White people did not exist until about 6000 years ago. Even if you believe this bs traced “creationist science” Noah’s three mythical sons would all have been black. All humans are descended from the first black African humans.

@@napoleonruss1528 the earth is only about 6 to 7 thousand years old. And that’s according to the Bible. So if we existed then the question begs where did you come from? You can sit there with your self righteous attitude thinking black superior thoughts all you want. But this is either true what he says or you’re subconsciously admitting that we existed before you which would bring a whole world of other questions. But don’t worry I don’t need your answers because I have already had all mine answered.

Interesting that religious people will trust DNA testing ( a scientific process) if it backs up their claims , but will then argue that other scientific processes like evolution are wrong . Seems science is ok as long as it suits the narrative .

@@billieboy8 ok so you evolved from one species to another? So you’re saying that your ancestors were monkey’s right? And before that they were fish then a single cell organism? Nah dude I go on facts not what proves my narrative. You don’t see a dog evolving into a cat or horse nor do you see an ape turning into a human do you? If that was the case then you’d see apes turning into humans today but you don’t. They tell you given millions or billions of years things go from probable to possible but we haven’t been around for millions to billions of years. I think you need to study before you talk about something you have no idea about.

@Radical Red Did I say what I believe ? I was just pointing out the irony . The straightforward fact is nobody knows how we came to be on this planet . We wern't there . Scientists can theorise given their knowledge of natural occurrences etc , and religious people can theorise given what they read in an ancient book , but nobody really knows . I'm open to any who can show me solid practicle evidence . The bible has so many different versions , just taking it literally and believing blindly is ridiculous . Talking snakes , humans living 900yrs , parting seas , same goes with science unless I see it with my own eyes it's hard to believe that there was this "big bang" End of the day nobody knows , and I'm not going to stress out over it I'm here, I lead a good decent life , one day I won't be . I'll make the most of my time . If I'm wrong I'll know one way or the other when I die whatever .

@@taylorthetunafish5737 Hello Taylor. What fact of history disproves biblical claims of history? How does the Bible dispute itself? Why don't the stories add up? You've made unsupported claims. So far, you have given only your opinion void of factual content.

@@taylorthetunafish5737 you need to do more reading, you're quite a bit behind the times.

Taylor The Tuna Fish, nice deflect. Jon Covey asked you to back up your claims but you ignored thar and went straight to Angela Hunt and demanded she back up her claims.

@Taylor The Tuna Fish, I can comprehend very well....when there is some thing to read. As it is, your response is not in this comment section. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt...maybe it was censored because I don't see it anywhere.

@@taylorthetunafish5737you would be very surprised if you educated yourself

Is there a Playlist for that series? I watched the first two and didn't know where the third one was.

@@calebmathias The New History of The Human Race playlist.

Bible apologists always try to push unproven claims. Note that almost everything alluding to the bible ends with a question mark. If you ask them to show you a single burial site they won't. Jesus' crucifixion and burial site was decided by a Roman emperor at a time when he was trying desperately to cling onto something to help unify his empire. No scientific proof. Just like no proof about the supposed burial site of apostle Peter. But go to Egypt and you will get proof of things or people that existed ten thousand years ago.

What discoveries would that be? He is tracing DNA back to people whose bones he did not have? Does this make sense? This is crap. Attempting to use science to prove what? You need the bones of Noah to trace his descendants. Did he present an explanation as to white all non-Africans have Neanderthal's DNA...3% to up to 40%, from one source?

Hi! Another of St Luke's ancestors here, apparently! CIS-ab rh null, and paternal dna only...what a life, what a ride!

'I've always balked at DNA tests' Does that mean you don't trust science? '.. but I'd love to know which son of Noah I came from' Does that mean you trust science-- if it aligns with your personal beliefs? 'I need this book'. The book is not going to tell you which son of Noah you came from. 'Nathaniel Jeanson’s Traced: Human DNA’s Big Surprise (2022, Master Books) offers virtually no surprises. This is not a science book. It is a work of fundamentalist religious propaganda dressed to appear scientific. Jeanson attempts to employ an analysis largely of his own invention on a narrow sampling of the human genome - extant Y-chromosome samples borrowed from other studies. These doctored genetic patterns are mapped onto historical events in an attempt to prove to the reader that all human beings are the descendants of the three sons of Noah - Shem, Japheth, and Ham. Jeanson’s views on world history are adolescent, Western-centric, and almost entirely focused on conflict and his science amateurish and divorced from any established methodology in molecular population genetics. In the end Jeanson, like all good science denialists, ends up ostensibly proving to the reader what he believed to begin with. Traced is a book working within his contractual obligations to his employer (the evangelical, conservative Christian ministry, Answers in Genesis) to promote a narrow, legalistic, literalist reading of the King James Bible and a Christian culture war agenda. It is not a science book. It is not a sober, informed historical account. It is a proselytizing work of pseudoscientific apologetics covered with a thin veil of carefully selected empiricism in an attempt to give his ideas the credibility he apparently craves' -- Herman L Mayes, Biology Department, Marshall University .. and countless other credible sources freely available online if you're interested. Apologetics books disguised as science are not going to teach you much about science.

