I love her lingerie.

Ros from Monsters Inc.

I thought I was the only one crushing on Judge Webster's glasses & Judge Boyd's purses! I wish we could see their SHOES, you know they are stylish, too!

Yes.

@@missvegasablereally? It’s speeding not a murder. He is awesome and he’s so cute.

He is truly a consummate professional but I doubt he's much fun at parties LOL.

@@ScottDLR We don't know if he is a legal geek in the court and a freak at the party. Some people really changes in a professional environment.

You are just stupid. He gave it a shot. No big deal

Yes just silly

Yeah "pro se fail" is kinda clickbait. There's "guy who just wants to argue" and then there's someone actually trying to mount a pro se defense. This is not the second one.

I suspect 90 days from now he will claim he never got anything in the mail so he didn't have to pay.

He's great.

He’s going to be a fantastic judge.

I want to believe that beneath Mr Regier's buttoned-up exterior there is a personality seething with volcanic passion.

Reiner is, without a shadow of a doubt, on the autism spectrum. He reminds me so much of my 9 year old in a lot of ways. There are differences as well, but he totally is ASD. I describe my kiddo as, a 9 year old version of Sheldon 😂

@@morganstrickland0924grow up

"Furthermore the video doesn't show its me because I stopped the video from playing. Yep, that's a solid defense." In a court of law it is in FACT a solid defense. It was then up to the PROSECUTOR to play the smoking gun part of the video.....which he failed to do.

Actually, yeah, I’d say it’s pretty solid. I’m absolutely not convinced the officers got the right guy.

Lol rael the cop testifying is the one who matters, not the video.

@@ragepig1059 This guy was railroaded. They had no proof he was the one the officer observed speeding. This was mistaken identity.

@@rael5469 He didn't need to show the video. The guy was found guilty regardless and the prosecutor knew with almost 100% certainty that he didn't need to bother with the video. The important part was the speed radar, on which the prosecutor laid a good deal of emphasis. The defendant should have tried to attack that. If that evidence could have had doubt cast on it "beyond a reasonable doubt" then the case would have gone the other way. But Pro Se defendants really don't know what evidence to focus on, or how to do it effectively. That's why they typically lose. This guy probably told his mates in a bar that he got stopped for speeding, and they loaded him up with bad advice which proved to be worth precisely what he paid for it - nothing.

pretty much.

The cop didn't pull him over while he was speeding, so he wasn't speeding, apparently.

"Wait a minute. Did this guy argue that the stop was invalid because the cop waited until it was safer to pull him over? " No.....defendant argued that the only proof the officer provided only shows empty highway on his dash cam, NOT the defendant's car. He might have mistaken some OTHER Chrysler 300 for the defendant's car which he encountered at the traffic light. Chrysler 300s are very popular and very numerous.

@@DHSpeedWalker "The cop didn't pull him over while he was speeding, so he wasn't speeding, apparently." It's a pretty good argument. There are LOTs of Chrysler 300s out there.

@@rael5469 maybe. But more than likely he was speeding and he got caught. Not everything is a conspiracy.

Right he was just at a stop light lol…. Guilty

I’ve heard this before and it makes me laugh too!

you make a point.

His therapist will be dealing with that for months 😂

WTF? 😂 Can you please post the link to the video?

It was funny. Saw it on another KZfaq streamer.

😂😂😂😂😂 True

@@justinafuchs2619I think it is in Law Talk With Mike.

He is a machine.

did you see his drug balloon up the butt testimony?🤣🤣

Beep beep boop boop

This man has secrets.. Dark.. Dark.. Secrets ☠

Yea - he glitched when he had to say “anal cavity” the other day

Representing Fools Worldwide Unlimited, we don't recognize this one as one of ours, way past our purview.

@@MalakianM2S heh heh... Actually, for something as simple as a traffic ticket I have, and will continue, to represent myself. It is more in the hope the LEO chooses to not come to court on his.her day off so I win the case by default. Were the LEO to show up I would likely just plead guilty and get it over with, as frankly I have never been uplled over when it was not deserved. I won'r speak an untruth in court, but I am fine playing the "LEO may not show" game.

