The NKJV is an excellent and trustworthy translation. I would encourage you to read it alongside your KJV. To truly get the best understanding, one must consult a variety of translations. This is actually what the KJV translators themselves stated in the preface to the reader.

Try the Simplified KJV (SKJV) :)

​@@VitoUno-- Or the Third Millenium Bible.

There are no mistakes in the nkjv it's antichrist doctrines of demons by design

Right on!

"Any bible can help to get someone saved but when it comes to studying we need to make sure we are studying the complete word of God. " I agree 100%!

Thanks for sharing!

First, I do apologize for not responding sooner. It is good that you asked the elder - never go off what a person says without studying for yourself! What you encountered is a prime example of scholarship being exalted over the Bible. Did the elder open up the NKJV and disprove the contradictions or did he simply point to the mysterious "original" manuscripts to justify his answers? Always look at who is being exalted. "And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence." - Col. 1:18 "...for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name." - Ps. 138:2 The Bible translations comprise a $6M industry. Have you ever wondered why only the King James Bible can be found in a dollar store? The KJV is the only Bible that is public domain, and as is the case with all public domain works, 25% of the text has to be changed in order to call it an original work that can be sold. If you look at the history of the NKJV, you'll find that it is traced back to the RV which is a product of Wescott and Hort (two scholars that did not believe the Bible - I did a video on it here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/maicmMt6mprYc30.html). Roughly 300 translations have been produced since 1900 - and none of them have had the impact on this world as the King James Bible. You don't have to be a Greek or Hebrew scholar to see that. All you have to do is look at what Bible gives Jesus Christ the preeminence, which Bible does not have any contradictions, and which Bible has not caused men to become wealthy. I hope this helps :)

I love how useful these discussions are… it’s great to see other seekers seeking 😊

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, no man can change that that Word will be with us throughout all eternity, Jesus I'd the Living Word, the man lied to you and is an antichrist servant and he knows it ,but willfully rejects the Real Lord Jesus Christ,remember Jesus said My Word they are Spirit and they are Life no man comes to the Father but by Me .I you really Love the God of the Real Bible, them get your daughter and get away from the deceitful liers and promoters of wickedness and evil.

I think this is a well-meaning video. But the analysis has shortcomings. The KJV does on occasion deviate from a more formally equivalent or literal translation of the Hebrew and Greek text compared to the NKJV. And, of course, vice versa. You can see this if you compare both translations with Young’s Literal Translation of the textus receptus. This not a money-grabbing modern translation but a very literal 19th century translation of the same exact underlying text of the KJV. Proverbs 16:1 (YLT): Of man are arrangements of the heart, and from Jehovah an answer of the tongue. Proverbs 19:18 (YLT): Chastise thy son, for there is hope, and to put him to death lift not up thy soul. Proverbs 25:23 (YLT): A north wind bringeth forth rain, and a secret tongue - indignant faces. In each of these instances, the NKJV has a more literal reading than the KJV. But the NKJV is not flawless. The point is that the KJV does not always have the more literal translation in every place. I have personally cross-compared many random passages of both to the original Greek and Hebrew with the help of concordances and interlinears and the NKJV stands up surprisingly well against the KJV in literalness. But there are still instances where the KJV has the more literal reading. For example, look at Proverbs 16:10 (YLT): An oath is on the lips of a king, in judgment his mouth trespasseth not. The KJV is more literal than the NKJV here. But then look at this one… Proverbs 18:8 (YLT): The words of a tale-bearer are as self-inflicted wounds, and they have gone down to the inner parts of the heart. The KJV matches Young’s translation more closely. However, if you look at the Hebrew word translated wounds you find that it means something that is swallowed or gulped down quickly or greedily. The NKJV better captures the literal meaning of the word, that it is something consumed, which is why the next line says that it goes “down into the innermost parts of the belly” (KJV). But the KJV translations aims to express the proverbial meaning more clearly even though it is less literal, which is consistent with the preceding verse: “A fool’s mouth is his destruction and his lips are the snare of his soul.” Ultimately, both are fine translations of the textus receptus. But you should not disparage one translation simply because it disagrees with the other. What matters is there agreement with the meaning of the underlying Hebrew or Greek text. Both get it right far more often than not, especially compared to many other translations out there based on the highly eclectic critical text. God’s peace and blessings be with you.