A good hint is if any of they’re sins are reported along with the judgement that is laid upon they’re family/nation it’s what is passed on from them on

There's no concern to "balk" other than the expense of the testing. I think my "full blown" testing a few years ago by CRI Genetics was about $180. I'll probably wait a few years and have some further testing done (Essentially a duplicate test) just to verify results of the first test. The reasoning here is that my brother has had several tests done by other companies since they have become commercially available, and the results have varied a bit in his experience. Nothing major, just some lack of consistency in his "pie charts" of the percentages of Scottish/Irish/Germanic. My mother and father had 3 sons and my genetic test showed some things that did NOT show up on my brother's because of the number of generations included in the CRI Genetics' test. So, the next time I get mine done, I'd like to get the same tests done for my two brothers by the same testing company, then compare the results. The interesting thing is that I know my genealogies going back to about 1800 and the test verified what I expected to see going back that far (Haplo R1b). So, get your test done and make sure you get the Haplo Group test although a lot of genetic testing outfits have an upcharge for that testing package.

It would be so cool to know who else in the Bible we came from

@@kingskid5130 if they existed, you are related to them:-)

No. Telling you comforting lies.

@Ndea Monk whatever works best for you man!

@Ryan Flanders no. For the sake of human progress, at some point we have to go with what's honest. When it was discovered the Earth wasn't the center of the solar system like religious people once thought, it wasn't as simple as saying whatever theory works for you. It was about what's accurate. We really move forward with what is truth. And what these men are saying doesn't at all represent that. How I deliver that is as important as if it's true or not. They're aren't multiple truths.

@Ndea Monk that was my way of saying I really don't care what you have to say. Going on videos and replying to comments 8 months a go looking for an argument isn't really my thing. Enjoy your night.

@@Flanderslessons but you responded anyway. You don't have much longer to wallow in that ignorance.

I see your comment

@@timothytrespas Not this specific comment

It's not peer reviewed. It wasn't published in any peer reviewed journal - only by a religious institution. Basically one for the bargain bin.

@@user-vo4wc2jz8g a liberal and his peer reviewed cry. The Bible was peer reviewed as was the flat earth theory. 😂😂

Heirs of the Promise E Raymond Capt The" Lost" Tribes of Israel

@@amyjoyce2301 Excuse me? Could you explain a bit more?

@@blindvision4703 Sorry it's been so long I thought you might not even be around. The first is a link if you can patch it together. If that doesn't work you can search for the video on youtube by title. It explains how the tribes of Israel got scattered, some south and some north and northwest. It's a copy of an older interview but very interesting nonetheless..... There's also a current channel that goes deep into how Europeans were originally from Israel thousands of years ago. It's called: Christian America Ministries. He's great and a very nice man who will answer your questions if you email him. Peace.

They have tested it.. it only has x chromosome. And it's AB

@@canezbrandy and specifically, AB-

The only problem is 1 that the shroud and any contents on it is very old, and thus will not give any kind of reliable result, and 2 many people have handled the shroud since it came to be, any number of persons DNA will be on there to contaminate the original blood.

Watch Ron wyatt

The shroud is Leonardo da Vinci's humour. 😄

Me too

In bible The name of The children is in the man so whatever your forefathers are that’s what you are.

Victor Rael, that means you are a descendant of Tarshish.

mother line is not easy to trace because your father could have another line different of yours so too hard to trace the origins , only y DNA can trace your origins

@@ScientificEliteEducations tubal

'AIG should..' Not attempt to teach any area of science. Ever. If you want to learn about the Bible, apologetics, etc., then fine, go to AIG. If you want to learn about science, you are going to have to look somewhere else, unfortunately.

