Thank you so much for the testicular blur.

Will the unedited version be on pornhub? American Hacker upskit interview

I Iiterraly laughed when the nut blur was added.

The blurring makes this way more comical. Friggin love deviant glad he's been on in range off an on, and ya know I've had a lot of giggles just from this q&a and the malfunctioning pants. Lol

This video gave the word "Flash-Hider" a new meaning.

I had this feeling during the entirety of part 1, that Shorts was not necessarily a smart idea, and that it was very likely to go wrong.

+100 points for the LockPickingLawyer shoutout

If you play the game of shorts, you either win or you become... Karl?

This became a japanese adult film for a bit there

Dev's social awareness and willingness to speak up among friends, which is harder to do than just yelling at random strangers, is so-fucking-appreciated. Caught the uncomfortable look in the first video but thought maybe I was reading too much into it.

For a guy with no kids,he sure has no problem showing off the boys..

@ 5:15 crash carts aren't locked. When a patient is coding, nobody trusts any form of lock.

Whoever edited this video, must have looked at Deviants crotch for thirty minutes straight. I respect that! Edit: More like ninety minutes. Three episodes, each about thirty minutes long... R.I.P

Love the intermittent blurring of deviants smaller 🧠. Also that it took James like 45 minutes to finally fix his chair arm. Great stuff guys!

Just noticed the pixelation. Might be best Q/A ever, and I'm barely 2 minutes in

Finally we know what to short shorts looks like. James is always operating on the bleeding edge of decency laws and I respect the hell out of him for it.

Based on the Ian interview with Ken Hackathorn (not sure about the spelling on the top of my head) - M1 carbines issues entirely are based on magazine issues. If someone made a great mag for the gun, it might run better.

Simplex locked safes/cabinets like shotlock are the best compromise in my bool, so glad it came up.

3:15 what was that mosaic censoring? are you really depriving your audience of Deviant Ollam's chicken skin? LMAO

My eyes are burning. Y'all need shorter shorts.

LOVE this format

"Biometrics is a username not a password" that's really deep.

Poor Sarah Noir! :)

glad I found this guy from your channel. seems like a really smart dude has a lot of cool stuff on his page

First part got me by surprise Now I am prepared Got some cherry ale

Damn that is one hell of a star studded cast for this one.

Nice to see Deviant and TFB here too.

Really happy I was just listening to this so I didn't get to see the crotch shot. On another note I'm really liking the special guests format of Q&A. James and Deviant both provide unique perspectives and are good for a laugh. I think you should do this quarterly with different guests.

There are still small firearm safes, more quick access boxes, using simplex locks. LuckyGunner has a good video on it.

This is epic guys!

