Ranking EVERY L-Mount Lens I've Tried!

Рет қаралды 57,034

10 ай бұрын

Footage Graded With Phantom LUT's (Check Them Out!)
transactions.sendowl.com/stor...
My Photo Preset (Works With Every Image!)
feedmecontent.com/one-and-don...
THE GEAR I USE:
*Some of the following links are affiliate links, so if you decide to purchase something, I get a very small commission at NO extra cost to you - Thanks in advance for supporting the channel!
CAMERAS:
My Main Cam (Lumix S5IIX)
geni.us/VHW0Kv
My B-Cam (Lumix S5II)
geni.us/Avt5
PRIME LENSES:
Panasonic LUMIX 24mm F1.8
geni.us/AdbkotR
Panasonic LUMIX 35mm F1.8
geni.us/j0l5fn
Panasonic LUMIX 85mm F1.8
geni.us/mZm1TkS
ZOOM LENSES:
Sigma 28-70 F2.8
geni.us/Bd6NL
Panasonic LUMIX 16-35 F4
geni.us/oTkQR
Panasonic LUMIX 70-200 F4
geni.us/RBByZLM
AUDIO SETUP:
Rode NTG4+
geni.us/2jHAaA
Tascam DR60 MKii
geni.us/fXkZU5S
Hollyland Lark 150
geni.us/6tla19
Since I've had the pleasure of trying out a lot of different lenses available for the L-Mount, I thought it would be good fun to rank them using a tier list I made.
I've used multiple different primes, zooms and cine lenses for the L-Mount with my Lumix S5, S5II and S5IIX. I feel like I have a good grasp of what lenses I like, and what ones I don't.
I really hope this video is helpful for you guys, and hopefully it'll help to inform your next purchasing decision!

Пікірлер: 187

@janwedek 10 ай бұрын

That was fun! My main change would be adding the 70-200 f4 to god tier. Never tried the 70-300 but the 70-200 is fantastic. Sharp, beautiful rendering, super stable, no breathing, lovely bokeh… love it.

@leisurelypaice 10 ай бұрын

I've only got the 20-60mm & 70-300mm and I literally love both of them. The 20-60 is just a really useful focal range for a kit lens and that 70-300 is just too good! I never want to take the lens off!!

@TheScatman89 7 ай бұрын

I have the exact same as you ! Im contemplating the 35mm f1.8 to add

@joergkampers_photography 4 ай бұрын

just got the S5 II with the 20-60, ordered the 70-300mm and the new 100mm and now thinking to get the 50mm as well.

@leisurelypaice 4 ай бұрын

Tbh Lumix just launched their 28-200mm Macro O.I.S. so for versatility I'd get that lens if you get the chance!@@joergkampers_photography

@mamselle09 10 ай бұрын

Great analysis and interesting point of view🙌 as always, appreciate the quality of the content!

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Thank you for the kind words! Appreciate you taking the time to watch this video 🙏🏼

@BlueHawk80 10 ай бұрын

Sigma 24-70 is a certainly 'fantastic' for me. Half the price and 100g less than then (also good) Lumix 24-70. Great alternative to the 24-105 if you're fine with a bit less reach (+ crop zoom option) but get a full stop of light + AFL button in return!

@midlifecrisis920 10 ай бұрын

Loved the inputs. With the L mount ecosystem finally flourishing, it is nice to put things in perspective and provide a user feedback on the what is hot and not. I have a 85 mm 1.8 (along with the 20-60) and absolutely love it . I would have loved to have seen the ranking include other 3rd party lenses for L mount ecosystem - Meike lenses/TTartisans too.

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Maybe it’s on the cards… third party lens tier list maybe?😜

@literbiker 7 ай бұрын

Nice video. I'm picking up an S5 and have started shopping for additional lenses to the kit lens. Love the channel!

