Disliked this video because of the interviewer. Like this comment for Jordan.

Wilson, you dirty, dirty smear merchant.

Everything about this Journalist, his inquisitive tilt of the head, his hostile gaze, his smug, self-satisfied face, his accusations, made me a JP fan.

Everything that is wrong about journalism: Simon Wilson. Three years ago, I wrote to him (without getting an answer): Dear Mr. Wilson, among all controversial interviews with Mr. Peterson, yours is truly outstanding. First, because of your mellow, pleasant voice and your very fine taste for intellectual glasses. But mostly, because you control your animus very well, trying to give the impression of an engaged journalist, who is just asking some important questions. The big effort for control covers the glaring expression, that your politeness is the most useful cover for arrogance. And that arrogance can't hide you're just performing preconceptions. Peterson, the angry egotist. At the end of every topic, you keep the last word with ironical degradation. You just talk over your guest, if it gets too much for you, or provoke him with out-cranked taunt. (20:30) The book is all black and white, but you cannot name one example. Wasn't there enough time to write down at least one? Maybe there was, but your animus made you forget it. Your disgust of Peterson is lurking through every look and every word. You are no journalist. You failed. It was painful to see the whole interview. I saw a rotten soul. Poor you! Get well soon. Christoph Spielberger

The smug dismissiveness of this interviewer is truly pathetic.

As a New Zealander, Simon owes me an apology for complete and utter embarrassment.

This guy tried to trap him with his sneaky slimy tactics at every turn. Attack a guy for 30 minutes and proclaim at the end he seems angry. What a cowardly snake.

Hes not even controversial, everybody normal likes him

My dislike was for Simon

The Simon Wilson guy constantly made sly digs at Peterson, was extremely patronising, and understands little of what Jordan Peterson says. He's an incompetent troll interviewer.

I’ve never seen an interviewer get so thoroughly schooled by a guest. Talk about an intellectual dressing down. I felt sorry for that interviewer after a while. What an utter humiliation.

I love how the interviewer said "that's a jump from what I said" and then immediately jumps into another question. He must find it hard to be questioned, especially as a journalist.

Acts smug and accusatory and then asks are you angry? Nice try.

The interviewer is trying his best to antagonize Jordan and failing miserably... Jordan is so amazingly calm and authentic

Such a sharp thinker. His ability to respond so quickly with detailed explanations to all those accusations and sleights of hand is incredible.

Imagine someone trying to tell you that you’re angry when you’re not angry.. that’s the kind of thing that might make you angry. Well done JP, keeping your composure and rooting your responses in FACT!

This interview demonstrates clearly the difference between someone who has spent their life developing hard won intelligence, and someone who has spent their life cultivating the shallow appearance of intelligence.

Changes topic every time he is losing ground :/

"I make a small minority of very noisy people very upset" I love it!

I became a fan of Jordan Peterson after watching him not only survive "ambush journalism", but watching him win these arguments. He accuses the left-leaning journalists of being lazy and uncreative. I read the "Gulag Archipelago" because Dr. Peterson has recommended it multiple times. What an eye opener.

I'm shocked by how smug, mean and incompetent the interviewer is.

I'm a 40 year old black man who lives in America and have been following JBP for the last year and read 12 Rules. Having said that, I have several friends who follow him as well, so this notion that all his followers are white men is just nonsense. I even post some of his videos on my FB from time to time and black people who don't know who JBP tend to agree with his message or the points in the videos I share. The only time someone says something negative on my posts is when it's someone who's "heard of" Jordan Peterson before.

It's frustrating that Simon doesn't seem to pay attention to the answers given and is more focused on trying to catch the person off guard with the next question. However, Jordan being questioned handles every question calmly and articulately, which is an excellent display of fairness and honesty.

This was such an impressive display of stoicism from Mr Peterson I’ve seen in an interview. Granted it’s some time ago and he has had many, many dialectical and personal challenges since then, but I salute Mr Peterson for his composure and professionalism in this interview. This level of control and level headedness is impressive.

The interviewer is unbearably irritating. He’s masking his anger because Peterson made him look foolish. He’s insecure and did a horrible job of trying to flip the table with the angry bs. It was impossible for me to not be irritated by him to the point of anger. Good for dr Peterson. I think anger because of the dishonesty of the interviewer in this situation in precisely what it should be. Imagine being that guy’s wife or child. God what a pretentious man

Painful to watch...the interviewer is so devious. He spoiled the interview which could have been a good one. Poor job interviewer !!

It's amazing how these interviewers can not hide their agenda at all. Jordan is doing amazing work.

Well done JP. You can tell this man was the one who was angry and failed to project his anger into your soul.

I don’t want my downvote for Simon to be misinterpreted as a downvote for Jordan, but I don’t want my upvote for Jordan to be misinterpreted as an upvote for Simon. Tough choice.

Poorly conducted interview; the interviewer isn’t interested in the answers to his questions. Uncomfortable to watch.

From New Zealand - I'm so sorry Jordan that you had to suffer this unbearable cretin. Someone should have warned you.

