Knock Out: The Evolution of Tank Ammunition

  Рет қаралды 510,795

The Tank Museum

The Tank Museum

Күн бұрын

Tank ammunition has gone a long way from basic solid armour piercing shot to the high-tech fin rounds of today. In this video we look at the development of tank ammo in its different forms and how it has evolved from the First World War to the modern battlefield.
Support The Tank Museum & Get great perks:
► Patreon: / tankmuseum
► KZfaq Membership: / @thetankmuseum
00:00 | Intro
01:21 | WW1
04:13 | WW2
06:42 | Armour Piercing Rounds
13:10 | High Explosive Rounds
16:41 | Uses & Summary
#tankmuseum #ChrisCopson #Evolution #Ammo

Пікірлер: 802
@thetankmuseum
@thetankmuseum Жыл бұрын
Hi Tank Nuts! The live chat has now ended. Thank you for your questions and we hope you enjoyed the video! For more opportunities to ask The Tank Museum experts your questions, support us on Patreon: www.patreon.com/tankmuseum/membership or become a KZfaq member: www.youtube.com/@thetankmuseum/membership
@catlee8064
@catlee8064 Жыл бұрын
Be honest, we only went smoothbore so we could get cheap rds from the yanks....and germans.
@azgarogly
@azgarogly Жыл бұрын
There is no stable isotope of uranium. So uranium is always radioactive. And highly toxic, that is much more important. True, different isotopes are radioactive to different extent, but as we are mostly talking about U235 vs U238, the difference in radioactivity of these is meh. Real difference is that one is suitable to sustain a fission chain reaction and the other is not. Otherwise, if we are not talking about building a fission device, both are equally dangerous.
@GARDENER42
@GARDENER42 Жыл бұрын
Please do a far more in depth video regarding tank ammunition at some point for those of us who understand the basics & would like to see more.
@steveshoemaker6347
@steveshoemaker6347 Жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT VIDEO.....Thanks very much i am Sub'ed..... Shoe🇺🇸
@melanieenmats
@melanieenmats Жыл бұрын
Oh the radiation from the uranium is "minor". Tell that to the deformed babies in Iraq. Simply disgusting this report, how it skips over the issue. It is impossible to prove that any disease is related to this by definition because you cant ethically test on pregnant women. However there is significant correlation. Disgusting how he skipped over all this. To me it is an utterly criminal weapon. This is why some countries abondoned using it decades ago. Utterly disgusting heartless propaganda slipped into an otherwise great video. The mention of the russians in current day betrays the alternate agenda in this presentation. Y'all make me sick.
@timgosling6189
@timgosling6189 Жыл бұрын
Just to be clear, DU is not waste from nuclear power stations. It is 'waste' from the process of extracting the radioactive U235 that goes on to form the fuel for nuclear reactors. Military DU comprises more than 99% U238; that's why it's only weakly radioactive and it will certainly never have been near the inside of a power station. It is though still a heavy metal and still chemically toxic, but you wouldn't want to be ingesting too much lead either.
@roll-outcommanders6520
@roll-outcommanders6520 Жыл бұрын
So it is not nuclear weapons, just very nasty chemical ones? Some justification on the usage of DU.
@gherkinisgreat
@gherkinisgreat Жыл бұрын
@@roll-outcommanders6520 You might as well call lead small arms rounds chemical weapons then
@furtivedig
@furtivedig Жыл бұрын
While not a nuclear weapon, of course, DU is toxic and somewhat radioactive. The biggest danger is produced when DU shatters and produces dust. Even if the chemical hazard is more serious I wouldn't discard the radiological aspect of DU, which decays, as anything does.
@death00124
@death00124 Жыл бұрын
So it's basically like firing lead asbestos at someone
@Ganiscol
@Ganiscol Жыл бұрын
U238 particles still give you cancer when ingested. Its by no means harmless, especially given that the rounds - be it tank sabots or 30mm fired from a Gau-8 - do not stay intact but, as mentioned in the video, shave material off upon impact. The area will be salted with U238 particles and dust... Also noteworthy: U238 is used as a booster for thermonuclear weapons, as the intense neutron flux of a fusion process can split U238 and trigger another fission chain reaction on top of it. Its the only way to achieve multi-megaton yield.
