😂😂😂

I miss those days ❤❤😂😂😂, although I was often on the wrong end of a few bouncers 😂😂😂

I remember those days ...😂😮

Yep, you're proper hard you aren't you.

@@jimjones-bk2is says the girl behind a screen

I was about to ask if Sefridges security have more power than the police 🚔

@myleftfoot1201 i don't want or promote that. I saw one member of staff holding the arm of a protester as they were being led ....or ushered out. I have to ask, if the security guy did nothing, would he be at risk of losing his job.? Saving the planet is an amazing idea and we all are aware of the dire consequences. However, are the JSO protesters willing to lose people their, job and potentially their home, just to tell us what we already know?

@@HoofHearted314 They had no plans to leave the property. At this point, you can use reasonable force to remove them.

@@HoofHearted314 They were trespassers FFS!

Because they are inside private property and when they refuse to leave, it's trespassing. On a public street, however, the police have limited powers.

“things “ 👌🏼

Mindless drones.

Mate you’re lucky he’s only touching.

It’s not assault anyway. Once they’ve been asked to leave, trespassers can be removed with minimum force.

they did get touched and found out it wasn't assault

Plenty of hypocrisy. They only hate it when it suits them, though. If we really did "just stop oil," the world would be in crisis.

Hi Viz vests , rubber soled shoes?trainers clothing etc. etc....... They would all have to be naked to take them seriously tbh!

The just use oil.

I think these mobs they sleep walk 😂 they are absolutely thick in the head

Exactly!

How do you know he's a decent man trying to make a living?

@@jimjones-bk2is a pathetic attempt at diverting, Jim 🤡

​@@jimjones-bk2isbecause he doesn't look like a dismissed teacher that got found with dodgy text messages vs a security guard wearing a suit.

@@interestedobserver587 never judge a book by its cover.

@@jimjones-bk2is When the dismissed teacher makes false accusations then he has shown the deficiency in his character and can be judged.

get the old fashioned security to move them like they used to have in clubs and pubs they never used to muck around bloody do gooders

@@TrevorWheeler-jn9kb A couple of LENNY McLEAN types would clear up the fuss !

The shop is private property, security employed to throw out unwanted visiters, so I hope they dragged him out the door 🤣🤣🤣

so many words are losing their meanings these days, the world is getting worse

it's very American, to look at an American wrongly is assault

@@strangeoldman1876 agree to this. I don't know why society is on the decline. Common decency is not common anymore.

​@@chadstaryshouldn't be correct tho change the laws or something because touching someone isnt assault

some politician should just have the ballz to lable them as the terrorist organistaion that they are!

You can't outlaw protest groups or political organisations. This isn't China. You can outlaw certain activities such as trespass and blocking roads, or incitement to commit a crime, which are already outlawed and which each individual in this organisation is guilty of.

@@EzioAuditoreDaFirenze99 Terrorist organisations can be proscribed.

A certain Austrian painter would have liked you.

@@romanpolanski4928 They're not a terrorist organisation. There's been no acts of terror or hate on their part.

These nutballs are being paid to do this. Follow the money. I wonder how you would find out about the payer?

Stop press africa has been a hot country for a million years

THEY ARE IN FACT far left SCUM

@@johnthompson7105Not as hot as it is now.

Calling people you don’t agree with ‘scum’ says more about you than them.

@@viv8117 oh year over 100 million people murdered by comunism in the 20th century communist SCUM

They need a kick in the a ss

And where is the useless well paid plods.

​@@alanrogerson7608Just plodding around doing nothing. I've been watching the approach taken in Germany. It is truly impressive. Police and civilians dragging the protesters off the roads.

@@ts757arse Hahahah, agreed! Your comment is GOLD!

Their security team must cost a fortune in salaries and benefits.

Reason and facts seem to be lost on them

The problem with the oil is setting it on fire releasing all the co2 into the atmosphere that is causing the planet to heat up. If we didn't burn 97,103,871 barrels of oil every day. They wouldn't be talking about stopping drilling. 35 billion barrels of oil up in smoke each year and folk still deny it will have an effect on the planet.. It's obvious the entire planet is heating up. There aren't parts of planet earth that are significantly cooler than they were 50 years ago. The problem is people think a humans lifetime is a significant amount in terms of planet earths changing climate. If we weren't burning fossil fuels thousands of times faster than carbon itself takes to grow, planet earth would take many thousands of years to change as opposed to just a few decades like we are witnessing. 32 billion barrels of oil a year up in smoke. 2 million olympic swimming pools worth of oil up in smoke. after taking between 60 and 250 million years to form...