@anewmaninchrist why read someone's opinion of the Authorised Scriptures, just read the Authorised Bible

Thank you so much!

Thanks!

Thanks!

Glad it was helpful!

The Bible isn't a novel it's the Book of Life a d can not be understood with the carnal mind of a man,remember Jesus said My Words they are Spirit and they are Life, He also said until I come give attendance to reading and the Lord give thee understanding. So if we do our part He's will do His,also read it out loud and ita written faith comes by hearing ,and hearing by the Word of God.If you diligently seek The Lord with all of your heart ,you will find Him and also remember the organ for believing is not the brains it's the heart for with the heart man believes unto righteousness and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation

The NKJV is not corrupt

What is corrupt about the NKJV? What are you comparing it to? The imperfect uninspired KJV? Since when was the KJV the standard? A translation from later manuscripts dedicated to the Pope. With mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover. Which the NKJV translates correctly. Still that is the insanity of the KJV only heresy. Strange how these so called "truth ministries" peddle out the same old lies

@@elijahbaxter7163 yes it is.

@@GodisGracious1031Ministries no it’s not

@@elijahbaxter7163 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/q7Wao8uh0uDYlo0.html

I agree the NKJV is just as wicked as the NIV, ESV, maybe even more so

I understand what you are saying, but you are leaving out two very important details. 1) I do not know if you watched the entire video. Discussed are the origins of the King James Bible and the NKJV. Look at the manuscripts that were used for the KJV - Masoretic (Hebrew OT from Israel) and the Textus Receptus (Greek NT from Antioch where believers where first called Christians). The NKJV does not share the same sources and stems from the Alexandrian (Egypt) and Vaticainus (Rome) texts. 2) You can compare English with English because we speak English and English is what the Lord used for the King James Bible that was used to spread the Gospel throughout the world (study the Church Age of Philadelphia).

@@truthunchainedministries1564 The Spanish speaking world already had the gospel in their language before the KJV. The Greek speaking world already had the gospel in their language before the KJV. Same for the Germans and Latins. Where does this idea come from that the world hadn’t had the Gospel yet til the KJV came along?

also marginal note on your KJV in Pr 18.19

Wrong!!!

​@@seansimpson1133you're misunderstanding what's being said. There are 2 lines of manuscripts. If you hear someone say "the Greek", that's not the question. It's which Greek is being used. The KJV uses the Byzantine text type which was used for Luther's German, Valeros Spanish, Diodari's Italian, Olivitans French, etc. These languages used the same line that was used for the KJV. All other English Bibles come from a corrupted source in the hotbed of gnosticism in Alexandria Egypt.

John MacArthur and David Jeremiah come to mind. Typically, those that support the use of the NKJV hold the notion that people should find the version that best suits them.

By stating that isn't the case at all. 1) The King James Bible was spread throughout the world from the 1700s to the modern day - which means it has a wider audience. 2) You can only buy a King James Bible in a Dollar Store - making it more accessible to all social classes. 3) The King James Bible remains the best selling book of all time - making it the most available. 4) From 1901 to 2023 (122 years) there have been a little over 300 versions of the Bible put out to replace the King James Bible under the argument that the KJV is too hard to understand. That means that a new "bible" has been produced every 2.45 months on average - meaning somebody wants your money and not because our English language changes too frequently.

Good morning. English plurality terms change over time. You'll find that "cherubims" is found 65 times in the King James Bible. You'll also find that "seraphims" is found twice. Just because we no longer use the "s" doesn't mean there is an error. Another example we can look at is "fishes". Today we say "fish" for both singular and plural, but that wasn't always the case in the English language. "Fishes" is used 27 times throughout the King James Bible. Hope this helps!

​@@truthunchainedministries1564"I,m" is ALWAYS the plural translated from Hebrew!

nope.

