Britains Heavyweight Champion is.. Balanced? - Challenger 2 TES - War Thunder

  Рет қаралды 47,750

JustinPlays

JustinPlays

Күн бұрын

Not too fast, not too slow, decent firepower, and good.. Armor? Alright the TES is not the absolute best, but it can still hold it's own in todays environment!
Please note, the video was made before the Teaser and Dev.. xP
00:00 - The Heavy Boi
04:03 - A.. "Slow" start
06:26 - Steady wins the race!
10:27 - THE DOWNTIER BOOLI
13:37 - Terrible Timing...
16:12 - But Wait, theres MORE!
19:54 - Will it still work?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wanting to support the channel while gaining access to Justin's In-game Decal? Use this link for 3% off your War Thunder store order, and unlock the Decal!
War Thunder 3% Discount Link - bit.ly/3AkZW2W
Patreon - / justinplays
Twitch - / justinplays
/ justinplaystv
Twitter/X - / justinplaystv
Instagram - justinplays...
Discord - / discord
Business - Justinplaysbusiness@gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to join in on the excitement that is War Thunder?
Use the link below to not only start the game but earn rewards as well!
warthunder.com/en/registration...

Пікірлер: 266
@sydney4814
@sydney4814 6 ай бұрын
Fun fact about the Challenger Theatre Entry Standard (TES); did you know that this is one of arguably the most unrealistic and broken models in top tier? the side armor is fairly infamous for how inaccurately programmed it is, the side armor of the TES in this game is unnamed "ERA", which is actually just unnamed ROMOR ERA from the 1980s, which is utter obsolete garbage. the ERA it has in real life is actually Rafael Shield R, which was developed FOR THIS TANK, and is capable of stopping up to 30mm APFSDS rounds! (you're looking at 130-160mm of kinetic protection) (also Shield R is a hybrid of ERA and NERA, it has an ERA block attached to a NERA screen, which is why the TES' ERA is model is over 60% thicker than the Challenger 2 (F2)'s modeled armor kit, it's also why the tank weighs 75 tonnes as the armor kit was "protection matters above ALL ELSE" and added ten tonnes or so to the tank's weight) Aaand Gaijin knows this, and outright bans any discussing it on the forums LOL, their justification is that the Rafael company's website+all the protection standards Shield R has qualification for aren't good enough sources to justify buffing it/want *more* documents to prove the true protective capabilities of it... all of this was known BEFORE THE TES ever entered the game in the dev server, the ROMOR ERA was called out/they were told what the ERA should be, and the solution was to lock the thread and just remove the name "ROMOR" from the xray while keeping all the stats)
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
Gotta keep russia winnin
@trevor7873
@trevor7873 5 ай бұрын
I know and hate that they keep the challenger so weak when its armor should be very good
@sydney4814
@sydney4814 5 ай бұрын
@@trevor7873 Aye, especially when you know it's just to make Russian mains feel better when they oneshot Challenger 2 TES' from across the map with BMP-2M darts/2S38 darts...
@DaktEdits
@DaktEdits 4 ай бұрын
Bro leaked the documents 💀
@sydney4814
@sydney4814 4 ай бұрын
@@DaktEdits I know it's a joke lol, but I very much didn't.... I literally just *DID MY RESEARCH* and am using the publicly available data for both tank armor and Rafael's armor package.... unlike Gaijin lmao.
@warhead_beast7661
@warhead_beast7661 6 ай бұрын
well, it gets nerfed next update, the side armor at one point was able to withstand the BMP 2 APFSDS, next update it will not anymore. Even though the ERA alone is rated for Dardo 30mm APFSDS but Gajin pulled the "public information is not enough to prove" card while russian ERAs get modelled after the claims their manufactures make
@PeterJ1851
@PeterJ1851 6 ай бұрын
Yeah thats typical GJ. They pull this card since the start of the game.
@potatosoup19129
@potatosoup19129 6 ай бұрын
@@PeterJ1851they only started showing more of this bias side as they added more modern tanks with technologies that are still classified.
@sydney4814
@sydney4814 6 ай бұрын
wait what lol??? are they nerfing it AGAIN while adding a premium version?!?!
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 6 ай бұрын
You're kidding it needs buffing FFS.
@zeffy._440
@zeffy._440 6 ай бұрын
It's able to resist a few shots it is not immune to APFSDS to the side
@Jenso1994
@Jenso1994 6 ай бұрын
For some reason I really like the TES, even if it is the complete opposite of my other favorite MBT (Type 10). Maybe because the side armor kinda works sometimes. Nothing I would rely on but a nice surprise every now and then. Together with the 5 sec reload it is just perfect for those engagements with multiple enemies. At least thats my experience.
@ARDEN440i
@ARDEN440i 6 ай бұрын
Second here! I've actually gotten a few nukes playing the TES 😂 don't ask me how, but I always do well playing it alongside my Black Night.
@whitestormmaster430
@whitestormmaster430 6 ай бұрын
how did you post this comment 3 days ago?
@toknode331
@toknode331 6 ай бұрын
@@whitestormmaster430 probably he's like on patreon or sometin n get early access to content? dat d be my only explanation
@Zosterias
@Zosterias 6 ай бұрын
Not gonna lie, as much as it sucks. I tend to not overextend in a Challenger 2 unlike in my Abrams/Leo2/Strv122s/T-80s. I’ve actually gotten more nukes in the Challenger 2s than I do with the strv 122s lol.
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
It's just looks so menacing and so beautiful at the same time. Shame gaijin doesn't give it justice
@No1harris_98
@No1harris_98 6 ай бұрын
Honestly so stoked for the chally 3 as a Brit but I do wish the chally 2 armour is a bit more accurate as it’s very lacking at times.
