I work for production houses. Most clients wont notice the difference in image quality between a Sony GM or a Tamron. U're safe buying cheaper glasses
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
That’s true!
@youshinkim54662 ай бұрын
Most Viewers see movie or picture through smart phone
@VictorLaforteza16 күн бұрын
Great review!! Might pick up one for events!
@mauriciolee73492 ай бұрын
Thank Kensei for an HONEST review of Tamron 50-300mm f4.5-6.3. I love it when you disclose you're not sponsored by Tamron. You also reveal its disadvantage that it's not suitable for vlogging.
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching!!
@rayeeaao2 ай бұрын
I'm a long telephoto lover, looking for a lens that can span from standard to at least 300mm focal length after I bought my a7CII. Discovering this lens in the past two days, I watched a lot of test reviews. You used it to shoot beautiful images, which made me decide to buy it.😍
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Thank you for watching! And glad to hear that!!
@milesm6931Ай бұрын
could you please try it on a APSC camera ? An 1kg combo would make it to (equivalent) 450mm😢😢
@BigGuyBandy2 ай бұрын
Hey Kensei, thank you for the great content, it's certainly helped me out, so keep doing what you're doing. 👍 💰
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Glad to hear that! Stay tuned in upcoming videos!
@kostasrestas2 ай бұрын
nice new hair style ! !
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Thank you! Cheers!
@mygad14 күн бұрын
Uh - Tamron 28-200 F/2.8-5.6. I have that lens and it's super great for a wide range of uses. If I am on the plane and going somewhere, one lens and that's the one I take.
@JatinthakurfilmsАй бұрын
New hair new style
@jaspercaelan49982 ай бұрын
Looks like this is a replacement for their 70-300, it's good that they seem to have fixed the issues with that lens. I'd like to see it in Z mount too. Looks like the perfect lens in terms of weight and focal length for telephoto landscapes. Always found the 100-400s and 70-200s were either too big and the focal length wasn't versatile enough.
@CC-gt3roАй бұрын
What issues? The 70-300 has superb image quality, more light entering the lens up to focal 240 than the 55-300, it is sharp and no chromatic aberration. I have parkinson and the photo are always sharp by keeping rule shutter 1/focal distance, so 1/250 or 1/300 at max focal. Some of my best photo come from this lens. Ibis work great for photo, in videos at max the best is to use a support to stabilize. The 50-300 seems excellent but the 70-300 is fantastic as well.
@makestuffmike2 ай бұрын
Super useful!
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Super thankful
@manfai050812 күн бұрын
any comments if compare to the Sony 70200f4G2? i got an a7Cii and looking for a tele lens for my up coming travel. thanks in advance 😊
@joerogan3703Ай бұрын
This one or Tamron 28-200? Which one would you pick?
@RiccardoGabarriniKazeatari2 ай бұрын
Awesome intro!
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@tats84452 ай бұрын
Thank you for your nice review ! What do you think of 70-200 f4 macro + 1.4tc combination (even if it’s double the price..) compared with this lens ?
@Princeton_James2 ай бұрын
The Sony lens is sooo good.
@umeshshrestha8232 ай бұрын
Can you compare thid with tamron 28-200 f2.8 - 5.6
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Interesting!!
@tvstamara2 ай бұрын
Wondering about that too. 28-200 has 2.8 at 28mm
@CC-gt3roАй бұрын
But 200mm for wildlife is too short. 300 is the minimum. But for travel you cannot do all with 50-300, you need a wide angle 17-28 or a 20-40. However with 28-200 you can adjust to all scenario.
@chilodaone2 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for the video, Hopefully you can help me with my decision. I am a total beginner with a A7C, Viltrox 16mm 1.8 (for night astro), Sony 55mm 1.8, Laowa 100mm 2.8 macro and the kit lens 28-60....I had been thinking in a zoom lens for travel photography, zoo and id like a lens i could use in a Formula 1 track. Which one would you recommend me to buy??? right now the 50-300 is at 1,100 CAD and the 50-400 is 1,474 CAD and altough there is a $$ difference, 30% difference in cost is not the end of the world. Which one would you recommend me to buy???
