How is Grealish a flop? Explain please.. Don't come with a/g bs please..By the way, 22 g/a vs 16 is not similar..Yes Antony would be if he started on a treble winning team

@@GermanChickenwing He is a flop because as a player he has not produced at the level one would expect from a 100 million pound signing. Frankly he was better at Villa but Pep changed his game to suit City but this did not improve Graelish's overall game. It actually stifled his game. You don't spend that kind of money for ball retention. Kudos on the treble, I think City would have won the treble with or without Graelish and there's nothing wrong with that.

@keigo7793 How was he better at Villa? His highest scoring season at Villa was 8 goals, and at City he had 5.. Grealish game is not about goals and assists because he ain't that guy

@@GermanChickenwing He was far more explosive in terms of take-ons and this made him a direct threat on goal for most teams, be it goals or assists(a maverick flairy type player) but City don't play like that so Pep tasked him with a different job, ball retention. I think City could have spent less money elsewhere and still found someone to retain possession on the left wing.

@keigo7793 I agree with you but not for the flop thing..

@@Magicmattattack Egal be simpin...