@61akra12 28 күн бұрын

This is an awesome video man. I keep revisiting it. So comprehensive, yet so concise. Bursting full of info and experience

@JoshCameron 13 күн бұрын

I appreciate this dude! Thank you!

@Lu-sj6ni 10 ай бұрын

my man, Josh! thank you for all that you do!

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Thank YOU for watching dude 🙏🏼

@James91 10 ай бұрын

Absolutely enjoyed this video! I heard Samyang's 35-150 is coming to l-mount. Will you be doing a review on that one when it comes out?

@natashanicole7408 9 ай бұрын

Legend as always

@daliamosesp 10 ай бұрын

Also own the 70-300. I replaced the 24-105 after I found 90% of my shots were over 70mm and often cropping in 2X at 105mm. I am very happy with that decision - it's a great lens and my copy seems sharper than my 24-105 did. Also I still own the 20-60 if I ever need anything wider.

@mauricio.montoya 10 ай бұрын

I love the S line from LUMIX, I’m always looking for lens and things to film with that camera, I feel that I’m going to grow in this camera for the next couple of years. Thanks for your advice Josh!

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Thanks for watching mate!

@EdProsser 10 ай бұрын

Amazing video and good to see a longer runtime!! I'm proud to only own "God Tear" lenses

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Thanks mate! Only god tier lenses for Ed and his RED 🤣

@MarioBenites 10 ай бұрын

Invaluable video! Thank you! I am new in Panasonic. I just bought SE S5 mark ii with Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 and I am very pleased. I am about to buy another lens and I am happy to know that the 18mm f1.8 and 70-300mm are in your God tier! One of those will be mine. Thank you again. have

@bwellington3001 4 ай бұрын

Just 2 day ago bought an S5ii with a Sigma 28-70 2.8 lens. Really just thinking picking an 85 and 24 later down the road and be done with it. Panasonic Full Frame was my dream camera since the announcement. I could never imagine i would be able to afford it.

10 ай бұрын

Nice video, Josh. I wonder how you'd like the S PRO 50mm F/1.4, I own this and the regular 50 1.8 and I very much prefer the look of the Pro (though I'm not entirely convinced about that price difference being worth it). Cheers!

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

I’ve actually never tried the S Pro 50mm, but I’d love to. My only issue is the size… that puts me off a bit! Since one of my priorities is packing/travelling light for shoots!

@m00dzilla 10 ай бұрын

Just what I was looking for

@alexeijz 10 ай бұрын

Thanks for the insight, some surprises there. Very curious where the Lumix 14-28mm would be on this!

@jayforcinema 10 ай бұрын

Very interesting choices Josh. I would probably keep the 35 1.8 God-Tier and add the 24-105 to the God-Tier as well personally. Same with the 16-28 from Sigma. I would probably have taken the 50 1.8 down a notch to the Fantastic category and that's pretty much it. And probably upgraded the Sirui 50 2.9 to Meh rather than would not recommend. I am hoping they come up with the carbon fibre variant of the 50 2.9, but the rendering from the Sirui 50 2.9 is definitely special and has a place for fiction work, even if not so much for run and gun

@djcrash77 10 ай бұрын

Ouch on the Sigma 14-24 F2.8! 😔 That's my daily workhorse for RE photography and I love it! Love your input though! I agree on quite a few of your choices!

10 ай бұрын

This is the video I needed in my life rn.

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

🙏🏼🙏🏼

@DHIRAJDC 10 ай бұрын

Perfect guidance bro . Thanx so much as must don’t cover l mount you are a gem bro

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Thanks dude! Appreciate it!

@driftwoodtv 10 ай бұрын

Good work and nice reccomendations.

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Thanks Nick!

@stevenchristides 10 ай бұрын

Appreciate the input and your thoughts about the lenses and the list was pretty helpful! Where would you put the 35 -50 and 80mm T2.0, 7Artisans lenses?

