KEEP THAT IN MIND WHEN SHOOTING ANAMORPHIC PHOTOS | Photography Workflow

KEEP THAT IN MIND WHEN SHOOTING ANAMORPHIC PHOTOS | Photography Workflow | PS, LR, Luminar

Рет қаралды 4,779

Күн бұрын

In this video, I show you the editing workflow of photography with an anamorphic lens. Starting with possibly ways how to properly display images in camera. Then I show different ways how you can create a worflow with common editing software like Adobe Lightroom & Photoshop or Luminar. I also talk about different pros and limitations of each software.
Thanks for watching!
How I created the shots: • THIS LENS & FILTER COM...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Socials
/ florian.augustus.alexa...
/ floriana.a.flow
my video production
/ flowingframes
Our studio
www.levyond.com
/ @levyondstudios6506
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapters
00:00 Intro
00:54 Desqueeze in camera
02:43 Previewing Photos
04:21 Lightroom Classic
07:56 Photoshop
09:45 Batch process in Photoshop
15:11 Luminar Neo
18:51 Davinci Resolve
20:23 Outro
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music
Title: Forest Peace
www.hooksounds.com
Title: Oriental Lo-Fi
www.hooksounds.com
Title: Unbroken Feelings
www.hooksounds.com

Пікірлер: 32

@lukebatarseh1387 9 ай бұрын

Finally! An actual video about the process of de-squeezing more than one image. Fantastic video. Can't believe there isn't a default setting for anamorphic photography!!!!

@florian.augustus.alexander 9 ай бұрын

Thank you really appreciate it! Yeah it would be really great having that in photo editing software!

@dave_mcbain 13 күн бұрын

Thanks man!

@EmmaKAlexandra Жыл бұрын

You can figure out the percent you need to squeeze in Luminar with the formula 100 * 1 / [squeeze factor, 1.33, 1.8, etc]. So, 1.33x is 75%, 1.5x is 67%, 1.66x is 60%, 1.8x is 55%, and of course 2x is 50%

@florian.augustus.alexander Жыл бұрын

Thanks for the tip, that's useful to know

@Issask 7 ай бұрын

Thanks for this, I'm really interested in experimenting with Anamorphic photography and this video was really useful starting point when it comes to processing

@esharpton Жыл бұрын

🎉 The only video I could find!

@darkpheonix69008 28 күн бұрын

What i do is desqueeze the jpegs and open them on the second monitor to get the feel, edit the squeezed RAWs in lightrom, export and desqueeze the final jpg

@brunowilliam7529 Жыл бұрын

Thank you, really informative! I learned a lot!

@florian.augustus.alexander Жыл бұрын

Thank you! That's great to hear!

@thorstenjaspert9394 3 ай бұрын

I would be awesome if adobe implement dequezing in LR. Lens correction profiles woumd be nic fir anamorphic lenses.

@aerovision257 4 ай бұрын

I’m really interested the Davinci resolve way, after color grading the photo on time line, how can you export them as photo not video?

@alcozome 6 ай бұрын

Nice video - Just subscribed

@florian.augustus.alexander 6 ай бұрын

Thanks mate!

@chesterholland7659 7 ай бұрын

Hello, I saw you mention how in lightroom you could desqueeze the photo (with the aspect tool) without having to re-import if the lens had a smaller squeeze factor. Do you by any chance know the value for which I would stretch for a x1.33 lens?

@user-jp9js9th8o Жыл бұрын

hello Florian, thank you very much for your comprehensive overview about the development of squeezed photos.. one aspect that interests me and perhaps others: are there any differences in the quality (sharpness, contrast, noise, distortion) between all those programs? e.g. I could imagine that Davinci uses other compression algos than a specific photo program.. at the moment I only use Capture one because of its stunning quality aspects in RAW, but C1 dienst support any changes in the aspect ration until now...

@florian.augustus.alexander Жыл бұрын

Hi Tom, thank you, glad to hear! That in fact is a really interesting point. I haven't seen any drastic differences, but I can imagine there are some slight ones. Espacially between Resolve and the other apps. as the foundation between a dedicated desqueeze function and a generic stretch might be different.