@donerkebab97
@donerkebab97 Жыл бұрын
I must say, I really enjoyed this video. Chris Copson has tremendously improved as a presentator. In the past I found his style good enough, but now i like it. the cadence has improved, as well as where, when and how he chooses to pause. Well done! Looking forward to more
@djd8305
@djd8305 Жыл бұрын
Agreed. His knowlwdge has been obvious, his experience emergent and I suppose I've become used to, and like his presentation style. Hard to follow David and David:) Tghough I'd really like to see more of David W.
@azkrouzreimertz9784
@azkrouzreimertz9784 Жыл бұрын
Was thinking the same thing
@Schimml0rd
@Schimml0rd Жыл бұрын
Great presentation indeed
@billy4072
@billy4072 10 ай бұрын
Got presence . 🤙
@CharlesStearman
@CharlesStearman Жыл бұрын
The word "sabot" (the 't' is silent) originally meant a type of French wooden shoe. In the 18th century, it was used to refer to a wooden disc which was attached to a cannon ball to give a tighter fit in the barrel.
@AlRoderick
@AlRoderick Жыл бұрын
The same wooden shoe that gives its name to sabotage, because machine wreckers in the early days of industrialization would throw their shoes into the gearworks of industrial machines to break them.
@user-gr4sq3lo6n
@user-gr4sq3lo6n Жыл бұрын
During the Industrial Revolution many of the new factory workers in France were peasants, who wore wooden shoes or sabots When they went on strike, they would throw their shoes into the factory machinery to damage it. Thus they were "saboteurs" committing "sabotage"
@bradyelich2745
@bradyelich2745 Жыл бұрын
@@user-gr4sq3lo6n Nice u all watch time team, too.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Жыл бұрын
@@bradyelich2745 Or Star Trek VI...
@bradyelich2745
@bradyelich2745 Жыл бұрын
@@trolleriffic Ha!
@thomasknobbe4472
@thomasknobbe4472 Жыл бұрын
Please do not feel as if you have to apologize for explaining all of these concepts so clearly and simply that a novice like myself can understand. I believe that your pacing, and the accompanying illustrations and film, will keep the video interesting even for those who are more knowledgeable on the subject.
@ddegn
@ddegn Жыл бұрын
I completely agree with your comment. The presenter combined with the location made the whole video very interesting and enjoyable. I'm not one who can identify tank types but it's sure fun to see the various tanks in the museum.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 11 ай бұрын
I've probably forgotten more bout tanks than these videos detail, but I till find them charming and must say I'm impressed that he managed to accurately describe the way HEAT works with the current understanding of things. While I was familiar with the statistics of the 17 pounder, actually seeing the rounds and projectiles handled gave me a much better understanding of their sizes. In short, I agree. These videos provides something for all.
@oligoprimer
@oligoprimer Жыл бұрын
A mistake about annealing (5:10): Hardening the round (via quenching) gives it strength but also brittleness. Annealing improves the toughness of the round so that it doesn’t shatter on impact.
@69Deez_Nutz69
@69Deez_Nutz69 Жыл бұрын
Yup, basically hardening the skin of the metal (about 2-7%) of the overall metal but imparting a relatively 'softer' metal inside after heating it up again.
@MrRedRye
@MrRedRye 11 ай бұрын
I assume he was conflating annealing and tempering. Heat treatment is probably above the level of this video though. You can do some pretty fancy things with heat treatment if you know what properties you want in a specific part of the design.
@billbuck3590
@billbuck3590 10 ай бұрын
Agreed, Annealing is a process used to actually soften steels. I guess the rounds were quenched and possibly tempered to get the desired hardness.
@liljasere
@liljasere 7 ай бұрын
It’s neither here or there it’s actually an exact science of just the right amount either way for the use case it’s just oversimplified for a short video
@JohnCBobcat
@JohnCBobcat Жыл бұрын
Even as someone who's a bit of a "casual enthusiast" on arms and ordnance topics (and who once-upon-a-time did volunteer work at a very different armor museum), I did appreciate the relatively comprehensive yet approachable coverage in this video.
@brianferguson7840
@brianferguson7840 Жыл бұрын
Just a correction on the solid rounds. "Annealing" is a heat treating process which SOFTENS metals, it doesn't harden them. It is used to control the crystal grain growth in the metal.
@dwwolf4636
@dwwolf4636 Жыл бұрын
To make them less brittle...