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Hey guys! Thanks for watching this video, it was a fun one to make and PLEASE take my opinions with a pinch of salt. Everyone has different boxes to tick when it comes to what lenses they decided to use, so the things I prioritise may be completely different for you! Also, thanks for 20K subs! I genuinely appreciate you all for taking the time to watch these videos. It means a lot and makes all of the effort worthwhile 🎉

@cameraprepper7938 9 ай бұрын

So is this for video use or photography ? I will never use zoom lenses for photography !

@daysandwords 6 ай бұрын

@@cameraprepper7938 What, why? Zoom lenses have more use in photography than videography, because you generally don't zoom while filming. And if it's a sharpness issue, then you're either pixel peeping beyond what anyone considers reasonable, or you're doing something wrong while shooting.

@cameraprepper7938 6 ай бұрын

@@daysandwords Zoom Lenses is expensive, heavy, big and so annoying and boring to use, a prime Lens is like an extension of your mind, most people I talk to only use two focal length od a zoom, so get a wide angle prime Lens and a short tele prime Lens and you can cover just about anything !

@davidp158 Ай бұрын

Thanks for this "shoot out". Most of us don't get to experience this many lenses, and I trust that gives you some degree of objective viewpoint. Looking at just the range of L mount lenses you have compared here, it's nice to see there is a range of good, to pretty damn good, lenses available. The L mount has gained traction, and I suspect it will continue to do so. I have the Lumix S 24-70 f2.8, and have to agree it is a heavy lens. I bought the kit lens as a walk around lens, and it works fine for exterior shots. I use DZOfilm Vespid primes for my video work, but the 18mm f1.8 and 35mm f1.8 primes would be sweet on my gimbal.

@joebledea 8 ай бұрын

Great comments. Please review more Sigma dg dn 1.4 lenses (like the 24mm, small light @1.4, the 35 and 50 also spectacular performers and value for money).

@nexttvc 10 ай бұрын

where is the Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm f/2.8 Lens?

@alistairlambert3275 9 ай бұрын

Hi Josh, realise it was not covered in your review but what's you view on the 14-28 f4-5.6 macro lens? My 20-60 has proved a very versatile lens so wondering what advantages this would offer over it.

@capitolbassfishing 6 ай бұрын

Just ordered the 28-70, Selling the 20-60 to offset price. I think I will land around $500 net so not bad. The 20-60 and the 50 1.8 both came with my S5ii package for $2095. I am feeling good with all of it...I still have my G9 for my M43 fix ... all lumix for me now.

@monstablocka2784 10 ай бұрын

Thank you very much ! What do you think about the Sigma 14mm 1.4 if weight and money don't count,.only image quality ?!

@anasrida3454 10 ай бұрын

Wish sigma would release a dg dn version of the 105mm 1.4

@nguyenbui90 10 ай бұрын

would love to see the comparision between sigma 90mm f2.8 vs lumix 85mm f1.8 sigma 50mm f2 vs lumix 50mm f1.8

@lifeshare7026 10 ай бұрын

for the moment i got 2 basic lenses with my S5ii offer pack , 20-60mm kit lens & 50mm f1.8 prime lens , next i would like to add 1> sigma 85mm f1.4/ lumix 85mm f1.8 , 2> sigma 28-70mm f2.8 , 3> lumix 35mm f1.8 4> panasonic upcoming wide to telezoom like 24-200mm something like this

@karikaru 9 ай бұрын

I got the 24-105 as my first lens after watching your reviews and really couldn't be happier. The ois is so good - if i accidentally flip it off, i notice immediately. Im personally really happy with the sharpness on my copy and i use the semi-macro all the time. For documentary and travel type shooting, it really is a jack of all trades with few compromises. Someday, maybe I'll grab a prime or a tele-zoom like the 70-300 or 100-400. But for now, i think I'm set.