@@GodisGracious1031MinistriesYep

Book of doctrines of demons ,its a book of antichrist spirit that's what it is

Never

It's a satanic masterpiece antichrist book of doctrines of demons, the Authorised Scriptures can not be changed by the pen of ungodly men, nkjv is a perversion correct me where im wrong

There is no such thing as original manuscripts. Everything is a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy, etc. This goes back to the founding of Israel. When you read Leviticus, you'll find that the Levites were: Priests, detectives, real estate agents, judges, doctors, auditors, health inspectors, and more. There was not one manuscript that was passed along to millions of people - they were all copies. Over time, manuscripts deteriorate and more copies are made. Fast forward to Luke 4:14-21 where Jesus read from Isaiah and Acts 8:27-35 where the Ethiopian eunuch was carrying Isaiah with him. These were clearly not the same scripts nor were they the same scripts from 760 B.C. to 690 B.C. (the 70 period where Isaiah wrote his book see Is. 1:1). You also have to look at the "original manuscripts" you are citing. Are you speaking of the Masoretic Text (from Israel) and the Textus Receptus (from Antioch) or are you referring to the Septuagint/LXX (from Egypt) and the Vaticanus (from Rome). What you'll find is that the KJV is the ONLY Bible to come from the Masoretic and Textus Receptus and has ZERO contradictions. All other "Bibles" come from the Egyptian and Roman sources and are filled with a plethora of contradictions. "The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever." - Psalm 12:6-7 1) Masoretic Text (Hebrew) - 99% of the OT 2) Original Aramaic - 1% of the OT (parts of the book of Daniel) 3) Textus Receptus (Greek) - New Testament 4) Old Syriac 5) Old Latin 6) German 7) English The seven languages used to purify the words of the Lord. That list was obviously an extremely simplified history. The test to see which Bible is true is very simple. Look at Colossians 1:18 "And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence." Which Bible gives Christ the preeminence? Is it the NIV that claims Satan and Jesus are the same person? Is it the 250 other versions that take away His title of Lord and remove His words? You must study these things. "Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth." - 2 Timothy 2:15 I hope this helps :)

Yes. I give examples of the ESV removing Christ's words and stripping Him of his Deity in this video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rZZ-lNeYxL3Pe2g.html

"Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;" - Titus 2:13 KJV "looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ," - Titus 2:13 NKJV I'm not sure how the NKJV is "clearer". All they did was changed "that" to "the", removed a comma, removed "the", and removed "our". This is a wonderful example of the NKJV authors meeting the 25% legal textual changes requirement in order to consider their work original and charge money for it. You should research U.S. copyright laws - specifically the requirements for changing an original work in order to make a profit off of that work. There's a reason why you'll only find the KJV in a Dollar Store :)

@@truthunchainedministries1564 Yes I understand the copyright laws and how that affects modern translations. My point was that a modern reader would find the diety of Christ much clearer in the NKJV rendering of Titus 2:13 than in the KJV rendering. The KJV makes it seem like the reference is to two different persons, 1 being the great God and 2 being our Savior Jesus Christ, due to the Granville Sharp rule not being known or understood by the majority of modern readers. The NKJV rendering is much more obvious that the reference is to one person, our savior Jesus Christ who is also our great God. The NKJV is my preferred translation, I was KJV-only for years, but since doing a lot of research on translation history, textual criticism, manuscript tradition, etc, I switched to the NKJV and it has been a huge blessing. Much more understandable than the KJV, and the Bible does say that “in all your getting, get understanding.”(Prov 4:7) The whole point of a translation is to convey the message of God to the reader, and my view is that as long as a translation is a formal equivalence type, then whichever translation belonging to that group that someone can best understand, that is the best translation for them. Many people cannot understand the 17th century form of English, so if they need an NKJV or even an NASB or ESV. Now personally, I’m still a TR guy, I like the concept of the CT, but the influence of Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus and Alexandrinus is what makes me choose the TR over the CT. If those three manuscripts did not influence the CT, it would be a different story. So for me, I’ve chosen the NKJV, a modern translation of what I believe to be the most reliable manuscripts. The NKJV improves on the KJV in a couple different ways, one key way being that they translate Hades as Hades, Tartarus as Tartarus, and Gehenna as hell. KJV translates them all as hell. Specifics matter. I love the KJV, but to truly understand the scriptures one must consult a variety of translations, just as the KJV translators themselves stated in the preface to the reader. Anyways, that’s my two cents opinion lol. Have a great day and God bless. 😊✝️

I haven't come across any. It took me awhile to get used to He/Him not being capitalized, and as you can see in the way that I write, I still capitalize the "H". If I am not mistaken, the capitalization of "H" didn't begin until the early 1980s/late 1970s. It is a relatively new concept. I get that it is a matter of reverence for God and a simple way to distinguish the pronouns. Keep in mind that Hebrew does not have uppercase or lowercase letters (the OT) and the Greek Textus Receptus (NT) was written in all capital letters.