I love how almost every interview is an attack and Jordan’s always wins

Jordan handles these pathetic interviewers with such grace it is truly amazing

This is why I cancelled my NZ Herald.. Very Left Wing

You can see instantly that Jordan Peterson instantly dislikes Simon Wilson. Smart man.

I've seen my fair share of Peterson interviews conducted by aggressive, uninterested activists, but this is a whole different level. There's something deeply rotten and despicable about this Wilson guy and the fact that he unsuccessfully tries to sugar coat it in the hallmarks of classic journalistic engagement just makes it all the more laughable and egregious.

I am a New Zealand citizen, and I’ve never been more disappointed in a New Zealand journalist… What ever happened to impartial journalism?! Why not ask him questions about his philosophies, let him answer and then move on… Rather than challenge, attempt to manipulate and try and bait him into a combative situation. God that pisses me off.

Why is it that everyone else can get to grips with Jordan Peterson's messages EXCEPT JOURNALISTS?

31:25 Shows Dr Jordan Peterson's greatness. His pure intention of his heart, we need more humans like him.

What an appalling interrogator, journalist? Feeble attempts to make Jordan peterson angry . His patience when dealing with these idiots is amazing.

I'm a woman who is so very grateful to men like Jordan Peterson, and who thinks men like Simon Wilson ought to be ashamed.

I’m a 24 yr old man from Rwanda 🇷🇼 (Africa) and I have introduced Professor Jordan BP to my friends and we love , admirer this guy

I have never seen an interviewer so eager for his chance to speak again.

I am stunned by the sophomoric mentality of this so-called journalist. Has the legacy media learned precisely nothing from the Cathy Newman incident? Never mind; these attempts to box Dr Peterson into a corner will continue to backfire, much to the embarrassment of those trying to curate such a disingenuous frame and ultimately winning Jordan further support from honest men and women. Once again, well done JP!

As a new Zealander, I’m appalled by this interview. Horrible, absolutely horrible what that journalist was doing. Kudos to JP for being polite and patient with this unprofessional gas lighting journalist. Never liked NZ Herald.

The interviewer was so biased and one sided that was hard to watch

I find it amusing that every journalist who attempts to outsmart Jordan Peterson ends up getting humiliated, and yet they keep on coming.

Thank you Jordan Peterson for speaking up in defence of reason.

These interviewers don’t even want to understand what he’s saying.

More like "Simon Wilson making a fool of himself in a 35 minutes interview"

This type of conversation is useful to happen once in a while because you get to see an example of gaslightning attempt and false interviewing get destroyed by proper thinking and managing your emotions in the face of manipulation. Being well informed and educated are the primary tools into facing situations like this. Then you have to say what you think and know preserving your temper. Thank you JP.

This world really has gone bunkers. Here is someone that can be easily discerned as genuine and very clear in thought and speech. Able to say what many of us would like to say but don't know how to. Speaking candidly and without vilifying or insulting....sorting the sense out of nonsense etc and the man is literally being tried by all the agenda bearing groups and journalists. We need more champions like this guy. I am not sure what the opposition to him is about though.......He has his opinions which are shared by many.......just that he is brave enough to be publicly and globally vocal and to stand up against this ridiculous agenda to get the whole world to be twisted, perverse and quite frankly, nonsensical. This pronoun discussion for example and calling people all kinds of madness is just a nut job. It is not worthy of a public discussion ........ that is why it is being forced upon us.......because other than that they wont get people not to view it as the result of psycological and mental handicap. But unfortunately it is the result of a serious mental problem. That needs to be pointed or its just going to keep spreading and creating deep identity crisis issues globally

What a manipulative liar. Jordan had to correct him on every question before he even finished it. Lol He was absolutely intellectually humiliated by Peterson

Cathy Newman has grown a beard and now wears glasses?

This vid should be retitled to "Controversial interviewer Simon Wilson sits down with visiting Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson" and subtitled "33 minutes of repetitive attacks by deliberate misreading and misrepresenting all available reference material". Hats off to Mr Peterson for handling it with this much patience and dignity.

See Peterson being interviewed is like seeing him dance in a mine field, voluntarily.

That guy is the definition of Passive/Aggressive!

Wow, I admire JP's willingness to be interviewed by a two-year-old. Well done Dr. Peterson.

Beautifully put and well said. I particularly love the point when Peterson explained that, he's not angry, instead he's in pain, it's sadness not anger. Men don't express sadness in the same way Women do. Peterson explains that he's in pain, that it makes him incredibly sad to see that just a tiny amount of encouragement has THAT much impact on Men in general, that it speaks to a disgusting problem in our society...because it does.

I miss mainstream interviews with Jordan Peterson. But I can also understand why he doesn't do them anymore.

This Simon guy is so hostile for no reason. He has an agenda to push, and that’s it. Thanks for staying calm and reasonable. Jordan wins again.

A series of “gotcha” questions that all failed spectacularly. Simon Wilson interviews like a first year student in feminist studies. Embarrassing.

Simon Wilson is really dangerous with his questions with a lot of tricks and lies. He just met someone truthful and without tricks. Well reality wins.