@borborcarcar 7 ай бұрын

Is the dual IS (body + lens) really on a gimbal level? If u put it to 50mm and walk for example I heard people dont even bother with gimbals for this combo of body and lens and I wanna figure out if Its a lens worth buying for the IS

@karikaru 7 ай бұрын

@@borborcarcar I've never owned a gimbal but I think it depends on what kind of camera movement you're doing. Walking? No. At least not just with a bare rig. If you have cage and sidehandles, and a bit of weight on the camera like a monitor and such it would probably be very close. For a simple crane type shot or short dolly-in/dolly-out you're probably good for anything subtle.

@CanditoTrainingHQ 7 ай бұрын

Surprised at how much Panasonic you emphasized and how little Sigma. Sigma 40mm F1.4 (used is super cheap), Sigma 50mm F1.4 DG DN, Sigma 105mm F1.4, Sigma 135mm F1.8 are all some of the best and most unique lenses out. A 35 or 50mm F1.8 is nice, but it's about the least special specs humanly possible for a prime lens.

@olesbadio1496 2 ай бұрын

Thanks for the great review. I'm interested in your opinion, will the sigma 35/1.2 be worse in terms of color? Because, despite the much higher light power and good sharpness, it is the sigma optics in conditions of dimming that the color of the skin tones seems to lose more saturation than the optics of Panasonic, Canon, Nikon.

@reflexfilms 10 ай бұрын

The Panasonic 24-70 f2.8 needs some love - a seriously impressive lens. My #1 god tier lens. But I reckon much of this list is spot on - especially that 35mm f 1.8

@ManuelDersch 10 ай бұрын

Hey Josh, fantastic video. I fully agree on the 35mm f/1.8 "god tier" status, it is indeed a very nice lense. The lighter and more compact design is a huge plus, especially when compared to the bulkier Sigma 35mm f/1.4. It's impressive how Panasonic managed to maintain optical quality while making the lens more portable.

@HGQjazz 10 ай бұрын

He downgraded it though - the 35mm. Personally I love mine partially because it's such a useful focal length.

@ManuelDersch 10 ай бұрын

@@HGQjazz He actuelly did, I think I missed that :D

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Panasonic really had a home run with the 1.8 primes, and it’s actually incredible how much quality they packed into such a small,lightweight profile. The only reason I demoted the 35mm F1.8 is because it doesn’t get as much use as it once used to, so therefore I was thinking more about my urge to reach for it; but that doesn’t take away from how amazing it is! I’m just a spoiled kid in a sweet store with too many options 🤣

@pablo-saitua 9 ай бұрын

I could not really see the difference in image, when shooting the 28-70 with 35mm 2.8 or above, compaired with the 35 1.8, shooting from 2.8 As I did not like the bokeh from the 35 mm when shooting under 2.8, I sold it and never looked back.

@NexusGamingHub635 6 ай бұрын

hi which one would you recommend sigma 35mm f/1.4 or lumix 35mm f/1.8?

@Gynra 8 ай бұрын

The Leica 24-90 mm f2.8-4 SL is an amazing lens, but it weighs about the same as a dustbin filled will ball bearings. Since I'm getting on a bit and am not a weightlifter I sold it recently. I'm now looking for a suitable L mount lens to replace it. The Sigma 28 - 70 looks really tempting. I'd prefer a wider angle at the lower end, but 24-70 f2.8s tend to be quite heavy, as you say. Maybe I should pair it with the 16-28 f2.8? I love the Panny 20-60 as a walk around lens, and I don't really need anything wider, but sometimes one needs a larger aperture. Any suggestions are welcome (well, almost any).

@knuterikhaugen-jf2lo 10 ай бұрын

Hey Josh, thanks for another great video😊 what about the LUMIX 14-28 f4-5.6 that was released earlier this year?

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

I haven’t tried it! …. Yet 😜

@knuterikhaugen-jf2lo 10 ай бұрын

@@JoshCameron I hope you will try it and give us a review😊 I am curious about this one.