@user-jp9js9th8o Жыл бұрын

@@florian.augustus.alexander hi Flprian, thank you for your quick reply... that is in fact an interesting point, not discussed by other contributors. But what I meant was actually meant much more simply: what direct output quality is / can be generated? As a newbie particularly with video cutting and a photograph I was surprised that davincis output as export via the still grabbing function generated a mushy 6mp pic from an actual 61mp original .dng I didn't find a way to change the export quality into 100% ... is there a "trick" to change that easily? Viele Grüße, Tom ps. Another mostly underr aspect could be the general handling of picture data by different development software - as there are big differences e g between genuinely for photography developed sw like capture 1 or Lightroom (the latter has a more flat colour and contrast behaviour and minor "exactness"/ sharpness) there should be much great deviations between photo- and videgraphic sw... tbt: to be tested

@florian.augustus.alexander Жыл бұрын

@@user-jp9js9th8o Hi Tom, yes the exporting options for photos aren't great in Resolve. When you export by grabbing stills, the image will have the timeline resolution. So in order to have the full res of the original photo, you have to make sure that the timeline you drop the photo in has the same resolution. It is a bit inconvinient with multiple aspect ratios etc. But then I mainly do the cropping afterwards in Lightroom. Another way would be to export the photos as a tiff sequence for example in the delivery tab. But surely Resolve isn't optimized for photo editing. But I still like the tools it offers very much. Yeah I guess there might be more differences with how the raw photos are interpreted between the different apps, but I haven't really taken my time analyzing that yet. But that could be a good idea to take a closer look at.

@tobiasnordli 3 ай бұрын

Wouldn't the correct way of desqueezing be to alter the height of the image? When altering the width you have to add pixels that are not there. If you decrease the height you throw away pixels you don't need..

@xavidub 4 күн бұрын

Luminar Neo just crashes everytime I try to do this

@Barwertfaktor 7 ай бұрын

Hi Florian, merci für das Video. Hast Du einen Tip, wie man die tonnenförmige Verzeichnung in LR oder PS korrigieren kann ?

@florian.augustus.alexander 7 ай бұрын

Ja, beide Programme haben tools zum korrigieren der Verzerrung. In Lr unter Transformieren und in Ps entweder in camera raw, das funktioniert ähnlich wie in Lr, oder unter den Filtern mit dem adaptive wide angle filter. Ich kann bei bedarf auch mal ein Video dazu machen

@Barwertfaktor 7 ай бұрын

@@florian.augustus.alexander Danke Dir , ich werde es mal probieren - und ein viedeo dazu ; immer gerne !

@Barwertfaktor 6 ай бұрын

@@florian.augustus.alexander Hi Florian - hab’s ausprobiert - funktioniert leider nicht . Beide Tools korrigieren entweder Tonnen oder Kissenförmige Verzeichnung. Bei der speziellen Optik des Sirui kommt es jedoch horizontal an den Rändern zu eine Beugung der Linien nach innen und vertikal nach außen - also einer Mischung aus Tonnen- und Kissenverzeichnung . Das könnte man jetzt pro Bild mit „Verzeichnen“ korrigieren, ist natürlich mühsam und ungenau . Hättest Du da eine Idee?

@dre1z3hn 8 ай бұрын

Ich hab noch kein anamorphes Objektiv. Wenn ich durch den Sucher schaue ist das Foto bei der Aufnahme dann auch so gequetscht oder sieht das in dem Augenblick "normal" aus?

@florian.augustus.alexander 8 ай бұрын

Bei der S1/S5 gibt es im Videomodus gibt es einen ananorphen desqueeze, dh die Preview und Playback sind korrekt dargestellt, aber sobald man in einen Fotomodus wechselt ist das Bild wieder verzerrt. Deshalb ist zum bild abschätzen die einzige Möglichkeit zwischen den Modi zu wechseln. Alternativ wäre eine Möglichkeit mit externem Monitor der einen ananorphen desqueeze hat zu arbeiten. Dann spart man sich das Modus switchen.

@dre1z3hn 8 ай бұрын

@@florian.augustus.alexander ah ok. Alles klar. Stimmt,..Jetzt wo du es sagst. Ich probiere das mal aus. Danke für die Antwort und das hilfreiche Video 🙏

@legacy_2309 Жыл бұрын

actions PSh luminar)))

@marino4691 7 ай бұрын

Hä, warum findest du die Luminar-Variante am besten? Die hat ja die meisten Manuellen Schritte und der Desqueeze ist einfach nach Auge

@florian.augustus.alexander 7 ай бұрын

LrC kann über den Slider nicht mal einen 1.8x desqueezen, PS und Resolve benötigen eine Umwandlung, was auch seine Nachteile hat. Da bleibt dann Luminar noch übrig