@mattkotewa6098
@mattkotewa6098 Жыл бұрын
​​@@dwwolf4636 to me annealing means to make soft completely. Stress relief refers to a 300-500 degree draw to relieve internal stresses in material. Hardening is the opposite of annealing. The man in the video misspoke unless there are different terms used across the pond. I think he is just using the term annealing a little loosely and means that they are hardened and then stress relieved. Which makes complete sense. If the were hardened and annealed then you didn't do anything but waste electricity or gas.
@FuckYouYouFuck
@FuckYouYouFuck Жыл бұрын
When he said annealing I assumed he meant tempering, which to the average person sounds like the same thing. At a guess, the shell would be forged from something like 1065 high carbon steel. In a fully annealed state it would be something like 15 on the Rockwell C scale of hardness, soft enough that you could easily file shavings off it. Heated to ~825°C and quenched in oil or water it might be around 65 HRC, but also very brittle. It would be so hard that a hand file wouldn't scratch it. Tempering it at say 250°C for a couple hours would greatly reduce the brittleness giving it toughness and elasticity so it doesn't shatter and reducing the hardness to something like 58 HRC, which a hand file would be able to scratch but just barely.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 11 ай бұрын
@@mattkotewa6098 Only a waste if you do both things to the whole projectile. For instance, you could harden the top and anneal the bottom so you get a hard striking surface with a bottom that won't break away on impact.
@mattkotewa6098
@mattkotewa6098 11 ай бұрын
@@johanmetreus1268 thats true, you can do some fancy things with your quench and with your temper.
@rhystaylor851
@rhystaylor851 Жыл бұрын
Super awesome to see a comprehensive basic talk about tank shells! I hope you guys expand the series and talk about stuff like HE filler vs solid shot in WW2, canister, and artillery shells
@MitchSprague
@MitchSprague Жыл бұрын
Great stuff! Excellent presentation.
@DarkShroom
@DarkShroom Жыл бұрын
this guy has one of my fave new youtubers, he is very thorough.... what i like from youtube is enthusasts, not some presenter that is just presenting and i think this channel understands what youtube is about in that regard a great many museams now put on top quality docs of their own, the imperial war museam also does great ones to
@user-gr4sq3lo6n
@user-gr4sq3lo6n Жыл бұрын
Left out APCR / HVAP - Armor Piercing Composite Rigid / Hyper Velocity Armor Piercing (Known to the Russians and Germans as Arrowhead from its shape) - A half way house to Discarding Sabot Armour-piercing, composite rigid (APCR) in British nomenclature, high-velocity armour-piercing (HVAP) in US nomenclature, alternatively called "hard core projectile" (German: Hartkernprojektil) or simply "core projectile" (Swedish: kärnprojektil), is a projectile which has a core of high-density hard material, such as tungsten carbide, surrounded by a full-bore shell of a lighter material (e.g., an aluminium alloy). However, the low sectional density of the APCR resulted in high aerodynamic drag. Tungsten compounds such as tungsten carbide were used in small quantities of inhomogeneous and discarded sabot round, but that element was in short supply in most places. Most APCR projectiles are shaped like the standard APCBC round (although some of the German Pzgr. 40 and some Soviet designs resemble a stubby arrow), but the projectile is lighter: up to half the weight of a standard AP round of the same calibre. The lighter weight allows a higher muzzle velocity. The kinetic energy of the round is concentrated in the core and hence on a smaller impact area, improving the penetration of the target armour. To prevent shattering on impact, a shock-buffering cap is placed between the core and the outer ballistic shell as with APC rounds. However, because the round is lighter but still the same overall size it has poorer ballistic qualities, and loses velocity and accuracy at longer ranges. The APCR was superseded by the APDS, which dispensed with the outer light alloy shell once the round had left the barrel. The concept of a heavy, small-diameter penetrator encased in light metal was later employed in small-arms armour-piercing incen
@Simon_Nonymous
@Simon_Nonymous Жыл бұрын
Yes, this was a bit of a dead end technology, but it was used, so it would have been nice to see it included; and you could then include squeeze bore guns as well possibly? A good constructive comment, and well explained.
@LeadHeadBOD
@LeadHeadBOD Жыл бұрын
Was about to say this as well. Quick addition though regarding the caps, they are not necessarilly present. Soviet 45mm APCR has no cap, only an aluminium (or was it soft steel?) ballistic.
@LeadHeadBOD
@LeadHeadBOD Жыл бұрын
​@@Simon_Nonymous for tank use, they are definitely a bit of a deadend. Not so much for aircraft though. The discarding sabot can get caught in the propeller of a helicopter or turbine of a jet engine, which you certainly do not want. For some reason Germany also never developed 20mm APDS until the 80s, instead using APCR (with a small incendiary component) for their autocannons on infantry fighting vehicles like the Marder.
