Firstly, the small window of time between murders and jumping in limo was ridiculously tight. When Park saw dark figure walk in house with AJ walking out 5 minutes later without sweet and looking clean. The was no blood evidence on gloves belonging to OJ but the nanogram marked in wrist area which was confirmed as cross contamination due to spillage of one of OJ’s blood vials. It was obvious detectives attempted to sweeten the case, which actually blew up in their faces. Too much of the dna evidence was dodgy. If you watched whole trial you’d know why jury found him not guilty.

​@@Will-nb8qk it's just easier to call you stupid

Thank Mark Furhman

​@@Will-nb8qkbecause the law protects people from forced lie detector tests.

@@sfullernj Of course it is. Superficial and one dimensional minds can’t cope with combinations of words.

No she didn't. There was no proof

Yes no proof even until now rip legend

Go make peace with your God, your rotten soul may need it!

@@Lin.Stone. Yea nothing says innocent like running from the police.

​@@jaymass1178Running from the police? People can walk faster than that slow speed chase.

It’s true but since then the hood still the hood and they didn’t get any better letting a murderer off. Here’s the kicker. Oj considered himself better than black people. He didn’t even consider himself a black man. He exploited an easily manipulated populous of people into getting him out of a double murder. She is lying. She feels guilt over the verdict. Especially after the civil suit, and the tell all book “if I had done it” with info only the killer would know. He also has a mental break which is why there was this mysterious other person present during the killings.

That’s speculation and speculation isn’t proof .

@@gts3004 Thirty years later, she still thinks he’s innocent. That’s only because they are the same race. I would have given her the benefit of the doubt if 30 years later she had a chance to redo then she should say he’s guilty.

@@AustindGreenwhy would she change her mind? OJ didn’t do it.

The jury had reasonable doubt based on the racist history and corruption of the LAPD and the overall incompetence of the Prosecution team in putting forward the racist Mark Furman and the gloves which didn't fit.

Wow

Jurors name please. Also, was that the sentiment of the two white jurors who also voted “not guilty”? Were they trying strike a blow to the man, in honor of Rodney King?

The real question is payback to who? Are people really that dense?

​@@dakotaflower5926 to what people call "the man", black people feel the entire system is rigged against them, before the 90s. Then Rodney King happened and was fresh in people's minds. One of the jurors even gave the raised fist as the verdict was being read, OJ half heartedly responds to it by raising his hand when he sees it, look at the video...

​@@dakotaflower5926 just white people in general. Just naked racism toward whites. They just straight-up think it's okay to kill white people.

What about the framing of O.J. by the racits cop Mark Furman?👿☠

@@lindawilliams8715 Never happened. Simpson's house had Nicole and Ron's blood all over it. Judge Ito disallowed a lot of damning evidence. Too worried about more riots. Rest in Hell, OJ.

Cops framed him. They took samples of his blood.

That was the only defense OJs defense had. There's zero proof he was framed. Stop it. Why would they want to frame an old football player. He wasn't a celebrity at the time of his murder. Why?

No shoes covered in Blood. Also O.J. was wearing tennis shoes.

Let a black man go free

To asses the evidence presented to them and make a decision, based on that. She did her job!

I watched the trial. I would've exonerated him also, even though I felt he was guilty. The prosecution didn't prove their case, and the defense did prove the cops were corrupt.

@@sean-hu2fo in the interview she flat out says they made up their minds before hearing the evidence.; ya knob.

To evaluate the case and evidence presented to them and whether it was proven without a doubt. Since when are jurors told to base their decisions on assessment of guilt or their personal feelings?

Murderer? EVIDENCE Please!! 🤨

dealingthereal6922 A lab employee testified OJ’s blood was at the crime scene. When the limo driver arrived to pick him up he wasn’t there yet. Where was he if not on his way back from committing the murders? He’d already gone out earlier for food

@@georgialee6755 you/we don’t know who’s blood 🩸 was at the crime scene. The blood that was at the crime scene was NOT the blood that was sent to Cellmark laboratory for DNA analysis and testing. When the limo driver showed up, OJ was, indeed, at home. You actually believe that when Alan Park saw OJ on his property that he was just getting back from freshly killing Ron and Nicole and that he managed to go upstairs; disrobe; ditch the blood soiled clothes from the crime scene; shower to get rid of any residual dirt and blood that was on his person; get dressed; and be downstairs, ready to go, all in a matter of five minutes tops?🤔 🤨

@@dealingthereal6922 Nicole's and Ron's blood was on OJ's socks. His blood was at the crime scene. Contrary to your paranoid rambling, we do know whose blood it was.