@DevinEMILE
@DevinEMILE 6 ай бұрын
I mean the Chally 3 they're adding is just a Challenger II test bed with the smoothbore. No more armor. Might as well call the Black Night a Challenger III Prototype
@mingshili9769
@mingshili9769 6 ай бұрын
As brit main I am not exited for it, because it gained 2 more weakness and only 1 advantage, I feel like it will have similar overall performance to 2E. Chally3 has slower reloading, and removed my favorate thing smoke ammunition, same 1500hp PU as 2E, only for a penetration gain, I can take it, but I am not convinced this is a total upgrade to 2E. Playing all the way too the latest chally😂you should already get used to the worst top tier apfsds and won't mind the penetration that much, because you shoot weak spot and gun barrel all the time then penetration will never be an issue
@DTC-ex7wg
@DTC-ex7wg 6 ай бұрын
@DevinEMILE Its more like the Challenger 2 LEP (RBSL)
@CALIMA2000
@CALIMA2000 6 ай бұрын
Gaijin should add the camo blanket that cover the ERA armor.
@codenamecrusade1083
@codenamecrusade1083 6 ай бұрын
8:15 - This seems to be an issue with the entire Sun City map, I've gotten killed throughout several great flanks just because the garden steps between B and C cause your gun to shake uncontrollably. Hope gaijin looks into that
@sydney4814
@sydney4814 6 ай бұрын
it isn't the steps, it's the curbing on them, if you want proof, go to anywhere with the tiny white curbs and park on them, they make your gun jiggle so much you can't aim!
@TNKDestroyer
@TNKDestroyer 6 ай бұрын
@@sydney4814 This is correct. Its the white curbs, ive been saying this for a while. Need a fix for sure
@fire_drake12.arc.24
@fire_drake12.arc.24 6 ай бұрын
ive noticed ANY map with that kind of curbing shit does that, not just sun city.
@jPlanerv2
@jPlanerv2 6 ай бұрын
Heaviest tank in game has worse armor than BVM and t90m that are lighter by like 20 tones lmao no bias here komrade
@Niko_rj
@Niko_rj 6 ай бұрын
It's called reactive armor, and work on it for decades.
@mrshar1000
@mrshar1000 6 ай бұрын
Contact 3-5 cannot stop APDFS, maybe the old M735 but defiantly not modern rounds, there is a reason why older country's stick with contact 3, its because it covers more of the tank and works well on older RPG rounds. The Soviet vehicles in warthunder especially contact 1 has been overperforming forever now, it needs to be nerfed.@@Niko_rj
@Niko_rj
@Niko_rj 6 ай бұрын
@mrshar1000 contact 3? What is this? Shouldn't Contact 5 hold modern apfsds? Yes? but in the game we do not have modern apfsds that were created against Contact 5. In real life, of course, everything penetrates contact 5, but reactive armor simply reduces the penetration of a projectile into armor. In the game we already have apfsds that Kontakt 5 should essentially penetrate, for example DM 53, it penetrates it in the forehead from 1 meter, but in the game all apfsds have reduced penetration. Also, the developer does not claim that it can penetrate Russian tanks with contact 5.
@joekingsword2150
@joekingsword2150 6 ай бұрын
Add the fact that the era in the tes has been proven to stop 120mm kinetic and that the mantlet area has COMPOSITE ON IT (not modeled In-game of course) so if it was accurate it would be impenetrable from a hull down position but nooooooooo.
@Boris_The_Turtle
@Boris_The_Turtle 6 ай бұрын
@@mrshar1000It doesn’t stop APFSDS. It technically reduces its penetration but the armor usually under it stops it.
@arakami8547
@arakami8547 6 ай бұрын
God, there are so many things Gaijin could do to make then Challenger series more realistic and more competitive. In real life she stands beside her peers, in-game she stands below them. As she is now, her gun is poor - her mobility is poor - and her protection is poor. She has a far inferior gun to the Abrams or Leopard, she is notably much less manoeuvrable as an Abrams or Leopard, and her protection is too flawed or is paired with a trade-off in mobility, to make it better than the Abrams or Leopard. Small changes to make her more realistic and to fix her in-game deficiencies would make her more competitive and enjoyable. Small changes. For realisms sake, its mobility really shouldn't be much worse than an Abrams or Leopard. Though powered only by a 1200hp engine, they travel on second generation horstmann hydrogas suspension. A similar suspension system permits the Type 10 (powered by a 1200hp engine) to absolutely smoke - and I mean smoke - the Type 90 (powered by a 1500hp engine) despite it having a lower power/weight ratio. Paired with regenerative steering which is not but should be added in-game, the Challengers should be nigh as manoeuvrable as an Abrams or Leopard 90% of the time bar when hoofing it, especially when off-road. Note that the Challenger can exceed 60kmh but is limited not to for maintenance sake and so as to not throw or damage the tracks, brakes, or transmission. One can imply that, as she retains the same top speed with 15 tonnes of additional armour. The Challenger was made no cheaper than its contemporaries, it's even quite a bit newer - only entering operational service in 1998. Her systems nonetheless have gotten a number of upgrades as well. Commanders have been given pseudo-thermal sights via installation of CROWS systems, and her gunner has received the third generation Catherine MP thermal imaging sights. Alongside improvements to her transmission, her engine has also seen a number of upgrades. Her new engine designated the CV12-8A and CV12-9A are improved over the original CV12-6A that we have in-game. Applique armour as seen on the TES and 2F in-game should famously be rated to stop 30mm kinetic munitions, not 30mm of kinetic penetration as they do in-game. Her Barracuda thermal camouflage as seen equipped by the TES in-game should help reduce her thermal signature compared to contemporary MBTs, in-game it does not. Paired with the Challenger 2s design which was made to reduce her radar signature and engine signature, the Challenger 2 should be harder to detect than it is currently. The Challenger 2 TES is also equipped with a full-spectrum soft-kill frequency jammer which does not work in-game... Another deficiency of the Challenger in-game is her slow first-stage ammunition replenishment, which is unrealistically slow, it should be halved. The only thing needed by the loader to replenish the first stage ammunition is for him to move light propellant, that's one of the numbered benefits of having two-piece munitions. For balancing sake, I'd also just love it if the Challengers UFP were rated to stop the best rounds in the game - not unlike the T80BVM and future T90M. The lower front plate is a glaring weakness, capable of being penetrated by the weakest guns in the game and easily by autocannons. Paired with her driver port and mantlet weaknesses, its safe to say that in-game she is even less protected than many Russian tanks - which just is not realistic for a tank 20 tonnes heavier that should be able to stop said penetrations in real life. Though applique armour of the TES and 2F added to the LFP should help protect her against low-power rounds and autocannon fire, her lower front plate would remain a glaring weakness to all but the weakest APFSDS rounds and of course, the additional armour would slow down the tanks mobility.
