What are you using?

@@dartme18 Just an old Casio digital piano. nothing fancy.

You'd be better off taking the money you'd use to get the Nautilus, save a bit more and get a Montage. It's only a couple of bucks more expensive than the Nautilus. Or a Nord Stage.

If you have a MODX, no need to get a Nautilus for B3 organ sounds. Buy the Organimation collection for Montage/MODX. About equal to the best organ sounds available for Kronos. Nautilus users loose out as that synth is incompatible with Kronos sounds even though, the DNA of the sound engines is the same. Seems ludicrous to me for Korg to over look this.

​@BrunodeSouzaLino Better off to forego an instrument with 60 gb of sample memory an ssd, streaming sample playback, multiple virtual analog synths. physically modeled string engine, and vector synthesis/wave sequencing capabilities? What does Montage bring to the party that would make you "better off"? It doesn't have a proper organ engine, either.

i highly appreciate the vsts too, but it's always a challenge finding a good quality controller or synth with the right layout of controls and keyboard type. interesting to hear you got the legend, as it's on my radar as an upgrade should I really get into this! have you ever compared with the crumar organs?

@@WoodyPianoShack You are absolutely right. Normal midi controllers are not perfect to be used as organ keys. I had an Arturia keylab 61 mkII but I had to sell it because playing "cluster swoosh" notes, you got stuck note every now and then. Currently I am using a Native Kontrol s61 and it works much better, but it has no fader to change drawbar settings... There is a GSI double keyboard for organs but a bit expensive (1200 euro if I remember well). I bought a Viscount because there was a good offer (used once by a USA gospel band touring in my city) so I cannot talk about Crumar Mojo. Viscount I bought was connected to a real Leslie and I fell in love with it immediately, it was a perfect emulation, all the guys in the shop were amazed of that sound. A known jazz player, Alberto Gurrisi (check him on internet) told me that Ventilator II pedal is the best Leslie trick you can get, but it costs 400 euro... I think I should try that one!

@@WoodyPianoShack That is exactly the problem. If people play ORGAN, they need something designed to both look like a B3 (layout wise) have all the right buttons and drawbars like the real thing and also have a decent equal feeling of the keybed, wich is the hardest thing to get, cause a B3 keybed was build like a tank, and everything today is build in cheap plastic. The legend (full organ) is the only one that have a full B3 look. The Crumar ones have modded Fatar beds wich generally feels much better to play compared to nord E5 or later. I have a Mojo61 wich I am very pleased with. The build quality (paint job generally) is less than stellar. but the keys feels well ballanced (I tried out a Nord E5 and Hammond XK-1c) was disapointed and finally took the chance on what users were saying on the net, and the baught the Mojo61, and It turned out to have much better key feel than those 2. But you need to take care of the Mojo, as it gets scratches in the black paint very easy. The Mojo has a very decent leslie sim and the latest software update about a year ago added a more warm drive where you can simulate what happens when a real leslie with tubes is placed close to the organ wich makes the circuit go into some kind of electro mechanical loop with the organ when you turn up the volume. Some people like to add an Organ Grinder pedal wich adds a more analog overdrive than many of the digital organs. If people use computers live, imo you can't beat the IK Multimedia Leslie sim. It is hands down the best sounding sim you can find imo. The Gsi Vb3-II is propably one of the best Organ engines you can get. Its not a coincident even Wersi has licenced the Vb3 for use in their OAX organs I know from people on the net that the Legend has the posibility to control most of the different Organ VST's that recieve the necessary cc's. The Mojo can too, but of cause the Mojo61 only have 1 set of drawbars

@@mrdali67 I can confirm that Viscount Legend can be used easily to drive IK Multimedia B3X. In November 2019 I had a concert for benefit. I decided to connect Legend to B3X: without any programming, drawbars for upper manual were already working, I didn't do anything else. But all switches on Legend sends a MIDI CC, and all commands on B3X can be mapped. So it is only a matter of 1-2 hours of MIDI mapping and you can have a perfect matching. I think I will do it for the next concert when virus will be defeated

​@@WoodyPianoShack Which has better Organ sounds between Korg Nautilus 61 and Yamaha CK61 ? I am confused between the two. Thank you Woody.

that means a lot, thanks!

About the Nautilus drawbars control, are there any MIDI CC or RPN/NRPN that make these accessible to an external MIDI controller, like the Nanokontrol for example ?

@@emmanuelguillard I looked at the Nautilus manual and it doesn't seem that you can. There is MIDI CC for the control knobs, but they don't work like drawbars. And there are no MIDI commands for the screen drawbars or the missing Kronos faders.

geoffk777 is your Kronos 1 or 2?