@oceanic8424
@oceanic8424 Жыл бұрын
Sighting in the enemy first, and getting an effective first hit quickly is the key.
@julianshepherd2038
@julianshepherd2038 Жыл бұрын
Or destroy the tanks support.
@hansolowe19
@hansolowe19 Жыл бұрын
Recon, intel, observation 🤓
@Jussijii77
@Jussijii77 Жыл бұрын
Before that, by looking what's happening in Ukraina, avoiding mines, enemy artillery and drones is the most inportant. After that there might be change to shoot that first shot.
@dudududu1926
@dudududu1926 Жыл бұрын
so?
@richardhighsmith
@richardhighsmith Жыл бұрын
Now I know we all want Smoothbore v. Rifled - A closer look!
@66kbm
@66kbm Жыл бұрын
Superb video, i can not fault it. The information was given in an understandable way. Chris gives great explanation for all subjects. Personal memories...RCT supporting RSDG in 1985, found out they called the HESH practise rounds SHSPRAC. When said it sounds good. No idea what they called SABOT rounds. Edit. @19.28 Let that sink in, then remember Challenger had the longest Tank on Tank kill ever, with a "dart" with a "Rifled" gun.
@waynemayo1661
@waynemayo1661 Жыл бұрын
Well done, sir! A complex subject briefly explained, but not over simplified. I look forward to future videos on the subject.
@matt8104
@matt8104 Жыл бұрын
As a retired US Army ammo dawg, I approve this great video!
@carlnewman7096
@carlnewman7096 11 ай бұрын
I was at tankfest 2023 last weekend, my 3rd tankfest & an amazing weekend. These videos, along with the tank chats series are all presented by people with an incredible depth of knowledge of the subjects discussed, & are great insights in to the complex & fascinating subject of armoured warfare past & present. I am a full gold membership holder & supporter of the museum & I cannot encourage a visit to the museum in beautiful Dorset , highly enough. Keep up the great work guys, & hope to see you next year at tankfest 2024. 👍👍😎
@rat_king-
@rat_king- Жыл бұрын
A Banana is more radioactive than a piece of DU.
@AugustBebelX
@AugustBebelX Жыл бұрын
Depleted uranium is toxic. The use of it is a war crime. This video is proof that the Tank Museum is a criminal and terroristic organisation. EVERYONE who promtes the use of DU is a candidate for the electric chair ...
@mbr5742
@mbr5742 11 ай бұрын
So the training agsinst being attacked by a guy with a banana that Monty Phyton offers makes sense...
@Whatisthisstupidfinghandle
@Whatisthisstupidfinghandle Жыл бұрын
Excellent video ! 18:58 sounds like an excellent follow up video idea
@dsclark1954
@dsclark1954 Жыл бұрын
Well that gave me a shock. The knocked out Sherman at 4.27 was commanded by Robert Hiseman at El Alamein. He happened to be my mothers boyfriend in Egypt. She commanded the Army telephone exchange in Cairo. I have a print of this and Bob has written on the back of the print. That’s not Bob in the picture but one of his crew How we caught it at El Alamein ‘Blighty’ T74285 5 troop B squadron 47 RTR
@jjsmallpiece9234
@jjsmallpiece9234 Жыл бұрын
Excellent as ever. A video on the development of fire control systems would be good - basic telescope, stadiametric range finding, ballistic computers and digital fir control. Plus gun stabilisation to allow firing on the move. Then there are night vision devices
@DirtyHairy1
@DirtyHairy1 Жыл бұрын
Yes the depleted uranium has way less radioactivity, but when its shot at a tank and creates microscopic dust, it still gets everywhere in your body and its known how 'not that bad´ it is.
@awatt
@awatt Жыл бұрын
Any airosol particles are bad for you. Wood dust can cause cancers. In that light depleted uranium is probably less toxic than wood dust.
@gsylass
@gsylass Жыл бұрын
Ask the Serbs and Iraqis how the cancer rates increased after the US used DU on/around them.
@Bird_Dog00
@Bird_Dog00 Жыл бұрын
Yes. Uranium 238is decays emiting alpha radiation. That's basicaly the HE-shell among the various form of ionising radiation (shitty penetration, but if it does get in, it does a ton of damage). And Uranium dust in your lungs is just in the perfect spot to put those alpha particles to work...
