To try to make more cubes than gan and have a easier and more understandable naming system than gan

I think they meant to say "try more to turn our cube"

Elaborated, TryMore wanted to be try turning anything more

It's about trying more so you get good at that thing

they should try more

LOL IT'S THE REAL ONE!

I'm afraid these mistakes in communication will make the promotion in the future much harder. So far this video has almost 100K views, and yet less than 10 clicks on this comment. 99.99% of people did not receive this explanation.

Ayo they responded

Send them again and ask Jperm to make another video… or u just got urself fired lmao

SHEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESH actual moretry company yt channel

Well I was doing maths

Same lol

@@saptarshidey9153 Im sick so I just decided to watch something. Math is amazing in my opinion

@@wolfyworthley3355 i love maths too👍

Same

thats so confusing ! why call that maglev at all

@@mxBug "MagLev is a buzzword now.

@@mxBug mag levn't

@@mxBug Actually we didn't call it maglev, we call it triple magnetic, two sets of attracting magnets and a set of repulsing magnets

So thats like the Qiyi Valk?

@Nerdy Cuber ._.

Bro playing Fortnite

@@maryannfeguro6167 it’s the same for most games

hypixel skyblock rarity too

Lol

Hi

True. I still like it though, which I can't say about most "new" things they put in cubes 😂

There’s no spring noise Lol

@@aafragz3746 Some people complain about Magnet Noise.

@@thesphyrth there isn’t a noise tho?

@@aafragz3746 It doesn't have to exist in your cube to say Magnet Noise doesn't. Take my RS3M 20 for example. The spring noise for some reason fixed itself after lubing it for the first time... never heard it again. The people complaining about Magnet Noise are also saying that it's more annoying than Spring Noise.

This is smart and stupid at the same time

why tf would they make a sample version thats different??? shouldn't the sample be something to gain a 'taste' of what you're actually gonna buy?

They are samples they sent to cubers for feedback. Based on the feedback they are making changes. They also didn’t have instructions in the samples because they weren’t printed yet. Final product will be different.

@@adityas9377 samples are for the users to try the real thing. test products are for experimenting and improving

Same but my pb is 17.76 How long have u been cubing

Yeah he's a really good teacher ☺️ my PB is 15.96 now because of him (Ignore my profile pic it's not me)

yo i just got a new pb of 22.07 lol

@@ediegodiddy5784 Lol noice!!

@@marialexos I have been cubing for the past 3 years but, did not learn F2L for 2 years so that is why i have a little increaed time of solving cube

A lot of people wont get this reference lol

@@incinezard3466 x perm and dab perm

That was 3 years ago lol

And this: #savethebananaduck

Hey man if you're looking to get sub 30 watch how to be sub 20 and start practicing what he says you need

he has tutorials of sub x you can go watch them

Learn good finger tricks early on!

Hey j perm

@@JPerm ratio

Yeah that's interesting! Maybe they just don't sell well enough to justify taking risks. I'd love a maglev 6x6... anything to make that thing faster

@@JPerm I'd imagine that GAN being one of the more innovative companies has something in development, but given how badly the 460 flopped since it sucked they are probably taking a lot of time with it. In terms of other companies Moyu already has the best 4x4s and they are doing maglev so a maglev 4x4 shouldn't be too far off. Aosu Maglev 2022 WR M? (6 word name I love it lmao)

@@PyrusnVentus the 460didn’t flop, it’s bad but a lot of people use it (which I don’t understand). it was their first attempt and creating a 4 by 4.

@@aafragz3746 Flop is probably a bad word, but given their status atop 3x3s as being very premium and top quality for the 460 to not come up as a recommendation from most cubers is definitely a failure.