@@putler965 you’re more than a just little confused about the actual facts of this case. 1. Ron’s blood was NEVER “found” on OJ’s sock. 2. There was NO BLOOD detected on that sock until after 6 weeks of it being in police custody. (STRONG Inference being, that INITIALLY, there was no blood on the sock.) 3. The blood🩸on the sock contained EDTA. 4. Also, it was proven that that blood did not get on that sock at the crime scene, as it had soaked from one side of the sock to the other. This could NOT have happened had there been a foot/ankle in the sock when the blood got on the sock. Hence, the blood was PRESSED onto the sock, while the sock was laying in a flat position without an ankle/foot being in it. 5a. Indeed, there was blood at the crime scene, but the blood at the crime scene was NOT the blood that was sent to CellMark Laboratories for DNA analysis and testing. 5b. It was proven in the trial that the blood that was collected at the crime scene was switched out for OJ’s freshly drawn blood and THAT was the blood that was sent to CellMark Laboratories for DNA testing and analysis. Hence, the police pulled NO STOPS in assuring that OJ was the one pinned for committing these murders. So, no, we do not know who’s blood was at the crime scene; but, yes, we do know who’s blood was DNA tested and analyzed.

No she followed the evidence THE GOAT innocent

What about rodney king??? Emmit till treyvon martin???

Hey petey looks like u guys get mad when the justice system works for us like it does for u guys 😅

@@pistolpyro97 yes, what about all those guilty people who got what was coming to them?

​@@pistolpyro97 A jury decision isn't allowed to be made on emotions Only the facts of the evidence You chose not to accept that as a fact It's considered influencing a jury Three years, for contempt !

Well, now they’re reunited in hell

How do you know that FOR SURE?

Keep Speaking The Truth

Robert looks like wow this guy OJ pulled it off again

@@mob4336 Keep Speaking The Truth

Fact...the judge denied Nicole's diary into evidence nor her 911 calls to the police for help.

There abuse also from Nicole, it was not one sided. I am sure Ron was coming for more than just to drop off glasses, he was coming to get some. That's what I think.

@@couponnation It's called "Self defense".

​@@couponnation please tell me, in what ways did she abuse her abuser?

@@BillyColeII-dr6dk It called it takes 2 to tango. She was not the innocent flower the propaganda media made her out to be.

They were best friends and never spoke again after the trial. He died of cancer also.

bc he knew he was guilty and couldn't believe he got away with it, prosecution did a shtty job and jury didn't comprehend DNA

Plus the evidence that was provided was all circumstantial & weak at best. Officer Mark Ferman made it worst. They couldn’t prove without doubt.

Ojs blood at the crime scene and his boot print in blood wasn't enough? It was enough in the civil trial. More on.

Same way Rodney king family look,

The first time I met OJ Simpson…

First of all you and we know nothing. None of us were there. So it's opinion not fact. Secondly it isn't about what you "know!" It's about what you can prove. If it was so clear as day that he did it, just so easy to know when you weren't there. Then it wouldn't have took too much to get a guilty verdict

Nicole was nearly decapitated, yet there was no blood evidence found in Oj's home, car or clothes. Please make that make sense? Everyone wants him to be the killer because he's unlikeable and abused her. Where is the evidence?

Tell that to the blacks who still believe Oj was framed and so called not guilty

@@sonicjet7759 Nothing funnier than someone liking their own comment just to see a number next to a 👍🏾 ⬆️. Sins of the past came storming back in the case. Fact is, he was found guilty by a jury of his peers. Same goes for when trump goes on trial…if he is found not guilty, that will be a fact.