@awatt
@awatt Жыл бұрын
@@Bird_Dog00 "International Atomic Energy Administration points out, “DU is 3 million times less radioactive than radium still found in many old luminous watches and 10 million times less radioactive than what is used in fire detectors.” DU is also far less radioactive than the potassium 40 found in the human body. Potassium is a substantial percentage of the dry mass of common Hawaii agricultural crops such as bananas and marijuana. A 2.5 lb bunch of bananas will contain over 100 mg of potassium 40. Gamma detectors are used to detect marijuana smugglers at international borders."
@TheKRU251
@TheKRU251 Жыл бұрын
Chris. You're doing a good job! Please announce your name at the start of the video or get it added to the title. You deserve the credit !!!!!
@Pyjamarama11
@Pyjamarama11 Жыл бұрын
My favourite round is the Oddball. Filled with paint to produce pretty pictures. Scares the hell outta people.
@jeffwickersheim195
@jeffwickersheim195 Жыл бұрын
I would really like to see a longer form video on rifled vs smooth bore guns and the pros and cons of the respective rounds fired!
@101stub
@101stub Жыл бұрын
Excellent video. Keen to see an expanded and more in depth look into the other tank munitions that you were unable to cover in this video.
@Bembem69
@Bembem69 Жыл бұрын
I never knew what cordite looked like before. Now I do. It’s one of those things I never really gave any thought to before. I enjoyed this video tremendously!
@musicbruv
@musicbruv Жыл бұрын
It would be interesting to see close up the damage various rounds to to a tank. I am always amazed at the power of an impact on a tanks armour.
@alexbowman7582
@alexbowman7582 Жыл бұрын
There’s various KZfaqrs making slow motion CGI videos of various shells impacting various armours.
@darrenjosephgregory
@darrenjosephgregory Жыл бұрын
If you are anywhere near Portsmouth, then head to fort Nelson, they have a section of ship armour that shows where it is has been hit by a HESH rounds and the resulting 'scab' marks on the inside. Must be absolutely terrifying to be pootling along in your tank and that large bits of the inside start ricocheting around at 300m/s.
@musicbruv
@musicbruv Жыл бұрын
@@darrenjosephgregory Been to Portsmouth a few time to see HMS Victory and the Mary Rose. thanks for the tip.
@theflyingfool
@theflyingfool Жыл бұрын
What an excellent subject! Thanks for a really good video Chris!
@mchrome3366
@mchrome3366 10 ай бұрын
Great video adding a lot of new material to whole process that doesn’t come around alot in other videos. Great channel, thanks.
@perrydear
@perrydear Жыл бұрын
Thanks! Excellent coverage of your subject!
@Herbybandit
@Herbybandit Жыл бұрын
For anyone wanting to know the basics this is very informative and straight to the point.
@ariochiv
@ariochiv Жыл бұрын
I love the POV shots where you can see the actual flight of the tank round. A great segment, folks, I enjoyed it.
@slartybartfarst55
@slartybartfarst55 Жыл бұрын
A really excellent video and a fantastic explanation of the various ammunition types without getting too technical. Thank you
@fluphybunny930
@fluphybunny930 Жыл бұрын
Excellent clear and concise look at the different tank rounds. Another great video.
@alsenar2
@alsenar2 Жыл бұрын
This is a very informative and well presented video. Thank you!
@thegodofhellfire
@thegodofhellfire Жыл бұрын
Awesome crash course! Thanks so much for the video.
@theodoreshasta7846
@theodoreshasta7846 Жыл бұрын
Highly informative presentation of a very complex subject. Well done, and thank you!
@DeaconBlu
@DeaconBlu Жыл бұрын
Great vid. I wish you could go deeper. Fantastic job folks. Thank You!
@marcelb7259
@marcelb7259 5 ай бұрын
What a brilliant, and yet concise, explanation on the subject. Thank you very much for sharing with us your knowledge and cheers from Canada.
@Hillbilly973
@Hillbilly973 11 ай бұрын
Excellent commentary. Thank you very much.
@elblanco5
@elblanco5 11 ай бұрын
Beautifully presented!
@06colkurtz
@06colkurtz Жыл бұрын
Good video. The driving band also seals the gun tube to ensure the force of the burning propellant pushes the round out the barrel.
@thcdreams654
@thcdreams654 Жыл бұрын
Really enjoy these videos. Thank you!
