Ottobeuren Abbey, Bavaria, Germany July 26th, 1975
Пікірлер: 39
@goldenstone70945 ай бұрын
The picture looks like a scene from Metropolis, and Richter is seen operating some large and mysterious machine.
@chrishopewynne2845 Жыл бұрын
Richter remains The Gold Standard of interpretation of JSB’s Organ output despite ALL the others….God rest your soul Karl and thanks for sharing your talent Many Many thanks for uploading this Ethereal Divine music.
@simontaylor23192 жыл бұрын
Compared to other renditions this is it...powerful stuff, the organ positively roars
@bert-hassokemnitz8580 Жыл бұрын
Göttlich,genial, geistvoll. So brilliant spielt niemand J.S.Bachs BWV 552. Karl Richter ist nicht tot.- Er lebt, dank KZfaq. Danke.
@schrysafis7 ай бұрын
In all of Bach's organ music we are all ensured he knew what he was doing. But the St. Anne prelude and fugue is something else here going on. The presence of the Holy Trinity. The fugue climax is justified by K. Richter's choice of registers. Amen
@angelosilva40517 ай бұрын
Il più grande di tutti i servitori ed interpreti di Bach Il più avvicente trascinante e profondo.Grazie Maestro Richter resterà per sempre.
@annamcancarini69532 ай бұрын
Come riconoscevano tutti quelli che hanno suonato con lui, era un 'diener', ossia il servo di Bach❤
@lucaogliari29123 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing. Karl Richter still is my reference in Bach's music.
@annamcancarini69533 жыл бұрын
Mine too, my first choice!
@karlrichterofficial33 жыл бұрын
As he always should be! :)
@stefanozucchetti75392 жыл бұрын
Anche per me
@TheLongSummer3 жыл бұрын
With Karl Richter through the 7 Heavens. Thank you so much for this upload, it made my Easter Sunday. Happy Easter and God bless!
@carmencasanova4433 жыл бұрын
Nadie con su fuerza,insuperable
@blindpugh12 Жыл бұрын
Beautiful rendition, thank you Karl.
@jmdujardin4 ай бұрын
absolument remarquable, je suis ému....
@Ann0-23-ky7dq9 ай бұрын
Bach’s Comp. Is like landmarks in how to understand how music breathes through audible Instr. Espec. The Cantatas, Organ works, Sacred Works etc
@Ann0-23-ky7dq9 ай бұрын
2Wards Perfection, l like the clarity of registration
@user-ys4zq2cz8k7 ай бұрын
I like his interpretations. A lot of water has gone under the bridge since his time, but I think organists should stilllisten to interpretations. I think that he really appreciated both the Trinity organ and Holy Ghost organs in Ottobeuren abbey. Karl Joseph Riepp certainly did well to provide us with these monumental choir organs.
@RenOkumuraOfficial2 жыл бұрын
9:19 -Fuga
@schrysafis11 ай бұрын
How could I skip hearing this majestic prelude to the lyrical fugue? I heard this work before just not the Richter recording
@pilizorrilla132 жыл бұрын
gracias!
@earthlightsmusic274310 ай бұрын
Brilliant recording and registration and acoustics! Hasn't that Abbey two organs? Walter Kraft played it on a Karl Josef Riepp organ there, so is this the same one?
@nightoil656710 ай бұрын
It actually has three organs, two by Karl Josef Riepp completed in 1766 and one by G.F.Steinmeyer completed in 1957. The two Riepp organs, on opposite sides of the chancel, are the smaller 2-manual Holy Spirit organ (left side) and larger 4-manual Holy Trinity organ (right side). The Steinmeyer organ is in the gallery above the west end of the abbey - the Marienorgel. Karl Richter is playing the Holy Trinity organ here. I think Walter Kraft probably did do his 1960s recording of BWV 552 on the Holy Trinity organ. It was definitely recorded at Ottobeuren (according to Bach Cantatas Website) and does sound like the organ in this recording. Richter may be from a now unfashionable musical generation but he plays with such spirit, bringing out the joyous essence of BWV 552. The fugue's third subject (13:10) is so incredibly optimistic - like a peal of bells - embracing the future. Info from: paulhale.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/ph13-12.pdf and mypipeorganhobby.blogspot.com/2009/05/1766-riepp-organ-at-ottobeuren.html amongst others.