😂

They had no choice but to acquit. The detectives carried the blood sample around the crime scene. More than a little sus for the LAPD since they have a long history of framing black suspects. No jury in America could acquit at that point.

@@louc6635 Just remember your excuses when trump supporters make their excuses when trump gets away with his crimes.

@@MatthewShane-ro9id criminal cases are based on reasonable doubt. Civil cases are based on the preponderance of the evidence. Which is why Trump was found "liable" of being a rapist and defaming that woman he raped back in the 90s. That was a civil case. That's why his properties are about to be seized. He can't get the bond, not even from the criminal underworld, his friends in Russia. His criminal friends are giving him the finger now. Just remember that when he's convicted in the case that starts on Monday lol

Trump's crimes are more obvious than OJ's🤷🏿‍♂️​@@MatthewShane-ro9id

Was based on corrupt cops mishandling blood evidence. Period. Nice try though

You see! That’s some BS the klansman cop that planted the glove said on tape

No based on evidence. Only white ppl make decisions based on skin color

How do you know she did that? The prosecution dropped the ball. Not the jury's fault.

@@Wesker10000 they're just racist white ppl. They have no sympathy for when white cops are found innocent for killing young black males yet they all come here and bash oj

The jury blew this case. You literally had a juror give OJ the black power salute after the verdict 😂

@New_Orleans_Ghost_Hunter When questioned by the defense if he Mark Furhman had ever planted evidence FALSELY, Furhman pled the FIFTH. Good cops don't plead the FIFTH regarding evidence planting. FURHMAN BLEW THE CASE!

mark furhman should be in jail for 100 years for tampering with evidence and planting evidence😩

@@wolfgangvonuce9803 once he pleaded the fifth on the stand

@@New_Orleans_Ghost_Hunter So you would ignore the planting of evidence as a juror?

Nobody dare say anything though.

Why? Do you Not feel the same about the woman who accused Emitt Till of harassment or the 2 men who got away with the Brutal murder of a 14 year old.

@@ECW1153 I'm not sure what your point is. I'm talking about the sheer ignorance of a jury that ignored concrete evidence that OJ was guilty. Just a fraction of common sense is all they needed but obviously didn't have it.

Not surprised...the smart jurors figure out a way to get off jury duty

It's hilarious that you would accused that jury of being "dumbest people on the planet" when in fact all white juries are so prevalent in this country and notorious for letting white perpetrators off the hook for harming black folks. Kyle Ritterhouse murdered two white folks the same as O.J was accused of and he walked free and that jury was basically all white. Are they too some of the "dumbest people on the planet !!!???" .

Doesn't matter. Reasonable doubt was all over the place in this case.

She is not nuts. She rationally and reasonably explained her decision to acquit. It may be difficult to accept, but as soon as Mark Furhman pleaded the 5th on planting evidence, the game was over. He could have pleaded the 5th to using racial slurs only, but he pleaded the 5th TO BOTH, which introduced reasonable doubt. Regardless of whether O.J. killed those poor people or not, the woman did what she was instructed to do under the instructions of the court, like it or not. That is why the deliberation was so short, because all the other evidence didn't matter (unfortunately) if the first cop on the scene pleaded the 5th to planting evidence. This is not complicated. Rather, it is following the law as a juror, which she did.

marvinolds6671 He had to plead the fifth to both. Once you plead the fifth once you have to for the remaining questions. In CA if an officer of the court is found guilty of planting evidence in a capital murder case the officer is eligible for the death penalty. At the time of these murders Fuhrman and his white partner Brad were actually working to get a black man OFF on a murder charge from the prior fall. They succeeded and then the murder went unsolved. Made no sense he’d frame a rich and famous guy. And where did they get OJ’s blood to frame him? He was on a plane.

@@georgialee6755 '' And where did they get OJ’s blood to frame him?'' oj had his blood drawn by the authorities when he got back and his sample went missing

@@georgialee6755 if you plead the fifth to something that means you did it. nice try

CIA

Coverup

Kato? Why did he put the glove on

@@kurtmanning2667😂😂😂

They never ask Nicole friends who she party with and brought drugs from to come on the stand.. I’m sure they knew something.