@zhufortheimpaler4041
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Ай бұрын
well, maybe Challenger 2 is properly represented in game? In respect to mobility: The base line Challenger 2 without TES weights in 64t and has a topspeed on road of about 59km/h, offroad of about 50km/h. The competition (Leopard 2A5 and M1A2 respectively for the time of introduction of CR2 in the mid 90´s) have around 70km/h roadspeed and 60km/h offroad speed at a combat weight of around 62/63t. Both M1A2 and Leo2A5 have 1500HP engines and a power to weight ratio of around 24HP/t, Challenger 2 has a 1200hp engine and a power to weight ratio of 18.75hp/t. It requires longer stretches at full acceleration to gain its top speed and it struggles more with heavy terrain while being slower on the average. It cant deepford water obstacles deeper than 1m without preparation and cant climb over obstacles higher than 90cm and cant cross ditches or trenches wider than 2.3m. In comparison M1A2 can not ford waters deeper than 1.2m, it can climb obstacles of 1.06m height and can cross trenches of 2.7m wide. Leopard 2A5 can deepford without preparation up to 1.4m, can climb 1.1m high vertical obstalces and can cross 3m wide trenches. Defacto Challenger 2 IS less mobile, agile and capable than the main competition of the day. And that is even without adding 11t of additional armor. During the time Challenger 2 was introduced, its main competition (M1, Leo2) all introduced features like electric turret and gun laying drives, commanders independant thermal imagers etc. Challenger 2 lacks this stuff. Until around 2019 the TSS (Thermal Sight System) of the gunners optronics was a late 80´s Gen2 Thermal Imager, only in the last few years a few CR2´s got the new Catherine MP Thermal Imagers as Upgrade. CROWS was only installed on a single CR2 squadron (Street Fighter Upgrade). Radio and Mobile Frequency Jammers are standard on both M1 and Leo2 since the early 2000´s, CR2 is not special here. Barracuda is also only issued to a few squadrons if at all. Challenger 2 was at introduction a mid 80´s technology design and did not get any relevant in service upgrades since its troop trials from 1992 onwards till today. At the same time, Challenger 2´s inflation adjusted price for a new vehicle in 1999 was 9.2 million GBP, about 11.5 million $. The comparison for Leopard 2A5 is around 7 million $ in the same timeframe So CR2 was significantly more expensive than a Leopard 2A5 in 1999 and at the same time lacked ALOT of capabilities of Leopard 2A5. (and didnt even have better armor, as 2A5 got new 2. gen chobham style composites AND applique armor ontop plus had the better main armament an ammunition availible)
@arakami8547
@arakami8547 Ай бұрын
@@zhufortheimpaler4041 As I noted, power-to-weight ratios and top speeds are not the end-all be-alls to a tanks mobility, see the Type 10 versus the Type 90. Otherwise, when compared to an Abrams M1A2 - the Challenger 2 has a greater ground clearance as well as a V-shaped hull, plus it has a lower ground pressure and a much superior suspension and transmission system. RWS, as with applique armour, driver front and rear thermals, Barracuda, and Jammers, are fitted to the Challenger 2s when deemed necessary as part of a Theatre Entry Standard (TES) upgrade. The British Army has no shortage of Enforcer RWS to fit to the Challenger 2s in case of war. Otherwise in-game, the Barracuda is present on the Challenger 2. In-game, RWS and its thermals are present on the Challenger 2. In-game, Jammers are present on the Challenger 2. None of those functions work, neither does the Challenger 2s otherwise core design signature-reducing features. Not represented properly is the Challenger 2s advanced suspension and transmission systems, not represented properly is her gearing suited for faster acceleration - not represented properly is her mobility. I believe it was the Challenger 1 that introduced independent commander sights and electric turret and gun drives to Western tanks; the Challenger 2 of course has those features as well. Commander thermals are provided by fitted RWS. Regarding the Challenger 2s gunner thermals, as far as I am aware - it's about on par with that of the 1992 M1A2s, though as noted - a number of them have been fitted with the modern Catherine MP. The 1998 Challenger 2 has received a comfortable amount of upgrades, on par with those fitted to the 1997 M1 Abrams SEP upgraded to the 2007 SEP V2 plus further minor upgrades. As with the Leopard 2 and M1A2, it also has Chobham Gen 2 - dubbed Dorchester in British Army service... Until NGAP and Farnham come properly online, Gen 2 Chobham and Dorchester are about the most advanced arrays fitted to Western tanks. Most certainly, the thickness of the Dorchester arrays of the Challenger 2s are thicker than those on the Leopard 2s.
@zhufortheimpaler4041
@zhufortheimpaler4041 Ай бұрын
@@arakami8547 HP/t ratio says alot about how well a tank does in heavy terrain. Challenger 2´s ground clearence WITHOUT TES is 500mm. M1A2´s is 430mm. There is barely a difference. Leopard 2A5 is 500mm. WIITH TES, CR2´s ground clearance is reduced, due to higher weight on the suspension and the additional mine protection below the belly. Challenger 2´s specific ground pressure is 0.9kg/cm², Leopard 2 is 0,89 and M1 is 1. With TES fiitted, Challenger 2´s specific ground pressure rises to 1.2kg/cm². The V shaped hull does not protect adequately vs mine blast, so it requires an additional belly armor plating in TES, wich reduces its ground clearance down to about 43-40cm. The assumed amount of CROWS or ENFORCER RWS etc is irrelevant, if they are not mounted as standard on in service vehicles, same goes for Barracuda, rear driver cameras and other shit. That the CR2 fleets TES package gets dismounted and shared between severeal vehicles does imply that the MOD did NOT procure enough TES packages and RWS for the whole fleet, but only a handfull for the few deployed vehicles. So are you talking about Challenger 2 with or without TES? And we are talking about the real vehicle, wich is objectively worse and more expensive than its competiton. Challenger 1 did not introduce independent commanders sights on western MBT´s, thats Leopard 1 with the TRP-2A commanders periscope, that allowed a form of Hunter-Killer on early Leopard 1, on Leopard 1A4 this was upgraded to the fully stabilised and hunter killer capable PERI-R12. On Leopard 2 the PERI-R17 was used from the start. Challenger 1 only had Night Vision (passive IR) fixed in th replaceable forward viewport of the commanders cupola and lacked an independant periscope. The Gunners primary sight was initially the same active/passive IR as on Chieftain (until the mid 80´s when it was replaced with TOGS) That Challenger 2´s composite is thicker than on Leopard 2 does not really matter, as Leopard 2 got the Arrowhead Applique armor ontop, wich increases protection vs CE and KE rounds compfortably beyond what CR2´s armor is capable of. And by the way, both M1 and Leopard 2 are already using 3rd generation chobham style armor for 10+ years.
