The fact that they didn’t return a “Not Guilty” verdict within the first two hours of deliberation is beyond terrifying… The prosecution didn’t come within a country-mile of proving a single charge ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’. This outcome shatters any remaining faith I had in the US justice system, and confirms a troubling reality: there must undoubtedly be tens of thousands of patently innocent people locked up in American prisons for crimes they clearly did not commit.

Bingo the alternate juror says the CW DIDN'T prove their case against KR to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt.

Good to know there was at least one juror that understood the assignment. Too bad she was an alternate.

Great information via the alternative juror. Thank you for your civic service ❤

This juror left me Speechless with her words ❤What a beautiful and kind soul ❤

What a rational, intelligent, compassionate and responsible woman. Thank you for your service.

This trial should scare the hell out of everyone. They framed an INNOCENT woman.

Something is seriously wrong with our jury system. This should have been not guilty the first day. What twisted person could come up with guilty beyond reasonable doubt? This is nuts.

There was no evidence to convict-

No reasonable juror could have thought Karen was guilty

This is a ethical and moral alternate juror. She didn't let emotions sway her thinking she just looked at what the prosecution put on. good for you lady, you can rest easy now knowing you are honest and trustworthy!

karen read is innocent proctor is a criminal

I can't wait for these jurors to hear what we've all been hearing on the outside for weeks.

This case is terrifying because if some jurors really thought the prosecution proved it's case, that means anyone can be convicted of a crime they didn't commit simply because some of our fellow citizens aren't able to employ common sense and logic when it matters. It really calls into question the efficacy of jury trials but it's so comforting to hear from an intelligent juror who understood the assignment. All it really takes to ensure justice is one juror who refuses to ignore the overwhelming evidence. I'm sure the other jurors were well meaning.... maybe they didn't understand what reasonable doubt was? Maybe they thought a not guilty verdict meant that they were agreeing that there was a cover up? Maybe they saw the pain the Okeefe family is in and thought they should convict an innocent woman as a way to comfort them? Maybe they were worried that the police would retaliate if they returned a not guilty verdict? Maybe someone intimidated them? Maybe the verdict form confused them?

The idea that a single juror listened to Prosecutor Lally's idiotic rambling case and thought Read was positively guilty astounds me Although, I'm glad all jurors involved stuck to their guns-- as is their duty. It's clear they made an honest effort and took their job seriously

I am NOT suprised she was one of the alternates. Bev knew who was team Read. She let this woman go the day before deliberations. All done by design. Thank you for your service.

They didn't allow her juror on purpose. They saw she was taking notes and paying close attention. They did not want someone like that going into the deliberation room.

I'm sickened that Proctor is getting transferred. In a just world he wouldn't be employed any longer and might even be facing charges.

Breaking news: I have a quote coming in from Chloe the dog...whats that Chloe? Chloe: "I bit him, I bit him, I bit him".

Exactly, not enough evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. The world saw this & yet only a few on the jury did not. Makes you wonder why. 🤔

Did anyone educate the jury that if there is not enough evidence to prove guilt then it’s not guilty?????

Congrats Jury 3... You are one of the best...hope you get to read this. Hello from the Philippines

God bless juror #3. Wish she was picked & not an alternate.

Smart juror!💞

I hope one of the jurors speaks out and tells us all what was the issue with the hung jury and how many were for and against conviction. I feel she is innocent and I want to know where it all went wrong in the deliberations as I'm sure the Defense and Prosecution would also.

Intelligence matters. Sure this juror saw the whole picture without bias. Good for her 😎

I hung a jury because a group of people let their emotions lead them allowing a persecutor to literally put a ring in their nose to lead them around. When I finally went before the judge and explained why they had failed to do their job of demonstrating that the innocent man on trial was not innocent. They never even showed him at the crime scene. A year later, they convicted his wife of killing him. It takes a strong person to do what is right. Too many people allow smoke and mirrors to lead them around. I really hate what they were put through. I cannot imagine what takes 9 weeks to show someone committed a crime. You have the evidence or you don't.

Why does Bev get to pick the forman ? I don’t like it.

This is not in Boston it's in Canton,Ma . This is going to cost this town millions !

I really want to hear from these jurors, specially the ones thinking guilty. It suck that we probably won't!