The real tragedy is that the interviewer probably views Jordan Peterson the exact same way after the interview as before

I have not commented on a video in a while but this interviewer was an embarrassment. He was incredibly accusatory, condescending and clearly came in hostile. Disgusting.

Disliked on the basis of the poor quality journalism exhibited.

I commend any video poster who doesn't disable comments. JP is such an incredible person this World needs

This is an amazing interview. How could one so completely fail to understand (or pretend not to understand) someone's statements and writing and maintain such an accusatory and condescending attitude? The arrogance is incommensurate with the ignorance. I don't know anything about NZ journalism, but if Simon is a regular part of the Herald, I am also amazed they keep this video available. Well, clicks and all....

Cathy Newman's career might be dead, but her spirit seems to be living on in 99% of other journalists.

Judging by all of the comments, almost all the Upvotes are for Peterson, and almost all the Downvotes are against the interviewer. Disaster for NZ Herald and this guy's career.

I don’t know how he keeps himself from lashing out after such repeated ridiculous prodding. It’s a good lesson for all of us.

This man is sooo articulate. He really understands the meaning of language and what comes out of one's mouth. Example: with respect to the Me Too Movement "Not 'the' movement... 'a' movement"

I'm sick of this kind of interviewer.

I’m a woman in my 70’s and find Jordan’s lectures are a shining light in dark times. He is an example of a generous bright man who provides leadership to better lives. This interviewer is an ideologue who aim is just to trap Jordan.

Homie tried to implement a preconceived plan of playing “gotcha” for 34mins and failed miserably

@jordanpeterson, thank you for making the world a better place for everybody ❤❤❤

total cringe from Simon Wilson, just misrepresenting Jordan's positions or inferring the worst. learn to steel-man an argument my man.

I'm curious when these interviewers will give up trying to put words into Jordan Peterson's mouth. Their success rate is 0.00.

I wonder why the interview was cut off at the end, some interesting ideas were being discussed at that point.

Can’t imagine why traditional journalism is circling the toilet bowl. I’m sure I’ll see this guy flipping burgers at Burger King in a few years.

God it pisses me off when they say "controversial psychologist Jordan Peterson" He's only controversial to you if you're a freaking idiot. Agree with him or not, he engages with everyone honestly and true to himself

Just discovered another journalist that makes my skin crawl.

ANGRY … no.. you can see he’s deeply moved, sad and passionate about helping PEOPLE .. men, women .. and stating facts.. why do people hate facts (not theories or subjective feelings..) it’s so sad.. keep going JP … ❤

JP talks about what some of us think and knows to be true but just not educated enough to put it in words. He's very intelligent and very factual which is hard to come across these days.

Appalling, behavior by the interviewer !! Such dignity and composure shown by Dr Peterson ❤️

How embarrassing for that interviewer. Arrogance looks putrid in defeat

Simon, as a New Zealander, I speak for us all that this was embarrassing and can u not!

Here we have another journalist that believes he is intelligent and decides to interview an expert in a specific field of study. We have another individual that has misinterpreted, misquoted, and has a fundamental misunderstanding about the subject matter in general and continually tries to put words in the interviewee's mouth to control the direction of the conversation. Dr. Peterson on the other hand is smart enough to not engage this type of behavior and has the self discipline to stay calm in the face of ignorance.

TL;DR The whole interview is: SW: "You do X." JP: "Do you have an example of me doing X?" SW: "You don't think you often do X?" JP: "I don't do X." SW: "OK."

Simon Wilson - you have just become the latest journalist to expose your bias to a very large audience. This must not be very good for business.

This is not an interview. This is a blatant attack. The interviewer does not allow JP to finish his sentences or ideas. If this was done to someone else, people would be completely mad. What an elegant way to handle a very passive aggressive interview!

Job of the interviewer is two - fold, to ask questions and to talk over the answers as much as possible.

Hey's not angry dummy. He's "on guard" and "focused" because the questions being asked are trying to provoke him into saying something that can be used against him.

This interviewer acted entirely inappropriately. It needn't really be articulated because its so self evident thats it's embarssing to even watch. He was rude, dismissive, and obnoxious. He didn't act like an interviewer, with thoughtful questions, instead he attempted to display his own ideology with rhetoric and falsity. Frankly its shameful.

I'm a Kiwi and I was embarrassed watching this. Some, if not all of his questions were espousing claims that were completely untrue, placed entirely incorrect words in his mouth and tried way too hard to misrepresent him in a way that was just cringe. I cringed so hard that my face almost turned inside out.

Poor Simon how was he to know that dealing with egregious journalists is another day in the park for Jordan

Why would the nzherald embarrass itself by posting this whole interview? Are they like channel4 and not realize that this doesn't look good for the interviewer?

All the likes are for JBP and dislikes are for the interviewer.

Im 23 years old and I’ve never seen an older man so unwise . Or just completely puppeteered by his oversight. Its so sickening.

I wish Simon wouldn't have gone into it trying to get a viral clip by provoking anger. He could've done better. Well done to him for being polite in terms of conversation function. Well done to Jordan for keeping cool and completely knocking the whole interview out of the park. Clear, concise, and articulate.