Similar argument to: "If I make it home to my driveway when you're chasing me for 20 minutes, you're not really pulling me over and I didn't do anything wrong." ;-)

You may be crazy, but not on this position. Judge Webster is great.

A little crazy goes a long way. 😊

I like her alot

I concur

He made a closing statement? Did you mean not cross examining the defendant's testimony? Because that's 100% true.

And his license will be suspended.

I always say, it's realistically impossible for anyone to know what they don't know.

Donald Rumsfeld said, "There are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we do not know we don't know." Heh. @@LoneWolfUsul

Good catch. ....and not allowed in court.

He knows what he did, he seems like a cheap skate that doesn’t want to part from a penny. Pay your fines deadbeat.

He is just a mess to waste time on this. Court time shouldn’t be used for lying speeder’s.

Exactly. Far from proof of guilt.

"He didn't want to see the entire video yet claims that all it shows is highway. " But wait.....all the video showed that was played in court WAS empty highway. So what are you saying? How does empty highway prove defendant was speeding? Think about the judges instructions in detail.

Yeah, the video convinced me the officer has no way of knowing whether he got the right car.

Lol rael should go pro se, along with his sock beaudure that he comes in and replies to himself with just to try to astroturf this dum monkey man's case. Probably the guy or a relative 🤣🤣

@@rael5469 did you not hear the video was over 12 minutes in length? Defendant stopped it 2 minutes in. why didn't he watch the entire 12 minute video that he REQUESTED?

@@paulmiddleton4215 Are you saying that the defendant lied under oath? Lying in the court room can get you a charge of contempt of court or perjury. He might have done that but I'm not sure as of this reply.

Yep, I saw that one. You can't win if you don't have photographs or video and, as she demonstrated, maybe not even then.

Indeed; in that case, Judge Webster clearly demonstrated what was only alluded to in most of the others-that she doesn’t actually care, even a little bit, about any testimony that doesn’t come from the officers. The defendant in that case showed evidence that the officer was in the wrong, and the officer’s only evidence was his word. Judge Webster didn’t care about the truth until that officer recanted his own sworn testimony.

I would take more weight from an officers testimony too, they are professionals with their careers on the line if they lie and get found out. They were definitely sober and do this every day they know what they are talking about. Members of the public have every reason to lie and obfuscate and most Police are very honest, that is why corrupt Police officers are so damaging.

@@oqlus what evidence did the defendant provide?... Oh the video he got bored of and dismissed lmao.

@@ericconnor8419 You wont understand unless you've watched the video. The evidence clearly showed the officer was lying. And the officer ended up realizing how bad it looked and changed his statement at the last second which made the judge change her ruling. She literally ruled against the defendant and then ruled in favor of the defendant 5 minutes later.

Yea... it's rare to see a lamen out-class a sov-cit, aint it. lol

He knows what he did just like a sovcitiot.

Thank you for sharing. I'm having a whisky. 🍻

A traffic member? Ok

Thank you. He muffed it by not playing the incriminating part of the dash cam.

I was thinking he looks constipated and in pain from it, poor guy! 3:45

Here you go: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/m52PiZel1b2Rdpc.html

Right what a waste of courts time, when your guilty.

Don’t forget “these ain’t my pants ”

I believe she said he was free to NOT testify and his refusal to testify wouldn't be held against him.

Also, Miranda is Federal, which has precedence over State.

That is an insult to garages everywhere.

You answered your own question with the word “games”. Arrested development.

Exactly. However he made a good point that the video only showed empty highway.

And The Atom. He's a decent super-hero actor.

What a disgusting remark

@@stacyscott4621 lol hardly

@@lilmsgsyes it was disgusting , did she put you in jail? Sounds like it

@@MarySmith-bc7mf lol, no

Only a fool would hire an attorney to contest a $248 traffic citation.