@alexanderreikreik8 ай бұрын
king Karl on the Queen Anne
@schrysafis7 ай бұрын
Smart reference!
@tucu22 жыл бұрын
So möchte ich Bach heute nochmal live hören. Das bleibt wohl ein erfüllter Wunsch, weil es keinen zweiten Karl Richter gibt. Ihn nachzuahmen wäre genauso unkünstlerisch wie das heutige, "historisch" informierte, aber stinklangweilige Standard-Bach-Spiel. Abgesehen davon: Man kann Richter nicht kopieren. Dazu war viel zu eigenständig. Eben eine Ausnahmeerscheinung!
@WClauS Жыл бұрын
Muß Ihnen beipflichten, die sogenannte historische Aufführungspraxis = stinklangweilig, deren Interpreten müssten sich mal fragen, wenn Bach die heutigen Orgeln zu Verfügung gehabt hätte, - er hätte wohl unvorstellbar gigantisches erschaffen , und Karl Richter hat diese Aufführungspraxis, - Gottseidank ,- abgelehnt !
@EwicoCylinder3 ай бұрын
Ich empfinde jeder der von diesem grässlichen "Standard Spiel" in irgend einer weise abweicht hat die Neigung in die Richtung wie der Herr Richter, natürlich wird Herr Richter dennoch unerreicht bleiben aber das es möglich ist sich in seine Richtung gegenüber den Standard hervorzuheben empfinde ich als sehr faszinierend. Das macht den Charakter eines jeden Organisten aus der dies Versteht und diesen Weg bereit ist einzuschlagen.
@tucu22 жыл бұрын
... unerfüllter Wunsch - muss es heißen. Sorry!
@karlrichterofficial32 жыл бұрын
Was meinen Sie mit diesem Kommentar?
@ProOrganoPleno7 ай бұрын
@@karlrichterofficial3Dies bezieht sich auf einen zuvor geschriebenen Kommentar vom gleichen Autor, in dem es versehentlich am Anfang „erfüllter Wunsch“ lautet. Ein im übrigen sehr treffender Kommentar, dem ich nur zustimmen kann! 👍🏻
@Pleyel673 жыл бұрын
unnachahmlich unübertrefflich, obwohl beinahe ganz unscheinbar. Es bleibt ein Rätsel, wie innere Größe und äußere Zurückhaltung derart nebeneinander stehen können. So gänzlich anders, als in unserer schnöden Bach-Gegenwart. Was war es? Die wirkliche Liebe zum Ton, zu jedem einzelnen? Eine Art Diener des Höchsten im Kleinsten.
@dieterbergner40653 жыл бұрын
Neben Glenn Gould der beste Bach Interpret
@consti18732 жыл бұрын
Weder noch
@annamcancarini6953 Жыл бұрын
You can't compare Richter with Gould: Richter played ALL Bach works, orchestral, choral, sacred, he was Kantor, organist, harpsichordist, chorleiter, conductor, improvisator in the great Leipzig tradition, while Gould played a few Bach works on the piano, an instrument Bach never used. Besides, Richter was organist at the Thomaskirche, where Bach himself was kantor for 30 years. Sorry, but Karl Richter is on another planet.
@jimijarvinenorgan Жыл бұрын
@@annamcancarini6953 Very wise words! Anyways, interpretation is always subjective, and appreciating different interpretations is essential, because that's how we create art. Copying others's interpretations doesn't do any good. Richter however is unsurpassed in his unique and elegant style.
@annamcancarini6953 Жыл бұрын
@@jimijarvinenorgan Of course, de gustibus...
@ttwiligh7 Жыл бұрын
Gould was just too sensational to compare with Richter. He introduced totally new way to appreciate Bach, while I agree that Richter was much more versatile, probably the most versatile Bach performer ever.....