@TravisBickle Popsicle I guess you've missed the part where this has all been tested and documented, and more tests are being done all the time. Feel free to conduct the tests for yourself. That's what actual science is--developing a hypothesis and then testing to see if that hypothesis plays out or not, and then coming to conclusions based on the results of those many, many tests. But feel free to continue denying the test results and sticking to man's assumptions based on man's assumptions (yes, I did repeat the word intentionally), which have ALREADY been debunked and proven wrong decades ago. The Christian faith is not anti-science. It's anti-propoganda, which is what today's "science" is all about. "'Of the 52 active scientists who made the most significant contributions during the Scientific Revolution, only one was an atheist.' Modern science did not rise in rebellion against God; it rose to applaud him." Quoted from Dr. Jeff Myers' "Truth Changes Everything." It's amazing what students in the public school system AREN'T taught about history and the Christians who laid the foundations for what we take for granted today--in the arts, the sciences, politics, education. Granted, we see a lot of those fields crumbling away--but not at the foundation level; only at the surface level, ever since society determined to shove God out of the picture.

@@lauriegermaine6506 What specifically are you referring to when you say 'debunked decades ago'? Science is about falsifying, not 'debunking'. So, what are you talking about that has been falsified? Just curious, thanks

@@lauriegermaine6506 'I am reviewing the hardcover version of this book which I purchased on March 29, 2022 before it went back on pre-order. I have a PhD in biology and a tenured position in the life sciences at a public university where I teach genetics and participate in collaborative research in molecular systematics and population genetics. This review is an abridged version of articles on my website critiquing Jeanson’s work. Nathaniel Jeanson’s Traced: Human DNA’s Big Surprise offers virtually no surprises. This is not a science book. It is a work of fundamentalist religious propaganda dressed to appear scientific. Jeanson attempts to employ an analysis largely of his own invention on a narrow sampling of the human genome. These doctored genetic patterns are mapped onto historical events in an attempt to prove to the reader that all human beings are the descendants of the three sons of Noah. Traced is a book working within his contractual obligations to his employer (the conservative Christian ministry, Answers in Genesis) to promote a literal reading of the Bible and a Christian culture war agenda. It is not a science book. It is not an informed historical account. It is a proselytizing work of Christian apologetics covered with a thin veil of carefully selected empiricism in an attempt to give his ideas credibility' -- Herman Mayes, professor of biology, Marshall University I left a comment with this quote earlier, but it disappeared..? Anyway, I fact-checked the book, 'Traced'. Have you done that yet? Scientists who write for Answers in Genesis adhere to a statement of faith. One cannot conduct science while adhearing to some sort of statement of faith. Concerning Christians contributing to science: yes, of course, many Christians and people of other faiths have contributed greatly to science over the years, such as Francis Collins, who led the Human Genome Project. The thing is, those scientists were conducting science while they were doing their work, they were not conducting Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc. Science is conducted the same way all over the world, regardless of religious beliefs, culture, language, etc. This book is apologetics disguised as science. I can definitely see how it would fool a lot of people, since it does seem 'sciency' to people who don't know better. Also, please keep in mind that this author's work has not been peer-reviewed. That should definitely raise some flags in your head if you know anything about science and how it works. 'Feel free to continue denying the test results' I am not 'denying' them, I am *rejecting* them because they are pseudoscientific nonsense. I would have no trouble accepting them if they were not, but they are, so I have no choice but to reject them. I don't have any religious beliefs, so I don't have to deal with that nasty problem called 'confirmation bias'.

From quora-- Q: Who peer reviewed Dr. Nathaniel Jeansen's work on Y chromosomal Adam/Mitochondrial Eve and did they have any objections? A: It took me a while, but I eventually found your reference: JEANSON NT. Does' Y-chromosome Adam'Refute Genesis?. Institute for Creation Research. 2013. As you see, it was ‘published’ by a non-scientific, religious institution with a self-admitted non-evidence-based bias. Nobody peer-reviewed the work. It was never published in any peer-reviewed journal. Any reputable scientist who might have been asked to review the work wouldn’t have only had objections, they would have recommended it be deposited in the circular file where it belonged. --Ian Lester, M.Biol. Sci. Advanced, Australian National University

For Y-DNA testing, you need males of the last name you're interested in. Perhaps your father had brothers with male children who could take a test. As far as I know, Family Tree DNA is the only company today that still does Y-DNA tests. Ancestry and others are sticking to the more profitable autosomal tests that hook you up with thousands of cousins and show which parts of the world your ancestors likely originated in.