Brilliant

⬆️ This! 👏

Yep it's used for just about everything in everyday living items...

especially while fiming everything trying to be the victims

“We’re non-violent”. Aren’t these cretins always going on about how certain words or certain behaviour are “violent”? By their own definition, what they are doing counts as violence. Personally I think that deliberately and intentionally causing a disturbance in a public place, event, or road, should be met by stiff penalties, with the affected parties being allowed to claim damages off the perpetrators.

They're stupor heroes.

It was dale vince money power

it isn't non violent when property is damaged ...

As a matter of fact by imposing their presence they just practice another type of violence. This kind of person are ready to go mad about a mild tap on the protected bottom of a kid but are ready to any form of psycholical assault to try to impose their point of view. In fact they do not have other choice as most of their theory are bs 😂

they should worry about knife crime if they really are worried about kids future

@@ramsey633 But knife crime doesn't affect the children of middle class white people?

Haha they were the first words that came into my head.

LOL EXACTLY WHAT I WAS THINKING

I seriously doubt that loser has procreated.

They are, it's a government (sponsored) message to make everyone think that everyone else believes the climate change myth in order to justify new green/carbon taxes the EU have planned for us. That's why JSO never protest to the Government. It's a public-brainwashing exercise.

I have actually become more of a climate skeptic, thanks to them.

​@@anthtansome people so gullible

Imagine if youre the patient!!!! I think if physically possible the patient would wanna get out and clear the path at all costs!!!!

@@MoveoverAndbark absolutely.

Drempels

You can't change an idiot , unless they spend some serious jail time to adjust their attitudes .

Correct. Further extraction of fossil fuels needs to end.

There's always going to be idiots roaming the world.

Thanks for the clarification. :). Never really thought about it :) So JSO were useful for something after all hehe

Yes. "Right of admission reserved!"

And that trouble maker trying to use his phone to film them, many premises do NOT allow photography.

Coffin Dodgers 😂

@@MargaretAnderson-ti1sw okay? But you only want the law applies to you? You can take their phone because you don't allow photography.

Laws only apply to "other people"

I just made that point above, then read you had beat me to it. Exactly.

probably caught fleas

Take a closer look at that 'mob'

@@jimjones-bk2isthey look like a bunch of dirty hippies. The only clean looking guy was the guy with the camera.

​@@jimjones-bk2ispensioners and people that should be on a mental home.

@@stewartsteinecke7301 exactly. Hardly a threatening mob, are they.

I was just thinking the same thing. It's time to give these idiots a taste of their own medicine. Make their lives a living hell.

Agree I would be tempted to give a VIGOROUS bum's rush to those trespassers

@@philherrick7319For these occasions, judges need to have a third verdict between guilty and not guilty: had it comin’

And what would you do, ,mr. honourable daily follower ?

Unfortunately, I don't think this constitutes aggravated trespass as it's indoors. Pretty sure that offence only applies if it's outside.

@@epoch71 How do you define trespass then ? A business can trespass you from their property / business. Shopping centres (including the parking lot) is private property. Therefore, if you are standing / walking / running / driving on their property they can have you removed and banned from their property.

@@roadmonitoroz I was replying to @MonstaMunch101 specifically in regard to the offence of aggravated trespass. I don't need schooled in other variants of trespass (of which I'm well aware) because that wasn't the purpose of my comment or my participation in the discourse. Thanks anyway!

@@epoch71 It has nothing to do with being indoors or outside. If you are on private property and have been asked to leave and refuse to do so, it is aggravated trespass. The distinction between trespass (a civil matter) and aggravated trespass (a criminal matter) is whether you are merely on private property without permission (trespass) or have been instructed to leave a private property and have refused to do so (aggravated trespass).

@@MonstaMunch101 Yup. My bad. The outdoors clause is Section 68 of the Criminal Justice & Public Order Act (1994) which is what I was referring to. This was enacted to deal with hunt saboteurs, raves etc. I seem to remember quite a stir about it being used in the mid-90s against the Newbury Bypass protestors. But yes you’re quite right … provision for aggravated trespass indoors was enacted in the Anti-Social Behaviour Act (2003). Per my previous comments I am only referring to criminal trespass. I’ve had enough dealings with civil trespass issues to last me a lifetime!

If anything they are not nonsensical, they are highlighting a real problem , which is a huge problem humanity is facing. I can understand that minor annoyance and disruptions to daily routines trigger you, and that their tactics are up for debate , but not the cause.