Emmitt till

@@my98-ot7jjOj Simpson

well all the evidence goes out the window when he’s first on the scene and plead the fifth when asked if he planted evidence in the case.

@@my98-ot7jj What has this got to do with the travesty that happened to Till? OJ should not even be mentioned in the same breath as what happened to Till.

Why

@@shermandudley5548 if I have to explain it to you...

@@iluvgalinayou can’t explain it.

Why because a black man wasn't sent to jail.

Whatever happened to, "respect the juries decision." Amazing!

The Goldman also changed words to last part after a judge gave right to it don’t leave that part out

Geez...The Goldman's made that change after they got control of the book rights.

Watch the video about the hypothetical confession. Wow.

Are you really so dense as to not understand that a books cover is made by the publisher to be sensational? Also the whole book is known to be ghost-written and it's senario is nonsense and a cash grab that Simpson entered into after the civil verdict. Anyone who actually sites this a evidence is a fool.

It's a confession. He remembers some parts, and tries to put hypothetical for others. It was an admission of guilt

They had a lot of evidence excluded. 10 lawyers on defense. Throw everything leading with race, at the wall and see if it sticks for huge millions pay check. Kato said jurors were waving at oj when he came in. He knew it was a lost cause.

I guess when you make a dumb decision, you stick with it. They were looking for reasons to not convict instead of to convict....

What evidence? And don’t say what was planted by the Hitler Cop

Lots of people just don’t have common sense

*Oh, so she was there?* There was Planted Evidence at the Scene. The LAPD Admitted to planting evidence so what is this woman talking about. There was plenty Reasonable doubt *especially the Timeline given by Kato, OJ's house guest. Kato knew the timeline was impossible for OJ to have murdered 2 people and gotten back to meet the limo driver* at the time he did. *She was NOT the only one who agreed he was NOT Guilty.* Too much Dirt went down with the Botched LAPD Investigation.

@@michaeldavis5155 exactly

She's never changed her story or position and I agree with her. The case was a bunch of nothing, no proof at all

Perfect comment!

EVER

So the prosecutors won't look like fools forever....

It never will be.

@lawrence6972. I bet it never makes any sense on Fox Fake Networks. I'm sure that MAGA Nation minions will understand: "If it doesn't fit, you MUST acquit". That will be taught in law classes for a century to come.

"If it doesn't fit you MUST acquit". Let the Fox Fake Networks sleep on that for the next century.

CN has nothing to do with this former juror saying how she felt about OJ trial 28 years ago.

@@user-cz5lj2vx1f it makes sense it’s on CNN because they can’t admit they’re wrong either, not because theirs a correlation genius.

​@@user-cz5lj2vx1fCNN sucks fake news

Absolutely positively the Jury knew this but not beyond a reasonable doubt after that idiot Marsha and that cop Furyman screwed the fucking pooch.

No he wasnt

Maybe

Well if just go on your feelings, but to convict you need some kind of evidence

@@vsedai try reading...

Great woman OJ Great man

like the white detective has all the evidence needed to solve the case but he wants more and the black prosecuting atty ask to wear the gloves which doesn't need to, like the white detective he don't need to provide more evidence they already got em but they though what they have is only circumstansial evidence.

Exactly!!!! because they did have evidence, his blood matched the crime scene!!

Yolanda = DUH!!!

in order to convict guilty, it has to be beyond a reasonable doubt. they had reasonable doubt.

@@User-ue2li A paid defense attorney claiming there are reasonable doubts does not mean there are reasonable doubts. In this case, there was *no* doubt whatsoever as to his guilt - reasonable or otherwise.

@@CINEKYD_MEDIA_ARCHIVE there was a reasonable doubt

I guess so

She can barely answer Laura Cotes questions,without sounding awkward.

They all thought he was probably guilty but when they found out the detectives picked up ojs blood sample from the lab and transported it BACK to the crime scene, they had to acquit. The Rampart scandal had just happened and the LONG history of the LAPD framing black suspects meant there was HUGE reasonable doubt. If the blood evidence was faked, ANYTHING could have been faked by the LAPD. Acquittal was the only option. That was on the detectives who were in the habit of doing sloppy work and framing black suspects on a regular basis.