@@germanshepherdlover2613 Kronos 2-88. The standard black model with wooden end caps.

when u comapare pc4 or 2700 to this sound it sound like it stuck in time how bad it sounds even yamaha sound better from them

happy ending then!

Indeed, it was! Love your videos and greetings from “the oil patch” in North Dakota!

Hah. I remember combing through the presets in my Native Instruments bundle, and coming across “Lord Jon” as a patch. You knew what you were getting when you pulled that one up 😁

@@Roboprogs Yep, I think even my Fa-07 and my MX88 have those “Jon Lord” presets in one form or another. It’s always fun to scroll through presets and listen to how various manufacturers interpret that “B3 sound”.

sure thing, i reckon the cx-3 would give nord a run for its money

You can actually find some 3'rd party knobs for the Kronos that makes it look more like a drawbar, but its still a bit off, because its a fader, not a drawbar. Those clicks when you pull the drawbars is essential when you register it on the fly, plus most of those faders on instruments that actually have 9 faders is way to short to give you just a litle idea of where the fader is if you have to compare it with the 9 positions on a drawbar. www.ebay.com/p/506031849 Crumar offers 2 different DiY (or finnished) Arduino faderboxes. You just have to have some basic tech understanding if you want to recode it for different instruments that don't follow the general CC standard for organ faders. The little one is a basic drawbar box with 9 drawbars in compact box and is very cheap if you put it together yourself. www.gmlab.it/#projects

Get an Arturia KeyLab mkII. It has 9 faders, and small wooden inlays in the sides. 😁

i am playing around with the 10 day trial now, but still leaning more towards the sound of blue3 and vb3. thanks for the compilment on the touch, working on it!

@@WoodyPianoShack VB3 is excellent too. The B-3X goes even further with effects if your trying to recreate the Jon Lord Deep Purple sound. B-3X blows away the Kronos / Nautilus engines when it comes to rock sounds.

Yes, this is the very best organ VST. Can’t hear difference between this with some eq and real one. Note that korg emulates not perfectly already existing organ emulator.

welcme and thanks

cool to hear from an original owner, not so much into that niacin track though. the nautilus is a love/hate relationship, the quality and sounds are fantastic but, and it's a big but, i struggle with and dislike touch screen user interfaces, even on modern devices, and this feels like 2000 era interface... you'll probably be ok if you have great eyesight and really sharp pointy fingers.

@@WoodyPianoShack And this is still just a "facelift" of the Kronos ui on a smaller screen. It does sound more mordern and "Play Me" than the Kronos but its still basically the same interface underneath and the Kronos system was never easy even your used to the older Korgs. All those tabs and "short" wording of functions makes it a steep learning curve before you are just able to master basic edit functions. If people just want an easy to use "preset machine" where you only do light editing of attack, release etc. save it as a user sound on to the next, neither the Nautilus or Kronos is recommended. many people have had their Kronos for 10 years now and I bet if you get an honest anwer to how well they know it, its a very small ammount that really use the advanced functions in it. Its an instrument they could make a PHD for. Juat the Karma engine that has been dropped in the Nautilus is in its own unbelievable powerfull, if you are one of the few that is able to understand it and have the time and stamina to sit down and learn.

@@WoodyPianoShack Yes, watching the last few videos it does appear that the touch screen doesn't always seem to respond well. Eyesight going downhill and pudgy fingers so I'd probably fare even less well than you!

Kurzweil KB3 sounds much better than Korg.

I have a Kurzweil PC4 with the KB3 engine. Certainly sounds pretty damn good to my ears, but I couldn't really compare it to Korg CX3 because I've never tried it. Anyway I think the Kurzweil PC series are more of a hybrid between workstation and stage keyboard than pure workstation.

@@marktaylor7162 PC4 is perfect choise, it has all features of a top range workstation. You can tweak KB3 and get any tone you like, leslie simulation is not the best on the market, but it is good enough for any live gig.

HI Jose, I love to hear from people like you with some connections, please mention me to the lovely people at crumar and viscount, would love to try out and demonstrate a mojo or crumar! happy new year to you too :)

@Xeraser It is

I really used to hate Yamaha’a organ sounds. Since the MOX, Yamahammer has had sweet onboard organs.

very flattering to think that, but i doubt if my vids or opinions have any influence on roland's or yamaha's roadmap, cheers anyway!