Combined arms trolling by the background noise. 10/10 bes Q&A ever

M-1 .30 carbine with rimless ammo, was a replacement for pistols. Most soldiers could not use the 1911 because of a lack of training and accuracy. The .30 [ 7.62mm x 33mm] carbine was possibly one of the earliest PDW, self defence weapon. .30 calibre was as powerful as a .45 Colt Auto and had longer range. And was much easier to train people to shoot accurately because 1911 pistols had to much muzzle climb, recoil and short sights. Carbine was designed to be light and was generally preferred to the Thompson due to light weight. And less climb with recoil. The carbine barrel was more in line with the shoulder. And the M-1 stock gave it more stability. Most pistols push barrels up when recoiling due to alignment difference with the hand grip. This can be demonstrated with the Kriss .45 submachine gun which lines up the barrel and pistol grip and the AR-15. The .30 carbine ammo is a little shorter than .300 Blackout but could be less powerful than 300BO due to chamber pressure. The main reliability problem for the M-1 carbine was flimsy magazines. Many are now old and may have cheap parts. The .45 Thompson also had more muzzle climb with full auto. So the M1 carbine was more manageable for poorly trained soldiers. The .30 carbine was not a main section weapon combat weapon. It was PDW defence for specialists that had other gear to carry and were not in the front line. Such as radio operators, , officers, NCOs, LMG and mortar crew. . The 30 carbine was popular for its light weight and ease of use. New carbines with new magazines were more reliable. They we mass produced for wartime issue. Long term service life was not a major factor. The carbine was also much cheaper than the .45 Thomson SMG. The carbine was not an alternative for the much more powerful Garand battle rifle. Making an M-1 carbine in .30 06 rem was pointless. The Garand was already available in that calibre. The Garand could have a shorter barrel for a heavy carbine version but would have been to heavy for its PDW role. Garand and M-1 .30 carbine had some common features. A better option for a battle rifle would have been a Garand with a 20 round removable magazine. Also a .280 calibre could have been a better option for Garand's but MacArthur wanted a full sized .30 06, full calibre battle rifle and not an intermediate .280 type of ammunition with less weight and recoil. The Garand with .30 06 also matched ammo with Browning BARs and Browning .30 06 light machine guns. So it was more practical with ammo. So the US army went into WW2 and Korea with an intermediate calibre rifle and replaceable magazines. There may have been an idea the M-1 carbine ammo could have come standard in a disposable magazine. Plenty of magazine were supplied but probably not enough for them to be completely deposable. Using old M-1 carbines now does not fairly match new WW2 M-1 carbines with new springs and new magazines. With larger intermediate ammunition, more strength, pistol grip and full auto option, the m-1 carbine would have had most of the features of an assault rifle which would have been usable for front line infantry. And probably a lighter, more accurate, cheaper and better replacement for the Thompson .45 SMG with less weight and muzzle climb. There was no practical need for a 30 06 rifle using the .30 carbine system. The post war M-2 carbine could have had better and larger 30 round magazines, intermediate ammo, full auto option and pistol grip. It could have bee an assault rifle. The Browning .30 06 LMG was also much cheaper than Thompsons. The M-14 would have been a better option for a Garand. Due to pre war features of the Garand did not suit WW2 battle conditions as well as it could have with replaceable 20-30 round magazines. The post war M-14 was meant to replace SMGs, LMGs, PDWs and carbines but was a poor compromise. The small ammo of the AR-15 assault rifle was more powerful because it could fire high pressure ammunition at higher velocities. So it was more deadly and accurate than M-1 .30 ammo. .High pressure 300 Blackout ammunition could have been a better combat round for a stronger built M-1 carbine. Or a M-1 carbine with longer cartridge. The M-1 carbine was excellent for its PDW purpose. And some frontline troops liked to use it instead of the Garrand,1911 and Thompson.

I hear the problem with M1 carbine reliability is that it requires lots of oil and fresh magazines, The magazines where considered disposable, that the G.I.s would throw out their mags as soon as a new supply of mags were available

Honestly I never noticed the first time I saw the vid but after someone mentioned it in the third vid. I came back and can't not unsee it.....I found myself watching to see when the blur came up...so lol? and ewe?....rofl. I do feel sorry for Karl having to edit that. :D

I am with you guys. Forget the electronic locking mechs. They fail, they fail hard, and many don't have access to the battery from the outside. Dial safes usually start failing and you can tell by the mechanism starting to stick or even be off the set numbers [sloppy], giving you warning, AND its easier to fix because you can still get into the safe to fix it instead of having to drill it out.

As for improving an M-1 Garand... Tanker model with synthetic stock! Lighter than you would imagine it to be and if you have one with a properly bent Op rod, totally reliable.

My father had a 30 carbine every time I shot it, it never had any problems other than sending the bolt home with a magazine when inserted which was kind of a convenient malfunction. Had about a 12-in spread at 200 yd. probably wasn't the most lethal at that range but could probably cause a decent boo boo. From what I've heard about m1 carbine the biggest issue with reliability is the springs and weather they have been replaced or not.

Why is that one part of the screen in lower resolution?..... OH, nevermind.

Could you post a link to the other guy's channels? They seem pretty cool and I'd like to check them out.

France suppressors are over the counter so if you have an innovative suppressor design you should market it here.