The biggest problem is space constraint. The middle layer of an even cube is a T shape, not a big rectangle like a 3x3 (and at least bigger odd cubes have a bit of rectangular space around the screw for you to do something, in particular the MGC5's one is pretty good). But for an even cube, finding space to insert 2 big flat metal discs, or cutting out an internal cylindrical cup from the stem of the T shape is a problem. Thickening the stem of the T shape would mean less space for the outer 2 layers to hook under, making the cube less stable. I thought about cutting up the stem portion to repurpose part of the stem for dual adjsutment, to avoid the need for a "double wall", but that requires detaching the center piece from the core, and it simply won't work because of how the XB allignement mechanism works. The center piece is made of a circle and a square, and the circle cannot move. This means that you need the center to descend all the way to the core and attach to the core. I ended up creating my own allignment mech to get around the limitations of XB and Eashsheen, not requiring the center piece to have a bump on top that links all the way down to the core, yet still allowing the corners to descend deep into the cube (something Eastsheen couldn't do. They put a big block in the core to asymmetrically hook the second layer. As a plus, the centers can detach from the core and the mechanism would still work, allowing for Yuexiao-style designs. But as a minus, it meant that the outer layer has to be shallow or else it will clash with the internal block). Unfortunately 3D printing precision isn't good enough for the 2 halves of the dual adjustment mech to fit perfectly, and the material has so much friction the dual adjsutment mech dosen't turn, and it would cost another huge sum of money to make another prototype. Would probably need to hired as a designer and have asses to injection molding to fully publish my design. However, the allignemnt mech works, and the middle layer of 3D printed 4x4 dosen't misallign. I think the Gan 460's allignment mech also works in a similar way, but it imposes it's own design restricitons that my 4x4 also somewhat avoided. Magnet adjustment systems however, are not even embedded in the internal mechanism, but exists in the external parts, so technically it should be extremely easy for a company to create magnet adjustable 4x4s. Given Moyu's resources, they can simply copy-paste the Aosu WR, GTS2 or Meilong 4x4 mechanism, but modify one of the edge halves to accomodate the Yuexiao EDM magnet switches on both sides. The magnet switches only need to be off-centered due to the double magnets of the inner layer, but it's not big off a deal. Plus that actually allows the user to adjust the inner and outer magnets independently of each other, allowing for choices like "equal inners and outers" and "slightly stronger inners", therefore satisfying both people who want more control in the 3x3 stage, and people who want a more consistent feeling cube. As for mods, a core-mag Aochuang WR hand mod isn't hard to do (I did it and it made the cube a lot more stable, also have an Aoshi GTS version of the mod). But Gan probably has the rights to do it, so if Moyu to produced an official version, it would look like obvious copying.

You're just not trying hard enough. You need to moretry

@@JPerm Could you do an 800K Q and A?

The quietest ones are tenyun v1 and tornado v2. They are almost the same. Get the one you like

Ask z3cubing to make the quietest cube. He has lots of spare time ☺

@Qwery Actually by this time i did. When i commented no. I commented this cause jperm mentioned the stronger magnets thing, and that makes moretry look bad. So i think would be better to get a review with the newer ones. Also i think the half-maglev is a miss translattion, actually in other videos is "triple system" and i think is cause it has magnets ilike the valk elite, but not in the inside of the center, they are in the exterior

@@s.kishore3441 Its actually my PB

Great scramble

7.35, decent time😐

BRO WHAT sorry for responding but actually though no cap?

1.its called a rubiks cube 2. you dont need a tutorial on scrambling the cube, when you become faster and lean more advanced finger tricks it will just come naturally

Just practice and do a lot of solves. Learning algorithms makes it easier although there are barely any algs for b moves

@@marovic78 done all of those and I am still not satisfied with my scrambling, sometime I can solve the cube faster than I scramble it..

yes actually j perm has lots of videos on move notation(the pattern to follow) and finger tricks(so you turn better) and also which fingers to use for which moves in his tutorial of how to solve a rubiks cube in 10 min vid i think. if not, reply to me and i will figure out the videos you should watch

Typically speaking a scramble only needs 10-15 moves, and there are some softwares that allow computer generated algorithms, tho it might take longer than just scrambling randomly

Practice look ahead bro

You could try learning some very simple OLLs and PLLs apart from the 2 look OLL and PLLs

My PB is 16.66

Doing F2L 2-look OLL and 2-look PLL (except for 2 extra PLL algorithms that I learnt) my PB is 15.81s. Just wait a while and practice. Your opportunity will come.

@@port9426 I have learned 3 or 4 OLLs and once I got them mastered is when I got the 21

I think it's just that the pandemic, along with his stint as a slave laborer last month at speedcubeshop, has completed his descent into insanity. 😅

@@blindleader42 Lol