This is the very reason I use NKJV! I do have a few KJV Bibles too and I love them both...this vid is enlightening! As I grow in the Lord, I see myself leaning more toward KJV, it just feels like I'm actually reading the Bible...lol...if that makes sense! ❤

I do enjoy the Amplified Classic translation (AMPC) for study and it does capitalize He/Him when referencing the Lord and/or Jesus. This translation is hard to find and when I do find it, it's a bit costly...I am a Bible Hoarder, so I don't mind :)

If I were Satan I would raise up the KJV only cult. Wait a minute he already has. The false teachers of the KJV only cult, would probably call Jesus a heretic

If I were Satan I would raise up the KJV only cult. Wait a minute, he already has.

Notice that v2 ends with a semicolon meaning we cannot take it out of context from verse 3. 2 O my soul, thou hast said unto the Lord, Thou art my Lord: my goodness extendeth not to thee; 3 But to the saints that are in the earth, and to the excellent, in whom is all my delight. King David is saying his goodness doesn't add anything to God's goodness. God's goodness is perfect, so much that only God can be said to be truly "good" (Matt. 19:16-17). This would mean that what goodness David had, profited the saints here on Earth. He (David) delights in excellent saints (real saints that love God - not fakers).

​@@truthunchainedministries1564 Thank's for the clarification Can you explain why Lucifer used. in kjv many say Lucifer is a Latin word and in strongs it says morning star and thanks again

Sure. The word "Lucifer" is a Latin word meaning "a bearer of light" and is a translation of the Hebrew word הֵילֵל which means "the shining one". 2 Cor. 11:14 tells us that he transforms (keyword) into "an angel of light". You have to be careful when using modern lexicons as they heavily rely upon the Septuagint. The Septuagint was a perverted Greek "translation" of the Hebrew texts and originated in Alexandria, Egypt. Remember that Satan's goal is to imitate and take God's place. Hence why he had modern "translators" give him Christ's name as "the morning star".

I am sorry for the delayed response. There is nothing wrong with illustrations when teaching, so if they are included, then great! That said, the most important thing is for you to focus on God's words so that you can grow in your knowledge and understanding of Jesus Christ (Eph. 1:17-19). If the illustrations aid you and inspire you to spend more time in the Bible, then that is a good thing.

@@truthunchainedministries1564 , KZfaq is removing my comments to you

Sir why bother with a book of someone else's version why not go The Authorised Word of the Living God, all the other versions are just doctrines of demons that other men that do not love the God of the Authorised Bible have published to fit there agendas

The organ for believing is not the brains ,it's the heart for with the heart man believes unto righteousness and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation

Yes. I use Websters 1828 Dictionary; it was the final version that cited the Bible. You can download the app for free or go here: webstersdictionary1828.com/ Hope this helps!

A lot of words are understandable like whosoever, its just words added together and when you read it outloud or in your head, it makes sense and all the Bibles has vocab you don't know, so you need to look it up! Just like how we still sing songs with old English and that we learn new jargon in work/school/sports, if we arne't rewritting shakespeare and can be willing to learn new words in work/school/play, we should also be okay with learning new words for the Bible!!

You're hardly screwed :) The language of the KJV is not as archaic as you think. The most common issue people have are the thou/thee and ye's, but once you understand them, you'll find that the language is far superior to our modern English. Thou/thee is singular and ye is plural. I'll give you an example of how and why this is important: "Marvel not that I said unto thee, Ye must be born again." - John 3:7 KJV "Do not marvel that I said to you, ‘You must be born again.’" - John 3:7 NKJV In the KJV, Christ said "marvel not that I said unto thee (you - singular, Nicodemus), ye (everybody) must be born again." In the NKJV and modern translations, Christ said "marvel not that I said unto you (singular, Nicodemus), you (singular, Nicodemus) must be born again." Also, the language isn't as difficult to understand as people make it out to be. Look at Job 6:6 in the Revised Standard Version: "Can that which is tasteless be eaten without salt, or is there any taste in the slime of the purslane?". Apparently, "Can that which is unsavoury be eaten without salt? or is there any taste in the white of an egg?" in the KJV was too difficult to understand lol Please do not give up. I was saved for roughly 20 years before I discovered the truth of the KJV and then it took me another few months to part with the other versions I had in my library. Eventually, I threw in the trash a few hundred dollars (at least) worth of "bibles". I'm happy to help in any way that I can and please do not hesitate to reach out!