Y dna traces back the male line of the family about 25 generations. Creationists hack utube channels aren't the source of information for things Scientific. The Human Genome Project made this type of thing common place and is considered one of the greatest achievements in science. Hope you find what you're looking for

This is going to be long, but I'm going to post it anyway.. from Amazon book reviews: 'There is little to like about this book. Like virtually all works of *science denial* it is built off of obfuscation, misinformation, cherry picking, confirmation bias, knowledge of relevant fields that is rudimentary at best and often *stunning omissions* of relevant science. It is in no way a valid work of science. There is ample reason for Amazon to have cataloged this work under 'Christian' books and 'Bibles/theology' and *not* science. Creationism, and especially the young earth creationism that Jeanson espouses, is an article of fundamentalist religious belief and is *completely divorced* from science and should more rightly be described as a form of *science denial* right up there with those who believe the earth is flat or that vaccines cause autism. Jeanson in Replacing Darwin carefully creates a narrative in which data from comparative genetics appears to point to a young history of life on earth. He does so *largely ignoring* virtually *all* the science that says otherwise from geology to physics to paleontology. Instead, he brushes *whole fields of scientific inquiry aside* to look only at a carefully chosen and *misleading set of data* from genetics that conveniently gives him an answer that just so happens to fit with the *statement of faith* in a literal Bible he had to sign as a condition of employment at Answers in Genesis (such a contract that would be unheard of among any actual working scientists, myself included). There is little evidence in this book that Jeanson has a grasp on the relevant science of population genetics. For example, he claims he is using standard "coalescence calculations" from coalescent theory that he derived from an undergraduate textbook on evolution (see location 3075 in the Kindle version of Replacing Darwin). However, the calculations he is using have virtually *nothing to do* with coalescent theory. The coalescent is a complex body of theory and methods that allows geneticists to trace the history of gene copies in a population and elucidate the effects of demographics, such as effective population size, on the time that elapsed from when two gene copies in the population could be traced to a single gene copy in the past. *There is not one place, one method or one citation in Replacing Darwin that could be properly viewed as relevant to coalescent theory* These sorts of errors, both trivial factual errors and fundamental conceptual ones, are throughout the book. Jeanson, for example, ignores the distinction between de novo mutation rates obtained from pedigrees and substitution rates (the latter of which is referring to the accumulation of fixed neutral genetic differences between lineages and the basis for assumptions underlying molecular clock approaches). He uses *cherry picked* per generation mutation rates rather than neutral substitution rates to create the illusion that the comparative genetic data support a history of life that goes back only a few thousand years. A conclusion virtually every professional scientist on the planet would find absolutely absurd' -- Herman L. Mays Jr. Associate Professor of Genetics, Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University.

What the heck is an 'evo'? And what is 'creation science'? This is a religious apologetics video, not a science video.

@@travisbicklepopsicle don’t hold your breath, you’ll never get an answer

@@joeycan6801 true. I should know better by now..

*More than been patient to wait for answers or hold your breath, like someone said here, I want to remind you that you need to not forget that this presentation is only touching a very tiny created part of something supernatural. . . What you see came out or was made up of what you can't see. This is an absolute true even when you talk about science.* *So it's not about receiving answers you can argue against or holding your breath for an answer taylored to your lack of faith or ignorance. . .* *It's is about to think a bit deeper and go back to the principles that govern the creation, because they are the same revealed through science. (God is Omniscient, so God's knowledge is revealed through science for those who can't get it the easiest way . . . The Spiritual Realm is everything)*

@6:57 The chart shows Shem> Peleg> Jews, but when it shows Ham>Ethiopia>? There's no mention of Ethiopian Jews. The Bible mentions Ethiopian Jews, and the garden of Eden- "that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. " So if Ethiopia is the geographic location of the birthplace of humanity, wouldn't it make sense that the first Jews were African Jews? Racist interpretations of the origin of humanity always leads to the omission of the Black man, even among socalled Christians!

@@BishopEddie5443 No because the Ethiopian Jews are descended from Solomon through the Queen of Sheba. FYI race pride is a false idol. I feel for you but you need to repent.

@@BishopEddie5443 The phrase "Racist interpretations of the origin of humanity always leads to the omission of the Black man, even among socalled Christians!" is the literal spirit of Cain, it is the curse of Canaan: resentment and judgement manifested for the service of the reviling spirit within. Remember 1 Corinthians 6:10 revilers will not inherit the kingdom of God. I hope this helps you. I'd love to know your thoughts.