@arakami8547
@arakami8547 Ай бұрын
​@@zhufortheimpaler4041 Look mate, I'm arguing that the Challenger 1s and 2s that are represented in game - the ones with RWS, Barracuda, with TES - are not represented properly. I don't give a rats arse about the current state of the Challenger 2 fleet, I would if Britain were at active war - in which case they'd be fitted with TES. Otherwise what I care about are the Challengers that are depicted in-game, and the accurate depiction of their equipment. I'm arguing that the Challenger 2s that are represented in game - the ones with RWS, Barracuda, with TES - they are not represented properly in-game. Sure as hell, not every Abrams or Leopard 2 are equipped with an RWS either - nor does every Leopard 2 have an arrowhead. Now: I'm aware that TES degrades the Challengers mobility, so would TUSK for an Abrams or whatever the Leopard gets. What do you want of the Challenger 2, for it to be a 74 tonne super-tank with the mobility of a 60 tonne Leopard 2? TES provides armour upgrades, that give the tank a level of protection above that offered by the base Challenger 2, by the base Leopard 2 A5/A6/A7s, and by the base M1A2 Abrams SEP/SEP V2. At its bare, weight for weight, it has a lower ground pressure than an Abrams and a higher ground clearance. Though those advantages are minimal, so is the Abrams ability to ford 1220mm of water, over the 1070mm of water that the Challenger 2 can. Yes power-to-weight ratios are good measurements to judge a tanks mobility, though it doesn't take into account the advancement of a tanks suspension and transmission systems, the tracks and grip, the ground pressure, et cetera. Compare a car with tires and weak engine, to a car without tires but a strong engine; in that scenario, you wouldn't expect the tireless vehicle with a higher power-to-weight ratio, to outpace the vehicle that has a lower power-to-weight ratio. The Challenger 2 relies for her mobility, on her advanced epicyclic transmission and hydrogas suspension - the Abrams and Leopard 2 do not, they have torsion bar suspension and lesser advanced transmissions. Same applies to the Type 10. The Type 10s more advanced hydrogas suspension and transmission system provides her with superior mobility to the Type 90, despite having a lower power-to-weight ratio. Challenger 1 does have an independent commander sight fixed to the rotatable commander cupola, therefore it is an independent 360 view commander sight. Thanks for the information regarding the Leopards use of independent commander sights, I assumed it had none like the earlier Abrams. The more you know. Lets settle that both the Challenger 1 and Challenger 2 have independent commander sights, and both have electric turret and gun drives. The armour of a tank also isn't entirely situated at the turret cheeks; the Dorchester arrays of the Challenger 2s hull are thicker than the comparable arrays of the Leopard 2s. It is as thick as the M1 Abrams LFP at 700mm LOS, though unlike the M1 Abrams SEP V2 LFP which retains Gen 1 Chobham that provides about 350-400mm KE protection, the Challenger 2 uses the more capable Dorchester. That's without an additional 50-100mm effective steel that is often seen donning the Challenger 2 UFP. Dorchester that dons the 1998 Challenger 2 is of the same generation of armour that dons the Leopard 2A5/2A6/2A7 and 1997/2007 M1A2 SEP/SEP V2.
@depressedodst2610
@depressedodst2610 6 ай бұрын
Your vids make the console grind easier I watch almost every vid when I see them 💪
@raizencore
@raizencore 6 ай бұрын
I recently watched your first TES video, I remember when it had like 5 thousand milometers of protection against chemical projectiles or something which was completely comical.
@paperthik9262
@paperthik9262 6 ай бұрын
Personally i use the "default short sight" when playing, its in base game and no custom sight quite does it for me but i also dont need range lines up to 6000m so the short range sight is a nice inbetween stopping the lines at 2800m i think, try using it if you dont want the clutter
@jackykast2926
@jackykast2926 6 ай бұрын
I’m really excited for the OES it’s just a easier way to get the TES plus the .50 cal is nice, the challenger 3 just seems like a worse leopard 2A6 though
@rastrom5589
@rastrom5589 6 ай бұрын
It is a worse Leopard 2a6 in ever way its sad really :(
@sydney4814
@sydney4814 6 ай бұрын
Also Justin!!! at 8:15/10:15 the jiggling/shaking is caused by those cursed white curbs, if you stop on them, they make your tank shake nonstop until you get off!
@michaelthebarbarian3380
@michaelthebarbarian3380 6 ай бұрын
It's amazing. I have 7 Challenger 2s in my stable for me Brits. Love.
@christopherchen8220
@christopherchen8220 6 ай бұрын
Another great vid! Thanks for the awesome content. I know you don't do SPAA very often...but Type 81 when? 👀
@TheTomster777
@TheTomster777 6 ай бұрын
Nice like seeing member stuff
@zacharyhaymore42
@zacharyhaymore42 6 ай бұрын
Fun fact, noticed that T80U is in my squadron. I was like hey I know that US751 Guy lol. Also, excited for my A1 HC
@AMDeZani
@AMDeZani 6 ай бұрын
19:50 The Frogfoot was so happy they killed you that they popped their wing off in excitement!
@chrisbacon3071
@chrisbacon3071 6 ай бұрын
I can’t wait for the Challenger 3 prototype!
@rastrom5589
@rastrom5589 6 ай бұрын
yey a worse Leopard 2a6 in every way :D
@thatonelocalauthority2809
@thatonelocalauthority2809 5 ай бұрын
@@rastrom5589not really. Better thermals, LWS, better reverse gear, slightly better hull armour at the cost of turret armour, more acceleration.