@@WoodyPianoShack You are greatly mistaken... I've spoken with reps of these companies and it's part of their marketing department to keep up with all the feedback. They're investing a lot of money and you have a good channel and enough engagement to make them pay attention to you even though they may never tell you.

roland used to make some pretty fabulous clonewheels themselves, i owned a little module for a while, VR something or another, it was better than my Nord at the time. The FA and Integra use parts of that engine I believe, albeir rebranded to SuperNATURAL I heard some Roland reps on a live stream saying it's coming to Fantom, which is about time.

@@midinotes Thanks for your reply! Of course, it’s almost impossible to play organ style in a weighted, non-waterfall keyboard. Although I think the intention of Korg was actually to create a Hammond clone section but in the end it’s only suitable in a band context where the organ doesn’t play a prominent role. Using plugins as "specialists" seems to be a good idea!

yeah possible, but i find it unlikely that korg would invest time on that.

The CX-3 (the 2000 version) was endorsed by a number of well known organ players who created some presets for the machine. These were indicated by their initials sort of as a prefix in the preset name. LS being Lonnie Smith, there were also Tom Coster (TC), Brian Auger (BA), Al Kooper (AK) and Bill Champlin (BC) "donating" sounds.

thank you, no there won't be, all the editing parameters are too small and crammed on the screen for me to do any kind of decent demo, hard to see and hard to film, and probably quite boring :)

@@WoodyPianoShack Well since the engine is derived from the might Kronos it's out of doubt it's good anyways. Looking forward to more videos with the organs you aquired recently :D

that's funny! i remember playing an xb-2 in the music stores and falling in love with it, it seemed somehow so musical and hate to say "organic" compared to all the synths that i was playing at the time.

i wouldn't buy the naut for any weight savings, the 61 is really heavy! nor does it have all the features of the kronos, if you consider a busy control panel a feature.

i totally agree, strength of the naut is of course it does so much more, and I'm pretty sure it would serve as a pretty decent organ in a gig! no real plans to get the Sk pro in for a demo, actually some of their other organ dedicated models are more attractive to me at the moment, who knows though, I'm always changing my mind about what I'm into!

i saw that on the official korg tutorial vids, it helps, but I like to keep my nails short :)

i',m normally just winging it, playing whatever first comes to mind without much attention to detail :p

Its very close to the classic "Jimmy Smith sound" You will find slightly different listings dependent what instrument people play it on. Generally its 788600000 3'rd perc. soft, fast. You can put the high drawbars somewhere between 0-1 to create some "leackage" effect if you can't adjust that on your instrument, but this is built into the Korg engine.There is quite much to fiddle with in the setup to make the sound a little more dirty. The key is also a major thing to get it to sound right too cause of the way the hammond drawbars work with each drawbar folding at different places, you may get a complete other sound if you don't play it in the original key :) The folding results in different tones gets boosted when you hit a note where one of the drawbars start to fold (fold - repeating tones 1 or 2 octaves lower in the top and higher in the bottom). If I could make a suggestion to Keyboard makers(not that I think they would listen) is to look at the original 2 manual Crumar Mojo. Here you can actually take you favorite Hammond model, open it up and, find your multimeter and make some measurements on each drawbar and some other places inside the organ. put them into a .txt file and upload it to the organ and save it as a preset ..eg "A-100 58 Old caps" Great idea. To bad this hasn't been implemented in the Mojo61. And if you have the meanings of either measuring a Leslie Rotor/Horn slow/fast speed, rotor/horn ramp up/ramp down, many software and dedicated keyboard organ engines can set these settings which is essential to get the leslie to sound how you like it to sound. You can also find listings online on avg speed settings on different Leslie models, but this can vary from speaker to speaker dependent on how old it is and how well it's been taking care off.. belts state, oiling on both Organ and Leslie motors

@@mrdali67 i think WSoP uses the 2nd harmonic on percussion, and perhaps not fast, for starters, and with less drawbars pulled out than the classic Jimmy Smith sound - (though I agree with what you say about the JS sound.) :) More reverb too. \

Sure... You need two roadies to move 200 kg up and down. And maybe 4000 euro to buy one revamped. This is why clones have success. They are light and cheap...

@@furiobisotti8150 There are genuine portable Hammonds. It's like genuine Rhodes. Only the real thing will do. Everything else is an imitation. I've never heard a digital clone equal the real thing for either Hammond, Rhodes, Farfisa, or Vox.

@@RBLevin Currently there is not anymore a real Hammond in production. Real thing does not exist anymore. Tonewheels were iron wheels moved by an engine. This electro mechanism is not produced today. There are digital clones with an Hammond label, owned by Suzuki. More or less the same with Rhodes

@@furiobisotti8150 Same with Rhodes or Vox or Farfisa. You have to buy used. But they're not hard to find. Not cheap, but worth every penny.