@rsat95262 ай бұрын
Been looking for a telephoto lens for my A6700. Do you think this one is a good option over Sony 70-350mm? If not, what are some of your preferred options? I own Viltrox 27mm F1.2, Sigma 56mm F1.4 and Sigma 18-50mm so I believe this one might be a good addition to cover the range I need for my travel photography. Agrigatou gozaimashita Akatsu san.
@karl.l2 ай бұрын
Nice clip, I have one question. I'm using FX30. Can I use this lens instead of 70-350 for APC cameras?
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Of course you can!
@BenjiSamosir2 ай бұрын
waiting for this on a z mount :)
@DoubleTheDom2 ай бұрын
Amazing video as always! Please use metric system 😞😞😞
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
Thank you!! I will next time 😀
@Mostahirtion2 ай бұрын
make a canon r8 video
@2000sidhupunjab2 ай бұрын
How is this MOST versatile when 50-400 exist from same brand with same aperture.
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
You grab it, then you know it
@Eatmeraw2 ай бұрын
Range and Weight as a package. This is almost half the weight of the 50-400.
@CC-gt3roАй бұрын
I have the super lightweight 70-300 at 545g. Try both and go hiking and you will see the light..
@2000sidhupunjabАй бұрын
@@CC-gt3ro I own Sony 70-350 mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS. Coming from 100-400 GM, Tamron 50-400 still feels super light. I just don't want to sacrifice extra 100mm (150mm in A7R5 26mp crop). Any lens ending at 300mm will make me buy 200-600.
@CC-gt3roАй бұрын
@@2000sidhupunjab for sure a 50-400 on a7c is already giving 600mm in video and photo at 10 mpx which is enough to print 5x7 or even 8,5x10. So on a7rV i cannot imagine, the crop 26mpx is already superior to my 24mpx a7c.
@pasarbunul41492 ай бұрын
This or sony 70-350?
@Princeton_James2 ай бұрын
Aps-c vs FF
@themarksmanABP2 ай бұрын
Apart from price, I'm not sure why anyone would buy it over the 50-400mm?? Strange release to me
@Through_the_lens_art2 ай бұрын
I think 50-400 weights around 1200g
@themarksmanABP2 ай бұрын
@@Through_the_lens_art ye its a heavier lens but you get 25% more reach at the same f stop. Hard buy this new lens when they have the 50-400....
@RiccardoGabarriniKazeatari2 ай бұрын
Weight! I'm all for the 50-300 (I'm gonna sell the 70-300 from Tamron for this one) while I avoided the 50-400 bc of weight
@themarksmanABP2 ай бұрын
@@RiccardoGabarriniKazeatari fair enough
@KenseiAkatsu2 ай бұрын
I guess the versatility and mobility?
@heynow28802 ай бұрын
I just bought the Tamron 50-400 and once I saw this lens with the weight I returned it immediately
@Jay_Q_0012 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Princeton_James2 ай бұрын
Too bad. One reviewer said the 50-400 has better optical quality and features. If all you are concerned about is the weight then you made the right decision.
@heynow28802 ай бұрын
@@Princeton_James I doubt it. We will see.
@CC-gt3roАй бұрын
@@Princeton_Jamesi have seen images comparaison magnified and 70-300 and 50-300 and 50-400 produce nearly the same images. I could not distinguish any difference except the latest two have a 50mm half macro that could be useful. The 50-300 is to my opinion the most complete if we consoder quality/focal length/weight/stability/price. The 70-300 is fantastic at 499$ USD. 50-400 is good for bird or paparazzi work but it is heavy and bigger. The 50-300 seems today the right choice. But i am very happy with the 70-300.