@@louc6635 . BS

@@christopherknight6248 Cope, that's reality

stop talking please, you'll be doing America a favor

@@noluhh.j4326He is right. Do America the favor of shutting your mouth.

The juror doesn't care about 2 people's lives. Simple as that.

RIP Juice

RIP OJ

Let him off because he is black? Thats a new one

It was also the time… what was going on in the world. If his wife was black his ass would’ve been under the jail

And Had GREAT LAWYERS#WHAT WE ALL WANT IF WE ARE BEING PROSECUTED

Watch the trial before jumping to conclusion

You'd be surprise about evidence that contradicts the prosecution. A strange fact is that dozens of witnesses after the murders got OJ's autograph and his finger was not bleeding. Also, the Bronco should have had much more blood in it IMO. I think OJ may have visited the scene but I believe (just like later in his Vegas robbery) he beought someone with him to do the dirty work.

Actually I hope she can’t sleep !

@@MsRocker961 For making the legally correct verdict? Remember - planted and contaminated evidence, no witnesses.

Great woman. OJ Great man

If she ask for forgiveness she'll be okay

@@123456CBOY Love is like violence to evil.

🤣🤣💀you are that mad

🙄

you sat here watched the whole thing and commented if you don't like what she did/says turn it off😂

@@noluhh.j4326 If I didn’t watch anything I disagree with, I wouldn’t see anything I disagree with or give myself the opportunity to learn and evolve, so turning videos off that I don’t agree with would be stupid of course. In this example all I learned is that she didn’t learn anything new and still thinks she made the right decision, even in hindsight, which I think is valuable information.

Great woman. OJ Great man

​@@my98-ot7jj Bless your heart..😆 🤣 Definitely a Biden voting Democrat

She can’t admit it. She will die denying she freed a murderer.

I guess she did

Great woman

They was no evidence that they could use to link him to the killing...and my favorite part is the best evidence came FROM the police.

​@@my98-ot7jjthat's what I say to cops that kill her kind

I am no OJ fan but some people seem to forget Mark Furmond. It was quite reasonable to believe evidence was planted by that white supremacist. He lied on the stand then had to take the fifth. OJ may have indeed done it, you have to admit is ironic that a white bigot helped get him off.

100% true

Yes, but the evidence still pointed directly to him and only him!

@@BerryationsIf there is a shred of doubt, a juror’s responsibility is to render the defendant innocent.

They had overwhelming evidence and if it was a white nobody he'd be in jail and I think we all know it

The Prosecutors were up against a bunch of the best lawyers money could buy - a bunch on Con men seeking fame and more fortune at the time!

Not when the lead cop pleads the 5th under oath asking if he ever planted evidence. 😂 Jury made the right decision. It was the same conclusion I came to while watching the trial from my living room.

Exactly!!! You can’t base your decision on one bad cop when there is a pile of evidence- and this is what they did

​@@Berryationsthere was an entire history of racist brutality and corruption within the entire LAPD and it got exposed in this trial.

@@meansnowflake political fueled delusion at its finest

@@Berryations What pile of evidence when you exclude what mark furman touched?

The glove had sat with dried blood on it, and he was wearing plastic gloves over his hands … Darden made a massive mistake that exemplified how the prosecution thought it was a slam dunk. Of course OJ did it, even the juror believed that.

Whoever killed Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman was probably also involved in the murders of Goldman's friends, Brett Cantor and Michael Nigg.

you must prove beyond a reasonable doubt. If he didn't put on said glove. They cant say with certainty that he did it via the rules of evidence and reasoning. That would be flawed.

He put on surgical gloves and spread his fingers apart while taking part in the glove theatrics, it was obvious they purposefully made the gloves look too tight. 🙄😑

@@VaporValkerie Defense attorney Johnny Cochran told the jury, "If it doesn't fit, you MUST acquit." O.J. managed to put the glove on in the courtroom. Would that tight glove have rendered him incapable of killing anyone in the courtroom, if he was also in possession of a knife? Reason is why logic makes sense. A tight glove isn't sufficient "reasonable doubt," in view of the overwhelming entire body of evidence. (Maybe he intentionally wore a small glove while committing the murder. Maybe it was the only pair of gloves he could find, at the time.)