Yes exactly Crooked Bev could read jurors responses and got rid of any Team Read people. The most twisted Judge I have ever seen 😮😮😮

Clickbait. Why not put “alternate” in the title?

Karen Read is factually innocent!

I love puzzling. And I love the fair response from this juror! Thank you!

Who didnt see this coming from a mile away? All you have to do is read the comments section under any of the videos on this case and you can see there is a clear divide amongst people who are watching, in general. The divide may not be equal but it’s there! I tried to watch this trial from an unbiased pov. I don’t care for a Karen read but that’s not what I worried about. I just kept thinking if I was a juror and had to follow the instructions given to me, could I convict this woman? The answer is NO! It’s not that I buy into the coverup or conspiracy . It’s that the evidence in this case was just not enough for me to say she 100% without a reasonable doubt, backed her car into John okeefe, willingly and intentionally. The police completely botched this investigation from the second they stepped on the scene. That is a huge problem. The crime scene not being secured for hours. Huge problem. Evidence popping up, stories changing, phones being thrown away, huge problem. 3 experts saying injuries aren’t consistent with a pedestrian strike, HUGE PROBLEM! Trooper proctor blew this case and from there on out everything else was a mess! Shame on the MSP for failing John O’Keefe. He deserved better!

Thank you! Fascinating! Thank you, juror #3 for speaking about this. It's a shame she didn't get to deliberate. I hope the other jurors also give statements or interviews. I would like to know what happened in that room and what was the split.

2:10 The right tail light in the back ground is cracked not shattered...If the Lexus didn't hit they should have acquit...

Much respect to this juror. Appreciate her speaking out and the precautions she took in doing so. I truly don't understand how anyone could honestly get beyond reasonable doubt based on the CW's case. The corruption laid out through the trial testimony was staggering, too.

Sounds like this alternate took her job very serious. I respect and appreciate her input. It was well thought out. She showed compassion for both sides of the families and she her comments from Proctor didn’t inflame her when it came to the case.( which it shouldn’t have done) Could we expect anything more from this juror? I don’t think so! Kudos to her for taking her position seriously and giving important feedback.

Can't wait for the re-trial. She was guilty.

Thanks so much for this info ❤

Juror: "No one saw exactly what happened!" -- That's true for a lot of violent crimes and not the right summary of why you would find someone not guilty. I was hoping she would provide something a little more specific with respect to the actualy evidence presented.

Alternative juror… who really cares; we need to hear from an actual juror that was in the room during deliberations… that’s who we need to hear from

Nice that the jurors had time to do puzzles.

Anybody that thought the prosecution proved their case is simply lacking in brains... I'm really fair person when you have two independent witnesses say not an accident..hello that is enough for doubt

Thanks for sharing

Great reporting Louisa Moller. 👍

She was right. No evidence and expert witnesses said he wasn’t hit by a car.

Wish she was an actual juror. Sounds like she has a brain

Not Guilty!

It's really interesting, Thank you

Now I wonder if the other alternate was an avid note taker as well. If so, it will be harder to believe both being excluded was pure chance.

She is Guilty

I was Juror #3 also. 1987 for 91 days.

Proctor has been rehomed like the dog. …..I bet he ends up working at the Am sets pizza store once he is officially fired

Juror No3❤️👍

“ I deem you not guilty because I feel sorry for you.” is not the job of a jury. It is to interpret evidence and apply the law according the legal procedure of the jurisdiction you are in. Not every adult is capable of doing this.

Great reporting. Nice job.

Thank you Nicky - I have learned to stop being a victim just recently and my life is so much better. Love you always

If one person came up with a guilty verdict to cause a mistrial, makes me suspicious

This is the juror who wore a pink dress and cried the day after she was named an alternate?

