Efter johan är det Elsa Widdings tur att vara med

Varför kan inte klimatbedragarna debattera mot s.k klimatskeptiker t ex Lennart Bengtsson eller Peter Stilbs? Varför kan de inte låta sig intervjuas i t ex SwebbTV?

Vi kan sluta ljuga om den eminenta faran.

Ja som vanligt vilken svammel. Ingen har en aning vad som händer.

Al Gore 2.0

Tack Johan, hoppas att du övertygade någon eller några människor !

Sjuk skrämselpropaganda utan substans.

Imponerande att lyssna på Rockström

Men det kan väl ändå inte stämma att det inte varit såhär varmt på 5 miljoner år!?

So beautiful ❤️❤️

The prevailing assumption of Earth's consistent thermodynamic equilibrium is historically improbable. Paleoclimatological data provide evidence of several climatic shifts throughout Earth's geological timescale, signifying deviations from the desired equilibrium. Undoubtedly, anthropogenic factors drive the ongoing climatic shifts. However, the principal concern is not high temperatures in themselves, but the accelerated rate of global mean temperature increase, which presents a significant risk (earthobservatory.nasa.gov/features/GlobalWarming/page3.php). Relying on a potential "black swan" technological solution, even electric vehicles, to mitigate climate crisis, pose significant risks. An alternative approach may involve transitioning our strategy from halting temperature rise to adapting to an elevated average temperature future, which is an area of science in its own. This transition should not exclude concerted efforts towards reducing carbon emissions, promoting a circular economy, and curtailing excessive consumption. However, attaining these objectives within a constrained timeframe could potentially be unsustainable. This might seem paradoxical, yet the equation involves a planetary mass extinction of both human and non-human species. One of the few immediate solutions to seize global temperature rise involves such a mass extinction event. Historically, there have been instances of runaway melting of Earth's ice caps, and this imminent risk demands our attention. Self-sufficiency, particularly in food production, is crucial for reducing transportation-related emissions. However, the paradox lies in the fact that environmentally driven political factions in many countries aim to reduce agricultural activities due to their significant emissions. Once again, the equation appears to suggest mass extinction as the only solution, which is universally undesirable. Hence, we need to rethink our strategies.