Do you believe one must keep the commandments to enter the kingdom of God?@@guineapigsith699

@@BishopEddie5443 First, The garden of Eden wasn't in Ethiopia. The River Gihon flows out Eden to Ethiopia. That could only happen if the continents were joined pre-flood. It is no longer the case post flood. Second,The curse of Canaan is more or less , Canaan being wiped out by God's judgment when the Israelites were freed from Egypt and told the land was theirs now. The Canaanites were a pagan race that practice child sacrifice among other disgusting things in the Lord's eyes. God gave them over 400 years to repent and they didn't . End of the line for them. Third, As far as blacks goes.We don't know if there were any blacks at the time of Canaan. Their skin tone might not have darken up by that time. The blacks might have been white, Unless you consider someone with a permanent tan as black , but Noah's sons most likely had the same skin tone. Ham's line would need time to darken up a bit. Keep in mind that it takes more than skin tone to be black. Facial bone structures are important too. They discovered a skeleton of a woman in Northern Europe just before Rome fell. Found out she was rich by her grave goods and she was black , by her facial bone structure. She was from a rich family visiting N Europe and died on the way back home.

Bible says they went eastward. I believe you can find them in India where they mingled with the aboriginal Dravidians.

@@verenatuna9010 Keturah was a Midianite which was Ethiopian..

With this reply you clearly display disregard for the Bible and God’s word. All we can do is pray for you.

@@gerhardborstlap7796 that's fine that you want to pray for him :-) another thing you can maybe do is learn about science from proper sources, not apologetics websites and videos.. *if* you are honestly interested in *learning*, of course.

'Valuable for apologetics' Sure, because when it comes to apologetics, anything goes :-) science, however.. doesn't quite work that way.

Only brothers would have the SAME Y cromsome as it is passed down from father to son. But Boys do have an X and a Y cromosome.Each. their X can be different.

@Plainsman Nope. Two Gentic Experts proved what he was saying and they are not Religious they have Degrees and evidence backing them up. But they ALSO studied the historical evidence of the Bible as in Archlogical EVIDENCE it has ern proven true. They would be a FOOL like you to disregard that history that coincides with history. Look this up, Dr. HARRY OSTRER AND DR MIKE HAMMER have proven this. "GENESIS CORRECTLY PREDICTS Y CROMOSOMES PATTERN" Use your brain.....not your emotions.

@@Mermaid404 When you say each X can be different, would that be only if they had different mothers, or even with having the same one?

@51MontyPython They're X's come one from their Father and one from their mother. Each has 50% of the Grandparents DNA from their mother and Father and they have 4 Grandparents. The X can be passed down from grandmother or grandfather. As BOTH have X CHROMOSOMES. So brothers can get either Thier father's X or their mother's X. Or vise versa. Only Identical twins get the same X as their siblings. DNA IS a crap shoot. But males Y CHROMOSOMES is ALWAYS passed from father to son. So two brothers WILL have their Father's unchanged Y CHROMOSOMES. That is why siblings may not look alike.

@51MontyPython Even Faternal twins can get different X CHROMOSOMES from their twin. They are two SEPARATE eggs developed and born just at the same time. Faternal twins can be boy/girls or boy/boy and girl/girl. Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen are Faternal twins. That LOOK identical but are just like siblings that look similar. Some look like their siblings some don't. One of my Neices looks darker then her two other siblings because her dad's side is darker.

You too buying into this hogwash?

@@samayo9746 I find it very interesting and logical. There is obviously lots more work to be done, but the lineage mapping shows a timeline that makes sense rather than thinking that we come from apes millions of years ago. We are created and the timeline shows our origins in a logical way. Why do you think that it is hogwash?

@@gordonmitchell729 it's hogwash because it's pseudoscience. Anyone who knows anything about science knows this. Ken Ham is *not* a scientist. Why don't you try learning about science from actual scientists? Learn about the Bible, apologetics, and stuff like that from Ken Ham. Learn about science from scientists.

@@travisbicklepopsicle I read that nothing can come from closed minds.

@@gordonmitchell729 sounds about right. Especially if a person has particular beliefs they *need* to be true. Difficult to penetrate a mind like that, and difficult for a person like that to be open-minded, especially when it comes to issues like this.