@ufcplayer2444
@ufcplayer2444 6 ай бұрын
AS a UK Main i Love that they get a new top tear plane and the challi 3 cud BE nice but the challi 2 IMA buy IT idk i wand IT and i will buy IT
@farmcat9873
@farmcat9873 6 ай бұрын
This 564mm pen round doesn't even touch the coming T-90M it's gonna be a mess trying to fight one of them in the new premium that the UK is getting cause this round is what it's gonna have to fight it.
@TimoZSimulations
@TimoZSimulations 6 ай бұрын
4:03 i had the same issue, but the funny thing is that just the folders for my xm1 and m1kvt are gone, every other vehicle is fine
@Code_Kai
@Code_Kai 6 ай бұрын
My issue with challengers in war thunder having seen them IRL is not the fact the top speed is low, it's the fact in-game their acceleration is completely butchered. They're pretty damn fast from a standstill getitng up to speed.
@AMDeZani
@AMDeZani 6 ай бұрын
Their turning is almost completely gimped. They should be able to maintain most of their speed while turning, whereas in War Thunder you slow to almost stationary when turning a corner.
@nightwing268
@nightwing268 6 ай бұрын
@@AMDeZani no regenerative steering will do that, it sucks to see irl nato tanks actually be so maneuverable at speed, then in war thunder just turn so slow.
@janiceroyal8052
@janiceroyal8052 6 ай бұрын
Ive tried to fix this and Noticed it too, My M60A1s were losing severe RPM so I Said UP yours Gajin, And stuck my Tank controls with Manual Transmission it helps a little.. But not much. It also saves your life driving tanks with no STB. 1s Gear with tanks looks cool and is really useful for M103.
@blacksky121_
@blacksky121_ 6 ай бұрын
Wow, this video was recorded a while ago, huh? Its been like half a week since the teaser
@swynty5767
@swynty5767 6 ай бұрын
Great video as always 😊 I really wonder what they'll get for their rank 8 tank, maybe the chally 3 or chally 2 130mm L/51 test bed hmm
@JustinPlaysTV
@JustinPlaysTV 6 ай бұрын
I wouldn't well imagine anything, maybe getting ready for the next update for Rank 8?
@fly_pie_1172
@fly_pie_1172 6 ай бұрын
chally 3 already announced as their rank 8...
@redicity5884
@redicity5884 6 ай бұрын
@@fly_pie_1172 the comment was made 3 days ago
@onfiredragon3009
@onfiredragon3009 6 ай бұрын
​@redicity5884 wait how did they comment 3 days ago when the video is an hour old
@swynty5767
@swynty5767 6 ай бұрын
@onfiredragon3009 I edit his videos, this was pre video release
@user-yv8ii8og2e
@user-yv8ii8og2e 6 ай бұрын
I get that bouncy glitch i had a tank turret from a t55 stuck in my tank the whole game and couldnt play at all for ages
@shadowconquer-yv5yd
@shadowconquer-yv5yd 6 ай бұрын
11:24, the bane of nearly every Soviet, Russian, and British tanks. Though French tanks do suffer to bad gun depression, they have the mobility to go in and reverse out. The 6km/hr and 4km/hr are so unfrench like from the Somua SM, Surbaisse, and AMX-13 though.
@shadowconquer-yv5yd
@shadowconquer-yv5yd 6 ай бұрын
Also, I relate to 16:13. Seeing another player with the same minor nation (except China and Sweden) as yours is like a eureka moment. Just another fellow that suffers alongside you. Especially after passing through rank 1 and 2 where only most players last and quit so French players are rare and only, I see them a lot at top tier and around 7.7.
@riccardotomelleri1216
@riccardotomelleri1216 6 ай бұрын
the Premium one is better then the searchable
@therizzler61
@therizzler61 6 ай бұрын
I love your content keep it up
@Bigshot1
@Bigshot1 6 ай бұрын
Hey man I was John_Warthunder_ on the other team in you last game! ggs dude too bad your team decided to leave so soon
@sentinelxcix2526
@sentinelxcix2526 6 ай бұрын
I think I prefer copy/paste premiums to locking interesting and unique things behind a paywall, but at the same time I'm not the biggest fan of being able to buy a top tier vehicle on day 1. Also I think the suspension doesn't know how to interact with the kerb, which is why the tank ends up bouncing around
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
I agree, they should make it if you want to get a top tier premium be a certain lvl or unlock certain rank in tt
@ImStiglitz
@ImStiglitz 6 ай бұрын
Man i wish gaijin treated the minor nations like they do with russia. I see to play Armored Warfare back when you could find a PvP match and their devs treated all tanks the same and balanced them equally, from arietes to the challengers.
@OperatorJackYT
@OperatorJackYT 6 ай бұрын
*ayyy its my favorite Bri'ish tank bruv* can you do the Challenger 3 next?
@Red_Lion2000
@Red_Lion2000 6 ай бұрын
This tank would be so much better if it was realistic and the gun breech weakspot wasnt half the turret.
@tomatimahl
@tomatimahl 6 ай бұрын
she may be heavy, but she sure is a beauty
@DTC-ex7wg
@DTC-ex7wg 6 ай бұрын
Challenger 3 (P), more like the Challenger 2 LEP (RBSL). While one lead to the other, they are not the same.
@Minute_Sniper
@Minute_Sniper 6 ай бұрын
Justin man, u said u was gonna do ztz-59D1 a year ago and u never did it
@aidensilgram6606
@aidensilgram6606 6 ай бұрын
Hope they do the 50% off at the end of this month like they did last year.
@luxiet2518
@luxiet2518 6 ай бұрын
I wonder whats difference between upcoming premium HC and one that is already in game.
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
There's a chair on top.... that's about it
@rowanyuh6326
@rowanyuh6326 6 ай бұрын
Luckily the next challenger gets dm53 smoothbore 120
@cedric9874
@cedric9874 6 ай бұрын
Does anyone have a sound bug at the moment in war thunder? Very often jet sounds are way to late or not in the right direction from where the jet is coming from. Sometimes i cant even hear some tanks. I uninstalled all mods and reinstalled the game but now its bugged again
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 6 ай бұрын
Turn off "speed of sound" in the options. I keep it on but it can be confusing.