@georged822 4 ай бұрын

I got the 50mm 1.4 S pro and 70-300. Both are god tier indeed. My 70-300 is very sharp, so lightweight, compact and very fun. The 50mm 1.4 is razor sharp and allows for full use of the S1R megapixels, cropping it is like I have a 50-150mm zoom.

@Iamtongue 10 ай бұрын

I’m curious to know your thoughts on the s pro 50mm f1.4. Not many people show good examples on KZfaq..

@bestinkamloops 10 ай бұрын

I’ve used the 50 1.4, and it takes stunning photos. It works well with video too.

@aiseurnae5976 10 ай бұрын

Awesome lens, this one and the 24-70mm S Pro are the best L moubt lenses from Lumix.

@Iamtongue 10 ай бұрын

@@bestinkamloops how’s the af with the new s5ii?

@bestinkamloops 10 ай бұрын

@@Iamtongue it seems to be working well for me. However I don’t have experience with Canon or Sony cameras to compare.

@about-africa3459 10 ай бұрын

All very understandable. For non-pros, I think the 20 60 for filming is great at the price.

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

The 20-60 is a solid kit lens; maybe I was a bit harsh 😳 it’s just the variable aperture for me, but for the price, it’s pretty damn good!

@philrodfilms 10 ай бұрын

Ever use the 14-28 macro? If so where would that go for you?

@gnosticone 8 ай бұрын

Watching you argue with yourself on this video was loads of fun!

@MicroFourNerds 10 ай бұрын

great list Josh! We are spoiled with a video over 10 mins! 🤣I

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

I may have to start doing more videos that last longer than 30 seconds 😭😂

@RhettThompsonFilm 10 ай бұрын

I literally just finished editing my new MFT lens tier list and now you come out with this! What are the odds?

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Great minds think alike 😳😂

@radimpalus 2 ай бұрын

Wow! You really shocked me with the ranking of the Sigma 14-24 DG DN lens - for me this is in the GOD TIER category, as it is optically one of the best wide angle zoom lenses ever made, and I have tried really many. And most lenses under 15mm have bulky front elements, so You can't use filters on most of them.

@randal8574 Ай бұрын

The 85mm 1.4 Sigma on my S5 is maybe my favorite lens I've ever used on any body (close second is the Voigtlander 17.5 f0.95 on my G9)

@leocasati 10 ай бұрын

great video Josh! Quick question, Lumix 24-105 vs Canon USM II 24-105, right now the canon has a better price and I have the MC21, should I go with lumix or save money and go with canon? There is a big difference between the lenses? thanks!

@lloydleonvision 7 ай бұрын

what did you decide? Im having the same thoughts

@leocasati 7 ай бұрын

@@lloydleonvision Canon, the Front element doesn't rotate. The AF works really good. Its not ultra sharp but for videos its okay

@lloydleonvision 7 ай бұрын

@@leocasati that's good to know. I have the MC21 as well, but I might just grab the Lumix. Keeping my eyes on these holiday sales

@leocasati 7 ай бұрын

@@lloydleonvision in my case, the variable nd and uv filters are very necessary for my work flow. Thats the only reason i decided for the canon 24-105 mkii

@MKethael 5 ай бұрын

Hi Josh, thanks for the video, really useful. I'd like to ask how kit 20-60 performs in direct comparison with sigma 28-70 2.8? Is there a huge difference in image quality and/or AF? I'm wondering if for a beginner photographer is it worth to pay additionally for sigma or if the kit lens will be good enough.

@user-VIVOROTEN 5 ай бұрын

Нет. Не стоит. 20-60 и так хорош!

@paulbvid 10 ай бұрын

This was fun🎉

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Hahaha thanks man! Hope you're good!

@larsarvidoma6207 7 ай бұрын

Hey! I have just got a used copy of this wonderful lens (Lumix 16-35 f4) from B&H, but I wonder: The front element wobble a little bit. Is it normal on this lens? Best regards from Norway.