Keep crying 😅😅😅

AND leather SHRINKS when exposed to moisture.

so why didn't the prosecution take that into account before making OJ try them on? They didn't HAVE to. But it was a spur of the moment decision by the desperate prosecution.

Not guilty period

No guilt about her decision she just said that on the video!!!

How do you know that?

You mad 😅😅😅

He is looking up at us.

​@@my98-ot7jjyou like men who beat and murder woman. Says a lot about you.

And soon you will be too, say hi to your father Satan for me

I think you mean the shoes,I think the gloves were Isotoners?

Emmitt Till

@@my98-ot7jj Why do you keep responding to people with "Emmitt Till?"

@@BarryMaplebecause y’all white master got away with murder too😂

Not true - they were made for Bloomingdales in the US, but they were still a fairly rare model. A receipt for these gloves, purchased by Nicole, was put into evidence at the trial.

Not potential

That was tainted, tainted, tainted by Mark Furman when he pled the fifth.

Same for Zimmerman, the men who beat Mr King. I could keep going..!!!

@@Hooderaw 🤣🤣

@@Hooderaw Just WOW

Hahahaha, oh boy!

Emmitt Till

Amen💯

Your so blind you can't even stay on script, the Prosecutions claim was HOT blooded murder, aka a crime of rage. And frankly it only the Goldman family which has been persecuting Simpson for years, Nicoles family which actually knew Simpson has been completly silent.

💯

Oh awesome 😂😂😂

Sure does, we saw that in the George Zimmerman trial, for example. 😏🙄

​@@brettsfav4 Zimmerman was attacked by the racist Martin. Being followed isn't grounds for assault.

Seems to happen often.

Exactly! They needed the most ignorant jury panel to win. What gets me is there was not even one that had enough brain to say “what the hell is up with all of this blood from the victims on his possessions and property” seriously the blood alone was irrefutable. But they took the LAPD. Is setting him up route. WOW! To think one day possibly your life may lay in the hands of idiots!!

If there was reasonable doubt in that case, there is reasonable doubt in 95% of murder cases that hit the court. You have the notion of "reasonable doubt" a little bit twisted it happears.

​​@@77Ronin_your stats are off. But even it they were true, then the correct conclusion would simply be that juries should acquit in 95% of criminal trials. It is a total violation of the rule of law to allow the results of an individual trial to be swayed by fear that conviction rates overall are too low. The fact you suggested this is itself sufficient ground to doubt you understand the concept of reasonable doubt in a legally correct way.

Very well said. I followed the O.J. Trial pretty closely & think he’s guilty. But I have a lot more contempt for the jurors who ignored obvious evidentiary problems with the Central Park 5 case and convicted innocence young men than I do for the O.J. jurors.

TY

The judge denied Nicole's diary, telling about her abuse and calls to 911 requesting help.....why?

planted tainted evidence creates doubt.... Beyond a reasonable shadow of a doubt... That's the part many people ignore, when they say "overwhelming evidence".. when evidence is planted, and the officer takes the filth when questioned, there's huge doubt.. So where back to, but you no he's guilty from the other evidence so convict him. It's not designed that way

I guess so

Great woman

Racism doesn't exist though. Right?

you should be ashamed of yourself for taking time to watch it and comment on it

​@@noluhh.j4326I guess so noluhh..

@@MatthewShane-ro9id Matthew Shane 😭 such a great name

@@noluhh.j4326 I think so

Just look at her. She looks miserable, she probably hates herself as much as she does everyone else she has blamed for being a failure her entire life.

Umm not guilty

Emmitt Till

I doubt she cares

Emmitt Till

@@my98-ot7jj If you're going to repeat that 100 times, you should at least spell his name right.