THANK YOU JUROR #3 FOR YOUR SERVICE AND ALL THE TIME YOU PUT INTO THIS CASE! I JUST WISH ALL THE JURORS WHERE AD INTELLIGENT AND HAD THE ABSOLUTE COMMON SENSE TO SEE ALL THE EVIDENCE AND ANALYZE IT PROPERLY AND COME UP WITH A NOT GUILTY VERDICT! YOU ARE A CLASS ACT AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR DEDICATED SERVICE!! ⚖️ 💕

Juries are instructed to err on the side of caution, so that if there is any doubt about guilt, they should acquit, rather than risk convicting an innocent person. The principal is "It's better to let 10 guilty people go free than to wrongly convict one innocent person." How can anyone possibly find her guilty? The letter said due to "deeply held personal values etc." juries are supposed to follow the principal of law and the instructions given to them no their own personal beliefs, this is why Jury needs to be a job. the average layperson can't distinguish between deciding guilt and judging someone's moral character. when it comes to someone's life, it should be decided by knowledgeable, experienced and empathetic people who understand the principals of law.

Talk to a juror who deliberated? The others don't seem to understand what reasonable doubt it...

I am probably going to get some heat for this BUT I feel some ppl got paid from the CW on that jury. The way they had the witnesses come in and sit for closing statements and how Lally insisted the jury keep deliberating 3 TIMES says something to me. This case was a PERFECT SYMBOL of what it means when the prosecution doesn't present its case or enough evidence however the defense did even though they do not have to. Im not on anyone's side but the right to Justice in the United States of America. There was something wrong with this case. Ive taken part of many trials and this case should have never been even indicted.

alternates dont count. get a real juror, on camera

Really worrying outcome..I mean reasonable doubt was met week one😢

Much respect to juror #3.

It boiled down to did Karen hit John with her vehicle. The entire trial got sidetracked with testimony the commonwealth never should have introduced.

Reasonable doubt. Next

The minute they said she qas home and he was going up and down stairs at the house she dropped him off at, i knew she was innocent. Same with the tail light. Wasnt shattered at 5 am on video but they claim she hit him hours before

How do we know she spoke to an alternate juror? Is there any proof of this 😅

There had to be some real dummies on that jury ….or they knew people 🤦‍♀️

Is it legal for her to talk to the media?

"Reasonable Doubt" that's the key to any trial for a juror to consider. Hopefully, a juror who was actually deliberating will come forward and let us know what went on the jury room. Fascinating stuff.

She's guilty ,she admitted hitting him.

They knew her position. That is why she was pulled to be the alternate. What are the odds that she would have voted not guilty and didn’t make the final group to decide. Aunt Bev was so obviously bias and this just proves it more

I hope the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is LISTENING. Useless to recharge. Save your careers and find out who really did this.

I can understand the public being split about 70/30 as most polls suggest , but for these peoplewho have sat through every second of testimony and evidence how anyone could not say not guilty is baffling to me , either they didnt understand the evidence or someone got scared

If a man did this he wouldn't have the supporters that Karen has and people would listen to the fact and not buy into the world bs

The jury is what you get when you teach children what to think instead of how to think. When they become adults they cannot see the clues of innocent or guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Karen read should have been set free with a not guilty in my opinion.

Sadly not a surprise, i regularly checked every livechat available and depsite a vast majority saying not guilty there was always a few who thought guilty. On average 90% thought not guilty so it wouldnt surprise me if the jury was 11/1 with a staunch pro guilt juror who wouldn't see reason

Werent the alternates yeeted before deliberations began?

Not interested in an alternates opinion.

Karen Read 100% guilty as a shadow jury

They saw the truth.

guaranteed the ex cop juror was the only hold out.

I bet the CW will revisit the idea of proceeding with a retrial

There are so many good people on this planet It’s too bad we always hear about the not so good ones

She earned her A+ From US!! And from JUSTICE!!!!

Corruption 10000000000% NOT GUILTY !!!!

So much evidence including her telling everyone at the scene that she “hit him!”

So that's what took so long! They wanted to finish their puzzle.

You have to beable to think critically and get rid of the bs to find her guilty.

I just need to hear the logic from any juror that explains away the dog bite on a vehicular homicide victim's body. That's got to be flat earth level stuff.

WTH is wrong with this jury. It was obvious that KR is Not Guilty. Ridiculous.

This woman would have been pro Karen and pro justice

A disgrace, what kind of jury did we have at all!!! Clearly not able to decide properly!

She is a turtle boy fan, please do ure homework she supprts Karen Read who is guilty. Please stop adding fuel to this fire

Was it her or #4? The judge said she left for "personal reasons", if it was her, too bad you didnt ask her what the reason was for her removal.