If you can find an "EVIDENCE BIBLE" from Ray Comfort in KJV they have all or most of the Archaic words translated. Also "THE DIFINED" KJB has all the Archaic words in bold and the translated words at the end of each page. Hope this helps brother.

@@raston1961it’s NKJV

The KJV is archaic, that is why God has blessed us with more accurate modern translations like the NKJV. The false teachers of the KJV only cult, would call Jesus corrupt.

Because in Genesis 1:1 there was only one heaven that was created. If you'll go through Genesis 1, you'll find the other heavens created which is why 2:1 states "Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them." There are three heavens in the Bible: the sky, outer space, and where the Lord's throne is located. Please see the verses below as evidence. The first heaven is the sky and the Bible shows us this in multiple verses: "If I shut up heaven that there be no rain, or if I command the locusts to devour the land, or if I send pestilence among my people;" - 2 Chronicles 7:13 "By them shall the fowls of the heaven have their habitation, which sing among the branches." - Psalm 104:12 "Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness." - Acts 14:17 "And he prayed again, and the heaven gave rain, and the earth brought forth her fruit." - James 5:18 The second heaven is what we call outer space. We can find this heaven defined in the following verses: "And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good." - Genesis 1:14-18 "For the stars of heaven and the constellations thereof shall not give their light: the sun shall be darkened in his going forth, and the moon shall not cause her light to shine." - Isaiah 13:10 "Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:" - Matthew 24:29 "And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casteth her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind." - Revelation 6:13 The third heaven, what most people simply refer to as "Heaven", is where God dwells: "And he said, Hear thou therefore the word of the Lord: I saw the Lord sitting on his throne, and all the host of heaven standing by him on his right hand and on his left." - 1 Kings 22:19 "But I say unto you, Swear not at all; neither by heaven; for it is God's throne:" - Matthew 5:34 "And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven." - John 3:13 I hope this helps!

The Bible states in Revelation 13:16-17 that people will have to take his mark in their right hand or in their forehead in order to purchase the basic necessities of life. This is more than just a simple mark done for economic purposes. Those that take the mark of the beast are worshipping him and sealing their eternal fate (Rev. 14:9-11). There are many speculations involving emerging technology that explain why repentance is not possible for those that take the mark of the beast. Currently, medical doctors and scientists are developing microchips that emit pulses in order to change a person's mood and can alter a person's brain chemistry in a process called "deep brain stimulation". Researchers at DARPA, University of California, and Massachusetts General Hospital are looking for permanent ways to remove the need for medications which can have harmful side effects. On the surface this sounds amazing as it can essentially cure PTSD, various mood disorders, and even Parkinson's Disease as research suggests. Could it be that when a person takes the mark of the beast (which the Bible shows to be voluntary even if it is under duress), the reason that they cannot accept Christ is because their brain is permanently altered? That would explain why the Bible says "in".

@@truthunchainedministries1564 Yeah... its more likely its "in" as microchips or something that will be a barcode to checkout.. Amazon is rolling out Amazon One and there is a lot of other things going on.. well, don't take the mark and share the gospel! time is ticking.

Hi! Finding the right Bible is something that definitely takes a lot of studying, but it is well worth it. I was saved for twenty years before I realized the changes made to the 300+ versions and came to the conclusion that only the KJV is perfect. Regarding your husband (and lost people in general), take a look at Jude 22 and 23: "And of some have compassion, making a difference: And others save with fear, pulling them out of the fire; hating even the garment spotted by the flesh." Essentially, a person will either get saved because they are drawn to Christ because of what He did on the cross or they will accept Christ because they do not want to go to Hell. The latter is the reason I got saved. The most successful tactic I've used when witnessing is to ask a person if they would let complete strangers move into their house - that is what people are expecting of God because they want to go to Heaven while rejecting His Son (John 3:16-18). Questions like that really get a person to think. I hope this helps and I'm always available :)

Changing from original languages to English, , , is a big change, much is lost and added when changing languages. Language changes over time, nobody speaks the kings English, that's why even KJV itself has been updated

I read the nasb 1995 too , but it has the same translation of proverbs 25.23 as nkjv which I was surprised.