I couldn't pay attention to what was being said. I was too busy laughing at the blurred balls

Ok, here's my big scary story about flying with guns, condensed as much as possible: We got bumped from a flight. Maintenance issues forced them to use a smaller plane. We missed our connection. It took 2 hours to get rebooked, then 4 hours of waiting for the new flight, and there was no way to get to our destination. The closest they could get us was 300 miles away, many hours later than planned, and then we drove 5 hours to our destination. We arrived at our destination 12+ hours behind schedule. The WORST PART? They shipped our checked bags on our original flight, to our original destination, on time. Yes, including my gun case with 48 pounds of guns and ammo. Solution? Call my Mom, ask her to go to the airport, and get my guns. "In can't get past security without a ticket!" Actually, baggage claim is outside of security. "They won't let me take your gun case!" Please Mom, just try, ok? You live 20 minutes from the airport. SHE LITERALLY WALKED IN, GRABBED MY GUN CASE OFF THE CAROUSEL, AND WALKED OUT WITH IT! Yes, seriously. No, it wasn't even supposed to be on the carousel in the first place. Nobody was watching, nobody said anything, nobody stopped her, there were no security precautions at all. And that's the story of how my Mom saved my guns by stealing them from an airport.

"Occupied California". That's a name I will use for the foreseeable. Thank you, Karl

Best Q&A to date!

Electronic lockboxes and safes are way faster in the dark. I have mech lock boxes too and if you over turn a dial in the dark, boom, gotta get a flashlight out.

In regards to EMP: be more worried about the nuke part of it since the country on the receiving end of the pulse might not know their opponent's intent and respond with all-out retaliation to a detected launch

The fratboy has cute legs but i prefer Ians brain.

James reattaching that chair arm scratched an itch in my brain.

15:02 is the best facial expression we have ever seen out of Karl

We are getting close to the last supper of gun videos.

At first I noticed and then looked away then when I saw the blur OMG funny as shit. God speed.

V-line safes are also simplex locks and available on amazon. I like them. You can mount to your desk. Bed. Car. Etc. Simplex locks also can be opened in complete darkness. No battery. Easy to retry a failed combo. Good enough for kids. Get the big box big enough for your bedside pistol AND CCW pistol. If you are leaving for awhile stick your guns in the “real” safe.

Did deviant make you sign a three episode contract?

Look at a self-winding watch type mechanism for recharging optics. That would recharge when you moved, instead of only when you shoot.

That piexelization was InJunktive Relief

Rhino gun safes have S&G mechanical locks either by default or as an option.

I dunno about flying, but here in Canada as long as it's non restricted you can ship whatever firearm right to the recipients door. You should of course try to make sure they are someone who can own firearms, but that's basically just an email with the PAL in it or just simply the number for purchasing from any licensed retailer. You also can't put any marking on the shipping box that say it's a gun so the post man is oblivious. Only people who know are the X-ray guys at the mail centers. Shipped off a 1960s K31 in a cardboard box just last Friday.

woooh dude. Put the mouse...back in the house.

i have had good luck with m1's unless they had iver johnson stamped on them then they made good paper weights or door stops

28:41 I'd love to see a "Modernised m1 project" à la WWSD, on InRange.

Supressors do allow you to shoot further, although that only really comes into the discussion when you're shooting out to a mile.

As far as I know, Zanotti Armor (modular safes for people who move around a lot) ONLY uses mechanical locks. Specifically La Gard, due to metal internals. I've got one purchased in 2014, when I was active, that has one of the La Gard locks.

RFID is the only electronic method I'd even consider and only for long term storage. I do agree that mechanical is the most reliable method and my safe is an old school combination safe. I prefer to effectively hide firearms to which I may need ready accessibility.

I like the idea of a NFC lockbox (With a back up dial, thumb, or pin code) with a NFC code on a ring, better if it's a wedding ring as you don't take it off much. Then you just grab the handle and turn and it unlocks automatically but no NFC ring present and it's secured.

The Mythbusters managed to defeat a fingerprint reader using a transparency printer, circuit board etching and some ballistic gel.

The blur lmao

I think that if suppressor technology advanced and they could be quieter, smaller, lighter, not heat up as much, or different attachment solutions, they could be a game changer.