@blatherskite9601
@blatherskite9601 Жыл бұрын
Excellent intro. Thanks!
@effectivemelody
@effectivemelody 11 ай бұрын
I learnt a lot. Looking forward to more stuff. The presenters are excellent and very clear and interesting.
@martindice5424
@martindice5424 Жыл бұрын
Very good. Clear and useful information (as always) 👍
@kaptkrunchfpv
@kaptkrunchfpv Жыл бұрын
Thank you for the video! Your explanations were spot on for my intellect.
@tapioperala3010
@tapioperala3010 10 ай бұрын
These videos should be mandatory :D Great quality!
@ericbergfield6451
@ericbergfield6451 Жыл бұрын
Very cool, I learned a lot here: so it was much more than just entertaining, but educational too!
@ghostshock4317
@ghostshock4317 11 ай бұрын
I love listening to this guy talk. Chris Copson? Great job!
@michaelguerin56
@michaelguerin56 11 ай бұрын
Good video, especially for new people. Thank you.
@reddevilparatrooper
@reddevilparatrooper 11 ай бұрын
Outstanding presentation indeed!!! Very accurate information. I used to be a Tank Commander on the M1A1 Abrams. I used to be a Paratrooper and an Infantryman once upon a time. Learning the M1A1 Abrams to maintaining and driving was very short and mastered it quickly. Gunnery was very important and foremost along with tactics. A good understanding of Tank Gunnery and especially crew, platoon, company or troop level live fire exercises after qualification is very essential. It develops unit cohesion especially under combat conditions where coordination must become instinctive when calling out fire commands to your crew, platoon, and to relay the engagement to your unit commander. It also works in reverse if your unit commander is excellent at his job as company or troops commander. When moving out on a mission all tanks as a first engagement round in combat should battle carry a SABOT round. After the first round is fired by the gunner, the commander has to identify the next target as he is searching to select the next round either HEAT or SABOT.
@FrankMuchnok
@FrankMuchnok Жыл бұрын
Very good content well presented. Good job !
@truetrueevil1
@truetrueevil1 11 ай бұрын
Exceptionally good video. It covered things in accessible depth in an admirable fashion. Though I would happily have gone deeper! Mentioning what wasn't covered was a great so we can go on and do some further reading/watching. Though I would love more on the subject.
@roygardiner2229
@roygardiner2229 28 күн бұрын
That was so enjoyable. Thank you!
@thomasburke7995
@thomasburke7995 Жыл бұрын
For years I have not been able to find an explanation as to why the 88mm was so effective at long ranges in the tanks.. the explanation given about the 6 pounder brought everything into focus.. the 17 pounder was probably the best to against heavy armour.. but the American 75 mm with advancements in AP rounds actually was a more versatile and valuable gun.
@michaeld.uchiha9084
@michaeld.uchiha9084 Жыл бұрын
Easy higher musle velocity and more weight.
@scottw5315
@scottw5315 11 ай бұрын
Going from memory but I think 80% of US tank rounds fired were HE. The 75mm provided more blast effect than higher velocity rounds. The Big cats were pretty rare on the western front so the Sherman was a good fit for "all" tank missions aside from dueling the Panther and Tiger. An old joke from the Germans, a Tiger could take on five Shermans at once...but there was always a sixth Sherman.
@lyndoncmp5751
@lyndoncmp5751 10 ай бұрын
@scottw5315 Panthers were the most prevalent German tank after Normandy. More Panthers than Panzer IVs were built in 1944 and 1945. There were 650 Panthers in Normandy alone. There were more Panthers than Panzer IVs in the Westwall battles and the Ardennes etc.
@davidgoodnow269
@davidgoodnow269 5 ай бұрын
​@@lyndoncmp5751Watch the Tank Chat: Reloaded on Panther. Almost none of the Western Front Panthers were able to engage in battle, they were almost all destroyed by their own crews without fighting.
@KMac329
@KMac329 Жыл бұрын
I was very comfortable with the level of complexity provided by this video. I found it very clarifying. I've seen all of the "Tank Chat" videos, so it's very educational to watch an episode that draws together a lot of the information about the ammunition. Still, I'm left wondering: What does SABO stand for, if anything?
@darrenjosephgregory
@darrenjosephgregory Жыл бұрын
I believe it originates from an old French word 'Sabot' which was a wooden shoe, then in the 1800s they used a wooden block on naval guns to wedge in the round and apparently it looked a bit like sabot and so the name stuck.