@MarkyMark2003
@MarkyMark2003 6 ай бұрын
I did the 15 a month Justin!!
@arcanos9706
@arcanos9706 6 ай бұрын
So, if you don’t like the challenger, what is your favorite MBT in game right now? Can be for looks, firepower, handling, armor, etc.
@JustinPlaysTV
@JustinPlaysTV 6 ай бұрын
Type 10, oddly enough
@arcanos9706
@arcanos9706 6 ай бұрын
@@JustinPlaysTV ooh! Might i ask why? What draws you to it?
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
4 second reload, really fast and somewhat working armour (don't count on it though)
@crazyadam9281
@crazyadam9281 6 ай бұрын
The biggest flaw of the CR2 tanks is their extremely small first stage ammo racks, I'm also not looking forward to facing the T-90M with that broken ass spall liner.
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 6 ай бұрын
It's a big stinking turd on top of the whole patch. Unless they go through hundreds of machines and give them liners as well.
@Fusion_Ghost
@Fusion_Ghost 6 ай бұрын
You have to recreate the file and itll work again
@dupstepfreak2
@dupstepfreak2 6 ай бұрын
i want to buy the chelly 2 premium that comms with the new patch.... will it be worth?? and how mutch will it cost+-?
@Optimusprime56241
@Optimusprime56241 6 ай бұрын
No it won’t
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 6 ай бұрын
It's sabotaged garbage.
@sabotagemtuga6571
@sabotagemtuga6571 6 ай бұрын
Can I use the discount if I am a console player?
@Mr.Su-35Flanker-E
@Mr.Su-35Flanker-E 6 ай бұрын
T-90M next?
@garett6493
@garett6493 6 ай бұрын
I was UK main, grind to top tier was PAIN, it made the grind for other nations so much more fun by comparison. Now when i play top tier, I avoid UK because everything is so slow. To play the chally, you basically need an enemy to present to you and if you dont kill them first shot, you are D U N done. They look like they have good armor but it feels like paper against everything else when playing. I rely on mobility so I never play UK anymore, its a shame really
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
Least you get stock apfsds
@gameboosted007
@gameboosted007 6 ай бұрын
Importen question: WHEN is the sale gonna start and WHEN will air superioriteit drop
@Red_Lion2000
@Red_Lion2000 6 ай бұрын
probably next tuesday.
@gameboosted007
@gameboosted007 6 ай бұрын
@@Red_Lion2000 and how long will the sale last?
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
Probably a week or 2
@gameboosted007
@gameboosted007 6 ай бұрын
@@shikikanaz4624 thx bscause i have exams rn so i dont have time to log in and spend money
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
@@gameboosted007 wish u luck man
@Trump24GreatWhiteHope
@Trump24GreatWhiteHope 6 ай бұрын
Why is there a table on the roof?
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 6 ай бұрын
To flag you when you're hull down. Gaijin sabotage you buy not giving you it's jamming function.
@Xinevlin
@Xinevlin 6 ай бұрын
Play type 16 P, i dare you.. The armour is thin but produces a lot of spall for some reason, kinda slower than FPS also 9.3 with m735 yeah.. no bueno.
@BBRAIN1977
@BBRAIN1977 6 ай бұрын
is that china invasion stil going on in Wt ? 90% of the games you have the feeling i am playing on asia server. it made the whole clan quitt Wt because communication and teamplay with them is out of the window
@jovanni_orb5116
@jovanni_orb5116 6 ай бұрын
Good morning
@vendetta8022
@vendetta8022 6 ай бұрын
It's purely a skill issues when your team are flanked by Chally 2. Nice games.
@Simon-tr9hv
@Simon-tr9hv 6 ай бұрын
I aalways finds it funny that thing on top of challenger2, not sure what its for, but it looks suspiciously similar to those support used fro pizza box to prevent the box collapse and/or touch the pizza
@Red_Lion2000
@Red_Lion2000 6 ай бұрын
The pizza table is the best thing about the tank.
@sydney4814
@sydney4814 6 ай бұрын
Fun fact, it's a thing that it's obvious why Gaijin won't ever model it LOL, it's a full-spectrum soft-kill jammer of guided missiles/anti-tank missiles that gives a full 360 of protection against certain types of guided missiles.... I think you can tell why Gaijin isn't ever going to model it in LOL (while giving T90A Shtora/T55AMD1 hard-kill APS)
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 6 ай бұрын
@@sydney4814 Yeah any weapon that needs to talk to it's firing platform with radio signals it should jam. Maybe one day. Perhaps when everyone gets spall liners too. Another instance of sabotage and bias.
@Simon-tr9hv
@Simon-tr9hv 6 ай бұрын
@@sydney4814 ah, thank you
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
Obviously a tea table for when it's tea time
@therizzler61
@therizzler61 6 ай бұрын
Do you think you make a video F-4S to see where it stands in the current day and age of war thunder
@therizzler61
@therizzler61 6 ай бұрын
Also do you have any tips for a beginer starting the grind
@alphawolf1786
@alphawolf1786 6 ай бұрын
He is a ground player if you want a review on the f4s you are better off asking defyn, seeker, or joob on it as they deal with top tier air
@therizzler61
@therizzler61 6 ай бұрын
@@alphawolf1786 ok thx i was jus wondeing from a CAS standpoint
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
I think a youtuber named 'jaek_' has a solid video on it which you can search up, but personally I would NOT play the f4s as it sits extremely high and has missiles which aren't beginner friendly. Try get the f5c instead (unless you already got it) 1. Try to fly low if you see jets like mig29, f16 etc as flying really low makes most radar missiles obsolete 2. Carry mixed countermeasures 3. In a down tier I'd fly high and use the sparrows (aim7) to get kills 4. Watch some videos on using radar and radar missiles 5. You can bomb but look around as I've killed many f4s going for a bomb run and get killed 6. Do not dogfight a f5, you WILL lose 100% of the time if they are good players 7. Learn enemy aircrafts, vehicles like j35xs (another premium) have extremely low amounts of flares (only 12) so it's easy food for your radar missiles as most don't carry chaff
@therizzler61
@therizzler61 6 ай бұрын
@@shikikanaz4624 ight thx so much
@Thedirtbeneathyou
@Thedirtbeneathyou 6 ай бұрын
I wish they would do the sa instead of the hc as a prem just so it’s unique because most of the poems are just copy and paste m1 and m1a1
@felixgaede6754
@felixgaede6754 6 ай бұрын
A WarThunder video that is not the dev server, what???