Howdy Karl, I did not know that Cheech and Chong had adult kids that were into guns.

0:03 someone please make this into a meme

I have an m1 carbine with an OG WW2 15 round mag and a 60's era 30 rounder... the 15 rounder tended to jam the gun up at least once every 10 rounds, while the 30 rounder was considerably more reliable... i recently replaced the main spring in the bolt and i actually havent had a single malfunction throughout at least 400 round when i use the 30 round magazine, and only a couple with my 15, which has a worn out spring anyway. TLDR: if your m1 carbine isnt working good find some quality magazines and check your springy bits.

The FedEx thing. The law, USC922(e) FYI, says they cannot "require or cause" anything to indicate there is a gun in a package/luggage. They're reading it as they are causing a package to be shipped with an indication. I'd much rather them be that uptight about it. I've had to correct a few airlines on this while flying because they wanted to tape the firearm card you fill out to the outside of my gun case. www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/922

your goal with bringing a manual gun to a match, try not to be last

The M1 carbine problems are caused by shitty original magazines.

6:55 Shout out to the LockPickingLawyer!

The best part about this video is you know some poor sole had too look at a nutsack trying to figure out how many frames the censored part needed to be there lol

wait I got a get my beer. . . ok

I disagree on the not shooting better with suppression thing. I actually do shoot better with a suppressed rifle in particular.

20:00 actually fedex has a blanket policy that we wont ship anything that says that it has a gun in it. I work with fedex ground and have had to rts packages because we could tell they were guns.

I just stared at the pixels :)

Y'all should have just put a black square over Deviant's lower half. The back and forth blur, plus those pasty legs make for strange viewing.

For the traveling lock question Eric from IV8888 had his cases just zip tied and he made some good banter after seeing what they did

Just noticed his moose knuckle is censored!

I think I witnessed the internet break, TWO REEVES???

Karl I will gladly help that poor man solve the crisis of backlogged lock cutting

Thermal Defense Solutions silencers!!!!!!! Check them out!!!

Deviant! PUT ON SOME DAMN PANTS!!!

InRange the TMI edition

I thought we didn't believed in censorship 😜

Ollam's Olives

I guess there's a reason they call him Deviant.

Trying to take a guy seriously on technical comparisons is trickier than I expected when there's a blur over his nuts. I can't be sure that it's less difficult than without the blur, but I'm going to minimize and just listen anyway.

M1 carbine should have been in 30 or 35 Remington instead of 30 carbine

24:53 You're serious about that offer?

M1 Carbine? Why the hell not put .30 through the Grease Gun platform? That's pretty reliable and it's got more firepower for the same recoil. Add a couple inches of barrel, and give it better sights and you're good to go. It's more compact than the Carbine. And cheaper. And box mags like the m3 pattern were reliable to base a .30 carbine version on (the M1 mags were it's reliability weakpoint). Then again why not chamber the M1 in .357 magnum and pair it with revolvers. In all seriousness. The 357 was around back then, and it's accurate enough. But a "utterly reliable" gun to issue to people? Seriously an M1 Garand model with an extended clip and internals to carry it. Maybe 12 shots. And a faster loading mechanism, probably a bolt hold open that will snap over the rounds when depressed, but not fly into battery until manually released. No garand thumb means faster reloading, you slam it in and press a button in one smooth motion. ...Extending the ammo capacity while still using clips (not mags) would've been a major improvement. Simple and reliable. And practically doubles the effectiveness of the weapon for combat encounters, if a soldier is expending 3-6 rounds per attack. If you fire 5 or 6 then yes you are still loaded, but the gun is practically bolt action now if you are Required to fire. With even a few more rounds to the capacity you can resolve Two attacks, or attack and counterattack, and the soldier has more flexibility to choose when they are going to expose themselves for a reload.

Peltier devices on ALL THE SUPRESSORS

James always makes it dirty....in a good way

23:28 hahaha

Balls.

Still looking for Deviant's chrome. How is he a cyborg?

nice blur