NO white people are making it a race thing.

hopefully nothing that your on

@@noluhh.j4326 🥲🤣😂 seriously! You crack me up here! You must be on the same alien level as this woman 🙈🫣😯 2 people lost their lives at the hands of this man “ OJ SImpson “! Enough said 🫨 crazy 🤣😂🤣

Legions of "other jurors in days past" have blood on their hands sending people of color to prison based on race. Enough to block out the sun.

Do we really want to start talking about blood in hands in light if this countries ongoing racist culture and extreme prejudice?

💯💯💯

Emmitt Till

@@my98-ot7jj Has nothing to do with OJs guilt. Emmitt Tills murder and the acquittal of those monsters is as horrible as this case when it comes to miscarriage of justice. And ALL of the defendants in both cases were guilty.

@@my98-ot7jj You saying that kind of proves that OJ was guilty and that the jury was just delivering payback

He didn't do nothing not guilty

If the roles were reversed it would be called white privilege

No one complains when it's the other way around. Wonder why??

@@thelovejoyshow568 Because they usually convict the killer

America is 13% black. The other way around would be the proper proportion.

How did you knew? Nobody knows

Could you possibly disply your bias any more plainly, a 9 year old is going to go off nothing but 'vibes' they get from adults, not the evidence.

@@ayanolsson Evidence

Mad snow Devils 😅😅😅

You have over 100+ comments and only two subs, clearly nobody give an about you or your opinion so stay quiet and miserable 😂

This!!!!!

Don't worry, we love you right back!

@@sean-hu2fo 👎

Let me guess, Trump 2024?

@@taxfree4603 nope. I'm voting Biden. I just can't stand hypocrisy. Black people defending criminals is exactly how trump supporters act when defending trump.

@@taxfree4603 nope. I'm voting Biden. Black community and MAGA community are the worst hypocrites on the planet

And that created more than reasonable doubt!

@@colinsparman26 only for anything he touched he was not the only cop working this case nor was he the only one collecting evidence

​@@BerryationsHowever Mark ruined the whole case. He said he never used racist language even though he was caught in tape saying it

@@Berryations and so what he was the first one there.. Ain’t no way that doesn’t raise alarm bells taking the 5th

@@SparkleInYourEyes2024 maybe he was just singing along to a lil rap music...

You do know he isn’t alive

Ask LAPD

Wasn’t really, was the prosecution.

Did you have that same energy when Kyle Rottenhouse and George Zimmerman were acquitted? No, shut up and stop "mAkInG iT aBoUT RaCE... YOuRe bEiNG A vIctIM" - Sound familiar? 🤣

In regards to this exact case, polling around African Americans has actually largely shifted since the mid-90's. Most African Americans polled this century have said they believe that OJ Simpson indeed was guilty. So the tribalism was real in the 90's, but concerning this case has largely shifted.

@@retiredtidepodeater3339your comparing the Zimmerman case to a case of a person cold blood killing 2 people out of jealousy? Your a special kind of stupid ain’t ya

​@@retiredtidepodeater3339 Is your thought process "omg that pedophile Kyle killed in self-defense could have been ME!!1"?

​@@retiredtidepodeater3339good whataboutism

If the glove don’t fit you must aquit

@@mantis10_surf85if you can’t spell we must expell!

You mean Chris Darden genius?

Because she decided to get on tv, again.

@@lisamorrison214 She did what the Judge instructed her to do. Make her decision based on the evidence not how she feels.

F Lee was masterful in that exchange. He let Furman lie through his teeth, then dropped the bomb on him.

Their was resonable doubt even before that.

@@kennethferland5579 So much reasonable doubt that they never found the real killer right? Delusional much?

Shouldn't mitigate the evidence though. They made it about race when he was a serial wife beater.

@@MsDidi38the lead detective, first one on the scene to collect evidence pleads the fifth to planting evidence doesn’t raise doubt??? be real lol

Exactly 💯

I believe they flat out just didn’t care about any of it

Emmitt Till

OJ has never admitted to killing them stop lying

No proof that he did. LAPD proved that he could not have made it back to his house. This is a murder that they know what time it happened, and how long it takes to get back to O.J.'s house. No matter how they tried it, they could not do it. None of her blood anywhere including his car.

@@my98-ot7jj Stop cheapening his death.

No such admission ever happened.