@FazekasPK
@FazekasPK 6 ай бұрын
I think the game is NOT ready for the arrival of rank 8 vehicles. Not in the slightest. We'll have another wave of powercreep (possibly feature creep too), ammunition that will make anything below obsolete and most of all, more compression. Oh, and almost forgot, a new wave of high tier premium quitters to make your gameplay a miserable experience. I'm not looking forward to the next update.
@Red_Lion2000
@Red_Lion2000 6 ай бұрын
What would make the game ready?
@FazekasPK
@FazekasPK 6 ай бұрын
@@Red_Lion2000 -Less compression, regarding technology in all BR ranges. -Stabilizing already existiing game mechanics, to make the work more reliably. -Improving server stability. -Having volumetric shells, armor interaction sorted out. -Improved rendering system, to not have invisible opponents. Should i continue? I can...
@Red_Lion2000
@Red_Lion2000 6 ай бұрын
@@FazekasPK "Less compression" We've been asking for this for years, it never happens. "Stabilizing already existiing game mechanics" Examples? "Improved rendering system, to not have invisible opponents." This I agree with, shit is annoying af. "Should i continue?" No need to be a prick, I was just asking. plus you didnt even mention the biggest problem, the fact that all the maps are close quarters call of duty style garbage.
@FazekasPK
@FazekasPK 6 ай бұрын
@@Red_Lion2000 Wasn't my intention to be a prick, but maaaaaan... CQB city fights are annoying as all hell. Having weapon systems designed to destroy targets at long distances, to be used in knife fights. One of my all time pet peeves. Gaijin does like to force those on the players, like it "helps making the game more action packed" as they say quite often. Also the sound engine that is completely random and can't play more than 4 different sounds simultaneously or reliably is kind of at the same level. You hear a friendly from 400m away, though half a city, but can't hear the loudest enemy tank from 20m unobstructed... Or when you can't hear SUBSONIC planes approaching you.
@Red_Lion2000
@Red_Lion2000 6 ай бұрын
@@FazekasPK I totally agree on the sound. The ATGM nerf was a real kick in the gut because the nerf was technically realistic, that atgms are long range weapons, yet 95% of the combat in WT takes place in unrealistic close range enviroments.
@MrJarvisful
@MrJarvisful 6 ай бұрын
Challengers vs merkavas, which are better.
@bearisland7200
@bearisland7200 6 ай бұрын
Challengers. Merkava is worse in every way pretty much
@Breakfast598
@Breakfast598 6 ай бұрын
Stock MBT gameplay, pls
@AutumnStar097
@AutumnStar097 2 ай бұрын
The chally 3 TD is just a better versions/combination of a german 120mm L/55 gun and all the great things from the previous tank, anyway, the TES is not that great, it is similar to the OES, and I don't see that much differences between them. Me personally loves british ground tech, because you got a 40mm gun in the first tier.
@wildtrigger1254
@wildtrigger1254 6 ай бұрын
I still believe britan will do good after this update
@rastrom5589
@rastrom5589 6 ай бұрын
Why? Britain is getting a worse Leopard 2a6 in every way Challenger 3 has worse armor,Its slower and heavier bad mobility
@ArctrooperHavoc
@ArctrooperHavoc 6 ай бұрын
Eats 10 rounds of aofsds in a close quarters game ah yes this is balanced
@knowahnosenothing4862
@knowahnosenothing4862 6 ай бұрын
That's not typical. Normally gets one shot busy being too fat to move. He has good ping it's the only thing saving him in this thing.
@getbrutal4388
@getbrutal4388 6 ай бұрын
i like absolute top tier uptiers (12.0, 12.3) the best because you generally don't have people who haven't at least grinded 1 high tier tank, as well as the prem they have. Yeah there's the occassional TURMS only with a Mig 29 but it's way less common than the 10.0 black hole. Those games are the absolute worst, worst teams, worst players, most chaos. The new prems are going to make absolute top tier the same shit and that sucks. It's unfortunate they feel the need to sell those vehicles. The gameplay takes a huge hit. You might think "more noobs to feed on a top tier" but really it's just "more teammates that are going to leave after one death and no kills".
@vagabundolino
@vagabundolino 6 ай бұрын
Why did you get so litle at 9:10
@JustinPlaysTV
@JustinPlaysTV 6 ай бұрын
Thats a good question..
@josiahcurtis1663
@josiahcurtis1663 6 ай бұрын
no way, i was in your last game on cargo port, 16:12 im BubblesR_Us. and at 16:59 you can see me die and my friend get a double kill (John_Warthunder_) Then at 18:08 He kills my friend and i get a double kill. And at 18:12 i shoot his side and only kill his loader.
@phoenix83191
@phoenix83191 6 ай бұрын
They should add BR 13 in this update
@sanmiguel4774
@sanmiguel4774 6 ай бұрын
No
@phoenix83191
@phoenix83191 6 ай бұрын
@@sanmiguel4774 why?
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
Think they should but only really for planes, I feel like planes like j8f, kfir c7 or any aircrafts with no bvr capabilities should be fighting the likes of su27, mirage 4000, f15 and grippen
@Runner357_TV
@Runner357_TV 6 ай бұрын
PHAT
@garionvogel3607
@garionvogel3607 6 ай бұрын
I’m mostly upset that a USA F-15 that was designed to kill the USSR planes gets out classed by a Su-27 in almost every way in this game, in terms of the tanks coming I’m disappointed that the Abrams is basically just a copy and paste of every other Abrams
@tonityrmi7992
@tonityrmi7992 6 ай бұрын
Haha... T-spot.. cos its british... I'll get my coat
@JustinPlaysTV
@JustinPlaysTV 6 ай бұрын
You're banned.. From my heart.