@Stierenkloot 4 ай бұрын

I can’t choose between 24105 and 70300. Halp. I don’t want to switch lenses or carry several with me. I love zoom but then again sometimes I just need wide angle. Did I just answer my own question? I just love the 70300 so much man I instantly fell in love when I used it at CES last year

@deanisplemoni 10 ай бұрын

Now you've got me thinking of that 14mm 1.4...

@sourapye 3 ай бұрын

thanks bro,, and I can't wait for 28-200

@silli12 3 ай бұрын

@JoshCameron Where would you rank the recent 100mm 2.8 prime and the upcoming 28-200mm lumixes on this list?

@diegolnoriega 9 ай бұрын

Josh, can't put the 70/200. 2.8 so down on the tier, cmon. Is it Heavy?, of course, is it costly? sure. But that is a Once in a lifetime lense. For conferences, for concerts for anything you need on a tripod it's a beast. I miss on the Tier the 7artisans, would you suggest invest on Them? or on the Lumix prime? For video mainly. Coz I am looking for some prime Lenses. Thanks again. Love your Channel

@CurrenSheldon 5 ай бұрын

What software are you using to rank these? Love the idea.

@Stierenkloot 4 ай бұрын

Just a website. Easy to google

@harryvlogs7833 10 ай бұрын

Yeah I got my panasonic s5 mk1 with 20-60 and 50mm f1.8 for 1,749 from amazon brand new

@densista1160 4 ай бұрын

where would you put the new telephoto lens 28-200mm ?

@nickalot 15 күн бұрын

i love watching people being genuinely excited talking about things they love hahaha "no i'm locking it in. it's god tier for me! *bangs table*" hahaha

@JoshCameron 15 күн бұрын

😂thanks for watching dude! ✌🏻

@rickreyn9242 2 ай бұрын

Josh, going out to Utah and Colorado where the vistas are grand. I also need to keep my kit light for the flight. I have the S5MII. Should I use the 16-35mm 4.0 Pro or consider acquiring the 24mm 1.8?

@JoshCameron 2 ай бұрын

The 16-35 f4 is a much more versatile lens, and I don’t think you’ll be needing the low aperture unless you’re planning on shooting something different from the landscapes and scenery :) the 16-35 will do you just fine, but I’d also try to cover the closer range too in case you want to pick out details!

@rickreyn9242 2 ай бұрын

@@JoshCameron Thank you! I’ve had good luck with the 50mm for closer in. I’m just not wanting to carry the 24-105 all day. Enjoy your channel!!

@KingLeo-nf3bj 5 ай бұрын

Have you ever tried the Lumix s pro 50mm 1.4? I've so many great things about it. If its as good as ppl say ill get it for my Bday

@biskero 9 ай бұрын

looking for a full frame zoom lens for the BMPCC full frame 6k any suggestion?

@samiiromaar 10 ай бұрын

I have the PS 20-60mm, the PS 50mm f1.8 the PS 85mm f 1.8. I got really happy when my 85 went to fantastic 😂 I was about to cry since its my newest purchase. I think you should include a linger video with all possibilities, canon, sigma, Leica, etc. Maybe have a guest to help out.. you know who

@philcordes7068 9 ай бұрын

Is there any Lens hood for the panasonic 85mm 1.8? I cant find anything ecxept when im Searching for canon, but canon dont fit on panasonic i think

@wiehookerbii3925 8 ай бұрын

SIGMA 28-70mm F2.8 DG DN / SIGMA 24-70/2.8 ART DG DN Which one would you recommend for Panasonic S 5? as one lens for everything. I have a Panasonic 24mm f 1.8 and a 20-60 mm f 3.5-5.6 and I want to replace them with one of them. sorry translated by google translator

@thomaswhitaker7519 7 ай бұрын

Should try out the Laowa 58mm f2.8 2X. I have had mine about a month and absolutely LOOOOOVE it!

@JoshCameron 7 ай бұрын

I actually think I own this lens haha! Should have included it!