@@RBLevin I am 56 years old. I have with me the Instruments that I was able to buy through my life. For example a wonderful Korg MS20 dated 1979. I had no chance to buy a real Hammond B3 or a Prophet5 or a Mellotron. I still play for fun and I am very happy to have VST versions of those masterpieces. A wonderful imitation is better than nothing

no idea, you'll have to check the program list pdf.

Nautilus has really good rhodes sounds

@@WoodyPianoShack Well thanks, l appreciate because l'm missing it on my Korg Pa4x. Maybe some link of a demo?

i agree. but don't have access to them sadly

​@@WoodyPianoShack It's a pity, it could be interesting.I have the Kurzweil PC3 and I think the B3 in this instrument sounds much more faithful than in the Korg. And the best sounding Hammonds can be found in the Suzuki Hammond SK1. But that's just my opinion. Regards.

@@marcindrej5647 kurzweil aren't popular or common in europe as in the states, so very rarely come across one, thanks for sharing your thoughs!

@@WoodyPianoShack Woody, Kurzweil is a great instrument, he has great possibilities, he is amazing in a live band, he mixes great and puts the band on a higher level, it's amazing how this key sounds in a band. very convenient and easy, I recommend you give it a try.

@@WoodyPianoShack I would loan you my Kurzweil PC4 for a review if you weren't in a completely different country, making it a touch awkward! (I'm in Scotland).

i'm not sure if I have it down enough to teach it, highly recommend you check out tony monaco's youtube and hammond school, he does this tune wonderfully.

@@WoodyPianoShack Can't find the link where he plays it. May you post it?. Cheers

i have kross, same as the krome i believe, naut is a step up in quality and feel.

​@@WoodyPianoShack yes i confirm, the kross & krome have the same bad keybed :). thank you for your return, if the keybed is good, the Nautilus is exactly that i need

i guess it could be jimmy smith, jimmy mcgriff too...?

i'm sure this has the solid sound you want, but myself, I can't imagine myself recording an entire song using the korg sequencer and touch screen UI. i'd use a computer sequencer, and the naut as a sound module.

i suppose the technology and algorithms are getting on towards 20 years old now, so not surprising the dedicated organ clones have surpassed it. nevertheless, probably would get the job done for a gigging musician playing in a band!

@@WoodyPianoShack Yea, Korg did a single version update of the cx-3 engine of the original Kronos and a free download pack of organ patches. So most of the stuff in the Kronos and Nautilus dates back to the Oasys, meaning the code base is somewhere betwen 20-25 year old. since Korg propably worked on developping these since 1995. Oasys = Pentium 4 (2002), Kronos = Atom D510 (2009), Kronos 2 = Atom 2550 (2012). I bleive the CX-3 in the Kronos is based on the same model as the 2001 CX-3 Organ wich fit well into the area

yes, that's an interesting and overlooked module, you do need some kind of controller to use it though, and organ style controllers are few and far between. i have exchanged a few emails with the developer, hoping we can try one out some day!

@@WoodyPianoShack that's great news nontheless! Thanks for your videos!

Totally disagree, I had a Genos and it is good but the Korg is better.

yeah, the one on my sx900 is decent too, but i'd rank it lower, my 900 doesn't have the vib/chor, does yours?

@@WoodyPianoShack It does. It's also an advantage that the Genos emulates 3 Organ models.

@@Echochamber79 If you say so. I still prefer the Genos.

It isnt bad on the Genos , but the rotary effect isnt good like it is on the Nord 5d i have , i have the Lester K rotary effect on the Genos tested and it improves the sound a lot . If you listen to al the clone organs and synths wirhout effects all the drawbar/sinus sounds are almost equal . ist al about the rotary effect ! , I have als a Motion sound real rotary speaker and that is more like the "real" thing 😃 , and after all you must learn to play the "Hammond" way .And that is the biggest challenge 🎹🎹

that's ok.

@@WoodyPianoShack I think your a really great piano player and you get some nice sounds out of the Viscount but the architecture of the Nautilus for Organ is weak and it doesn’t take any prisoners for players that are less than well versed with the Hammond. I say this with respect and appreciation for all your other work, I follow your channel with interest. Ultimately it’s the buyer that has the final say in this, but I really feel that the Nautilus is just a weak, weak product and better off serving as a DAW such as the Kronos or M3 in its application for live work.

thanks pal. well, fact is, it's the sound engines from the kronos after all... :)

@@WoodyPianoShack Hitting the nail right on the head.