@@mikiafu Absolutely. But their antics cause the problem to be lost over the method they use. They are oblivious to their own hypocrisy, and that's the real dilemma here.

@@mcarp555 Yes, that might be true to an extent, but also I think it's been blown out of proportions. I never met anyone who would come across them in London, it's not like they are everywhere.

@@mikiafu Nonetheless, I can't think of anything they've done that hasn't just annoyed people. Whether it's slow-walking in the road, disrupting televised Snooker or trying to deface historic works of art, it only draws attention away from what they are protesting about.

@@mcarp555 yes but we need to put these action in a context .as said most people are not being impacted. I live in London know a lot of people who commute daily and none of them was ever incoveniced by them. It's not like all roads all being blocked. Rather a 0,1% percent are temporarily annyoed, but most of us get the message, about a potential calamity that will affect all of us, across. It's the sun etc that are trying to portray these people as the worst criminals.

In my country, filming is prohibited in private property, you need the owners consent. I doubt that is different in the UK.

Why not?

@@jimjones-bk2is well I have oil central heating and i’d be mighty p’d off if they tried protesting in my living room 😅

@@1ninjatiger 😂

@@jimjones-bk2isIt’s trespass.

I'd still slap him one. Obnoxious little 💩

It's much easier to remove unwanted people from a private building than a public place/road....... oh, that and the Police are a bunch of simpering halfwits who struggle to tie their own shoelaces, let alone uphold the law. They're usually too busy affixing the latest rainbow flag paraphernalia to their stab vests in support of the most recently vocal gender minority.........

That's because this so-called protest is being staged. I'm going to refer to it as 'reverse propaganda' so you might understand. It's classic Goebbels - unattractive protesters being fought off by the 'brave' and strong public. Big Oil money is funding this, as well as paying to have these videos moved to the top of the KZfaq queue.

They do at home, trust me. 😳🤕😢

Remember that the next police want a pay rise.

World of difference between private and public security.

Who are paying these people?

well when the WEF decides to depopulate lets hope its this lot first 😏

I suggest transporting them to an island in the middle of nowhere, where they can protest in peace.

Absolutely. If it was my store, I would first have my "nabbers" grab all of the cell phones being used to take video, put them on the floor, and stomp them into dust. THEN the pepper spray would come out, and other stuff as well. These "hostile protestors" are the same people who block ambulances when people in critical condition are being denied life-saving healthcare. Nothing non-violent about them.

Poke the bearded clown in the eye and the camera up his jaxci

You mean bored/boring middle-class wasters? Didn't do that at Glastonbury though!!even though it was Whiter than a Royal balcony 🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅 Security should have put the duster on them 😎👍

Bored/boring middle class wasters should have been at Wimbledon Cheering for neo-nazi Ukraine 😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣

@@l.m2190 ROFL, that's about 3 steps below "a bloke in the pub told me".

they are funded by dale vince

@@bonysminiatures3123 Did you have a point, or is it just your turn to say something stupid?

@@TheIrvy they are funded by dale vince owner of forest green rovers you are a few steps behind let you catch up ( if that is possible )

@@bonysminiatures3123 And what relevance does that have? What matters to us is that they're blocking the roads and causing a public nuisance. Why would we care who's funding them?

They're extremely well funded, mainly by the "climate emergency fund" which receives donations from some very high profile and wealthy supporters. According to the website the CEF dispersed over $5.1m funding climate activism last year. 🙄

@@sidean26 I wonder how many of the high profile and wealthy supporters use private jets.

🤦‍♂️🤣🤣

Lol! 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂

Most premises do NOT allow photography.

title didn't live up to the video

😆🤣😂

😂😂😂

The ones with the camera is the co-ordinator they need to start arresting these and confiscating their camera equipment as evidence of terrorist activity so they might get it back in a few years if extremely lucky. Have them marked as the organiser so senten3cing will b3 much greater than for the brand dead retard terrorists with yellow bibs. We need to sieze this equipment if they come by vehicle which is most likely after all it is do as we say not as we do sieze the vehicles slap them with fines that after the first time are easily in the thousands then tens of thousands if the rich scum want to fund them fine let them h3lp pay off the national debt with their ill-gotten money.

Poor cannon fodder? What sort of results do those fools expect? They all look addled and confused like Joe Biden.

@@tomsherwood4650 Veganism is bad for the brain.

He look the NUTTIEST is that why he's in charge 😂😂😂😂😂

You right, and he is the only one getting paid, all other are just useful idiots.