I completely understand your frustration. Before I really started studying the history of the Bible, the KJV's history, and the changes made to the 250+ modern "versions", I had spent over $600 on various translations and commentaries. Even after knowing that the other "versions" were subtracting and changing God's words it took me a few months before I got rid of them. I struggled with throwing away $600+ dollars worth of materials. If I may, what I would recommend is to take this to the Lord in prayer and be honest with Him. Tell him about this struggle and help Him guide you on what to do.

@@truthunchainedministries1564 I have a question for you :) I searched a ton of kjv bibles and found one that I love The Humble Lamb Bible, very expensive but I want it to last me for years, only thing it has pictures and now the mean devil is telling me it’s bad to use one with illustrations, I need your opinion? Please help? :)

@@moodrevolverget an authorized King James Bible it’s like 20$ at Walmart. You shouldn’t be spending more than 30$ on your Bible

You dont have to spend that much to get your hands on a kjv bible. They go for like $20

Can we use other bible translation based on textus receptus like modern english version

I understand what you are saying, however, the other "versions" create contradictions and blasphemies. Wouldn't it make more sense to suggest a person look up an unknown word in the dictionary? That is what we tell people to do in every other instance.

@@truthunchainedministries1564 then what about that textus receptus contradicts with itself and not every edition is same that they differ each other If textus receptus is accurate then what about the bible translation in other languages that are not based on tr but translated using Alexandria manuscript from what I understand is that in India the translation from bible society of India didn't mention which manuscript they used but it has some incomplete verse like 1john 5v7 it has half verse like modern translation if they don't have bible translated form tr but many are being saved and what about other English speaking person that use modern version like NKJV, ESV or nasb they are yielding in spirit I am not debating with you but I have expressing my doubts Don't you think that kjvonly is going towards idolatry and kjv worship, which distract us from becoming close and having fellow ship with Jesus I am. Saying this because the bible says the heart is deceitful above all

​​​​@@truthunchainedministries1564 but what about those who say TEXTUS RECEPTUS contradicts with itself and not all editions are same And what about the Bible in other languages which were translated using Alexandria manuscript And many English speaking people using modern translation like NKJV ESV or nasb they edifying in spirit by reading those versions I am not debating with you but I am expressing my doubts previous I read NKJV and i used kjv for strongs Don't you think that kjvonlyism going towards idolatry worship kjv rather than GOD and distracting from fellow ship with god because many people hear form people arguing kjv is only we should read and some says no we use any version to read which leads many people in dilemma and becoming a hindrance that many people don't read Bible due to this argument and the bible says the heart is deceitful above all And if really those new version contradicts and Satan involved in those versions don't you think god is capable of using them for his glory to make Satan ashamed like what happened with Esther

It isn't idolatry at all. If you lived in the ancient world and you wanted to know what God said, you had to read Hebrew and that text came from Israel. Moving forward to Roman times when Greek was the primary language throughout the known world (thanks to Alexander the Great spreading Greek and then the Romans connecting the countries via roads), if you wanted to read the New Testament writings you had to know Greek. The Alexandrian manuscripts and LXX both came from Egypt (which is never a good place in the Bible) and were produced over 100 years AFTER the complete of the NT (which was finished around 90 AD). The Textus Receptus came from Antioch, which if you know your Bible, was where believers were first called Christians. The Masoratic Text and the Textus Receptus were both written in Jewish and Christian environments - all others came from pagan countries like Egypt (Alexandrian and LXX) and Rome (Codex Vaticanus). I highly recommend you study the entire history of the King James Bible. How it came about and the history of the English language, then study the perversions that came out due to the Wescott and Hort cult. If you are curious about the latter, I did make a video on that here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/maicmMt6mprYc30.html

It was just temporary and is all good now lol

Agreed! The NKJV is garbage!

Not at all. Just read the words on the page :)

Satanic antichrist doctrines of demons that's what it is

@@truthunchainedministries1564 yes you are

I have. All of the modern Bibles stem from the Revised Version. I did a history of the RV and those behind it in this video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/maicmMt6mprYc30.html

@@truthunchainedministries1564 yes I watched the playlist in order last night! Just came across your channel yesterday and I've found it very helpful and informative. Thanks for your research and teachings. God bless!