If there’s one prehistoric mammal I can honestly say I’m fascinated with, it’s Livyatan! I was so glad to see PNSO finally giving it its due but I do wish it had turned out a little better (looking at those seams!)

Could you tell me where do I find that research on ceratopsian jaws?

Yeah but he gotta make the list interesting. He often admits that pnso can always take all the spots

That Smilodon is amazing. By far the best one i have seen so far.

Does look like they did a good job with that figure but I’m holding out for their chonkin rex 😉

Pnso is better

Hm, I’m not quite sure where you’re located, or what currency you’re referring to but Everything Dinosaur currently has the Irritator in stock for about 53 USD before shipping!

@@Killershrewfan On this Dans Dinosaurs it says 259.99 $ which is really much but I live in Europe so idk if it's cz shipping or something

Do you know the name of the specimen? I wanna check it out

Two great options!

@@Killershrewfan unfortunately I only get one next week, Sinoceratops and that’s it. No more collecting

​@@kevinobill4818you can keep going if it makes you happy

It’s about taking them for what they are. It’s true that compared to the likes of PNSO and the other companies you mentioned, Safari’s offerings do feel simplistic and childlike. That being said, out of all those companies, Safari puts the greatest emphasis on education, and do market themselves as being made for kids. As you can imagine, this means they put accuracy and affordability first, so the fact that you can buy (depending) several meticulously researched Safari figures for the same price as one PNSO, Nanmu, or REBOR offering doesn’t hurt. They might not be as intricately sculpted or painted but they are made for a different niche of the market and price bracket, so comparing them in black and white terms like “which figure is better sculpted and painted” can be a bit unfair. When I make reviews or top ten videos like this, I like to consider intention above all else. I won’t judge a Nanmu figure for being scientifically inaccurate when it’s clearly not trying to be. When it comes to safari, the question isn’t “is this the most realistic figure ever?”, it’s “did they uphold their commitment to accuracy, and is it a nice figure for (usually) less than twenty bucks?” And the answer is usually a resounding YES!

@@Killershrewfan Thanks for the explanation :) makes sense now

Amen! I see this in the comments section on every PNSO review, someone who enjoys the Safari version better. I just can’t see how, PNSO is hands down the best model maker on the market.

​@@JohnSmith13146safari deserves to be celebrated for bringing accurate and affordable models to kids. That's why they're on here. That's being said, of anyone genuinely prefers safaris offerings to pnso than they're out of their mind 💀

@@starbirds2464 agree 100% I’m not trashing Safari for their low purchase price (and subsequent low quality), just saying they aren’t even remotely in the same ballpark as PNSO, so it baffles me how serious collectors can put them in the same arena and say Safari is better.

Well if people think that animals dont have individual differences, are just skin over bone and are copy pastes and the so different in shape trex skulls are not enough for them to prove it then no wonder why it gets so much hate

The head is the worst part imo. It looks derpy and doesn't represent the beautiful animal as say prehistoric planet does. The body is fine animals often look a lil chunky