Wouldn’t you be curious about your ancestors and origin after the flood, I am!

If you have a Bible with a map you can find out too I kind figured that after the flood my ancestor was Japheth he and his wife moved to Southern Europe over time. I have one Bible that has a map showing where the people went to after the flood I’m going to buy this book .

This was covered 2 years ago. There have been several published tests to compare to.

Do the have the dna of the three brothers ?

I’d like to know this too mate 👍

I'm sure some young Earth creationist, somewhere along the line, has published an article somewhere using some 'sciency' sounding words claiming this information can be extracted from ancestry DNA testing.. perhaps AIG or ICR has mentioned it in one of their many pseudo-scientific articles.

you would have to transfer it to Family Tree DNA

Why would that be funny?

@@nialcc Last name.

@@nialcc because his name is Ken HAM

Because Shemites and Hamites were from two different son's bloodlines, but were often identified as the other. All people of color are not Hamites! His academics place all people of color as if descending from Sub-Sahara Africa. 🌍 And we all know where that trane of thought comes from.

@@merloncox4408 Trying to play the race card? Ad hominem.

He was 60 years old when he went on the Ark. That means his wife would have been just about as old. At that age they couldn't have had more children......unless of course he slept with his Daughter's in law. But that was very unlikely.

@shamarhebrew20 He and his wife may have had old age children like Abraham and Sarah or even Elizabeth, mother of John the Baptist, also aged.

There is no record of this if it had been so God would have told us trough his word the Bible It is crucial that we believe the Bible as God has spoken it if we don't all breaks down or will break down eventually

@@efrenm8826 We see in Genesis that Adam and Eve had more children before Cain and Abel that the scriptures do not tell us about, this is because Cain was the first to kill somebody, killing was the first noteworthy event to take place after the fall, so this is what we are told first, how do we know this? Because the first thing Cain does after being cursed, is getting married and going off to make a city of his own, so there must be a world with enough people in it already for him to be able to do these things… Scripture is true, and I am eternally grateful for a Father in Heaven who wants us to know him and love him, but all things cannot and are not written in scripture, the world has not been big enough to hold that much information until our day, God must always work within our abilities not his, and the best we were and are still able to handle, is just the noteworthy things, but when Christ returns he has promised to first correct all the misunderstandings we have had, and then to fill us in on all the things the scriptures did not have room to tell us about, and this is going to be so amazing!! Just because the scriptures do not have enough room to record things that took place, does not mean those things did not happen, and just because we use our mind to take real information and extrapolate out what could actually be possible, based upon true information we already have, does not mean that we are offending God, we are not building a gospel around these things, we are just thinking about them, and what did God give us curious minds for, if not to be curious? Just some thoughts…

@@Mermaid404 Bodies before the flood were not like bodies after the flood, people were living many hundreds of years, for a person who lived 950 years, 60 years old would be the equivalent of a toddler by our standard today… Getting our tiny minds to understand a world we have never seen or experienced, is the same as attempting our minds to understand heaven, our minds just cannot do it, our minds just do not have that ability, the earth and the people before the flood could be and do things it and we cannot do today, that event changed everything, nothing is the way it was before…

They don't care :-) anything they think confirms their beliefs *must* be fact.

@@travisbicklepopsicle My issue with them isn't the interpretation of the data that all sides have access to (I'm willing to follow the dots to get out of the inchohearant non-theistic religious materialism) it's their incorporation of a couple 20th century well-funded (verifiably false) history narratives into their formation. I'm sorry, it's a sophomoreic error. I was hoping that this might be biological proof of their inferred Shem biological lineage claim but it's just more layers of conjecture added to the pile. For me, that's the basic deal breaker as they, type 28 jews (ref. Rom. 2.28, 29) are using this venue as a conflated rehortical padlock to attach and promote their nonesence greatest victim fable.

@@labas9817 Please elaberate.

The global flood never happened

No it's actually a reference to "Ham" as in low quality comedy. I can't believe you didn't see the obvious

its pure coincidence and myth sorry

Actually he's an author who writes books that cater to the indoctrinated and ignorant. Probably a lot easier than getting an honest occupation

@@imafeltersnatch7634 "actually he's an author" You said the indoctrinated? That would be you but you don't listen..

Because we all are descendants. He went back and found the three split at the same time

I can recommend Ancestry, my sister and I have different last names and we are Identical twins. We did the tests in different years and they said we were Identical and they got our cousin lists right! So, I would go for them.