@arka2982
@arka2982 Жыл бұрын
excellent as always
@utkarshtrivedi8870
@utkarshtrivedi8870 10 ай бұрын
Very much informative video, well done 👏
@anselmdanker9519
@anselmdanker9519 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for a great presentation. Cheers!!
@manders7868
@manders7868 Жыл бұрын
Thank you. I think that was an excellent introduction to the subject.
@Oldermodels_are_twitchy
@Oldermodels_are_twitchy Жыл бұрын
This was fantastic! A very good introduction on the subject to a layman like myself.
@MortRotu
@MortRotu 10 ай бұрын
I'd love to see a part 2 to this particular video covering the other types of rounds and where the spent brass goes please!
@quicktoevil
@quicktoevil 7 ай бұрын
Thoroughly enjoyed !
@jonroads8281
@jonroads8281 Жыл бұрын
Brilliant video!
@residentgeardo
@residentgeardo Жыл бұрын
Very interesting video. Please do more of this kind of stuff!
@wamanning
@wamanning Жыл бұрын
description of the annealed chromium projectiles is incorrect. it was not to harden. hardened chromium steel tends to fracture in to smaller pieces, which would degrade effectiveness of armor-piercing rounds. annealing is the opposite of hardening -- it increases the ductility and reduces the hardness of a material.
@trolleriffic
@trolleriffic Жыл бұрын
It's done to increase toughness isn't it? I seem to recall that annealing is done very carefully with strict control over the temperature and time spent to increase toughness while minimising the reduction in hardness of the metal. I think there's also differential hardening (or whatever it's called) which might be done using a mould which has one end water-cooled to rapidly chill the tip of the projectile for maximum hardness, while letting the rest of the round cool more slowly so that it's softer and tougher.
@awatt
@awatt Жыл бұрын
You are both right. It reduces brittleness
@Mtlmshr
@Mtlmshr 4 ай бұрын
Great series!
@dapre
@dapre Жыл бұрын
You are right ; I did enjoy this video. Thank you.
@robertsantamaria6857
@robertsantamaria6857 Жыл бұрын
I never understood what the first cap in APCBC was for. Now I know. Thanks Tank Museum!
@terryroots5023
@terryroots5023 Жыл бұрын
Excellent, this was a great introduction
@N0d4chi
@N0d4chi Жыл бұрын
Well done video, good intro for people who dont know much about tanks in the first place.
@ptonpc
@ptonpc Жыл бұрын
Great presentation. Thanks
@chriscookesuffolk
@chriscookesuffolk Жыл бұрын
Fantastic content and presentation
@ProfessorPesca
@ProfessorPesca 6 ай бұрын
What an effective communicator this guy is.
@260bossute
@260bossute 11 ай бұрын
great explanation for the shell composition. Well done!!
@ericschmidt2085
@ericschmidt2085 Жыл бұрын
I loved the video, but I would love to see more technical and in-depth videos. So many channels provide the same baseline of information on things like ammunition types and their functions, different types of armor, etc. But I have yet to find a channel that goes into real depth on the subjects.
@thameswanderer
@thameswanderer Жыл бұрын
Excellent explanation. ❤
@johnmoorefilm
@johnmoorefilm Жыл бұрын
Mr Copson is remarkable
@Sawyersmaple
@Sawyersmaple Жыл бұрын
Very informative. Thanks for the chat.
@mohammedsaysrashid3587
@mohammedsaysrashid3587 Жыл бұрын
A wonderful explanation thanks for sharing
@germanredneck4414
@germanredneck4414 11 ай бұрын
that was super interesting, thank you
@RobSchofield
@RobSchofield Жыл бұрын
Excellent! Perhaps a second one as a follow-up covering the rounds you describe at the end? Great stuff.
@davidgoodnow269
@davidgoodnow269 5 ай бұрын
He described the use and composition and even showed a cut-away model! What is it you want to know?
@RobSchofield
@RobSchofield 5 ай бұрын
As I say, the rounds briefly mentioned @ 18:54 might be deserving of a short follow-up, or even an entire video of their own. A cross section lasting 2s does *not* explain how it works or how it's used tactically. THAT is what I would like to know. Any more questions?