@BugattiONE666
@BugattiONE666 6 ай бұрын
NOT TOO SLOW ARE YOU HIGH DRUNK OR TROLLING
@hiphip4808
@hiphip4808 6 ай бұрын
I think the armor on the challenger 2 isnt as bad as people, I find its hull armor is more trolly and inconsistent compared to say the Leopard 2s, M1s and other NATO tanks (other than sweds)
@sentinelxcix2526
@sentinelxcix2526 6 ай бұрын
The upper front plate has ~525mm KE protection, so it can defeat weaker darts and even BM60 in the right situation, the issue is that the driver view port, mantlet, and entire LFP can be defeated by any darts you'll fight at top tier
@ArctrooperHavoc
@ArctrooperHavoc 6 ай бұрын
​@@sentinelxcix2526most of the time I would take 4 Hits before I end up dying each game in the challenger
@Trump24GreatWhiteHope
@Trump24GreatWhiteHope 6 ай бұрын
I actually like the challenger 2, the thing I hate the most besides shit thermals is how loud the engine is.. you will never get the drop on a push. Unless there deff or just unlucky it seems
@012jxs7
@012jxs7 6 ай бұрын
hi
@romasterkey946
@romasterkey946 6 ай бұрын
In the city map sun city or what ever stay off the stupid white curbs. Their models has been broken forever your scope will jump if your tracks are touching them.
@Uncle_Buckshot
@Uncle_Buckshot 5 ай бұрын
The spot on 14:22 is annoying asf.. ruining the game for others with spawn camping.
@IceXV2
@IceXV2 6 ай бұрын
10:30 Russian ammo dont like to pop, Then you need to watch videos from Ukraine
@bencarmine3032
@bencarmine3032 6 ай бұрын
The white edfes of the side walks make your aim bounce up and down. Ffing anoying.
@babalonkie
@babalonkie 6 ай бұрын
Britain does not do "The Best"... it goes for "Sufficient".
@floathua
@floathua 6 ай бұрын
I want to repost your video to the Chinese bilibili websie,It means distributing your video to other websites and marking your original link. Of course, all this behavior will not bring me any financial gain. It is all yours.I will not change your video, your video will be distributed to other websites as it is and bring Chinese viewers to your original video,It's all about generating electricity for love. In short, it's a porter. Of course, the machine translation I used may not be accurate when it is directly translated into Chinese?I'm waiting for your reply here
@9Achaemenid
@9Achaemenid 6 ай бұрын
to correct Russian haters, USSR got only one 11.7 top tier mtb while all other nations got at least 3x 11.7.
@shikikanaz4624
@shikikanaz4624 6 ай бұрын
Even so there 11.0/11.3 are really solid, but not wanting to say they don't deserve it but t90m needs to be drastically nerfed for it to be fair in the current meta
@9Achaemenid
@9Achaemenid 6 ай бұрын
@@shikikanaz4624 I personally think Sweden got the most op top tier mtbs even though they haven't been in war for the last 200+ years.
@olex2999
@olex2999 6 ай бұрын
This update should be called "Ukrainian Tears" because of all the butthurt. Yes, the t90m is op, but the chally looks op too, and don't get me started on the f15 and griffen EDIT: I expected hate for that comment, but glad to see I'm not the only one sick of the butthurt by the mostly reddit community
@thatoneguy1741
@thatoneguy1741 6 ай бұрын
Looks OP and IS OP are not the same
@jPlanerv2
@jPlanerv2 6 ай бұрын
More like Any other nation player rage other than handheld russian shit tanks players update
@Kubulin24
@Kubulin24 6 ай бұрын
What UA has to do with War Thunder?
@gameboosted007
@gameboosted007 6 ай бұрын
Gripen* and i mean sweden realy needed a capeble top tier aircraft and i think the gripen being a lil OP is ok because not that many ppl play sweden and US has the F16´s (getting the F15´s) and USSR has the Mig29´s (getting the SU27). So i would think its ok for sweden do be get a better aircraft because its the only one they have.
@olex2999
@olex2999 6 ай бұрын
@@gameboosted007 I agree completely. I'm fine with vehicles being OP, it's cringe when people only notice/care when it's USSR vehicles.
@roulejj1342
@roulejj1342 3 ай бұрын
Trash tank
@whatsaht2117
@whatsaht2117 6 ай бұрын
British top tier is absolute trash lol
@Jiberiel
@Jiberiel 6 ай бұрын
Just say it, US high tier teams just suck d*** ;D its why i stopped playing US ground. when i spaded my M1A1, it took me 126 games (with prem account and talisman) and 118 of them were lost. Unfun to da maximum
@FazekasPK
@FazekasPK 6 ай бұрын
I think the game is NOT ready for the arrival of rank 8 vehicles. Not in the slightest. We'll have another wave of powercreep (possibly feature creep too), ammunition that will make anything below obsolete and most of all, more compression. Oh, and almost forgot, a new wave of high tier premium quitters to make your gameplay a miserable experience. I'm not looking forward to the next update.
How to bring sweets anywhere 😋🍰🍫
00:32
TooTool
Рет қаралды 54 МЛН
Stupid Barry Find Mellstroy in Escape From Prison Challenge
00:29
Garri Creative
Рет қаралды 18 МЛН
Каха ограбил банк
01:00
К-Media
Рет қаралды 7 МЛН
Tiger vs 50 Tanks!?
19:35
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Yak 23: This Plane Is too good! | War Thunder Guides
5:19
Kaelsier
Рет қаралды 6 М.
My Favorite Main Battle Tank In The Game
23:10
PhlyDaily
Рет қаралды 217 М.
GAIJIN RESPONDS - Challenger 2 Debacle - War Thunder
21:52
TheEuropeanCanadian
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Boris Balances The "BRITISH" Bias - Bhishma TWMP  - War Thunder
23:57
Britain's "Heavyweight" Champion! - Challenger 2 TES - War Thunder
27:33
Balanced British Underdog - Challenger Mk.2 - War Thunder
25:22
JustinPlays
Рет қаралды 41 М.
БРАВЛ СТАРС ВЗЛОМАЛИ?!
18:31
Поззи
Рет қаралды 540 М.