~$90 kit from 23andme 🐁

CHECK with Your Doctor. He might know.

Noah did not curse Ham, he cursed Caanan, all of Ham sons were not cursed or there would have not been an Egypt ( Mizriam) if the curse applied to all his descendants ( Mizriam,Put, Kush)

@Rick Gaines, Truly, the Scriptures say that Noah cursed his younger son Canaan (Genesis 9:24-27), and this curse came upon the Gibeonites (Joshua 9). But go and learn what this means. Genesis 10:6 The sons of Ham were Cush [Ethiopia], Mizraim [Egypt], Put [Libya], and Canaan [Palestine, Lebanon, western Jordan, southern and coastal Syria].

@Eytan Baruk the Bantu peoples descended from the sons of Cush (Genesis 10:7-8) in what we know as Sub-Saharan Africa. And over time intermingling clearly happened.

@Eytan Baruk if I were to agree w/ you, then I would also believe that there is no way that all European peoples descended from Japheth. I disagree w/ you, but tell me, if you believe that Sub-Saharan Africans like the Bantu peoples did not descend from the sons of Cush, then who did they descend from then? And if you don't have an answer, then this conversation is simply pointless.

@Eytan Baruk I believe that the Bantu peoples of Sub-Saharan Africa descended from the "sons" of Cush (Genesis 10:7-8), and that all white Europeans, Native Americans, East Asians, and South Asians descended from the "sons" of Japheth (Genesis 10:2-5). And the book of Enoch is not canon in New Testament Christianity according to the order of Melchizedek.

*Agree!*

Ken Ham was a school teacher.

It's intended to be confusing so you don't ask too many awkward questions. Frankly it's nonsense pseudoscience. It just sounds good to those who don't know any better. It's easy enough to research this stuff with Google.

Get the book

Family Tree DNA, wait till they have sales, as it can be expensive ?

yDNA, male only, did your father have a brother his sons would be your closest , or descendants of your Grandfather

@@williamallan7915 my father's brother is dead. I don't know any of my cousins through him as he wasn't married to the mother of his children. I'm only close with his sister's and their children. My brother's daughter got her genetic testing done. I guess I'll never have access to a Y gene from my grandfather.

Because he has a Biblical view . The scientific community can read the Bible and read his book.

@@cortneyhavens lol, some have and destroy his assertions…..Jeanson will never, ever, publish his assertions because he knows that the scientific community, experts, scholars who do this for a living; will prove with documentation, that he is wrong, way wrong. Jeanson’s work is for the Christian community who need something to continue to prop up their faith.

@@KD-hi6hh LoL, K I have seen these people and they aren't Christian. They are argumentative and believe the earth has existed for millions and millions of years. They have no definitive scientific proof. You know why? LoL because science is not absolute or 💯 . His research is interesting and more believable than a pseudo science world view.

@@cortneyhavens "They have no definitive scientific proof" .....What planet do you live on !!?? You obviously don't study science do you (no disrespect)....There are acres and acres of scientific "proofs" of the expansion of sub atomic particles (Big Bang) and Evolution. Granted, there are no "absolutes" (except math) but the compilations of math equations, experiments, dating methods, Archeology, Geology, Anthropology etc...all describe & corroborate the scientific theories (not hypothesis) of 13.8 Billion year old universe and 4.5 Billion year old Earth. None of them, zilch, napa, zip - corooboarate a young Earth that Dr Jeanson is trying to push.

@@KD-hi6hh Or maybe they won't publish it because they don't want anything other than their worldview broadcasted.

That's silly. There was a second ark, or really, I guess Noah's Ark was the second ark. A lot of those people you see in drawings being left by Noah (because actually he wasn't much of a sailor) got picked up by Utnapishtim. When the weather cleared up, Utnapishtim reported Noah to the maritime board.

@@byteme9718 i like it hahahhaa

Ancestry is good, especially if you want to search records and build a family tree, and you’ll get X Chromosome letters (men also get Y). FTDNA is more detailed. For example, you can see which actually chromosome the branches of your family are on, which is interesting on the X and Y. And they offer health information markers. You can also pay for more tests to deep div into the X (and men their Y) Chromosome. But I’ve not looked at them in a while, and they’re always changing, so I would suggest browsing their sites.

if you join Family Tree DNA , do it as cheap as you can, look for family name that could give the Haplo Group

True, richard dawkins, david attenborough come to mind.