you. You're saying he praised him for being good scientist, and then ( of course ) went on to say things " already in his book " So... not praise then. And while I admit that it's hardly worth Hawking's time to respond to Lennox, it's still in very poor taste to criticise him right after his death. What you are saying is that Lennox literally came out days after Hawking died and said " He was a good scientist, but totally wrong about god " Why bother? Why not show some class and just say he was a good scientist? Better still, why not keep your mouth shut and say nothing at all? No... Lennox couldn't help himself. Very, very, poor indeed. Hawking was lightyears ahead of him in many ways.

Roper122 , Hawking's denial about the creation, to me, is just an indirect proof of inflated ego as a human being or a total lack of intuition or strategic thinking. A good tactician but a poor strategist... Newton vs Einstein.... one tactically comes up with a predictive approach to gravity without explaining it, the other one explains it... I am not impressed at all by those world-class tacticians who tries to justify bad strategies with genius tactics. The same can be found in chess. Master tacticians who can justify sometimes bad positions gainst weaker opponents with grandiose tactics... Hawking is just that... a master of cheapos (chess term)... He's going to face his creator soon.... God, the perfect tactician and perfect strategist...

But of course, whether Lennox comments are distasteful or not is simply a matter of your opinion and has no objective moral grounding. Therefore, it's perfectly consistent with your worldview for Lennox to make such comments, and you don't really have a complaint here. In fact, your complaint is inconsistent with materialistic naturalism. Embarrassing.

notallgarbage Oh sorry... I was criticising Lennox for attacking the recently deceased. But you obviously enjoy that sort of thing.

I like the way the young interviewer put it, namely, it is a category mistake to confuse agency with law.

For instance the law of gravitation as formulated by Newton may indeed more or less accurately describe the agency of gravitational pull : what it does not do is prescribe that gravitational pull is the only relevant agency. In a football match, some freewilled agencies are interfering with Earth's gravitational pull on the ball and therefore the actual movements of the ball will not illustrate a good graph of purified gravitational pull, most of the time, except when someone drops the ball from his head to the ground in order to shoot a penalty or reenter the ball. As soon as then his feet touch the ball, it is no longer just illustrating the law of gravitation, because it is no longer just under the agency of Earth's gravitational pull.

Energy = mass in e=mc2 Gravity creating mass?

We've fallen far enough to think that a being with imperfections are the best work of a perfect being.

@2plus2 your brain needs a good washing.

"God existence is beyond science." Then I am under no obligation to believe it.

We have been given a gift of choice.Man is created in the image of the Creator.Man conscience and soul is enriched by the choice of believing in God.The belief in God transforms our brain activity and the chemical in our body and makes us a loving person in relationship.Love is a gift from God to human being derived from our belief in God ,what we experience we share and give to others unconditionally

We have been given a gift of choice. Man is created in the image of the Creator. Man conscience and soul is enriched by the choice of believing in God. The belief in God transforms our brain activity and the chemical in our body and makes us a loving person in relationship. Love is a gift from God to human being derived from our belief in God ,what we experience we share and give to others unconditionally

Alexander Williams: we don't presuppose anything you moron, we use logical deductive arguments, see William Lane Craig you doofus😝😝😝

Isaac Newton: No, that's is complete bullshit, before the big bang there was *NO MATTER* *NO ENERGY* *NO ANYTHING* you are full of shit! And Isaac Newton was a Christian you fool! In the absence of any other proof, the thumb alone would convince me of God's existence. Isaac Newton!

+Isaac Newton "(1) we have evidence to support our beliefs and not just ancient books of fairy tales" There is not even close to sufficient evidence to warrant belief in the triune God Christians claim to believe in. And I am not talking about arguments; but _evidence_ . There is not even a good definition of what the 3 persons in one being of YHWH / Holy Spirity / Jesus, is. "- Can you give me evidence for your god, please?" I don't have a god. "You clearly don't understand the Big Bang Theory" I understand it much better than you do. Try reading some actual 21st century cosmology texts or peer reviewed papers and then getting back to me. I will get you started with some easily accessible descriptions which all back my point. curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/101-the-universe/cosmology-and-the-big-bang/general-questions/570-where-did-the-matter-in-the-universe-come-from-intermediate www.space.com/25126-big-bang-theory.html www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-myth-of-the-beginning-of-time-2006-02/ Now, you can continue to simply claim that I am wrong, but I am providing _evidence_ to back my points. Do you see the difference?

His beliefs obviously. His believe is there is no “God” the bigbang created the universe not “God”