@thomaswhitaker7519 7 ай бұрын

@@JoshCameron Where would it slide into the list? You’ve really got my wanting that 18mm now!

@saab_9 8 ай бұрын

Which one is best for 4k 60 hz video shooting ?

@horusfenix8983 9 ай бұрын

If you could only get one, which zoom would you you choose between 70-300macro , 24-105 Macro, 70-200 2.8? 😅

@rohanpatil6168 10 ай бұрын

i go hiking with the pana s24-70 and the pana s pro 70-200 f2.8😅. its a really good exercise and you def. dont need any gym membership. you'll be ripped just by using tue 70-200 everywhere

@adamolejniczakProperPants 3 ай бұрын

Hi Josh. Is it normal with Lunix lenses, specially in 85 mm, that I can hear sone noise when auto focusing? Coming from sony and it was dead silent.

@Williamsandyking Ай бұрын

how about sigma 28-70 vs sigma 18-50 vs sigma 16-28 for the first lens to buy, which u recommend?

@filipmichalsaffray441 7 ай бұрын

Hey Josh, I have Probably used 4 of your God Tiers 35,50,70-300 I wants to but the 28-70 when I have thé founds ans the 18mm...

@welee8728 9 ай бұрын

I have a Panasonic G9 and a 50mm s.. What is the appropriate adapter for it? pleeeeeeeeeeeas heeeeelp meeeeee

@m-stat9 7 ай бұрын

I love my Sigma 24-70! 835g is still okay and for the money IT IS A GODTIER BEAST

@toyinosi 6 ай бұрын

Off topic, I'd hazard a guess you play MCOC. That compariosn tier system looks familiar. 😀

@tannerlocklear4332 5 ай бұрын

where can i get the 70-300 mm 4.5-5.6 lens??

@hitched_productions 8 ай бұрын

No Panny Pro 50mm f1.4 Josh? :)

@kennethgooswit3697 28 күн бұрын

What about the Sigma 24-70 2.8

@AstralasProduction 10 ай бұрын

For me, 24-105mm is a very good run'n'gun lens (sadly there are no f/2.8 options for it), also, I think you should test Sigma 100-400mm f/5-6.3

@JoshCameron 10 ай бұрын

Will see if I can grab that lens for testing! If they made a 24-105 f2.8 with O.I.S then it’s game over 😳

@denverdog7715 8 ай бұрын

What SD cards do you use?

@kentmemories 4 ай бұрын

I purchased 70-300mm because of your GOD tier review!.

@JoshCameron 4 ай бұрын

I hope you're enjoying it! Love that lens :)

@BikesAndBatallas 3 ай бұрын

@@JoshCameron I have the 70-300 (got it for 250 euros, which was insane and basically forced me to get it). I love the lens, but my use case currently is mostly making short videos about the Spanish civil war (riding around Spain on my Triumph), so I use the 18mm, 50mm, and 85mm quite a bit. I sometimes use the 20-60mm but not as much as I thought I would as changing out lenses on my RS3 gimbal is just so easy with the primes. I'll usually use the 18mm and the drone for some establishing shots (and the 18mm works well for peering out from bunkers and walking through trenches). Between the 18mm, drone, and 50mm I cover about 70% of what I shoot. When I'm with my kids I like to have the 20-60mm because who the hell knows what I'll need with them. But I always bring the 85mm 1.8 because the photos of them come out so wonderful. I'm really trying to work the 70-300 but I just don't have as much experience or imagination on how to use it for what I'm doing and here in the city (Madrid). I can see myself using it this summer at the beach for dolphin pods, sailboats, and fishing boats (or the kids playing in the wash from afar). But for my civil war stuff I just don't know.

@r.Koozie 10 ай бұрын

As one of my absolute favorite focal lengths, I’ve been deciding between 35mm lenses, mainly the Panasonic 1.8 and the Sigma 1.4 and 1.2. I have the Panasonic 24mm and 85mm and think that the S series lenses are really great, but the Sigma lenses are also great and the 1.4 is a bit brighter and in the same price bracket as the Panasonic. Would love to hear recommendations if anybody has experience with the three 35s and how they compare.