@davidgoodnow269
@davidgoodnow269 5 ай бұрын
@@RobSchofield Oh. Well, you point your gun in a direction, fire that round, and it spreads ball bearings at a rate of about 1 meter every 10 meters forward, utterly destroying *everything* not substantially armored in its path; to about 50 meters' swath at 500 meters. The ball bearings remain lethal well past 1 kilometer, but dispersal at that point reduces hitting any individual to a fluke. As the projectiles form a Cone of Destruction, many go high and many go low, but those going low are at such velocity and hardness that they tend to ricochet off hard ground and _graze_ targets. They are nominally for clearing brush, such as the hedges in Normandy, allowing the tank to exit a road. These are the modern version of canister shot, by the same name, and used much the same.
@johnfisk811
@johnfisk811 Жыл бұрын
Very well presented.
@saylor0955
@saylor0955 7 ай бұрын
Very interesting, great job
@headshot6959
@headshot6959 Жыл бұрын
Glad this guy is on the payroll. Excellent quality videos, some tiny inaccuracies pointed out in the comments, but look at the wording of them. This is clearly not troll/hater territory, it's a respectful exchange of knowledge and opinion. Maybe the tank museum can appreciate the quality of it's viewers.
@pfrost4011
@pfrost4011 Жыл бұрын
Awsome info thanks
@jm9371
@jm9371 Жыл бұрын
Great video
@andersjjensen
@andersjjensen Жыл бұрын
At around 10:55 when they describe the hit on the T-72 it would have been prudent to point out that it's internal ammo detonated. An APFSDS round does not have the kinetic energy to lob a 4 ton turret 300 meters. To viewers not intimately familiar with the subject mentioning which guns uses cased ammo and which does not would probably have been helpful. Especially the last segment went rather quick back and forth between the two scenarios.
@Knight7562
@Knight7562 11 ай бұрын
this is so good 😮 thanks
@lzappa9109
@lzappa9109 Жыл бұрын
11/10. Every time, thank you.
@davidhanson8826
@davidhanson8826 Жыл бұрын
This host... is workin out... Thank you for good content
@mr.muffins6240
@mr.muffins6240 Жыл бұрын
I never knew how much I needed this video in my military-geek life :D
@Subcomandante73
@Subcomandante73 Жыл бұрын
Very informative.
@eirikronaldfossheim
@eirikronaldfossheim Жыл бұрын
A DU arrow is also heavier, even if tungsten is heavier than DU. Tungsten need around 10% alloying elements, DU only 2%. This will decrease the weight of the tungsten arrow.
@AugustBebelX
@AugustBebelX Жыл бұрын
Depleted uranium is toxic. The use of it is a war crime. This video is proof that the Tank Museum is a criminal and terroristic organisation. EVERYONE who promtes the use of DU is a candidate for the electric chair ...
@fritztheblitz1061
@fritztheblitz1061 Жыл бұрын
Great Video, thank you for your work. Greetings from Germany.
@battlefieldbartender5671
@battlefieldbartender5671 Жыл бұрын
👍, holy crap this was great TY!
@carloshenriquezimmer7543
@carloshenriquezimmer7543 Жыл бұрын
They also have not spoken about APCR shells (armour piercing composit rigid)
Powering Victory: How tank engines went from 105 to 1200bhp
18:42
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 389 М.
How did tank guns get so deadly? | Evolution of Firepower
26:18
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
Backstage 🤫 tutorial #elsarca #tiktok
00:13
Elsa Arca
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН
🍟Best French Fries Homemade #cooking #shorts
00:42
BANKII
Рет қаралды 55 МЛН
Sprinting with More and More Money
00:29
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 166 МЛН
D-Day Tanks: Operation Overlord's Strangest Tanks
31:18
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 165 М.
The Insane Engineering of the Javelin
15:12
Real Engineering
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Cheap, Effective, Everywhere: The RPG-7 | Anti-Tank Chats
20:57
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 899 М.
Wire Guided Tank Killer | Swingfire | Anti-Tank Chats
20:49
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 217 М.
PIAT: Better than the Panzerfaust?
18:57
Military History Visualized
Рет қаралды 145 М.
Anti-Tank Chats #5 | PIAT | The Tank Museum
23:31
The Tank Museum
Рет қаралды 134 М.
Tanks 105: Anatomy of a Modern 120mm Round
9:24
The Chieftain
Рет қаралды 279 М.
Most underrated US Tank? @thetankmuseum
12:04
Military History not Visualized
Рет қаралды 199 М.
The Shoemaker that Stopped the Tank Ace
7:02
Yarnhub
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
Backstage 🤫 tutorial #elsarca #tiktok
00:13
Elsa Arca
Рет қаралды 31 МЛН