@jackmenzl7334 10 ай бұрын

Good Afternoon Koozie, I own the sigma 35 1.2, and it is one of my go to's for close up portraits. I switch between the 85 1.4 and 35 1.2 and I find that my clients are really impressed with how blown out the background is even with minimal compression on 35mm. The sharpness is also unparalleled. It is worth the extra money. Hope this helps! Jack

@r.Koozie 10 ай бұрын

@@jackmenzl7334 Thanks! In the end I will probably take your advice and go with the 1.2. Not only is it a faster lens and fantastic for photography, but from my research it seems to control focus breathing much better than the 1.4 version, and close to, if not on par with, the Panasonic when shooting video.

@anasrida3454 10 ай бұрын

I'd recommend against the sigma 35mm 1.4. Visible chromatic aberration, soft close up image quality and focusing is hit or miss. Wish I had bought the panny 35 1.8 instead.

@r.Koozie 10 ай бұрын

@@anasrida3454 Good to know, thanks!

@Motive-action 8 ай бұрын

8:46 its no the SH1 markt II 🤔🤔🤔🤫🤫? Hahahahah good video

@GoatProjectMedia 9 ай бұрын

Crushed between the 70-200 f4 & 70-300 by Panasonic

@garreswe 10 ай бұрын

You know, you should also rank the lenses within each tier 🙂

@slopoke2007petey Ай бұрын

why not the 24-70 panasonic

@firehorseweddingphotograph3995 10 ай бұрын

Sigma 16-28 + 28-70, Lumix 70-200 f4, Leica 24-90, all ‘Fantastic’ and every day lenses for me. The 24-90 would be ‘God’ if it was either smaller & lighter, or f2.8 constant aperture (because both might be asking too much!). If I had to pick just one and done, Sigma 28-70 and waiting for a 70-180 to replace both the Leica and the Lumix 70-200 on size & weight.

@game2572 5 ай бұрын

I got the 50 1.8 for $50 when I bought the S5ii

@Keilikeramen 5 ай бұрын

I follow your god tier all the way 50/28-70 sigma/20-60/85 sigma but for wideangle still debate 18 and 16-28 sigma which one to choose

10 ай бұрын

Thank you so much for the vídeo. But, i change my bag if i could, becouse today the most important thing is weith. Love hike, so. i put two lenses in my back pack. The 18mm because is light, good, and you can do excelent night sky photos. the second will be the 24-105 f4 and thats all. Nothing more. I have nikon camras too and i miss so much this focal lens 24-120mm. It is sooo good you go further than 105mm anyway... I prefer almost everything in Panasonic. Colors, dynamic range... video. One more lens stay with me, but not for hike, but for landscape photos. it is the 100-400mm from sigma. versátil lens. well. Sorry about my english. From Brazil 😅. thanks

@jmthefilmmaker 7 ай бұрын

my favourite sigma 105 2.8 macro isn't in this list

@UriRa 10 ай бұрын

Frankly inferior zooms from f4 should be at the bottom, not at the top of the table. With a variable focal length, only 150-600 dg dn os sport makes sense, the rest are better with a fixed focal length, including manual ones, like laowa 12 f2.8 or 90 f2.8, which will give more than plastic from sigma or panasonic. Although sigma 85, 35, 20 with f1.4 are quite good....

@TheNairbr 10 ай бұрын

I have the 70-200 f2.8 and I hardly ever use it purely because of the weight. Pretty much to the point if you travel internationally with it, you are going to be hit with excess baggage. The 70-300 looks like better value to quality ratio.

@aiseurnae5976 10 ай бұрын

Image quality is not as good (I had both), the local contrast is much better on the 70-200mm. But the size and weight are a real problem.